Congrats Vamsi!.
On 6/3/08, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Ant,
>
> Forgot to mention in my previous note... I accept Tuscany PMC's invitation
> to me to become a committer :)
>
> I already have a signed ICLA in place. My JIRA userid is vamsic. My
> Apache
> userid is vam
Hi Luciano,
Please check the project blog for the 3rd weekly progress report:
Link:http://gdatabindingtuscany.blogspot.com
The wiki page is also updated:
Link:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Integrate+Google+services+in+SCA+compositions%28Apache+Tuscany
Hey Mike
What are your concerns with regards to license ? Looking at [1], it
looks like the GData Java Client is Apache License 2.
[1] http://code.google.com/p/gdata-java-client/
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Mike Edwards
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Douglas Leite wrote:
>>
>> After analyz
Douglas Leite wrote:
After analyzing the Google Data API and the code of binding-atom,
binding-atom-abdera, and binding-feed, I propose an approach to start the
development of the GData biding.
I propose creating a new type of binding: biding-gdata. Similarly as
binding-atom-abdera, that extends
Hi Ant,
Forgot to mention in my previous note... I accept Tuscany PMC's invitation
to me to become a committer :)
I already have a signed ICLA in place. My JIRA userid is vamsic. My Apache
userid is vamsic007. Please add my id to the required groups so that I get
the necessary permissions.
T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-2362.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied, thanks Ram.
BTW, could you please take a quick look
Hi Ram
I have just applied the TUSCANY-2362 patch. Could you please take a
quick look as I was having issues trying to get a sucessful run of the
validation iTest bucket, but I guess it's due to different issues.
Thanks
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> O
+1
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to rename the implementation-data-api module to data-api, to
> reflect that it's not a component implementation type.
>
> I'm planning to rename the package as well, but keep the current
> implementatio
Well detailed Oscar ; )
It is one thing I learnt after playing hours with Android, you need to
rebuild every modified project which is imported in the android project, the
android project itself does not check for modifications on its dependencies
:S...so, when you rebuilt the imported project it
Welcome Vamsi.
Thanks,
Feng Wang
On 2008-06-03 02:02:46,ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The Tuscany PMC has voted for Vamsavardhana Reddy to become a Tuscany
>committer.
>
>Congratulations and welcome!
>
> ...ant
>
Mike Edwards wrote:
ant elder wrote:
The Tuscany PMC has voted for Vamsavardhana Reddy to become a Tuscany
committer.
Congratulations and welcome!
...ant
Welcome Vamsi!
Yours, Mike.
Welcome!
--
Jean-Sebastien
I'd like to rename the implementation-data-api module to data-api, to
reflect that it's not a component implementation type.
I'm planning to rename the package as well, but keep the current
implementation.data package as well for backward compatibility.
I'd like to do that later this week, if
I'm starting to split some of the binding and implementation models in
separate modules, to allow their models to be used without dragging
their runtime dependencies.
We've already done that on a number of them, I'm going to follow the
same pattern for the following modules as well:
- impleme
Hi Adriano,
I continued testing retrotranslator. Here's what I've done up to now.
1. Downloaded the modified code from [1].
2. Downloaded SCA modules from [2] and installed as shown below:
svn checkout --revision 643746
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules
cd mod
After analyzing the Google Data API and the code of binding-atom,
binding-atom-abdera, and binding-feed, I propose an approach to start the
development of the GData biding.
I propose creating a new type of binding: biding-gdata. Similarly as
binding-atom-abdera, that extends the binding-atom, this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gilbert Kwan updated TUSCANY-2364:
--
Attachment: T2364.vtest.patch
T2364.vtest.patch is the update
> Release vtest atService7 of
Release vtest atService7 of ServiceAnnotationTestCase
--
Key: TUSCANY-2364
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2364
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Test
Components: J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gilbert Kwan updated TUSCANY-2363:
--
Attachment: T2363.vtest.zip
T2363.vtest.patch
T2363.vtest.patch is the update
Simon Laws wrote:
Should we really be restricting the behavior of the service side SOAP stack?
If your intent is to support 1_2 does that mean we outlaw 1_1 if the SOAP
stack happens to be able to make sense of it?
Simon
Simon,
This all depends on what you think is meant when the intent "SOA
ant elder wrote:
The Tuscany PMC has voted for Vamsavardhana Reddy to become a Tuscany
committer.
Congratulations and welcome!
...ant
Welcome Vamsi!
Yours, Mike.
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Thank you for this great news. And thanks to Tuscany PMC for this
recognition.
Great job Vamsi! Congratulations
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Gilbert Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, Tuscany does not generate any error for both cases (marked
> as "Error").
> I will open a Jira to log this down as Mike suggested
>
> Gilbert
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:09 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Congratulations and welcome!
Mario
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ant
elder
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 3:02 PM
To: tuscany-dev
Subject: [NOTICE] Vamsavardhana Reddy voted as Tuscany committer
The Tuscany PMC has voted for Vamsavardhana
Great news Vamsi! Welcome.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Congratulations! You are well deserved.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>>
>> --
It is strange.
Removing the at the bottom of the assembly bin.xml changes it so
that the dependencies do get included again, but several felix dependencies
also get dragged in. What is the complete list of jars that should be
included?
...ant
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:02 PM, kelvin goodson <[
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Congratulations! You are well deserved.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> --
> From: "Vamsavardhana Reddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:15 AM
> To: ; <[EMAIL PR
Congratulations! You are well deserved.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Vamsavardhana Reddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:15 AM
To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [NOTICE] Vamsavardhana Reddy voted as Tuscany committer
Thank y
Works for me now, thanks.
...ant
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now it should be fixed under r662499. There was a typo in the code that led
> to JDK dependent behaviors (ordering in the Class.getMethods()).
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
> ---
Currently, Tuscany does not generate any error for both cases (marked
as "Error").
I will open a Jira to log this down as Mike suggested
Gilbert
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:09 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think right now our binding.ws services (or Axis2 services) will work with
>
Congratulations and welcome Vamsi !
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for this great news. And thanks to Tuscany PMC for this
> recognition.
>
> ++Vamsi
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:32 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The Tus
Thank you for this great news. And thanks to Tuscany PMC for this
recognition.
++Vamsi
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:32 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Tuscany PMC has voted for Vamsavardhana Reddy to become a Tuscany
> committer.
>
> Congratulations and welcome!
>
> ...ant
>
The Tuscany PMC has voted for Vamsavardhana Reddy to become a Tuscany
committer.
Congratulations and welcome!
...ant
Now it should be fixed under r662499. There was a typo in the code that led
to JDK dependent behaviors (ordering in the Class.getMethods()).
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 2:37 AM
To:
Subject:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2362:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
> Fix for test failure in TUSCANY-2344 & 5 valida
I think right now our binding.ws services (or Axis2 services) will work with
either SOAP 1.1 or 1.2, and the response from the service will use the same
soap version as the request. Thats the default Axis2 behaviour, not sure if
its possible to change to restrict that. So right now the Tuscany code
This failure also occurs with the 2.1 version and the 2.2-beta-1 version.
The current trunk version is 2.2-beta-3-SNAPSHOT, which I haven't found in
a repository yet, so the only version that seems ever to have worked is the
2.2-SNAPSHOT version. I have taken a look at the assembly plugin JIRAs,
vtest for soap version and multi soap bindings of binding.ws
Key: TUSCANY-2363
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2363
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Test
C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2362:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2362-New.patch
NOTE: Please note that this new patch is jus
I'll try the SUN JDK.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 1:08 AM
To:
Subject: Re: JAXWSJavaInterfaceProcessorTestCase fail?
Looks like this is a jdk issue, works ok with IBM JDK5 but always fails
The following table shows all combinations:
Service Require vs Reference Require:
None vs None: OK
None vs soap: OK
None vs soap.1_1: OK
None vs soap.1_2: OK
soap vs None: OK
soap vs soap: OK
soap vs soap.1_1: OK
soap vs soap.1_2: OK
soap.1_1 vs None: OK
soap.1_1 vs s
I have pinned down the change that caused the absence of EMF jars in the
distribution zip to be the switch from the maven assembly plugin version
2.2-SNAPSHOT to the 2.2-beta-2 as altered here [1].I hope to look at
this again soon, but have to stop for now. If anyone has any views on what
ver
We would have to create one. Let me try to help you and see if I can
get one available soon.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I have been working on introducing monitors to various processors
> across modules, I came across an instance where the
> DASIm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wojtek Janiszewski updated TUSCANY-2357:
Attachment: add-license-headers.patch.tar.gz
Thanks for reminding. Here's a patch
Folks,
Thinking about this further, we should I think come up with a common and consistent model for the
handling of problems found during model processing.
Let me make a proposal or two that folk can throw rocks at if they please:
- Model processor code should NEVER throw an exception that e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12601596#action_12601596
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2357:
Thanks Wojtek, patch applied.
One comment, wher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated TUSCANY-2361:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2361.patch
TUSCANY-2361.patch:
1. Refactored the implement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated TUSCANY-2361:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
> Databinding tests for primitives and primitive
While I have been working on introducing monitors to various processors
across modules, I came across an instance where the
DASImplementationProcessor.java (part of implementation.das module) does not
provide proper validation messages when the required attributes are missing.
Most of the time, th
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> I have provided the fix with TUSCANY-2362 for the same.
>
> For Junit4, let me have a look and provide the changes accordingly.
>
>
> On 6/2/08, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at
Gilbert Kwan wrote:
I defined a service requires soap.1_2
and a reference by ws binding which requires soap.1_1
http://localhost:8080/BComponentSOAP12"/>
I got no warning, error message, or exception. Is it fine?
What is the proper beha
Yes! See - http://apache.markmail.org/message/bd7dw4ixeauvyznk.
...ant
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hey Ant,
>
> Thanks for offering to perform this task!
>
> Have you managed to make any progress with this?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
> On Thu, May 2
Hi Simon,
I have provided the fix with TUSCANY-2362 for the same.
For Junit4, let me have a look and provide the changes accordingly.
On 6/2/08, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Simon,
> > After downloading t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2362:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2362.patch
> Fix for test failure in TUSCANY-2344 & 5 valid
Fix for test failure in TUSCANY-2344 & 5 validation message
---
Key: TUSCANY-2362
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2362
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Comp
Hey Ant,
Thanks for offering to perform this task!
Have you managed to make any progress with this?
Cheers,
Dave.
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, now that it looks like everyone wants this to go ahead I'll go do this,
> not sure if I'll have time t
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_15-b04)
...ant
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Mike Edwards <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>
>> Looks like this is a jdk issue, works ok with IBM JDK5 but always fails
>> for
>> me with the Sun JDK.
>>
>> ...ant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-2360:
Attachment: MultiLevelRecusion.zip
We could turn this into an itest with some work I guess but fo
Databinding tests for primitives and primitive arrays - local service,
pass-by-value tests
--
Key: TUSCANY-2361
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2361
ant elder wrote:
Looks like this is a jdk issue, works ok with IBM JDK5 but always fails for
me with the Sun JDK.
...ant
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:32 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On a fresh check out I'm ge
Autowiring in nested composites doesn't work in all cases
-
Key: TUSCANY-2360
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2360
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Componen
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Imagine PolicyOuterComposite
>>>
>>>
>>>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12601556#action_12601556
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2291:
Fixed in r662367 but the vtest is still commente
Looks like this is a jdk issue, works ok with IBM JDK5 but always fails for
me with the Sun JDK.
...ant
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:32 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On a fresh check out I'm getting a fail
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> After downloading the complete latest code from the repository, i noticed
> that the reason for the failure in CouldNotResolveLocation for
> implementation.resource and implementation.widget validation is due to th
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:32 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a fresh check out I'm getting a failure in
> JAXWSJavaInterfaceProcessorTestCase, anyone else seeing that or is it just
> me?
>
> ...ant
>
>
> testProcessor(org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.java.jaxws.JAXWSJavaInterface
On a fresh check out I'm getting a failure in
JAXWSJavaInterfaceProcessorTestCase, anyone else seeing that or is it just
me?
...ant
testProcessor(org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.java.jaxws.JAXWSJavaInterfaceProcessorTestCase)
Time elapsed: 0.046 s
ec <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.Assertion
Rationalize the SCA runtime use of cglib and asm dependencies
-
Key: TUSCANY-2359
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2359
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Hi Simon,
After downloading the complete latest code from the repository, i noticed
that the reason for the failure in CouldNotResolveLocation for
implementation.resource and implementation.widget validation is due to the
missed code while applying the patch.
The changes suggested in the patch doe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12601539#action_12601539
]
Georg Schmidt commented on TUSCANY-2343:
Hi Rajini,
thank you for your good supp
69 matches
Mail list logo
