Re: Transaction policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework

Hi Raymond, I've checked in some changes in r589585 wherein the the java implementation runtime now adds an interceptor apply policies over implementations that specify it. I have deleted the earlier impl. where the invoker was wrapped to do this. Thanks - Venkat On 10/21/07, Venkata Krishnan

Re: Model intents and policySets attached under implementation.xxx elements, was:Re: Transaction policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework

Venkata Krishnan wrote: Hi, 1) So for intents and policysets attached to implementation.xxx I understand that you are proposing the addtion of another field in the Component model to hold this information. i.e. -ListIntent getRequiredIntents() /* this will capture intents specified at the

Re: Transaction policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework

[snip] Venkata Krishnan wrote: Hi Raymond, Please see my comments inline. Also, now that you are with this, may I request your views on the problem that I am facing with attaching intents and policysets on implementation model instances. Presently, atleast for the JavaImplementation model

Model intents and policySets attached under implementation.xxx elements, was:Re: Transaction policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework

setService(String service); } Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 11:55 AM Subject: Re: Transaction policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework [snip] Venkata

Re: Model intents and policySets attached under implementation.xxx elements, was:Re: Transaction policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework

[snip] Raymond Feng wrote: We can have something like: Well... You know what I think about how to model the intent - operations relationship :) I think that you should experiment a bit with what you're proposing, I'd like to just bring to your attention that: - modeling operation and

Re: Model intents and policySets attached under implementation.xxx elements, was:Re: Transaction policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework

policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework [snip] Raymond Feng wrote: We can have something like: Well... You know what I think about how to model the intent - operations relationship :) I think that you should experiment a bit with what you're proposing, I'd like to just

Re: Model intents and policySets attached under implementation.xxx elements, was:Re: Transaction policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework

: Re: Model intents and policySets attached under implementation.xxx elements, was:Re: Transaction policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework [snip] Raymond Feng wrote: We can have something like: Well... You know what I think about how to model the intent

Re: Transaction policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework

Hi Raymond, Please see my comments inline. Also, now that you are with this, may I request your views on the problem that I am facing with attaching intents and policysets on implementation model instances. Presently, atleast for the JavaImplementation model instances we reuse instances across

Transaction policy seed code and questions on the Tuscany policy framework

Hi, I checked in some code as the seed to jump start the transaction policy support in Tuscany. Please see more details at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586640view=rev. By looking into the code we have today, I have a few questions. 1)