Glen,
Good thoughts here as always, thanks. Right now, the UV db is not fully
replicated to the MSSQL tables, rather the other way around (for the
most part). The ISAM WCS tables also update UV. Therefore, at present,
the UV db comes closest to being the reference, and it still runs the
business.
users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and
non-MV dbms (AD)
Hello Baker,
We have a customer who is processing tens of thousands of transactions a
day. These transactions are centralized on SQL Server so that the Oracle
ESB, UniVerse and Web System
25, 2007 12:54 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non-MV dbms
Baker,
Given the scenario you have just outlined, and my imaginings of the way
that each of the 3 systems SHOULD work, you have no likelihood of
deadlock collisions (this cou
s,
-Baker
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janet Bond
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:35 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
MV dbms [AD}
As promised here is Robert Houb
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ross Ferris
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:42 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and
> non-MV dbms
>
> Well, I was actually only tasked with making the ATS more real time for
> our Asia sales office. Since they're entering orders during our night,
> they always get the short end of the stick, ATS may or may not be right;
> the batch updates are all timed/tuned for US timezone (and work pretty
> ac
are
Visage > Better by Design!
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes
>Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2007 3:11 AM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer b
That would be an [ad] ... but there are some people that may convince us
to port Visage.DRS to UV as well --> slight "tweak" would go a long way
to a proving parts of a "solution" for this scenario (but how did you
know we were looking at replication to "foreign" databases?)
Ross Ferris
Stamina So
[/ad]
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes
>Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2007 12:20 AM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non-
>MV
8 PM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: Re: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
>MV dbms
>
>Sockets are just the pipe you push/pull things through. One of the
>features they bring to the table is that you get to (yes, I actually
>said that) design your own p
nesday, October 24, 2007 1:35 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
MV dbms [AD}
As promised here is Robert Houben's input to your question Baker!!! :)
For anyone who doesn't know me, I was the lead designer and developer of
t
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 12:15 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV dbms
Janet,
I can setup a conference call with one of Developers.
We have been in the transferring Multi
Glen,
You always get the good ones, doncha? What does the warehouse control
system use as a database? How many different O/S are we looking at here?
The first idea that comes to mind is transactional queuing and
inspection. A FIFO updating situation will not work, since you have
logic that is u
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:20 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non-M
ns to this science.
-Baker
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:58 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
MV dbms
Baker,
How
007 2:36 AM
>> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> Subject: Re: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
>> MV dbms
>>
>> Is it just me or does it smell like troll in here all of a
>> sudden
>>
>> Since the question as defined in
Well, you'll setting you requirements "high". But that's the thing to
do...
What business requirements do you have?
What what constraints do you have?
Budget? Deadlines?
Can you afford to be bleeding-egde with no experienced in-house
expertise to diagnose or support this "ideal" soltuon you'r
d
(or emerge)
Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage > Better by Design!
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes
>Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2007 5:05 AM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: RE: [U2]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2007 2:36 AM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: Re: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
>MV dbms
>
>Is it just me or does it smell like troll in here all of a
>sudden
>
>Since the question as defined in the sentence be
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George R Smith
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 3:13 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV dbms
[AD]
Gee Janet all you had to do was put "This is not an ad, it's a fact
y, October 23, 2007 1:37 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV
> dbms [AD]
>
> I added it in the Subject should it be somewhere else?
>
> Please accept my apologies if I have offended anyone.
>
> J
> What is the fastest and lowest cpu overhead method of
> transferring data between U2/MV databases, and other data sources?
Our esteemed colleague and moderator Chuck Barouch has/had a product called
Zeus which does/did transfers like this. If he can avoid self-censorship
for a moment I would i
Janet,
I can setup a conference call with one of Developers.
We have been in the transferring MultiValue data to other data sources
since the early 80's (PK Harmony to start with, anyone remember). We may
have some good input for you.
I'm not in a position to buy anything, really just trying
12:10 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non
MV dbms
Not likely, Baker Hughes has been in the PICK arena for many moons and
is one of the founders of the Texas users group.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schasny [mailto:[
Subject: Re: [U2] Fastest Bi-Directional data transfer btwn MV and non MV dbms
[AD]
Janet,
When posting as a vendor or service provider, please use [AD]
brackets [/AD] in your response as a courtesy to others.
- Charles Barouch, Moderator
Janet Bond wrote:
> I can setup a conference c
Janet,
When posting as a vendor or service provider, please use [AD]
brackets [/AD] in your response as a courtesy to others.
- Charles Barouch, Moderator
Janet Bond wrote:
I can setup a conference call with one of Developers.
We have been in the transferring MultiValue data to other
Hello Baker,
Please email me.
I can setup a conference call with one of Developers.
We have been in the transferring MultiValue data to other data sources since
the early 80's (PK Harmony to start with, anyone remember). We may have some
good input for you.
Thanks,
Janet Bond
FusionWare Corp
Not likely, Baker Hughes has been in the PICK arena for many moons and
is one of the founders of the Texas users group.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schasny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it just me or does it smell like troll in here all of a
sudden
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-user
Sockets. If you have a consumer that can accept a socket connection, I
believe that'll provide the most efficient throughput.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Baker,
There is a happy medium between CPU overhead and bandwidth usage. If you
use compression of some kind, then CPU overhead is going to be higher than
an uncompressed stream. Cached disk writes are normally going to be faster
than network writes, unless you have a fiber backbone or dedicated
Is it just me or does it smell like troll in here all of a
sudden
Since the question as defined in the sentence below is pretty generic
I'll respond in kind. Sockets. Inter process communication across
disparate platforms and applications is just what they were made for.
Low overhead, high thr
31 matches
Mail list logo
