On 3/22/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi Meeraj
>>
>> From my perspective having demonstrable code in June would be spot
>> on as
>> I have to speak on SCA then and would consider a demo if we could
>> do it.
>>
Maybe we can even get something earlier - I'm also speaking at Jav
> Hi Meeraj
From my perspective having demonstrable code in June would be spot
on as
I have to speak on SCA then and would consider a demo if we could
do it.
Maybe we can even get something earlier - I'm also speaking at JavaOne.
I don't have the knowledge yet to comment on the details
On 3/22/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 8:47 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
>> Ok, cool, so I can run a simple app in a single VM. Let me try it
>> out.
Just to set expectations, I don't think the system configuration in
the default runtime has been switched over to the
On Mar 22, 2007, at 8:47 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
Ok, cool, so I can run a simple app in a single VM. Let me try it
out.
Just to set expectations, I don't think the system configuration in
the default runtime has been switched over to the federated deployer
yet. So if you run the calc sample
after deployment onto the slave ran in single-VM mode
using local bindings.
HTH
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 12:22 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: A question of federation - was: Planning kernel release 2.0
O
bindings.
HTH
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 12:22 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: A question of federation - was: Planning kernel release 2.0
On 3/22/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/22/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Now that the SPI is getting stable and we have the initial end-to-end
story for federation working, I would suggest we plan for the final
release for kernel 2.0, with emphasis on federation and user experience.
I was thinking about
