It wasn’t rejected but I think it took a week to hear back. In fact, several
more came through today.
Look, this is kind of like Trump’s Executive Order. It just seems like it got
dropped on us with no notice and we weren’t prepared. And it’s taking a long
time to get a response so it seems
- On Feb 24, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Eduardo eme...@webjogger.com wrote:
> That’s good news and interesting PTMP approach.
> We may install a second link close bay and I’m not sure if using PTMP could
> make
> some issue in that case.
Ubnt has spent most of their recent effort on the PTMP functi
Was this one rejected?
James - can you check on this one and see what issue is?
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Rory Conaway
wrote:
> Here is one we submitted last week for example.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* UBNT RMA [mailto:r...@ubnt.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 23, 2017 5:33 PM
> *To
Taking a look in this one.
On Feb 24, 2017 10:51 AM, "Ben Moore" wrote:
> Was this one rejected?
>
> James - can you check on this one and see what issue is?
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Rory Conaway
> wrote:
>
>> Here is one we submitted last week for example.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
ISPSupplies is showing 20 in stock.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> Where are they all??? Everyone I've checked with is out.
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://list
That’s good news and interesting PTMP approach.
We may install a second link close bay and I’m not sure if using PTMP could
make some issue in that case.
From: Mark Steckel
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 6:46 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Cc: Ubnt users
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] PTP with Po
Eduardo you have already provided your path length - 2200ft, and it uses
100mhz of bandwidth on a completely different band(24 ghz).
I personally have a 1.4km shot, and it achieves max modulation by quite a
bit.
Go research 24ghz products and make your own decision though, don't just
trust us. Hig
Where are they all??? Everyone I've checked with is out.
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Daniel,
Which channel width are you using to get 740M and what’s the distance of the
link?
From: Daniel Peoples
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 7:21 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] PTP with PoweBeam AC ISO
AF24 and be done, 740mbps full duplex.
Daniel Peoples
Resona
I read in the list that they are not easy to align and also the brackets are
not good. Did they fix those brackets, yet?
How reliable is the performance?
From: Roy
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 8:57 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] PTP with PoweBeam AC ISO
Litebeam
Since when do you need this? Just submitted some recently and did not
get asked for any of this no way I'd probably be able to find it
anyways.
On 2/23/2017 10:55 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:
We will do something different moving forward. Just caught us off
guard and it’s much slower.
Ror
11 matches
Mail list logo