Re: Release 1.3?

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mike Edwards wrote: > > > >> Simon Laws wrote: > >> > >>> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then > >>> there > >>>

Re: JMS Client

Hi All, I can now run JMS client successfully with latest binding.jms, but you need to confirm following with WAS 6 before testing it.. this was done with the help of Ant... This investigation done on sample sample-helloworld-jms-webapp 1) see the link http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/

Re: Databinding tests for array of java.net.URI

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I pointed out is the following: > > URI.createURI("http"//abc").resolve("uri") (toString()=="http://abcuri";) > creates a non-equal instance of URI.createURI("http://abcuri";). By the > javadoc of URI, this is violati

Re: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Mike Edwards < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good debate here, but let's be clear about the big picture before the > details swamp the debate. > Big +1 to that, i really hope we can some consensus on what the distributions and runtimes should look like before we

Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ant elder wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Simon Nash wrote: >>> >>> ant elder wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Seb

Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Please see my comments inline. > > Thanks, > Raymond > > [snip] > >> Good requirement, but I don't think that the current manifest + >> tuscany-all JAR solution is a good one (for example it mixes APIs and >> intern

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2323) Error generating WSDL when the original wsdl file used to specify the service interface does not use soap namespaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12604081#action_12604081 ] Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-2323: - I checked in r666390 which fixes the symptoms

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2323) Error generating WSDL when the original wsdl file used to specify the service interface does not use soap namespaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Nash reassigned TUSCANY-2323: --- Assignee: Simon Nash > Error generating WSDL when the original wsdl file used to specify th

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2323) Error generating WSDL when the original wsdl file used to specify the service interface does not use soap namespaces

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12604079#action_12604079 ] Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-2323: - This problem is caused by Tuscany not implemen

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2383) Cannot define component property with Component Type File

Cannot define component property with Component Type File - Key: TUSCANY-2383 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2383 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Componen

Re: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

Mike Edwards wrote: ... Are people interested in exploring these ideas? Jean-Sebastien, I'll start with the last question first: YES. But I'd next like to step back from what I can see is developing into a somewhat "active" debate (to use a neutral euphemism) :) and investigate the big pi

Re: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: I'd like to discuss the following: "What distro Zips are we building and what do they contain?" I think we could improve our distro scheme to provide: - smaller packages - easier for people to find what they need I was thinking abo

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2343) OSGi bundle design leads to class loading issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12604050#action_12604050 ] Rajini Sivaram commented on TUSCANY-2343: - Daniel, Do you have a date that you w

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2382) Endpoint model changes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-2382: Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next > Endpoint model changes >

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2382) Endpoint model changes

Endpoint model changes --- Key: TUSCANY-2382 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2382 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Wish Components: Build System Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino I'd

Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany

Hi, There are two specifications in these areas. 1) Java2IDL: http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/08-01-14.pdf 2) IDL2Java: http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/08-01-11.pdf Let's try to use a few scenarios to help us understand what rules should be applied. Case A: There is an existing CORBA service (

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-181) Need a command line tool and maven2 plugin to validate an SCA assembly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-181: --- Issue Type: New Feature (was: Wish) > Need a command line tool and maven2 p

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2381) Detect extensions installed in a Tuscany distribution

Detect extensions installed in a Tuscany distribution - Key: TUSCANY-2381 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2381 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Wish Components: Bui

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2331) Got expection where the wsdl defines an operation without input

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Becker updated TUSCANY-2331: Attachment: BServiceDan.wsdl I am no WSDL expert, but it seems to be a not valid WSDL file to me.

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-2331) Got expection where the wsdl defines an operation without input

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Becker closed TUSCANY-2331. --- Resolution: Invalid > Got expection where the wsdl defines an operation without input > ---

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2380) Modular distribution structure

Modular distribution structure -- Key: TUSCANY-2380 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2380 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Wish Components: Build System Reporter: Jean-Sebastien

Re: Databinding tests for array of java.net.URI

What I pointed out is the following: URI.createURI("http"//abc").resolve("uri") (toString()=="http://abcuri";) creates a non-equal instance of URI.createURI("http://abcuri";). By the javadoc of URI, this is violating the rules: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/net/URI.html Identit

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2331) Got expection where the wsdl defines an operation without input

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603975#action_12603975 ] Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2331: --- I got a diferent exception. It looks like

Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

ant elder wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Simon Nash wrote: ant elder wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: I'd like to discuss the following: "W

Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, Please see my comments inline. Thanks, Raymond [snip] Good requirement, but I don't think that the current manifest + tuscany-all JAR solution is a good one (for example it mixes APIs and internals in the same JAR, doesn't work well with IDEs, works only for one big

Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

ant elder wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Simon Nash wrote: ant elder wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: I'd like to discuss the following: "W

Endpoint model design, was: Endpoints

Simon Laws wrote: ... I've created an itest (late-reference-resolution) to show how late resolution could be done using endpoint resolvers. ... I've spent some time looking at that test and the following classes: Endpoint EndpointFactory Endpoint EndpointResolver EndpointResolverFactory Endpoi

Re: Reconciling service bindings

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> I'm looking at TUSCANY-2352 (which I raised when I was doing some policy >> testing). The issue is that promoted service bindings aren't augme

Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

Hi, Please see my comments inline. Thanks, Raymond [snip] Good requirement, but I don't think that the current manifest + tuscany-all JAR solution is a good one (for example it mixes APIs and internals in the same JAR, doesn't work well with IDEs, works only for one big distro, requires diff

Re: Databinding tests for array of java.net.URI

Raymond, The comment "junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was:" I had in @Ignore in the testcase code may have lead to some confusion. I agree that uri1.equals(uri2) is not same as uri1.toString().equals(uri2.toString()). The issue I am trying to bri

Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Nash wrote: > >> ant elder wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > I'd like to discuss the fol

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2229) Got WARNING if @Context is used to annotate a setter method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2229. --- Resolution: Fixed Fixed under r666213. Thanks. > Got WARNING if @Context is used to annota

Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Nash wrote: > >> ant elder wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > I'd like to discuss the fol

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2229) Got WARNING if @Context is used to annotate a setter method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603932#action_12603932 ] Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2229: --- Hi, This is a result of declaring the two

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2229) Got WARNING if @Context is used to annotate a setter method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2229: - Assignee: Raymond Feng > Got WARNING if @Context is used to annotate a setter method >

Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

Simon Nash wrote: ant elder wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: I'd like to discuss the following: "What distro Zips are we building and what do they contain?" I think we could improve our distro scheme to p

Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany

Wojtek Janiszewski wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: I think it would be good to split binding-corba in two modules: - binding-corba for the model and SCDL read/write - binding-corba-runtime (or another suffix that makes what it is obvious) for the runtime handling, service and reference p

Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany

Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: I think it would be good to split binding-corba in two modules: - binding-corba for the model and SCDL read/write - binding-corba-runtime (or another suffix that makes what it is obvious) for the runtime handling, service and reference provider code. This is the

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2377) problem reading complex property from @file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2377. --- Resolution: Fixed Test case patch applied and the problem is fixed. > problem reading com

Re: Databinding tests for array of java.net.URI

Hi, Here is a simple test case to prove my point: public class URITestCase { @Test public void testURI() { URI uri = URI.create("http://abc";); URI uri1 = uri.resolve("uri"); URI uri2 = URI.create("http://abcxyz";); Assert.assertEquals(uri1, uri2); } } The A

Re: Databinding tests for array of java.net.URI

Hi Raymond, Whether or not resolve() works with http://abc, I have a URI created as URI.create("http://abc";).resolve("xyz") and java does not complain about this URI object . The current problem can be restated that this URI object can not be passed in an array of URI objects back and forth betw

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2379) CompositeProcessor.java is calling promotedService.getService() instead of promotedService.getName() when writing out a composite file.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam reassigned TUSCANY-2379: Assignee: Ramkumar Ramalingam > CompositeProcessor.java is calling promot

Re: Databinding tests for array of java.net.URI

I think it's a problem in the test case. The resolve() cannot work with http://abc (which abc is treated as a host name). I changed it to http://abc/, then it works well. You can simply create a test case using URIs only without Tuscany in the picture. Thanks, Raymond ---

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2109) Conflicts between component reference interface and promoted composite reference interface are not detected

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603900#action_12603900 ] Scott Kurz commented on TUSCANY-2109: - Based on where our discussion ended up here: h

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2343) OSGi bundle design leads to class loading issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603899#action_12603899 ] Sebastian Voigt commented on TUSCANY-2343: -- Hi Rajini, We have seen that all Tu

Re: Problem seen in Policy Processors

As explained in my previous post, after introducing a fix as shown below Intent resolvedRequiredIntent = resolver.resolveModel(Intent.class, requiredIntent); if (!resolvedRequiredIntent.isUnresolved()) { requiredIntents.add(resolvedRequiredIntent); for the unreachable code, noticed that not

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2378) Databinding tests for generics, parameterized and polymorphic types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603891#action_12603891 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on TUSCANY-2378: -- Added test for polymorphic t

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2378) Databinding tests for generics, parameterized and polymorphic types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated TUSCANY-2378: - Description: Databinding tests for generics, parameterized and polymorphic type

Re: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

ant elder wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: I'd like to discuss the following: "What distro Zips are we building and what do they contain?" I think we could improve our distro scheme to provide: - smaller pa

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2371) Databinding tests for StandardTypes, array of StandardTypes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603856#action_12603856 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on TUSCANY-2371: -- Completed: At revision: 6660

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2267) Raise a warning if both reference target and binding URI are specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2267: - Patch Info: [Patch Available] > Raise a warning if both reference target and bi

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2267) Raise a warning if both reference target and binding URI are specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2267: - Attachment: TUSCANY-2267.patch > Raise a warning if both reference target and b

Re: Reconciling service bindings

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm looking at TUSCANY-2352 (which I raised when I was doing some policy > testing). The issue is that promoted service bindings aren't augmented with > the composite service bindings that promote them. Looking at the > Base

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2343) OSGi bundle design leads to class loading issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603844#action_12603844 ] Daniel Stucky commented on TUSCANY-2343: Hi Rajini, I finally managed to get the

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2325) Schema validation does not register the exception with the Problem, yet Problem looks for it and finds it to be not-null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603836#action_12603836 ] Luciano Resende commented on TUSCANY-2325: -- Is there any simple way to reproduce

Reconciling service bindings

I'm looking at TUSCANY-2352 (which I raised when I was doing some policy testing). The issue is that promoted service bindings aren't augmented with the composite service bindings that promote them. Looking at the BaseWireBuilderImpl code there is a method called reconcileReferenceBindings() that d

Re: Release 1.3?

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Edwards wrote: > >> Simon Laws wrote: >> >>> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then >>> there >>> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like >>> the >>> right

WSDL generation when binding.ws specifies a WSDL file

The SCA Web Service binding spec says that a WSDL document should be generated for a service that uses . This applies whether or not the element specifies an existing WSDL document. If the element specifies an existing WSDL document, the generated WSDL document contains statements referring t

Re: [VOTE] Release SDO 1.1.1

Building in windows, with a clean repo : Missing: -- 1) org.eclipse.emf:common:jar:2.2.3 Try downloading the file manually from the project website. Then, install it using the command: mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.eclipse.emf -DartifactId=common -Dversion=2.2.3 -Dpac

Tuscany overriding of Axis2 code

I just committed r666041 which removes the copied processListService() code from TuscanyListingAgent, and instead uses an override of extractServiceName() to get the necessary Tuscany-specific behaviour. This was needed because the TuscanyListingAgent.processListService() code was older than the

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2368) Seaprate the Policy calculation phase from the Wire build phase in the builders

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2368. - Resolution: Fixed Change committed at r666037 > Seaprate the Policy calculation phase from the

Re: Changing SCA trunk version from 2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT to SNAPSHOT

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Luciano Resende wrote: > >> > >> How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would probably give us some room to have > >> couple releases without th

Re: [VOTE] Release SDO 1.1.1

I'd like to get this voted on and released but nervous to start that after Kelvin had trouble getting the emf dependencies, could any one else try building the tag and seeing if it works or not for them - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1.1-RC2/- its a small check

Databinding tests for array of java.net.URI

I am using the following URI's in my test: URI[] uris = new URI[3]; uris[0] = URI.create("a/b/c"); uris[1] = URI.create("http://abc";); uris[2] = URI.create("ftp://a/b";); The return value from the service method is inputUri.resolve("uri"). One service method takes

Re: Release 1.3?

Mike Edwards wrote: Simon Laws wrote: It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then there has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like the right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the last couple of months there are

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2267) Raise a warning if both reference target and binding URI are specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603810#action_12603810 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-2267: - I think this should apply to all bindings. It'

Tuscany Board Report for June

I need to submit our ASF board report by next Monday. I've created a wiki page - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/June+2008 - please add anything you want mentioned. ...ant

Re: Changing SCA trunk version from 2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT to SNAPSHOT

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luciano Resende wrote: >> >> How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would probably give us some room to have >> couple releases without the necessity to keep updating the trunk pom >> version. And this would probably make ev

Re: JMS Client

I've been able to recreate this problem by using a non-IBM JRE with the WebSphere JMS client. Turns out the Tuscany JMS binding needs to a special property added to the JNDI initial context environment when NOT running on an IBM JRE. I've updated the binding-jms code to do this and it works ok now

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2267) Raise a warning if both reference target and binding URI are specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603797#action_12603797 ] Ramkumar Ramalingam commented on TUSCANY-2267: -- Hi Simon, I just wanted to c

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2267) Raise a warning if both reference target and binding URI are specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam reassigned TUSCANY-2267: Assignee: Ramkumar Ramalingam > Raise a warning if both reference target

A question about data integration using SDO/DAS

Hi, everyone : SDO is claimed to be the tool for data integration , which provides a unified view for end-user to access customized data. However, I have not found any samples in released Tuscany SDO/DAS project ,which demonstrate its usage on data aggregation. So ,I just want to ask y

Re: Distribution zips and what they contain, was: SCA runtimes

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: >> >> I'd like to discuss the following: "What distro Zips are we building and >> what do they contain?" >> >> I think we could improve our distro scheme to provide: >> - smaller pack

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2242) Incorrent port name in wsdlElement leads to NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603793#action_12603793 ] Ramkumar Ramalingam commented on TUSCANY-2242: -- Hi Simon, I have a fix for t

Re: JMS Client

Hi Ant, Thanks for your investigation on this. I m getting exception with WebSphere JMS client with a Sun JDK... below is the stacktrace for it... javax.naming.NamingException: Failed to initialize the ORB [Root exception is java.lang.ClassCastException: com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl]

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2368) Seaprate the Policy calculation phase from the Wire build phase in the builders

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2368: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Seaprate the Policy calculation phase from the Wire build phase in t

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2242) Incorrent port name in wsdlElement leads to NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam reassigned TUSCANY-2242: Assignee: Ramkumar Ramalingam > Incorrent port name in wsdlElement leads

Account Request - Scott Kurz - Tuscany

Dear root, Please create an id for Scott Kurz on the Tuscany project Preferred userid:scottkurz Full name: Scott Kurz Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany ICLA is on file. Votes: tuscany-private, June 9, Message-ID

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2360) Autowiring in nested composites doesn't work in all cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2360. - Resolution: Fixed Changes committed at r665992. Changed wire build so that autowire doesn't wir