Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Joe Hass wrote: > Thanks for doing this. I've always found sports graphic packages > intriguing, especially as the technology has improved. A couple thoughts: > > * Words cannot express how much my minimalist heart loves the simple use > of

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

Since they upped the number of games a season to three, then even if you remove Jacksonville from the equation, you're looking at two teams per season as potential Superbowl hosts. If they take a multi-year approach as they seem to be, then it must indeed simply be a case of having to hand over a

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015, 14:30 Tom Wolper wrote: On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Bob Jersey wrote: With the Bills down 13-27 at half, that no-blowout idea was being seriously questioned someplace... B Two possessions' difference at halftime is not a

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:36 AM Adam Bowie wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Joe Hass wrote: >> >> To pivot this slightly, what the NFL has yet to do is put a game in >> London that would (in theory) be a moderately compelling match up. In

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

I'm never sure how attachments work on Google Groups, so below are some links to some screengrabs. Note that because they come from iPlayer they have an additional BBC transparent bug in the top left that doesn't appear on live broadcasts.

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Joe Hass wrote: > > To pivot this slightly, what the NFL has yet to do is put a game in London > that would (in theory) be a moderately compelling match up. In the 14 games > played as part of the "International Series", this was the first

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

The reason the Chiefs are playing in London this week and gave up a home game with Detroit is that the NFL said if you want to host the Super Bowl, you have to play a game in London. No other reason.

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

Carrot and stick... On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Ryan wrote: > The reason the Chiefs are playing in London this week and gave up a home > game with Detroit is that the NFL said if you want to host the Super Bowl, > you have to play a game in London. No other reason. >

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

Thanks for doing this. I've always found sports graphic packages intriguing, especially as the technology has improved. A couple thoughts: * Words cannot express how much my minimalist heart loves the simple use of the team abbreviations without the logos. That drives me up a fricking wall. * I'm

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

So here's the weird part of this: as I read back on the articles from last year when this extortion/requirement was announced, everything sounded as though you had to do it within five seasons of the hosting year: you win the hosting rights, you travel. But 50-52 are already assigned, the league

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

I watched the whole game on Yahoo (that was a 6:30 am start time out here) on my iPad (so I could just stay in bed). I was impressed with the quality of the picture and sound. But I still hate London games. And, if I have not mentioned it this season yet, I still detest Thursday games (except for

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

Also, if you at all went to yahoo.com or a few other sites they own, you were shown a live stream whether you asked for it or not. How many of the streams were for that reason only and not because the person actually wanted to see the stream? I'm at least one of those millions for that very

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

Tom Wolper, to moi, in part: > > It takes some effort to get beyond the press release language in the > article, but the first takeaway is that the 'time watched' divided by > 'unique viewers' is 30 minutes in a 3 hour broadcast. That means a few > people watched the whole 3 hour game and the

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Bob Jersey wrote: > > Tom Wolper, to moi, in part: >> >> It takes some effort to get beyond the press release language in the >> article, but the first takeaway is that the 'time watched' divided by >> 'unique viewers' is 30 minutes in a 3

[TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

*Yes, I am aware that CBS stations in the team market carried it... They're still counting it up back at Y!, as there were/are many ways to reach the stream of da Bills "at" da Jags... Technical issues were apparently kept in check; while Marissa Mayer said that ad space was sold out, one

Re: [TV orNotTV] At least 15mil log into NFL's Yahoo-only* game Sunday

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Bob Jersey wrote: > *Yes, I am aware that CBS stations in the team market carried it... > > They're still counting it up back at Y!, as there were/are many ways to > reach the stream of da Bills "at" da Jags... > > Technical issues were