In a message dated 11/17/2004 7:31:48 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Miller wrote:
>>Come to think of it, Jesus was not an author. :-)
John wrote:
>Actually, He is the author of the book of
>Revelation, is He not?
I guess I can see how you might argue this from the fi
In a message dated 11/17/2004 7:23:52 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John wrote:
>David, why in the world can you not simply say,
>"I think this is wrong?" I don't understand why
>you persist on couching the views of others,
>views you disagree with, in complete opposition
Not to be greedy, but couldn't you do both? :-) Izzy
-Original Message-
Would you prefer me not to reply, but instead use
my time to write some articles to post here from time to time? I have been
considering that such might be a better use of my time right now. I have
two articles on
David Miller wrote:
Come to think of it, Jesus was not an author. :-)
John wrote:
Actually, He is the author of the book of
Revelation, is He not?
I guess I can see how you might argue this from the first verse of
Revelation, but I think we have to say that John authored Revelation. If we
think
John wrote:
David, why in the world can you not simply say,
"I think this is wrong?" I don't understand why
you persist on couching the views of others,
views you disagree with, in complete opposition
to the biblical message.
I do not characterize all views as anathema. I characterized the viewp
Actually, Jesus is the author of the whole Bible. 2
Timothy 3:16- All scripture is God breathed... He just
used man to write it down for other people.
Suzy
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 11/16/2004 1:01:11 PM Pacific
> Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Come to
ï
'should not be taken personally' The word 'person'
is of significance in understanding 'One God, three
persons' .
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 16, 2004 18:12
Subject: [TruthTalk] Self-deception
From: "David Mi
In a message dated 11/16/2004 2:10:26 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are plenty of folks
on this list and elsewhere in this world who hate me greatly.
There is NO ONE on this list who hates you -- not one. Repent.
John
In a message dated 11/16/2004 1:01:11 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Come to think of it, Jesus was not an author. :-)
Actyally, He is the author of the book of Revelation, is He not?
JD
In a message dated 11/16/2004 10:40:45 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Such a viewpoint is anathema.
>It denies the gospel. It denies the righteousness of Christ,"
verses -- "As for Lance, however, you AGAIN clearly misread what I wrote because I do not consider Lance to
ï
?
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:01:47 -0500 "David Miller"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:||
>These conversations should never be taken
personally.
||
Jonathan wrote:
I believe that there is a relational aspect that needs
to be forged prior to the logical being effective.
It is this relational aspect that you lack with John and
Lance. If they do not feel that you are giving credence
to their thoughts or 'listening' it becomes a tit for tat,
back
Today I have learned a new concept on TT: "scripture bombs". Izzy
-Original Message-
A number of scripture bombs are placed usually at the end of the email to
enforce that it is not just your opinion, but God's.
Jonathan
Lance wrote:
David, seriously, please identify 15-20 authors who've influenced you.
It would be an aid. Plleese?
I suspect the following isn't what you want, but
Moses
Job
David
Solomon
Isaiah
Jeremiah
Ezekiel
Daniel
Hosea
Joel
Amos
Obadiah
Micah
Nahum
Habakkuk
;s interpretation of a certain doctrine. Judy and I often
disagree; yesterday, although we were not in unison, we were united.
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PRO
No. David, seriously, please identify 15-20 authors who've influenced you.
It would be an aid.
Plleese?
.
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: November 16, 2004 14:35
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Sel
Lance wrote:
Will you kindly write for us an underived paragraph?
I just did. Those were my thoughts, not something derived from someone
else. This does not mean that other people have not influenced my thinking
in years past, but it means that I do not simply parrot others in the ideas
and th
DM:Will you kindly write for us an underived paragraph?
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: November 16, 2004 13:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Self-deception
> John wrote:
> > Could it be that KB expr
John wrote:
Could it be that KB expresses that which Lance believes?
David, you might try responding to those words, included
by Lance, and see what Lance has to say rather than resorting
to the kind of criticism, disguised as honest (no doubt) advice.,
as is recorded above. You the Teacher -- La
7;ve every written a thought which was truly and
genuinely original so, don't be frightened of Karl. He was probably the
greatest theologian since Athanasius.
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: November 16, 2004 10:46
Subject: Re: [T
In a message dated 11/16/2004 7:47:56 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please try, in your reading of others, to incorporate the truth they share
into your own thinking processes. Reject that which is not true. Formulate
a way of thinking that is your own, that does not rely
Lance wrote:
I recently inserted a quotation from KB that addressed this
very matter under 'ADDENDUM'.
This list is meant to discuss what YOU believe. If KB were here, we could
talk with him about it, but he is not. Nevertheless, you think he expressed
something that you could not, so let's exa
Lance wrote:
You are 'kin' to Rosanne Roseannadanna.There is either a
misapplication or misapprehension of the heart of a matter
under discussion. One major difference between yourself
an RR is that when, as I see it, the matter is clarified, RR
said either 'never mind' or 'well, it's always someth
Thanks three-named mystery man.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: November 16, 2004 08:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Self-deception
> Lance, I believe it was Emily Latella, another Gilda Radner char
Lance, I believe it was Emily Latella, another Gilda Radner character, that
said "Never Mind". You are right about RR saying "It's always something".
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subjec
You are 'kin' to Rosanne Roseannadanna.There is either a misapplication or
misapprehension of the heart of a matter under discussion. One major
difference between yourself an RR is that when, as I see it, the matter is
clarified, RR said either 'never mind' or 'well, it's always something', you
jus
26 matches
Mail list logo
