12:33:19 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest voices"
Tares are NOT ONLY in the pews JD,
Where have you been?
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:29:09 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You did not deal specifically with my comment. Are you saying that the apostles, prophets, e
Tares are NOT ONLY in the pews
JD,
Where have you been?
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:29:09 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You did not deal specifically with my comment. Are you saying
that the apostles, prophets, evangelists,
pastors and teachers are not to be given heed? That
Beat that OL Straw Man to death! The Inspired KJV & the Infallible Understanding!Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: NO!! I am not saying any of what you are carrying on about below And show me where I have introduced the term "infallible understanding" - this also is all your
NO!! I am not saying any of
what you are carrying on about below
And show me where I have introduced the term
"infallible understanding" - this also is all yours
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:29:09 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You did not deal specifically with my commen
08:57:46 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest voices"
Yes and under the old system he provided Moses seat and who sat there?
Did Jesus encourage the ppl to follow them? He said listen to what they say (because back then they were
in charge of the scriptures) but they
Yes and under the old system he provided Moses seat and
who sat there?
Did Jesus encourage the ppl to follow them? He
said listen to what they say (because back then they were
in charge of the scriptures) but they were not doers of
the Word and Jesus told the ppl not to do what they
did beca
Barth as even more Christ centered than you, IMO. -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 18:57:17 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest voices"
Wha
What?? Not arguing Barth??
I see the doctrines of these men along with some of the
rcc church fathers as huge problems. They make what
should be clear so complicated that we end up going
round and round and round the mountain without making
any headway. Who is responsible to discern the
JD, you and the other followers of Barth
are testimony enough of that. iz
There is simply nothing
that has been presented on TT
that evidences Barth as a "liberal."
a theology of
'sincere' works in the works?
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:21:53 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We should not belittle the
sincere efforts of each
other..
sure--good
questions get positive responses & requests: my style interests
you--eh?
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 17:30:55 -0500 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
You call what you do here "interacting with others"
Gary? Now this is really interesting.
||
my God is the God
of parrots and poets, Bro; he's made no problems like you wanna
create
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:11:34 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
This is a BIG problem for your 'god', not
mine![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(listen to
yourself somet
t the center of the discussion, I don't see how such discussions are harmful.
jd -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 12:53:26 -0600Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest voices"
jd in red. -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:48:03 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest voices"
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:38:23 -0500 [EMAIL P
Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:24:39 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest voices"
Did Jesus say that after He had gone to the Father he would send a real smart theologian by the name of
Barth to "unfold the revealed work attested in the scriptures" JD?. Of course not - and
bind a stone to it, and cast it into the midst of Euphrates
Taylor <wmtaylor@plains.net> wrote:
Very good, John.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest vo
You call what you do here "interacting with others"
Gary? Now this is really interesting.
I'd say Lance is the voice from above and Kevin's is
like "regular folk" even if his subject matter is re another
Kingdom.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:53:03 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
apparently Jes
This is a BIG problem for your 'god', not mine![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (listen to yourself sometime, Bro--sometimes its even interesting:) On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:46:31 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:sometimes God Orders the destruction of THE "ORIGINAL" so that wha
Sorry Bub, he has loosed my stammering tongue!And his mouth was opened immediately, and his tongue loosed, and he spake, and praised God. And NOW My tongue shall speak of thy word: for all thy commandments are righteousness. PS 45 my tongue is the pen of a ready writer. His word & Name will
(listen to yourself
sometime, Bro--sometimes its even interesting:)
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:46:31 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
sometimes God Orders the destruction
of THE "ORIGINAL" so that what we have is nothing but a
copy.
apparently Jesus
said everything he needed to say back then, but you sound more like his
parrot than his sheep, Bro; why not try interacting with us, like you're one of
us on the planet rather than the Voice from
above?
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:35:26 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED
hrates Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Very good, John.- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 9:38 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest voices"Judy, Bill has correct
in. jd -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 09:32:24 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest voices"JD why do you think Barth is correct?
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:16:35 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
||
[rather,] barth Devotes a WHOLE chapter to
[eradicating] "DOUBT" in Evangelical
THEOLOGY||
Hardly the kind of atmosphere where faith grows. Maybe that is why barth Devotes a WHOLE chapter to "DOUBT" in Evangelical THEOLOGYJudy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 07:36:51 -0700 "Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Judy, let's assume that we could tak
9,000 pages of his Dogmatic Barth can say less with more words than any man I know! Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bill writes: "It will take many years, I'm sure, before Barth will be allowed to speak for himself to the conservative community. In the meantime Evangelical Christi
So you do see the irony?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:50
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
So no
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:11
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
In all sincerity, Judy, don't you see the irony
in your endeavor?
No Bill.
message,
yet, again.
jd
-Original Message-----From: Judy Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4
Dec 2005 09:32:24 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest
voices"
Yes, I think it an astute observation Iz. Kind of
like when God thundered and roared from the Mount
and Israel quaking told Moses - You go up and see what
He is saying
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:49:45 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Judy, would you say
that th
Did Jesus say that after He had gone to the Father he
would send a real smart theologian by the name of
Barth to "unfold the revealed work attested in the
scriptures" JD?. Of course not - and we have the Bereans
for an example - they were able to search the
scriptures daily to see if what Pa
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:11
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
In all sincerity, Judy, don
No Bill. My message is "READ THE BIBLE" and then
we can talk.
the Golden Rule is good but can't apply to most of the
ppl you mention because they have gone on to their reward
whatever that might be.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 09:34:49 -0700 "Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In all sinceri
: Sunday, December 04, 2005
11:51 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of
the "greatest voices"
If if if you really need to ask this question, you
know nothing of the Holy Spirit.
-Original Message-
From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL P
If if if you really need to ask this question, you know nothing of the Holy Spirit. -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:49:45 -0600Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest voices"
Very good, John.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 9:38
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
Judy, Bill has correctly cast the shadow -- y
For some time I have been studying, not
Barth, but some of his students on TT. Overall, they seem like a cranky bunch
at best. iz
You will try in vain to get me into an argument over Karl
Barth. I just simply won't do it. If you are interested in the man, then read his wor
Judy, would you say that the less you have
the Holy Spirit to teach and guide you, the more you need Barth and others? iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Judy Taylor Was Barth inspired or
misguided in his belief that the "task of theology is to
ice of the Living God work in my heart as I consider the biblical message, yet, again.
jd
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 09:32:24 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One
In all sincerity, Judy, don't you see the irony in
your endeavor? When you write or speak, you want others to listen to you. You
feel entitled to that. The proof of this: when they don't listen, you feel like
you have been dissed. Why? because you think you have something important and
tru
Were you talking to me? I wasn't
listening.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 8:32
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"great
What is not God's fault?
The words you speak concerning His ppl?
IYO could Barth smarten them up?
Or should we listen to Paul who writes that we already
have the mind of Christ?
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 08:35:22 -0700 "Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It's not God's fault.
From:
It's not God's fault.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 8:20
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
Not a very loving evaluation of God's workmanship
Bill
Lots of men have spent a "lifetime" preaching some
agenda or another - only those who 'in obedience' are speaking God's oracles
will receive a reward and I don't hold much hope for those who add to or take
from THE WRITTEN RECORD.
The bo
ssage -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 7:37
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 07:36:51 -0700 "Taylor" &
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 07:36:51 -0700 "Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Judy, let's assume that we could take all the words you've
posted to TT and bind them together in a book. What would it number, say,
maybe 9000 pages? Would a single one of them be worth reading? What were you
JD why do you think Barth is correct?
Have you ever asked yourself why a God who promised
through the prophet Jeremiah 2631yrs ago and later through the prophet Ezekiel
2602yrs ago that He would make a New Covenant with His ppl and that this New
Covenant would include writing His Law in their
Judy, let's assume that we could take all the words
you've posted to TT and bind them together in a book. What would it number, say,
maybe 9000 pages? Would a single one of them be worth reading? What were you
attempting to do with those words, if not to unfold the revealed word attested
in
This is a very good understanding, in small part, to what I see in Barth - and I think Barth is correct:
From 1932 to 1967 he (Barth) worked on his Church Dogmatics, a multivolume work that was unfinished at his death. It consists of 13 parts in four volumes, running altogether to more than
49 matches
Mail list logo