On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 08:00:58PM +, James Lundy wrote:
> Could this be a bug in my Pycharm 3 compiler I have had mixed
> experiences running the code.
As a general rule, any time you get an unexpected error and think "Could
this be a bug in the compiler?", the chances are almost always "N
On 24/02/18 20:00, James Lundy wrote:
To whom it may concern. This code is from Dr. John Keyser.
Please arrange for him to go on a programming course :-)
gooddata = []
for singleday in datalist:
if (singleday[0] == day) and (singleday[1] == month):
Yuck, unneeded brackets disease.
On 24/02/18 20:00, James Lundy wrote:
> To whom it may concern. This code is from Dr. John Keyser.
Since you don;t show us the complete program I will have
to make some assumptions...
> gooddata = []
This is degioned as a list by virtue of the []
> for singleday in datalist:
> if (singleday
To whom it may concern. This code is from Dr. John Keyser.
gooddata = []
for singleday in datalist:
if (singleday[0] == day) and (singleday[1] == month):
gooddata.append({singleday[2], singleday[3], singleday[4],
singleday[5]})
# Perform analysis
minsofar = 120
maxsofar = -100
numg
On 29/03/17 22:23, kay Cee wrote:
> func_list = ('func1', 'func2', 'func3')
>
> for f in func_list:
> eval(f)()
Instead of using strings just use the functions directly:
func_list = (func1, func2, func3)
for f in func_list:
f()
That avoids the potentially insecure eval and will be faster t
Greetings all,
I would like to use a list of functions for an automation project, and this
is the prototype I came up with
###
def func1():
print('func1')
def func2():
print('func2')
def func3():
print('func3')
func_list = ('func1', 'func2', 'func3')
for f in func_list
Just checkin'
--
Alan G
Author of the Learn to Program web site
http://www.alan-g.me.uk/
http://www.amazon.com/author/alan_gauld
Follow my photo-blog on Flickr at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alangauldphotos
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To
On 08/05/16 08:59, Alan Gauld via Tutor wrote:
> This means you can get
> - single emails (default)
> - emails plus digest
- digest and no emails
> - neither (this is my choice because I read via gmane)
Sorry, I missed an option...
--
Alan G
Author of the Learn to Program web site
http://www
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 08:59:01AM +0100, Alan Gauld via Tutor wrote:
> On 01/05/16 05:18, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > ...(And I think we should default to
> > individual emails, not daily digest.)
>
> It took me a little while to find this one, but I've checked
> and the default is to receive
On 01/05/16 05:18, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> ...(And I think we should default to
> individual emails, not daily digest.)
It took me a little while to find this one, but I've checked
and the default is to receive individual emails. You need to
opt-in to get the digests and opt-out to stop getting
Hello,
I figured out the issue. It was a silly mistake - i was not running the correct
code; instead was running code from another program which was active on a
second tab. Thank you.
On Sunday, May 1, 2016 4:15 PM, Jason N. via Tutor wrote:
Thank you all for your responses.
I am us
Thank you all for your responses.
I am using Py 2.7 and this time I copied and pasted the code from here:
http://www.opentechguides.com/how-to/article/python/57/python-ping-subnet.html
to my system but received the same error when I ran it.
You can see the error screenshot here: https://unsee.c
On 01/05/16 07:23, boB Stepp wrote:
> I am in agreement with this as well. I have often wondered if
> newcomers are subscribed or not
Most are. Several who are not, subscribe very soon
after - presumably in response to the intro message.
> as after subscription one receives a
> very helpful em
On 01/05/16 10:06, Alan Gauld via Tutor wrote:
> Quite a lot of people use the digest service, especially lurkers.
> (A quick scan of the members lists suggests around 35-40%
> of all members use digest). I'd be reluctant to remove a
> service that is so widely used.
I've just had a look at the d
On 01/05/16 06:35, c...@zip.com.au wrote:
> There seems to me a subjectly large number of very short threads with a
> question from someone, a couple of responses from list members, and no
> further
> reply.
>
> To me this argues that either newcomers are not subscribed and probably do
> not
On 01/05/16 05:18, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> What's your policy here on the tutor list?
I don't really have a policy. The list policy, set by
my predecessors, is to allow anyone to send mail and
encourage them to subscribe. All unsubscribed mail
goes to moderation (and there i
>> Of course, in the case of python-list, non-subscribers can just use the
>> Usenet interface (comp.lang.python, or Google Groups, or gmane). But
>> anyone using Usenet is presumably savvy enough to check for replies
>> using Usenet.
>>
>> What's
yone using Usenet is presumably savvy enough to check for replies
using Usenet.
What's your policy here on the tutor list? I think we should require
subscription before people can post. (And I think we should default to
individual emails, not daily digest.)
I am not Alan, but personally I am +0.8
eck for replies
using Usenet.
What's your policy here on the tutor list? I think we should require
subscription before people can post. (And I think we should default to
individual emails, not daily digest.)
--
Steve
___
Tutor maillist -
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 06:51:17PM +, Jason N. via Tutor wrote:
> Hello,
> I found this simple script online but when I execute it I get the
> following error: "TypeError: 'list' object is not callable" Here is
> the code sample:
>
> import subprocess
> ls_output= subprocess.check_output(['di
On 4/30/2016 3:27 PM, Alex Kleider wrote:
On 2016-04-30 11:51, Jason N. via Tutor wrote:
Hello,
I found this simple script online but when I execute it I get the
following error: "TypeError: 'list' object is not callable"
Here is the code sample:import subprocess
ls_output= subprocess.check_o
On 2016-04-30 11:51, Jason N. via Tutor wrote:
Hello,
I found this simple script online but when I execute it I get the
following error: "TypeError: 'list' object is not callable"
Here is the code sample:import subprocess
ls_output= subprocess.check_output(['dir'])
It works on my system: Ubun
Hello,
I found this simple script online but when I execute it I get the following
error: "TypeError: 'list' object is not callable"
Here is the code sample:import subprocess
ls_output= subprocess.check_output(['dir'])
I searched online and found a another similar code sample
(http://www.opentec
On 19/04/16 21:56, isaac tetteh wrote:
> I have a list like this
> [
> ("name",2344,34, "boy"),("another",345,47,"boy", "last")
> ]
Assuming this is list_tuple...
> for row in list_tuple:
> for row2 in row:
> return row
This can't work because return needs to be inside a function.
ine
1563, in make_responserv, status, headers = rv + (None,) * (3 -
len(rv))ValueError: too many values to unpack
> From: d...@hashcollision.org
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:01:41 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] List of tuples
> To: itette...@hotmail.com
> CC: tutor@python.org
>
Sorry for typos in response: on cell phone at the moment. ;p
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
Okay, in the context of a function, the error you're seeing makes more
sense.
You need to ensure that the return value of the function is of the right
type. In SingleView, the intended return value appears to be a structured
response value.
Given that, then any other return statements in the bo
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:56 PM, isaac tetteh wrote:
> I have a list like this
> [
> ("name",2344,34, "boy"),("another",345,47,"boy", "last")
> ]
> How do u get each value from it like
> Output
> name
> 2344
> 34
> ...
>
> What i did was
> for row in list_tuple:
> for row2 in row:
> re
I have a list like this
[
("name",2344,34, "boy"),("another",345,47,"boy", "last")
]
How do u get each value from it like
Output
name
2344
34
...
What i did was
for row in list_tuple:
for row2 in row:
return row
But i get error too many value to unpack
Please help
Sent from my
?
*From:* Alan Gauld
*To:* Stewart Lawton ; tutor
*Sent:* Friday, 8 May 2015, 10:33
*Subject:* Re: my membership and access to the Tutor list
On 08/05/15 09:09, Stewart Lawton wrote:
> Hi Alan
> Thank you very much for your respo
On 08/05/15 09:09, Stewart Lawton wrote:
Hi Alan
Thank you very much for your response to my Tutor@python.org question.
I thought my membership was complete and that I could log in to answer
your comments.
The tutor list is a mailing list not a web forum. You don't login to answer
com
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 05:09:43AM +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> Almost correct, but not quite. range, like xrange in Python 2, is not a
>> generator, but a custom-made lazy sequence object.
>>
>> py> gen() # This actually is a genera
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 05:09:43AM +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Almost correct, but not quite. range, like xrange in Python 2, is not a
> generator, but a custom-made lazy sequence object.
>
> py> gen() # This actually is a generator.
>
> py> range(1, 10) # This is not.
> range(1, 10)
Oop
On 11/04/2015 20:02, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 10:41:28AM -0700, Jim Mooney wrote:
Why does the first range convert to a list, but not the second?
p = list(range(1,20)), (range(40,59))
p
([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19],
range(40, 59)
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 02:15:49PM -0400, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Jim Mooney wrote:
> > Why does the first range convert to a list, but not the second?
> >
> p = list(range(1,20)), (range(40,59))
> p
> > ([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 10:41:28AM -0700, Jim Mooney wrote:
> Why does the first range convert to a list, but not the second?
>
> >>> p = list(range(1,20)), (range(40,59))
> >>> p
> ([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19],
> range(40, 59))
Why would the second conver
Op 11-04-15 om 19:41 schreef Jim Mooney:
Why does the first range convert to a list, but not the second?
p = list(range(1,20)), (range(40,59))
p
([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19],
range(40, 59))
I'm not sure I understand correctly. This is what the top
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Jim Mooney wrote:
> Why does the first range convert to a list, but not the second?
>
p = list(range(1,20)), (range(40,59))
p
> ([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19],
> range(40, 59))
>
Assuming you are using python 3.x ran
Why does the first range convert to a list, but not the second?
>>> p = list(range(1,20)), (range(40,59))
>>> p
([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19],
range(40, 59))
--
Jim
"Stop, Harold! That bagel has radishes!"
"Thank God, Mary - you've saved me again!"
__
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:17:11PM -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 03/23/2015 09:42 PM, boB Stepp wrote:
> >Can you give me a ballpark number for "large", where this would start
> >making a meaningful difference?
> >
>
> Not really. See Steve's response for some numbers.
o_O
Have you borrowed Gu
On 03/23/2015 10:17 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
On 03/23/2015 09:42 PM, boB Stepp wrote:
Not really. See Steve's
OOPS. Peter's
> response for some numbers. If I had to guess,
I'd say that for lists over 100 items, you should use bisect or
equivalent. But I'd also say you should have one algo
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 08:42:23PM -0500, boB Stepp wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
> > The catch to a list comprehension is it has to visit all the elements, while
> > a binary search would visit log-base-2 of them. So instead of 1
> > elements, you'd be searchin
On 03/23/2015 09:42 PM, boB Stepp wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
The catch to a list comprehension is it has to visit all the elements, while
a binary search would visit log-base-2 of them. So instead of 1
elements, you'd be searching about 14 items.
I suspect
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Dave Angel wrote:
[...]
> By the way, if you were to use a plain old loop the expected speedup over
> the listcomp would be 2. You can break out of the loop when you have found
> the gap, after iterating over one half of the
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
> The catch to a list comprehension is it has to visit all the elements, while
> a binary search would visit log-base-2 of them. So instead of 1
> elements, you'd be searching about 14 items.
I suspected as much, but had not verified this.
Patrick Thunstrom wrote:
The generalized problem:
L = [V0, V1, ..., Vn], where V0 >= V1 >= V2 >= ... >= Vn .
Find index i, such that V[i] >= Vt >= V[i + 1], where Vt is the test
value being searched for. I need to know the indices i and i + 1,
which I need to interpol
>>> The generalized problem:
>>>
>>> L = [V0, V1, ..., Vn], where V0 >= V1 >= V2 >= ... >= Vn .
>>> Find index i, such that V[i] >= Vt >= V[i + 1], where Vt is the test
>>> value being searched for. I need to know the indices i and i + 1,
>>> which I need to interpolate based on where Vt falls.
>>>
Dave Angel wrote:
> On 03/19/2015 12:20 AM, boB Stepp wrote:
>> I hope extolling the beauty and power of Python on this list is
>> allowed, because I have had a large "WOW!!!" moment tonight. I had a
>> problem I was working on at work this afternoon. I have a list of ~
>> 10,000 floating point nu
On 19/03/2015 04:20, boB Stepp wrote:
I hope extolling the beauty and power of Python on this list is
allowed, because I have had a large "WOW!!!" moment tonight. I had a
problem I was working on at work this afternoon. I have a list of ~
10,000 floating point numbers, which run from largest to s
On 03/19/2015 12:20 AM, boB Stepp wrote:
I hope extolling the beauty and power of Python on this list is
allowed, because I have had a large "WOW!!!" moment tonight. I had a
problem I was working on at work this afternoon. I have a list of ~
10,000 floating point numbers, which run from largest t
I hope extolling the beauty and power of Python on this list is
allowed, because I have had a large "WOW!!!" moment tonight. I had a
problem I was working on at work this afternoon. I have a list of ~
10,000 floating point numbers, which run from largest to smallest.
There are duplicates scattered
- Original Message -
> From: Mark Lawrence
> To: tutor@python.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 10:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] List of ints
>
> On 04/03/2015 00:25, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:50:41PM +1000, Phi
On 04/03/2015 00:25, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:50:41PM +1000, Phil wrote:
count [0] += 1
This fails with the following error;
TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable
I know that others have already solved the problem, but here is
something which might help you solve
On 03/03/15 23:44, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Having never heard of QPython I've just looked it up, so for those who
don't know from http://qpython.com/ it's "a script engine which runs
Python programs on android devices". I doubt if there is much
experience on this list with it although you might ge
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:50:41PM +1000, Phil wrote:
> count [0] += 1
>
> This fails with the following error;
>
> TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable
I know that others have already solved the problem, but here is
something which might help you solve similar problems in the future.
The
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 09:09:03AM +1000, Phil wrote:
> I'd been away from home for five weeks and during a quiet period I
> installed QPython on my tablet with the aim of porting a programme that
> I'd written in C++ 15 years ago to Python. Cutting and pasting and even
> moving around the IDE
On 03/03/2015 23:09, Phil wrote:
On 03/03/15 17:46, Mark Lawrence wrote:
You are trying to increment the first element of count which is itself a
list containing one element. You actually need:-
count[0][0] +=1
Thank you Lawrence, Alan, and Danny,
The solution is embarrassingly obvious. I
On 03/03/15 17:46, Mark Lawrence wrote:
You are trying to increment the first element of count which is itself a
list containing one element. You actually need:-
count[0][0] +=1
Thank you Lawrence, Alan, and Danny,
The solution is embarrassingly obvious. It's been a long time since I've
a
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Phil wrote:
> Thank you for reading this.
> Python 3 under Linux.
>
> I'd like to set up a two dimensional list of counters as follows;
>
> count = [
> [0],
> [0],
> [0]
> ]
>
Can you explain why the list is two-dimensi
On 03/03/15 06:50, Phil wrote:
I'd like to set up a two dimensional list of counters as follows;
count = [ [0], [0], [0] ]
And then increment the first counter as follows;
count [0] += 1
Are you trying to increment the zero to make it 1?
Or are you trying to add a new value, 1, to the first
On 03/03/2015 06:50, Phil wrote:
Thank you for reading this.
Python 3 under Linux.
I'd like to set up a two dimensional list of counters as follows;
count = [
[0],
[0],
[0]
]
And then increment the first counter as follows;
count [0] += 1
This
Thank you for reading this.
Python 3 under Linux.
I'd like to set up a two dimensional list of counters as follows;
count = [
[0],
[0],
[0]
]
And then increment the first counter as follows;
count [0] += 1
This fails with the following error;
TypeE
On 19/01/2015 00:55, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 02:20:55PM -0800, Danny Yoo wrote:
Just to add, log(0) is mathematically undefined.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm.
For the record, IEEE-754 specifies that log(0.0) should return -INF.
That's what Decimal does:
py>
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 02:20:55PM -0800, Danny Yoo wrote:
> Just to add, log(0) is mathematically undefined.
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm.
For the record, IEEE-754 specifies that log(0.0) should return -INF.
That's what Decimal does:
py> from decimal import Decimal
py> Decimal(0)
Just to add, log(0) is mathematically undefined.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm.
So depending on the problem's context, it might be worth asking why log is
being applied on this input. Is such input expected? Make sure the code
isn't trying to correct for input that shouldn't be there
On 18/01/2015 13:41, Asokan Pichai wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Sydney Shall mailto:s.sh...@virginmedia.com>> wrote:
I am a beginner and I have a question of syntax.
Welcome!
I am just learning to use list comprehension, which oc course, I
find very helpful indeed.
On 18/01/15 13:20, Sydney Shall wrote:
I am a beginner and I have a question of syntax.
Please don't hijack an existing thread.
Simply changing the subject line is not enough.
Always send a new mail to tutor@python.org to
start a new discussion.
Otherwise the new discussion gets interleaved wi
On 18/01/15 13:20, Sydney Shall wrote:
The problem is I am occasionally getting exactly zeros when I need to
obtain the logarithm of the number.
for i in range(len(cap)):
Its usually better to iterate over the collection rather than use indexing:
for item in cap:
if cap[i] == 0.0:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Sydney Shall
wrote:
> I am a beginner and I have a question of syntax.
>
Welcome!
>
> I am just learning to use list comprehension, which oc course, I find very
> helpful indeed.
>
> However, I am stuck with a specific problem of how to incorporate an else
> in
On 18/01/2015 13:20, Sydney Shall wrote:
I am a beginner and I have a question of syntax.
I am just learning to use list comprehension, which oc course, I find
very helpful indeed.
However, I am stuck with a specific problem of how to incorporate an
else in a list comp-rehension. I cannot do it
I am a beginner and I have a question of syntax.
I am just learning to use list comprehension, which oc course, I find
very helpful indeed.
However, I am stuck with a specific problem of how to incorporate an
else in a list comp-rehension. I cannot do it.
The following snippet of code does
Armindo Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is my first post so I don't know if I am asking the correct way so
> let me know if I messed anything up.
>
> ***Please note. My code contains a list of quotes that has many lines. I
> have noted the beginning and end of the quotes list so you can
On 28/09/14 03:36, Armindo Rodrigues wrote:
have noted the beginning and end of the quotes list so you can easily skip
and go straight to the code section. ***
It would probably have been better to just delete all but a nfew of the
quotes. We don't need all of them to evaluate your code.
i
Hi everyone,
This is my first post so I don't know if I am asking the correct way so let
me know if I messed anything up.
***Please note. My code contains a list of quotes that has many lines. I
have noted the beginning and end of the quotes list so you can easily skip
and go straight to the code
On 17.05.2014 15:26, Alan Gauld wrote:
On 17/05/14 08:01, ani wrote:
So I thought it would be cool to read a sequence at three different
frames,
A sequence of what?
And whats a frame in this context?
...I've come across a conundrum: how to make a list of lists.
outerlist = []
innerlist = [
On 17/05/14 08:01, ani wrote:
So I thought it would be cool to read a sequence at three different frames,
A sequence of what?
And whats a frame in this context?
...I've come across a conundrum: how to make a list of lists.
outerlist = []
innerlist = [1,2,3]
outerlist.append(innerlist)
outer
ani wrote:
> So I thought it would be cool to read a sequence at three different
> frames, which I have pasted below. However, I've come across a conundrum:
> how to make a list of lists. See, I'd like a final output that displays
> data of the type of frame with a + or a - to signify the directio
So I thought it would be cool to read a sequence at three different frames,
which I have pasted below. However, I've come across a conundrum: how to
make a list of lists. See, I'd like a final output that displays data of the
type of frame with a + or a - to signify the direction of the read (+1
Hi Gabriel,
Try lists of non-numbers as your input, and the error should be a
little clearer to see. You should see the conceptual error you're
making if not everything in your program is numeric.
Try:
words = ['hello', 'world', 'hello']
print(words.count(0))
print(words.count('hell
- Original Message -
> From: Dave Angel
> To: tutor@python.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [Tutor] List issues
>
>& quot;Wheeler, Gabriel" Wrote in message:
>>
>
> (not much I could read there. This is
"Wheeler, Gabriel" Wrote in message:
>
(not much I could read there. This is a text mailing list, so
please tell your mail program to send in text mode, not html.
Only parts of your code were visible here, and your question not
at all. Fortunately, Peter quoted all or most of your message.
H
Wheeler, Gabriel wrote:
> Im having trouble completing this function with lists. Im supposed to
> create a function that will let me know if there are repeating elements so
> I wrote this and am not sure where the error lies.
It helps you (and us) a lot if you clearly state the error you are see
Hi
Im having trouble completing this function with lists. Im supposed to create a
function that will let me know if there are repeating elements so I wrote this
and am not sure where the error lies. It is supposed to count the number of
times a number appears and if its greater than 1 then it w
On 12/14/2013 10:12 AM, Bo Morris wrote:
Thank you for your assistance. Based on your direction, I figured it out.
*This... *
def add(number):
print 1 + int(number)
x = ['2', '4', '6', '8', '10', '12']
[add(item) for item in x]
*Is the same as... *
def add(number):
print 1 +
Bo Morris wrote:
> Thank you for your assistance. Based on your direction, I figured it out.
>
> *This... *
>
> def add(number):
> print 1 + int(number)
>
> x = ['2', '4', '6', '8', '10', '12']
>
> [add(item) for item in x]
>
> *Is the same as... *
>
>
> def add(number):
> print
Thank you for your assistance. Based on your direction, I figured it out.
*This... *
def add(number):
print 1 + int(number)
x = ['2', '4', '6', '8', '10', '12']
[add(item) for item in x]
*Is the same as... *
def add(number):
print 1 + int(number)
x = ['2', '4', '6', '8', '10', '1
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:03:57PM -0500, Bo Morris wrote:
> i have the following simple function that iterates over the list.
Actually, no it doesn't. One important skill of being a programmer is
precision of language. The function "add" you show below does not
iterate over the list, it is th
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Bo Morris wrote:
> i have the following simple function that iterates over the list. It passes
> the list item into the function and adds the numbers. What would be the
> equivalent way of writing the "map" portion with list comprehension? My code
> is as follows:
On 14/12/2013 01:03, Bo Morris wrote:
i have the following simple function that iterates over the list. It
passes the list item into the function and adds the numbers. What would
be the equivalent way of writing the "map" portion with list
comprehension? My code is as follows:
def add(number):
i have the following simple function that iterates over the list. It passes
the list item into the function and adds the numbers. What would be the
equivalent way of writing the "map" portion with list comprehension? My
code is as follows:
def add(number):
print 1 + int(number)
x = ['2', '4
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:36:13AM -0500, Jacqueline Canales wrote:
> Thank you guys so much i was able to figure it out. I definitely thought to
> much into the the problem and made it harder on myself. Cant thank you
> enough for assisting me. I have one more problem with the coding tho.
>
> com
THANK YOU!!! All of you were very helpful!! Will definitely use you
guys again for any other issues, glad you challenged me to think rather
than giving me the answer!!!
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Amit Saha wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Jacqueline Canales
> wrote:
> > Tha
Thank you guys so much i was able to figure it out. I definitely thought to
much into the the problem and made it harder on myself. Cant thank you
enough for assisting me. I have one more problem with the coding tho.
composers = ['Antheil', 'Saint-Saens', 'Beethoven', 'Easdale', 'Nielsen']
new_lis
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Jacqueline Canales
wrote:
> Thank you guys so much i was able to figure it out. I definitely thought to
> much into the the problem and made it harder on myself. Cant thank you
> enough for assisting me. I have one more problem with the coding tho.
>
> composers =
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:04:38PM -0500, Jacqueline Canales wrote:
> composers = ['Antheil', 'Saint-Saens', 'Beethoven', 'Easdale', 'Nielsen']
> x = 'Antheil'
> s = 'Saint-Saens'
> h = 'Beethoven'
> y = 'Easdale'
> k = 'Nielsen'
This is a step backwards from what you had in your first post. You h
Hi Jacqueline,
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Jacqueline Canales
wrote:
> composers = ['Antheil', 'Saint-Saens', 'Beethoven', 'Easdale', 'Nielsen']
> x = 'Antheil'
> s = 'Saint-Saens'
> h = 'Beethoven'
> y = 'Easdale'
> k = 'Nielsen'
>
> if s[0] == 'S' or s[0] == 's' == s[-1] == 'S' or s[-1] ==
top posting fixed
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Jacqueline Canales
mailto:jackiexxd...@gmail.com>> wrote:
composers = ['Antheil', 'Saint-Saens', 'Beethoven', 'Easdale',
'Nielsen']
x = 'Antheil'
s = 'Saint-Saens'
h = 'Beethoven'
y = 'Easdale'
k = 'Nielsen'
i
hello,
well, i have to say that you've at least made a good start at a solution.
right now you're thinking about it very much like a human. try to put
yourself into the shoes of a computer: how can we solve this task for just
ONE name?
once you have that solution, then you can apply the same solu
On 27/09/2013 18:04, Jacqueline Canales wrote:
composers = ['Antheil', 'Saint-Saens', 'Beethoven', 'Easdale', 'Nielsen']
x = 'Antheil'
s = 'Saint-Saens'
h = 'Beethoven'
y = 'Easdale'
k = 'Nielsen'
if s[0] == 'S' or s[0] == 's' == s[-1] == 'S' or s[-1] == 's':
if y[0] == 'E' or y[0] == 'e' =
On 27/9/2013 13:04, Jacqueline Canales wrote:
> composers = ['Antheil', 'Saint-Saens', 'Beethoven', 'Easdale', 'Nielsen']
> x = 'Antheil'
> s = 'Saint-Saens'
> h = 'Beethoven'
> y = 'Easdale'
> k = 'Nielsen'
>
> if s[0] == 'S' or s[0] == 's' == s[-1] == 'S' or s[-1] == 's':
> if y[0] == 'E' or
1 - 100 of 705 matches
Mail list logo
