Have to admit it is kinda scary to develop for twitter, but maybe when
more plans are released we'll understand twitter's plan a bit better.
I don't begrudge Tweetie for being acquired, good for them, i'm sure
it was a nice deal for them. It's a very narrow tightrope twitter
walks though with
This is certainly a risk we all face. However in my mind there are
ways Twitter can do a better job in indicating where we should and
should not concentrate effort. For example, there are things that
Twitter has had in its V2 roadmap for years now, and some of us have
decided to try and implement
Ryan,
Great news thanks for the update!
Jesse,
Well said.
On Apr 12, 10:40 am, Ryan Sarver rsar...@twitter.com wrote:
One more from me. People have been asking for specific details around
Tweetie for Mac and I wanted to make sure we clearly message our plans
as we know it. To be clear,
Ryan,
Thanks for clarifying, finally, at least. Rebranded Twitter or not,
Tweetie as owned and developed by Twitter basically reinforces and
confirms everything that we posted on the Nambu blog this morning:
Twitter will take anything significant built around Twitter for
itself, 100%.
Twitter
While this is bad news to handful of iPhone based app developers, it's
a great news for millions of iphone users who will be able to get
Twitter app for free.
On Apr 12, 2:46 pm, Eric Woodward e...@nambu.com wrote:
Ryan,
Thanks for clarifying, finally, at least. Rebranded Twitter or not,
Eric, I disagree. This just means they've put us on notice that if our apps
completely revolve around Twitter we risk going into competition with them.
I don't think there's anything wrong with that, although it is frustrating,
I agree (this is nothing new - they've been doing this for the last
I've spent eight months on a new Twitter client myself, and I had
planned to start showing it at Chirp. Mine is in-browser so I suppose
it's not quite the same situation, but in reality I do think they are
all, for the most part, in competition with each other - no?
On Apr 12, 1:12 pm, Isaiah
On 04/12/2010 01:58 PM, Orian Marx (@orian) wrote:
I've spent eight months on a new Twitter client myself, and I had
planned to start showing it at Chirp. Mine is in-browser so I suppose
it's not quite the same situation, but in reality I do think they are
all, for the most part, in
I seem to remember some debate over how uberTwitter comes out with
such a large share in that analysis, but either way everything I have
seen has pointed to 40% of tweets posted coming from Twitter.com. In
my mind it would be smart for people to think about how to get market
share from that piece
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Orian Marx (@orian)
or...@orianmarx.com wrote:
I seem to remember some debate over how uberTwitter comes out with
such a large share in that analysis, ...
I've always been amazed by this, actually... check out:
On 04/12/2010 04:44 PM, Orian Marx (@orian) wrote:
I seem to remember some debate over how uberTwitter comes out with
such a large share in that analysis, but either way everything I have
seen has pointed to 40% of tweets posted coming from Twitter.com. In
my mind it would be smart for people
- Chad Etzel jazzyc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Orian Marx (@orian)
or...@orianmarx.com wrote:
I seem to remember some debate over how uberTwitter comes out with
such a large share in that analysis, ...
I've always been amazed by this, actually... check out:
12 matches
Mail list logo
