Sorry Venkat, I didn't explicitly respond to your posting, but I hope the
answers I gave to Sebastien's similar line of questioning makes it clear.
Please let me know if not.
Kelvin.
On 28/02/2008, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This software will implement relevant open standards
Hey, that's np. Your response to Sebastien was elaborate enuf :) . Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 4:30 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry Venkat, I didn't explicitly respond to your posting, but I hope
the
answers I gave to Sebastien's similar line of questioning makes it
kelvin goodson wrote:
Implicit in this rewording is the understanding within the Tuscany community
that there would be one Apache home for SDO Java development. When this
thread is referenced in proposal for the new project, or discussions around
it, it must be clear to the wider Apache
This software will implement relevant open standards including, but not
limited to, the
SCA standard defined by the OASIS OpenCSA member section, and related
technologies.
When we say including but not limited to I understand that it would very
well contain SDO and others implicitly. Or, does
This is about creating the healthiest Apache environment for fostering
creative ongoing SDO Java development.
The feedback from Apache members to the proposal I put forward for a new
project, was that it was too tightly scoped around JSR 235.
In order to broaden the scope of the new project
kelvin goodson wrote:
...
implicit in this change to the charter is the
understanding that if another Apache other project is established with an
explicit remit for SDO Java development, then we would work towards
ensuring that new development happened in that new project.
OK that helps,
Implicit in this rewording is the understanding within the Tuscany community
that there would be one Apache home for SDO Java development. When this
thread is referenced in proposal for the new project, or discussions around
it, it must be clear to the wider Apache community that the Tuscany
See inline.
Simon
kelvin goodson wrote:
There's been a discussion thread going for a while [1] in the Tuscany
community with regards to shifting the Apache home for SDO Java work to a
new project. This has been going on in parallel to the discussion on the
incubator general list on
I'm fine with the proposal. In Tuscany SCA Java, we support many
databindings such as JAXB, SDO, XmlBeans and AXIOM. IMHO, SDO is one of the
technology choices to represent data in the SOA environment. Removing SDO
from the sentence will give us more flexibility. I agree that it doesn't
stop
kelvin goodson wrote:
There's been a discussion thread going for a while [1] in the Tuscany
community with regards to shifting the Apache home for SDO Java work to a
new project. This has been going on in parallel to the discussion on the
incubator general list on establishing a new project,
There's been a discussion thread going for a while [1] in the Tuscany
community with regards to shifting the Apache home for SDO Java work to a
new project. This has been going on in parallel to the discussion on the
incubator general list on establishing a new project, originally aimed to
be
11 matches
Mail list logo
