[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/14/2005 5:36:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nice Isogesis
You glory in your "ignorance," and then use "isogesis." Just showin off ??
JD
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:21:36 -0700 "Bill Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's the wrong question, Kevin. We can discuss
the particularsof those natures if you like, butJudy's claim is that
Jesus did not have TWO natures. Do you agree with her?
Bill
jt: Kevin, I say he had a human body
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 14, 2005 07:55
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Nature of
Jesus (God's image)
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:21:36 -0700 "Bill Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's the wrong question,
the nature of his human body, isn't it, Judy?
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 5:55
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Nature of
Jesus (God's image
:01
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Nature of
Jesus (God's image)
Because Jesus did not have Adam fora father he did not recieve a
sin nature
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:21:36 -0700 "Bill Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECT
: Monday, February 14, 2005 6:01
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Nature of
Jesus (God's image)
Bill:It would appear that you have two who
disagree (Judy, Kevin) and, one 'what's the big deal' (Terry). Are you able to
'flesh out' (pun intended) the practical implications of your
No problem with His human body Bill, it was then just
like ours is now but without the taint of sin - like Romans 7 would not have
applied to him as it does to us. Today he has a transformed body that can
walk through walls. judyt
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:19:52 -0700 "Bill Taylor" [EMAIL
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Nature of
Jesus (God's image)
No problem with His human body Bill, it was then just
like ours is now but without the taint of sin - like Romans 7 would not have
applied to him as it does to us. Today he has a transformed body that
can walk through walls
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005
7:46 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
Nature of Jesus (God's image)
No problem with His human body Bill
Bill when you use the term "the nature of humanity" you
are using a theological term and I have no idea whether or not you are saying
the same thing as I am. This is what I have been talking about all
along. You claim Jesus had a fallen Adamic nature just like us. Paul
describes how this
nglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 7:33
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Nature of
Jesus (God's image)
Bill when you use the term "the nature of humanity"
you are using a theological term and I have no idea whether or n
Judy wrote:
Jesus when he walked this earth in a body
of flesh because His flesh did not have sin
dwelling in it.
Yes it did.
Romans 8:3-4
(3) For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh,
God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin,
jt: I have nothing at all to "cover up" Bill. If
I am wrong and you show me where in scripture that is in balance and context I
will thank you for it. Terry has a unique way of expressing himself but if
I understand him correctly he is not saying that Jesus had a fallen Adamic sin
nature
"likeness" of sinful flesh EQUALS sin dwelling in it?
Nice Isogesis
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy wrote: Jesus when he walked this earth in a body of flesh because His flesh did not have sin dwelling in it.Yes it did.Romans 8:3-4(3) For what the law could not do, in that it was weak
14 matches
Mail list logo
