Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-05 Thread Susan Joslyn
This would be easy for me to implement - thinking out loud, though, I don't think I have any customers who promote to live that frequently. But I suppose it could poll live each morning and make the suggestion. Any of my (PRC) customers who see this and are intrigued by this, pipe in or email me

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-05 Thread Susan Joslyn
that I have been able to discover, yet! I'm fascinated to hear anyone else's ideas and experiences. Susan -Original Message- From: Steve Romanow [mailto:slestak...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 8:30 PM To: sjos...@sjplus.com; U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Vers

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-05 Thread Steve Romanow
On 03/05/2011 03:29 PM, Wols Lists wrote: On 05/03/11 09:30, Steve Romanow wrote: Git- I personally think git is best for very large workgroups working on a single large codebase (i.e. an os kernel). It is primarily geared to people comfortable in the shell. It does _not_ have good win32 sup

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-05 Thread Wols Lists
On 05/03/11 09:30, Steve Romanow wrote: > Git- I personally think git is best for very large workgroups working > on a single large codebase (i.e. an os kernel). It is primarily geared > to people comfortable in the shell. It does _not_ have good win32 > support so it is a non-starter for me.

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-05 Thread Steve Romanow
On 03/05/2011 06:53 AM, Susan Joslyn wrote: Regarding your snippets below: Would this really be something you want? Your ongoing work merged into everyone else's ongoing work every day - before your work is finished and tested? I think the idea is you move discrete, completed patches to the

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-05 Thread Wols Lists
On 05/03/11 11:53, Susan Joslyn wrote: > Regarding your snippets below: > > > > Would this really be something you want? Your ongoing work merged into > everyone else's ongoing work every day - before your work is finished and > tested? Sorry, but I have to respond here ... NO NO NO. Not m

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-05 Thread Susan Joslyn
Regarding your snippets below: Would this really be something you want? Your ongoing work merged into everyone else's ongoing work every day - before your work is finished and tested? I approached the whole concept of items being checked out to others differently - you can take a branch copy

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Susan Joslyn
the change control for the rest of the things inside U2 besides basic programs in directories. Plus a separate solution for data integrity is still required. Susan Message: 13 Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:59:11 +1100 From: "Hona, David" To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Steve Romanow
On 3/4/2011 11:59 AM, Doug wrote: Hi Bill: I find this very messy. After a program has been changed 50 times, do I really care what the other 49 versions look like in my U2 account. I think not. I sometimes change a program every 1 to 5 minutes as I'm going through testing process. Then some

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Doug
: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 8:32 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Version Control When fixing THIS.APP, copy all the source code from THIS.APP.R3 to THIS.APP.R4,

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Doug
49.00" -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 9:04 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Version Control One year ago, I was editing all of my code with EditPl

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Bill Brutzman
h the XLr8 editor? --Bill -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Doug Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 9:48 PM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] Version Control Hi Bill: The U2 world works insi

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Bill Brutzman
--- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Hona, David Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 1:59 AM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] Version Control If you are using U2 environment a lot of stuff won't work without utilising

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Wols Lists
On 04/03/11 00:55, Bill Brutzman wrote: > It is not clear to me how SubVersion and GIT developers refer to the latest > rev of their subs. Also the reverse...what programs use the subs. This is > where OSGI fits in. I have heard rumblings that people are working on an > Eclipse-compatible OSG

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-03 Thread Hona, David
1:48 PM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] Version Control Hi Bill: The U2 world works inside the database. The rest of the world thinks source code control should be outside the database. Your use of VOC is very unique and probably applicable to a small set of the U2 community.

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-03 Thread Doug
Hi Bill: The U2 world works inside the database. The rest of the world thinks source code control should be outside the database. Your use of VOC is very unique and probably applicable to a small set of the U2 community. Source code control, except for U2, is done from the local workstation and

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-03 Thread Bill Brutzman
Doug: I have been considering this matter for some time... It seems that software development in the non-U2 world revolves around huge Maven scripts to re-compile builds of vast dynasties of code. The U2 VOC concept makes all of this hassle go away. With VOC, we just update the single progra

RE: [U2] version control

2008-04-28 Thread Stevenson, Charles
From: Brian Leach > ...The key was to appoint someone who was responsible for it. > If it is anything more than trivial, it needs someone charged > to administer it, Conan the Librarian > not just left to the whims of developers!... Which brings us to the 2nd key: Build in perks for the develop

RE: [U2] version control

2008-04-21 Thread David Beahm
Thanks to everyone for their feedback on this. Brian Leach's article was useful, and Edward's advice really gave me a shove in the right direction. It's good to know that others have found Subversion to be an appropriate choice -- maybe I am not that crazy after all. ;^) I have some more to

Re: [U2] version control

2008-04-18 Thread doug chanco
nt for U2! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Beahm Sent: 16 April 2008 21:22 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] version control We are looking to add our UniData/SBClient environment to Subversion, and wanted to get a

RE: [U2] version control

2008-04-18 Thread Edward Brown
eing edited. I can make the source available if anyone's interested? Edward -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Joslyn Sent: 18 April 2008 13:26 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] version control [AD] Hello Group. O

RE: [U2] version control [AD]

2008-04-18 Thread Susan Joslyn
lf Of David Beahm > Sent: 16 April 2008 21:22 > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: [U2] version control > > We are looking to add our UniData/SBClient environment to > Subversion, and wanted to get advice from anyone who has done s > something similar (CVS, etc.)

[U2] Re: [u2] version control

2008-04-18 Thread Lee Bacall /Moley 888
/www.sjplus.com - Original Message - From: "Brian Leach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:29 AM Subject: RE: [U2] version control > Jerry et al > > I would say good version control - like all code management - is a skill. > > And m

Re: [U2] version control

2008-04-17 Thread Rex Gozar
David, One other item: in managing development, testing, and production accounts, I've found it easier to use "relative Q-pointers" in the software. So instead setting the Q-pointer: CUSTOMERS 0001: Q 0002: AR 0003: CUSTOMERS set it up to use a relative pathname: CUSTOMERS 0001

RE: [U2] version control

2008-04-17 Thread Brian Leach
G > Sent: 17 April 2008 13:54 > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: RE: [U2] version control > > It seems that everyone needs to be a specialist these days, > even in our business. > > > Jerry Banker > Senior Programmer Analyst > IBM Certified Solutions Exper

Re: [U2] version control

2008-04-17 Thread Rex Gozar
David, We use CVS here. We store all of our source code in a flat file/directory structure. We use an OS level "build" script to generate the accounts, create the files and dictionaries, and load them with data. The primary goal in our situation was to create a one-step build for our produ

RE: [U2] version control

2008-04-17 Thread JPB-U2UG
rsday, April 17, 2008 4:14 AM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: RE: [U2] version control > > David > > You might want to check out an article I wrote for Spectrum about this. > Back-issues are on www.intl-spectrum.com. > > One other tip: > > We u

RE: [U2] version control

2008-04-17 Thread Brian Leach
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Beahm > Sent: 16 April 2008 21:22 > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: [U2] version control > > We are looking to add our UniData/SBClient environment to > Subversion, and wanted to get advice from anyone who has done s > something similar

Re: [U2] version control

2008-04-16 Thread David Beaty
Beahm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:22 PM Subject: [U2] version control We are looking to add our UniData/SBClient environment to Subversion, and wanted to get advice from anyone who has done something similar (CVS, etc.) Searching through past post

[U2] version control

2008-04-16 Thread David Beahm
We are looking to add our UniData/SBClient environment to Subversion, and wanted to get advice from anyone who has done something similar (CVS, etc.) Searching through past posts, I found Brian Leach's note about generating DICT items from scripts, which I quite like; I suspect there are more