Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
The alert aggregator demo module was not compiling. I fixed it by
changing a dependency scope from "runtime" to "compile" in pom.xml
under revision r546698.
Also removed some tabs in pom.xml and fixed the svn:ignore properties
under the root of the module and src
Simon Laws wrote:
Looking back at this I think you are right that the specs that that a
Domain
will have a base URI per scheme. We may have been a bit over zelous
with the
base URIs in there association with bindings.
I'm just wondering why we assumed it was defined on a binding basis. I
imagi
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
+1 from me - sounds very useful especially if distributions are going
to be
available.
- Venkat
On 6/7/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
> Wouldn't that fail if you start from a clean repo ? It expects the
> other modules to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12504044
]
Pete Robbins commented on TUSCANY-1297:
---
I have fixed the element ordering problem.
The writing of xsi:type
Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
I think that the Spring Implementation is now in reasonable shape and
is capable of being added to the main trunk build. The basic function
is there, supporting Services, References and Properties. Advanced
stuff like scoped behaviour of components will need extra
Folks,
I think that the Spring Implementation is now in reasonable shape and is
capable of being added to the main trunk build. The basic function is
there, supporting Services, References and Properties. Advanced stuff
like scoped behaviour of components will need extra work. More test
ca
Looking back at this I think you are right that the specs that that a Domain
will have a base URI per scheme. We may have been a bit over zelous with the
base URIs in there association with bindings.
I'm just wondering why we assumed it was defined on a binding basis. I
imagine separate base uris
OK cool - I'm not going to do any more here today but if you do more I'll
pick it up in the morning.
Simon
+1 from me too. I'm sure Venkat will do a fine job.
Simon
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Yeah, Venkat did loads on the last release. +1 from me for Venkat as
0.91 RM
Simon
+1 from me
-
To unsubscrib
I did try
SCADomain.newInstance("http://whatever/uri";, "mydir1", "my.composite")
and it didn't work for me. The code only seems to take any notice of
location if it's and absolute URL (which the above location is not) so I
would expect
SCASCADomain.newInstance("http://localhost";,
"file:///c:/
Simon Laws wrote:
Yeah, Venkat did loads on the last release. +1 from me for Venkat as
0.91 RM
Simon
+1 from me
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simon Laws wrote:
Sebastien, it looks like a good start on the lazy loading to me.
On the disitributed runtime scenario point. I'd like to start putting the
distributed runtime bits I have so far into head so I would like to work
with you in making a start on the notion of a domain/runtime confi
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Alongside the separation of loading and resolution there is a more
simplistic point here I think about the current implementation to do with
how a composite location is specified. As users of SCADomain I think Mike
and I fell into the trap of believing that
SCADomain.new
On 6/7/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting. Taking a step back I think we should agree what we are trying
to represent in a model of the topology before we decide where the
information comes from and the exact syntax of the configuration files. So
from the previous two suggest
I've starting to move and reorganize some of the distributed runtime ideas
from my sandbox into the trunk. So far there is not much there
modules/
topology - and empty module for topology model things
samples/
calculator-distributed - the current motivating use case.
There have been several t
Add support for simple distributed runtimes to trunk
Key: TUSCANY-1338
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1338
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions
I am trying to use callbacks with the WS Binding and receive a NPE during
composite activation. It looks like the issue is that the resolve() method
in the WebServiceBindingProcessor is not setting up a callbackInterface on
the InterfaceContract. The following snippet shows how the callInterface
This sounds good to me. I assume Christian's suggestion for additional
SDOUtil methods, and Bert/Steffen's request for notification support, are
two more candidates for 1.0.
Christian and Bert/Steffen, are you planning to open JIRAs for those?
I'm worried about how many things are really doable
Hi Rajini,
good to hear that you're going to contribute to SCA-OSGi :-)
We wrote a paper about the different possibilities of combining OSGi and
SCA for the SCA drumbeat end of march. You can find it on the OSOA
homepage:
http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/SCA+Resources.
The paper contains a high l
Hi All,
I just want to clarify if the below is something missing in DAS or just that
I have not understood it clearly.
Appreciate your response.
At present, DAS has managedtx attribute at ConnectionInfo level(default
true). So when true
or not specificed, each Command does a database commit. W
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1335:
-
Attachment: ForWikiJune12.zip
Note: If non-committers are getting a different space to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1127.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved in commit 546467. There were no remaining references to get
Ant,
We will implement this as part of for now, so that
Tuscany core doesn't have to be modified before OSGi implementation code is
committed. So both service and reference properties will be specified in the
element as you described.
Graham and I were discussing this today, and we are not co
Yeah, Venkat did loads on the last release. +1 from me for Venkat as 0.91 RM
Simon
Ok, thanks Venkat for looking into this.
Simon
I was wanting to take Luciano's help to make my id admin. Since he is not
available I've just about posted to infra to add my id as confluence admin.
As mentioned on the IRC last night I'd like to check up after I get admin
privelges, if this can be done by us or should have to only go thro infra
Ok, so can our Confluence admins tell us if we need to create a JIRA with
infra to make this happen or whether they can action this?
Simon
27 matches
Mail list logo
