Vlad Lungu wrote:
> Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
>>> +int board_eth_init(bd_t *bis) __attribute((weak,
>>> alias("__board_eth_init")));
>>> +
>>> #ifdef CFG_GT_6426x
>>> extern int gt6426x_eth_initialize(bd_t *bis);
>>> #endif
>>>
>>
>> [This comment is not for Ben, but for everyone.]
>>
>> Do w
Change your love life and sex life today with this secret.
http://www.raianzr.com/
FDA Approved Male Enhancement Product Available
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio
Hi,
Sorry, for the slightly off-topic post, but I figured
someone else might have faced a similar issue.
I'm in the process of bringing up an MPC8349E PowerPC
based board. The board is configured as a compact PCI
peripheral board. The board will boot U-Boot off
on-board Spansion S29GL-N Flash, an
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 07:10:44PM -0500, Ben Warren wrote:
> > > Here's the patch that will be going in:
> > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/36039
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> In current source code, when the device number of PCI is 0, process PCI
> bridge without fail. However, when the device number is 0, it is not PCI
> always bridge. There are times when device of PCI allocates.
>
> When CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE is enab
Dear Peter,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Your patch is available for test from
>
> git://linux-arm.org/u-boot-armdev.git#070524_netstar
>
> Please confirm that the code runs on netstar
>
> Sorry for the delay, I hope to get this patch into the next merge window.
How ab
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 07:10:44PM -0500, Ben Warren wrote:
> > Here's the patch that will be going in:
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/36039
> >
> > I guess Wolfgang just hasn't had a chance to pull the 83xx tree.
> >
> > CO
Dear Jean-Christophe,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> This fixes a naming bug for at91rm9200 lowlevel init code:
> NOR boot flash is on chipselect 0, not chipselect 2. This
> makes code use the register name from chip datasheets.
It seems to me that this patch as well as the other
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit
> 23e20aa6488e6c0622496549861bfdc74108debe:
> Yuri Tikhonov (1):
> lwmon5: Fix register test logic to match the specific GDC h/w.
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit 23e20aa6488e6c0622496549861bfdc74108debe:
> Yuri Tikhonov (1):
> lwmon5: Fix register test logic to match the specific GDC h/w.
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-c
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> The patches by David I've picked up from dtc and applied to track libfdt.
>
> The patches by Kumar improve the "fdt" command.
>
> All patches were posted previously (prior to the merge window opening).
>
> Thanks,
> gvb
>
> The fol
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I'm trying to download u-boot 1.3.2 from ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/u-boot/ =
> but the FTP site is not responding.
It's working fine here.
> What am I doing wrong ?
Using windoze? Probably some crappy piece of software they call a web
browser instead of
Dear Daniel,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Please pull sparc. u-boot-sparc.git master.
I cannot do that, as the commits in your repo don't correspond to the
patches that have been posted on the mailing list. THis makes it
impossible for me to understand what has been acked o
Add test for DPIC_SYS_ERROR_REG to be zero in the LWMON5 dsPIC POST.
Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---
---
diff --git a/post/board/lwmon5/dspic.c b/post/board/lwmon5/dspic.c
index 65b96bc..dbaa074 100644
--- a/post/board/lwmon5/dspic.c
+++ b/post/board/lwmon5/dspic.c
@@ -97,8 +
Zvika Vered wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to download u-boot 1.3.2 from
> ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/u-boot/ but the FTP site is not responding.
>
> What am I doing wrong ?
>
> Thanks,
> Zvika Vered
Hi Zvika,
If you can use git to clone the repository, that is highly recommended.
Note that
Hello,
I'm trying to download u-boot 1.3.2 from ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/u-boot/ but the
FTP site is not responding.
What am I doing wrong ?
Thanks,
Zvika Vered
IAI \ ELTA
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy al
Hello,
I ran u-boot on Xilinx ML405 board. It runs from flash and relocates to RAM.
I want to use u-boot to launch a vxworks ELF image.
The vxworks image is Ok. If I download it using JTAG and run it vxworks runs.
But when I try to run it using U-boot I have problems.
I tried the following sequne
Hello,
The attached patch removes a warning when compiling drivers/serial/serial_sh.c.
Regards,
Mark Jonas
CHANGELOG:
--
sh: Removed warning when compiling drivers/serial/serial_sh.c.
Signed-off-by: Mark Jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -purN u-boot_old/drivers/serial/serial_sh.c u-boot/d
These defines embedded the u-boot env variables and/or the bd_t structure
in the fdt blob. The conclusion of discussion on the u-boot email list
was that embedding these in the fdt blob is not useful: there are better
ways of passing the data (in fact, the fdt blob itself replaces the
bd_t struct)
The worlds leading Mens Enlargement Supplement available at massive discounts.
http://www.Filadelphio.com/
Go where no man has ventured
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual
Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
>> +int board_eth_init(bd_t *bis) __attribute((weak,
>> alias("__board_eth_init")));
>> +
>> #ifdef CFG_GT_6426x
>> extern int gt6426x_eth_initialize(bd_t *bis);
>> #endif
>>
>
> [This comment is not for Ben, but for everyone.]
>
> Do we need such alias to empty func
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > > I would prefer to move this init code not into the board code but into
> > > > the platform/cpu code. Speaking for P
Hi Dan,
There are two configuration switches which are used only by the stxxtc
board, of which you are listed as the maintainer.
CONFIG_OF_HAS_UBOOT_ENV
CONFIG_OF_HAS_BD_T
These add the u-boot env variables and the bd_t struct into the fdt blob
before booting linux.
The value of doing thi
On 12:28 Fri 21 Mar , Pieter Voorthuijsen wrote:
>
> 2nd try, previous one was wrapped:
> Double checked spaces and coding style...
>
> Original message:
>
> Hello,
>
>+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>+ * along with this program; if not, write to the F
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > I would prefer to move this init code not into the board code but into
> > > the platform/cpu code. Speaking for PPC4xx, here all configuration I know
> > > of have the same init code. And copying this i
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I did not get into much depth with this issue, but your fix will make the
> logbuffer ram and pram unaligned to a page boundary. I am not sure if this
> is a good idea. Let's say you want to ioremap the pram under Linux you cannot
> let the mapped regi
On 12:24 Fri 21 Mar , Pieter Voorthuijsen wrote:
> Hello Jean-Christophe,
>
> Thanks for looking into the code, unfortunatly I cannot use the
> git-send-email :( Outlook seems to only be able to wrap so I'll attach
> the pacthes as a file... I double checked for spaces and coding style..
>
>
Gaaah! Sorry, forgot to CC the list.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Shinya Kuribayashi
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > with a quick glance, find the comments below.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ben Warren w
Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 22 March 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> > I would prefer to move this init code not into the board code but into
>> > the platform/cpu code. Speaking for PPC4xx, here all configuration I know
>> > of
Hi Matthias,
On Saturday 22 March 2008, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> I followed this discussion. The DU440 board will also need this fix.
> On the PMC440 board we reserved the top memory region for
> some PCI accessable shared memory. I will check how we can
> handle skipping the top 256 bytes and prov
On Saturday 22 March 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I would prefer to move this init code not into the board code but into
> > the platform/cpu code. Speaking for PPC4xx, here all configuration I know
> > of have the same init code. And copying this into
Hi Stefan,
I followed this discussion. The DU440 board will also need this fix.
On the PMC440 board we reserved the top memory region for
some PCI accessable shared memory. I will check how we can
handle skipping the top 256 bytes and provide a patch for both of our 440EPx
boards soon.
I did no
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I would prefer to move this init code not into the board code but into the
> platform/cpu code. Speaking for PPC4xx, here all configuration I know of have
> the same init code. And copying this into all board ports instead on one
> place in the cpu
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> If feedback is positive, I'll port all other in-tree controllers and
> boards and will put in a branch of the net tree. Hopefully volunteers
> will line up to sanity test.
>
> Please have a look and let me know your thoughts.
I appreciate the approa
Dear Wolfgang,
Support for the new uImage format is available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-testing.git new-image
The branch contains all patches related to the new uImage development
that have been posted to the list.
Regards,
Bartlomiej
-
35 matches
Mail list logo
