[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-952:
Attachment: JIRA952-May22.txt
Code and UT with small config files
> DAS must support quer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1295:
-
Attachment: JIRA1295_952_May22.txt
Cumulative changes for JIRA 1295 and JIRA 952 as bot
Build failure on Linux/IBM JDK
--
Key: TUSCANY-1296
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1296
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Build System
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90
I've given the src and binary distros a spin on linux. My configuration is
Fedora Core5
IBM JDK 1.5.0
Maven 2.0.6
Binary:
I concur with Luciano that the READMEs for
calculator-rmi-reference
calculator-rmi-service
implementation-crud
now don't match the way that the samples are currently organ
OK, I agree. I note that SDO already does this. Any more thoughts about
things we can do to improve the way we can all work in this area? What else
do SDO, DAS do that SCA needs to do? Maybe we can come up with a checklist
for the build and release up on the developer guide section of the web site
On 21/05/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have done necessary updates to STATUS page [1], and the Incubator
Tuscany
page [2]. Note that the changes on the incubator page takes a little while
to get reflect on the live website.
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tusca
Java SDO has been doing this using an Java-SDO-Mx release rather than
Java-SDO-Next, but as I said on IRC I think the Next naming is much better.
I propose that we adopt the policy that no-one other than a release manager
ever assigns anything other than a *Next value for the fix release of a
JI
One of the problems with not assigning the specific fix version to JIRA's
till the end is that you can't see whats outstanding from the JIRA overview
page which is something I've found useful and have used it in past releases
to manage what things need to get done. See
http://issues.apache.org/jir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497879
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-513:
Hi Ron,
You're right that the getStaticType() method should look l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497890
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-513:
Got that fixed. Thanks.
Now I have run into a problem with an infinite lo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497899
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-513:
Frank,
I temporarily worked around the problem by replacing the DataObject
Hi,
Build failure seems to be a show-stopper to me :-). Thank you for catching
it.
The databinding-jaxb uses the maven-jaxb-plugin to generate JAXB classes for
the unit tests. So if we fix it, the scope of testing shouldn't be a big
deal. All we have to do is to run the maven build on the en
I'm not clear what you're saying - "Build failure seems to be a show-stopper
to me" and "So if we fix it..." - surely we must fix it if its a showstopper
and we want to have a release?
What is the fix, from the earlier post it didn't sound like there was a good
known fix?
...ant
On 5/22/07, R
I think my proposal is consistent with your desire to get the overview.
When entering the new release phase, all JIRAs fixed in the period since
the last release would be reclassified to the newly created version tag,
along with all JIRAs that the community sees as important for the
forthcoming r
Ok, go ahead.
You also mentioned a JavaDoc issue before, would you like to fix that as
well or can that be left to be fixed on the next release?
...ant
On 5/22/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we are going to resping the RC, I'd like to remove the modules that are
not being
Ok :) I hadn't read the JIRA.
Simon, as you're the one that can recreate this would you be able to commit
that and test it works for you?
...ant
On 5/22/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the confusion.
Simon found the build break and he didn't take it as a show-sto
If we are going to resping the RC, I'd like to remove the modules that are
not being part of the build from the source distribution.
On 5/22/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the confusion.
Simon found the build break and he didn't take it as a show-stopper. I
then
sai
Hi,
Sorry for the confusion.
Simon found the build break and he didn't take it as a show-stopper. I then
said the build failure is serious enough to be a show stopper.
Simon found the fix by moving the plugin to the latest version (I just
realized that he only said that in the JIRA) but he w
Ok, so I'll remove the following modules, that are not part of the build,
from the 0.9 branch : binding-jms, discovery-jms, implementation-spring and
jmx.
As for the javadoc, I'm flexible with that, and I think it can be fixed in a
new release.
On 5/22/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've give the distros a shot on windows xp.
- The src disb. builds clean
- The tried all the samples from the binary dist just following the
READMEs. Like the others I do find the README for the rmi samples out of
sync and also the crud-client app does not run. But all the other samples
r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497937
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-513:
Frank,
Nevermind, I think I have it working now.
- Ron
> Implement suppo
Hi,
I have updated the "Extending Tuscany" document with the latest SPIs and
added the "Add databinding" section. Please review and comment.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/51879/ExtendingTuscany.ppt
Thanks,
Raymond
---
OK, so I can't get the compile to work on my linux box with a simple change
to the version/location of the maven-jaxb-plugin that the build uses. I'm
going to upgrade my JDK and see if that has a positive effect but of course
that has no bearing on the SCA release. As this problem is restricted to
Thank you for the explanation.
On 5/21/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, it's intergrated with Tuscany SDO C++.
Next step is to implement a sample for it.
I intend to add some info on wiki before the first release.
Regards,
Adriano Crestani
On 5/21/07, haleh mahbod <[EMAI
I think using XXX-Next seems more appropriate now, that we are going out of
milestone releases.
As for the JIRA process, I think that Kevin's original proposal seems good
and would be consistent no matter witch phase of development/release we are,
it also leaves room to the Release Manager to con
I have fixed a small issue on on the ajax binding, that was causing a
NPE during server shutdown, and also renamed the chat sample
application to follow the same pattern other web applications were
using (e.g calculator-web).
With this, here is my +1 to get the sample added to the build.
On 5/21
Hi,
I am new to this list and product. I just wanted to know if
there is any work going on in implementing deep integration with
apache geronimo app server. If it is going on I am volunteering to
help. If not I would again like to volunteer to take up that task
along with anyone else intere
Hi, Manu.
Welcome to Tuscany and thank you for looking into Tuscany/Geronimo
integration.
Please see my comments inline below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Manu George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: Tuscany sample app
Hi
Hi,
I downloaded the 0.90 binary distro and unzipped it locally. I also deleted
my local maven repo. Then when I follow the README in
tuscany-sca-0.90-incubating\samples\calculator to run "mvn" to build the
samples, I get the following error as appended later.
Am I not supposed to build the
Hi Raymond,
Thank you for the warm welcome and for the prompt response. I
am adding my comments inline below.
On 5/23/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Manu.
Welcome to Tuscany and thank you for looking into Tuscany/Geronimo
integration.
Please see my comments inline below.
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Sebastien.
I'm trying to play with this cool demo and I have a few questions:
1) How can I start the stockquote and accountservice under different
HTTP ports (8081, 8082)?
2) What's the URL of the web 2.0 demo page?
In my case, I first started StockQuoteServer, Calcul
31 matches
Mail list logo
