On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 03:36:06PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 08:18:03AM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:50:08AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > Ilias,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 09:37:50AM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 08:18:03AM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:50:08AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Ilias,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 09:37:50AM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > > The previous patch is changing U-Boot's behavior wrt certificate based
> >
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:50:08AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Ilias,
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 09:37:50AM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > The previous patch is changing U-Boot's behavior wrt certificate based
> > binary authentication. Specifically an image who's digest of a
> > certifi
hi Takahiro,
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 08:54, AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
>
> Sughosh,
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:40:00PM +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 13:28, AKASHI Takahiro
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:48:13PM +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > > > hi Takah
Sughosh,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:40:00PM +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 13:28, AKASHI Takahiro
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:48:13PM +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > > hi Takahiro,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 08:18, AKASHI Takahiro
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On 2/14/22 01:05, Adam Ford wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 8:26 AM Adam Ford wrote:
omap_ehci_hcd_stop appears to be dead code, and omap_ehci_hcd_init
is only called by the probe function, so it can be static to that
function. Remove both from the header along with some additional
checking fo
,
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 18:58, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 2/10/22 08:05, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> > This commit adds the menu-driven UEFI Boot Variable maintenance.
> > User can add and delete the Boot variable, and update the
> > BootOrder variable through menu operation.
> >
> > S
Hi Fabio,
Can you help test these 3 patches on imx6qdl-pico board or imx7s board on your
side to double check whether these patches enlarge the total boot time?
Best Regards
Bough Chen
> -Original Message-
> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:ma...@denx.de]
> Sent: 2022年2月14日 5:53
> To: Bough Ch
Hi Takahiro,
2022年2月14日(月) 10:06 AKASHI Takahiro :
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 11:17:37AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 2/13/22 10:01, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 2/3/22 10:23, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > > Add a cold reset soon after processing capsule update on disk.
> > > >
Heinrich,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 04:20:11PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 2/10/22 09:11, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Background:
> > ===
> > The purpose of this patch is to reignite the discussion about how UEFI
> > subystem would best be integrated into U-Boot driver model.
> > I
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 19:11, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 2/10/22 08:05, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> > This patch enables the menu-driven boot device selection.
> > User can select the Boot included in BootOrder variable.
> >
> > If user quits thie menu, or the selected Boot fails to bo
Hi Heinrich,
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 19:12, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 2/10/22 08:05, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> > Provide u16 string version of strcat().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahisa Kojima
>
> Please, provide a test in test/unicode_ut.c.
Yes, I will add.
> > ---
> > include/charset.
Ilias,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 09:37:50AM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> The previous patch is changing U-Boot's behavior wrt certificate based
> binary authentication. Specifically an image who's digest of a
> certificate is found in dbx is now rejected. Fix the test accordingly
> and add ano
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:32 PM Peter Geis wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 1:58 PM Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 08:04, Peter Geis wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:54 PM Simon Glass wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > Good Morning,
> > >
> > > > Add th
Hi Alex, thanks for taking a look at the patch.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, at 05:25, Alex G. wrote:
> On 1/30/22 21:41, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
>> Some platform designs include support for disabling secure-boot via a
>> jumper on the board. Sometimes this control can be separate from the
>> mechanism enab
Hi Pali,
Please see below.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 4:21 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Sunday 13 February 2022 16:08:51 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > Hi Pali,
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 3:42 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sunday 13 February 2022 15:24:46 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > > > Hi Pali,
> > > >
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 11:17:37AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 2/13/22 10:01, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 2/3/22 10:23, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > Add a cold reset soon after processing capsule update on disk.
> > > This is required in UEFI specification 2.9 Section 8.5.5
> > >
Heinrich,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:16:34PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 2/9/22 11:10, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > With this enhancement, mkeficapsule will be able to sign a capsule
> > file when it is created. A signature added will be used later
> > in the verification at FMP's SetImag
Heinrich,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:25:15PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 2/9/22 11:10, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Add a couple of test cases against capsule image authentication
> > for capsule-on-disk, where only a signed capsule file with the verified
> > signature will be applied to
On Sunday 13 February 2022 16:08:51 Tony Dinh wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 3:42 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday 13 February 2022 15:24:46 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > > Hi Pali,
> > >
> > > Looks different, but the BootROM did not start the image. Please see
> > > the log below.
>
Hi Pali,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 3:42 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Sunday 13 February 2022 15:24:46 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > Hi Pali,
> >
> > Looks different, but the BootROM did not start the image. Please see
> > the log below.
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 2:48 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
> > > O
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 8:26 AM Adam Ford wrote:
>
> omap_ehci_hcd_stop appears to be dead code, and omap_ehci_hcd_init
> is only called by the probe function, so it can be static to that
> function. Remove both from the header along with some additional
> checking for DM_USB.
>
If it's not too
On Sunday 13 February 2022 15:24:46 Tony Dinh wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> Looks different, but the BootROM did not start the image. Please see
> the log below.
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 2:48 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday 13 February 2022 14:45:07 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > > Hi Pali,
> > >
> > >
Add support for ethernet on the imx8mn-ddr4-evk.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
Cc: Fabio Estevam
Cc: Peng Fan
Cc: Stefano Babic
---
arch/arm/dts/imx8mn-evk.dtsi| 1 +
board/freescale/imx8mn_evk/imx8mn_evk.c | 41 +++--
configs/imx8mn_ddr4_evk_defconfig | 8
Enable missing config options to make the board boot from SD card.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
Cc: Fabio Estevam
Cc: Peng Fan
Cc: Stefano Babic
---
configs/imx8mn_evk_defconfig | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configs/imx8mn_evk_defconfig b/configs/imx8mn_evk_defconf
Hi Pali,
Looks different, but the BootROM did not start the image. Please see
the log below.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 2:48 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Sunday 13 February 2022 14:45:07 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > Hi Pali,
> >
> > Some compile errors, please see below.
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 8:16
On Sunday 13 February 2022 14:45:07 Tony Dinh wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> Some compile errors, please see below.
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 8:16 AM Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday 22 December 2021 20:08:56 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > > *** Run kwboot
> > >
> > > # kwboot -t -p -B 115200 /dev/ttyUSB0
Hi Pali,
Some compile errors, please see below.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 8:16 AM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 22 December 2021 20:08:56 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > *** Run kwboot
> >
> > # kwboot -t -p -B 115200 /dev/ttyUSB0 -D /localdisk/mtd0.t5335z
> > Patching image boot signature to UART
> > A
Hi Pali,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 1:33 PM Marek Behún wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 22:23:10 +0100
> Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > > In that case the whole ternary operator can be dropped, i.e. instead of
> > > ((hdr->ext > 1) ? (hdr->ext * 0x20) : 0)
> > > you can have
> > > ((hdr->ext - 1) * 0x2
On 2/11/22 12:16, haibo.c...@nxp.com wrote:
From: Haibo Chen
The original code logic can not show the correct card clock, and also
has one risk when the div is 0. Because there is div -=1 before.
So move the operation before div -=1, and also involve ddr_pre_div
to get the correct value.
Rev
On 2/11/22 12:16, haibo.c...@nxp.com wrote:
From: Haibo Chen
Now original fsl_esdhc.c are split as fsl_esdhc.c and fsl_esdhc_imx.c.
fsl_esdhc_imx.c only cover i.MX SoC. So ARCH_MXC is redundant.
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut
On 2/11/22 12:16, haibo.c...@nxp.com wrote:
Hi,
[...]
@@ -897,6 +900,11 @@ static int fsl_esdhc_execute_tuning(struct udevice *dev,
uint32_t opcode)
esdhc_stop_tuning(mmc);
+ /* change to default setting, let host control the card clock */
+ esdhc_clrbits32(®s->vendorspec, VEN
On 2/7/22 08:59, Bough Chen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marek Vasut [mailto:ma...@denx.de]
Sent: 2022年1月29日 1:37
To: Jaehoon Chung ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: sba...@denx.de; Bough Chen ; Igor Opaniuk
; Peng Fan
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mmc: fsl_esdhc_imx: add wait_dat0() suppor
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 22:23:10 +0100
Pali Rohár wrote:
> > In that case the whole ternary operator can be dropped, i.e. instead of
> > ((hdr->ext > 1) ? (hdr->ext * 0x20) : 0)
> > you can have
> > ((hdr->ext - 1) * 0x20)
> > if I interpret this correctly.
>
> No, it cannot be dropped, with c
On Sunday 13 February 2022 22:15:09 Marek Behún wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 20:41:08 +0100
> Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 13 February 2022 17:16:42 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 22 December 2021 20:08:56 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > > > *** Run kwboot
> > > >
> > > > # kwboot -t -p -B 115
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 20:41:08 +0100
Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 13 February 2022 17:16:42 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 December 2021 20:08:56 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > > *** Run kwboot
> > >
> > > # kwboot -t -p -B 115200 /dev/ttyUSB0 -D /localdisk/mtd0.t5335z
> > > Patching image boot si
On Sunday 13 February 2022 17:16:42 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 December 2021 20:08:56 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > *** Run kwboot
> >
> > # kwboot -t -p -B 115200 /dev/ttyUSB0 -D /localdisk/mtd0.t5335z
> > Patching image boot signature to UART
> > Aligning image header to Xmodem block size
> > Wa
U-boot is intended to replace linux kernel in android boot image(ABL), and
it's FIT payload to replace initramfs file. The boot process is similar to
boot image with linux:
- android bootloader (ABL) unpacks android boot image
- ABL sets `linux,initrd-start property` in chosen node in unpacked FDT
U-boot is intended to replace linux kernel in android boot image(ABL), and
it's FIT payload to replace initramfs file. The boot process is similar to
boot image with linux:
- android bootloader (ABL) unpacks android boot image
- ABL sets `linux,initrd-start property` in chosen node in unpacked FDT
When u-boot is used as a chain-loaded bootloader (replacing OS kernel),
previous bootloader leaves data in RAM, that can be reused.
For example, on recent arm linux system, when chainloading u-boot,
there are initramfs and fdt in RAM prepared for OS booting. Initramfs
may be modified to store u-bo
When u-boot is used as a chain-loaded bootloader (replacing OS kernel),
previous bootloader leaves data in RAM, that can be reused.
For example, on recent arm linux system, when chainloading u-boot,
there are initramfs and fdt in RAM prepared for OS booting. Initramfs
may be modified to store u-bo
The default U-Boot environment variables and design are all set up for
the MAIN R5FSS cluster to be in Split-mode. This is the setting used
when the dts nodes were originally added in v2021.01 U-Boot and the
dt nodes are synched with the kernel binding property names in
commit 468ec2f3ef8f ("remote
It's better to restore previous value at offset because otherwise the
function can corrupt memory reserved by Linux (e.g. ramoops).
Signed-off-by: Andrei Lalaev
---
arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_helpers.c | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mac
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 10:27 AM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
wrote:
>
> Hi Adam
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 5:03 PM Adam Ford wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 1:27 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Tim
> > >
> > > You are using the imx8mm. I have problems on imx8mn.
Hi Adam
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 5:03 PM Adam Ford wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 1:27 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tim
> >
> > You are using the imx8mm. I have problems on imx8mn. It's like some
> > part is not implemented. Time to time power domain timeout if I
> > ena
On Wednesday 22 December 2021 20:08:56 Tony Dinh wrote:
> *** Run kwboot
>
> # kwboot -t -p -B 115200 /dev/ttyUSB0 -D /localdisk/mtd0.t5335z
> Patching image boot signature to UART
> Aligning image header to Xmodem block size
> Waiting 2s and flushing tty
> Sending boot image header (512 bytes)...
On Wednesday 22 December 2021 20:08:56 Tony Dinh wrote:
> *** Run kwboot
>
> # kwboot -t -p -B 115200 /dev/ttyUSB0 -D /localdisk/mtd0.t5335z
> Patching image boot signature to UART
> Aligning image header to Xmodem block size
> Waiting 2s and flushing tty
> Sending boot image header (512 bytes)...
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 1:27 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
wrote:
>
> Hi Tim
>
> You are using the imx8mm. I have problems on imx8mn. It's like some
> part is not implemented. Time to time power domain timeout if I
> enabled
> mipi pipeline
If you're using ATF from its mainline branch, it likely
On 2/13/22 10:01, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 2/3/22 10:23, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Add a cold reset soon after processing capsule update on disk.
This is required in UEFI specification 2.9 Section 8.5.5
"Delivery of Capsules via file on Mass Storage device" as;
In all cases that a capsu
On 2/10/22 08:05, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
Provide u16 string version of strcat().
Signed-off-by: Masahisa Kojima
Please, provide a test in test/unicode_ut.c.
---
include/charset.h | 13 +
lib/charset.c | 12
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/incl
On 2/10/22 08:05, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
This patch enables the menu-driven boot device selection.
User can select the Boot included in BootOrder variable.
If user quits thie menu, or the selected Boot fails to boot,
efi bootmgr continues to boot in accordance with BootOrder variable.
S
On 2/10/22 08:05, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
This commit adds the menu-driven UEFI Boot Variable maintenance.
User can add and delete the Boot variable, and update the
BootOrder variable through menu operation.
Signed-off-by: Masahisa Kojima
---
lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c | 720
On 2/3/22 10:23, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Add a cold reset soon after processing capsule update on disk.
This is required in UEFI specification 2.9 Section 8.5.5
"Delivery of Capsules via file on Mass Storage device" as;
In all cases that a capsule is identified for processing the system is
On 2/3/22 10:23, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Since the efi_update_capsule() represents the UpdateCapsule() runtime
service, it has to handle the capsule flags and update ESRT. However
the capsule-on-disk doesn't need to care about such things.
Thus, the capsule-on-disk should use the efi_capsule_upd
According to the MicroBlaze reference manual (xilinx2021.2/ug984/page-37):
"""
If an exception is caused by an instruction in a delay slot (that is,
ESR[DS]=1), the exception handler should return execution to
the address stored in BTR instead of the normal exception return
address stored in R17.
"
Also, rename it to XILINX_MICROBLAZE0_DELAY_SLOT_EXCEP, since it only
covers delay slot exception support.
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait
---
arch/microblaze/cpu/exception.c | 2 +-
board/xilinx/microblaze-generic/Kconfig | 9 +
include/configs/microblaze-generic.h| 3 ---
3 f
The correct mask for getting the source/destination register from ESR in
the case of an unaligned access exception is 0x3E0. With this change, a
dummy unaligned store produces the expected info:
"""
>> swi r5, r0, 0x111
...
Hardware exception at 0x111 address
Unaligned data access exception
Un
A user exception is triggered by inserting a bralid/brki jump to
"C_BASE_VECTORS+0x8" in the software flow. Because u-boot microblaze code
does not deal with MMU-related features such as user-mode/privileged-mode
separation, there are no code sequences that call into the user exception
handler.
It
The switch statement in _hw_exception_handler() only covers the
rightmost 5 bits that encode the exception cause:
switch (state & 0x1f)
{
...
}
For this reason, the "0x1000" case will never be reached, because the 13th
bit was zeroed out. To fix this, move delay slot exception handling before
the
The unaligned access messages are only valid in the case of an unaligned
data access exception. Do not print them for other types of hw exceptions.
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait
---
arch/microblaze/cpu/exception.c | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mi
The privileged instruction exception seems to have been introduced in
microblaze v7.00 along with MMU support, so having it wrapped in
MICROBLAZE_v5 ifdefs seems incorrect. Move it out of the ifdef, since all
recent microblaze versions support it.
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait
---
arch/microblaz
61 matches
Mail list logo
