I need suggestions on where to look. Firefox on my system stopped working
with orca after the last update (no setting changed) and my wife tells me
that it is working properly as far as sighted people are concerned. All
other applications that I run from the desktop appear to be working
+1
This is awesome, thank you.
On 19/08/2015 19:52, Luke Yelavich wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:14:10AM AEST, Lucas Radaelli wrote:
Folks,
Just wanted to say that I gave orca and firefox another try and the
experience seems to be much better than i was used to! this is awesome.
I am
ack I posted a message in the linux-accessivel list with
instructions on how to build orca from git.
On 08/19/2015 02:14 PM, Lucas Radaelli wrote:
Folks,
Just wanted to say that I gave orca and firefox another try and the
experience seems to be much better than i was used to! this is
awesome.
Yeah, thanks for this important resource Luke.
--
B.H.
Registerd Linux User 521886
Luke Yelavich wrote:
Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:54:35AM +1000
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 07:58:19AM AEST, kk wrote:
> > Wow,
> > Who maintains this ppa for accessibility devel?
>
> I do.
>
> Luke
>
> --
hi
Any orca version after ... I believe 3.12 is the version that got the
gigantic firefox improvements, should work fine. I'd of course recommend
you run 3.16.3 which I believe is the latest, but I'm not sure how easy
this is to do in ubuntu. There's an accessibility PPA luke,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm using orca 3.16 in Trisquel, a derivative of Ubuntu 14.04, though
I did not build it; rather, I added the Accessibility Devel ppa to my
system, and the latest access stack (including orca) got installed on
system upgrade. Having done this, I may b
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 07:58:19AM AEST, kk wrote:
> Wow,
> Who maintains this ppa for accessibility devel?
I do.
Luke
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:14:10AM AEST, Lucas Radaelli wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Just wanted to say that I gave orca and firefox another try and the
> experience seems to be much better than i was used to! this is awesome.
>
> I am running 14.04.
>
> Just to make sure tha
tions on how to build orca from git.
>>>
>>> On 08/19/2015 02:14 PM, Lucas Radaelli wrote:
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> Just wanted to say that I gave orca and firefox another try and the
>>>> experience seems to be much better than i wa
Wow,
Who maintains this ppa for accessibility devel?
happy hacking.
Krishnakant.
On Thursday 20 August 2015 12:56 AM, Dave Hunt wrote:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:accessibility-devel
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/l
Mine is 3.17.3 pre
Meaning I have a much later version, built from git source.
Happy hacking.
Krishnakant.
On Thursday 20 August 2015 12:39 AM, B. Henry wrote:
yes, it will certainly build
You might need to get some at-spi packages from an extra repo, let me check on
something and I'll post
wrote:
Folks,
Just wanted to say that I gave orca and firefox another try and the
experience seems to be much better than i was used to! this is awesome.
I am running 14.04.
Just to make sure that I got the best that is available, could you
confirm to me which is the orca version that I shou
ns on how to build orca from git.
On 08/19/2015 02:14 PM, Lucas Radaelli wrote:
Folks,
Just wanted to say that I gave orca and firefox another try and the
experience seems to be much better than i was used to! this is awesome.
I am running 14.04.
Just to make sure that I got the best th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Trusty and Orca Users!
I'm using orca 3.16 in Trisquel, a derivative of Ubuntu 14.04, though
I did not build it; rather, I added the Accessibility Devel ppa to my
system, and the latest access stack (including orca) got installed on
system upgra
t;
> >Just wanted to say that I gave orca and firefox another try and the
> >experience seems to be much better than i was used to! this is awesome.
> >
> >I am running 14.04.
> >
> >Just to make sure that I got the best that is available, could you confirm
gave orca and firefox another try and the
experience seems to be much better than i was used to! this is awesome.
I am running 14.04.
Just to make sure that I got the best that is available, could you
confirm to me which is the orca version that I should be running and
which firefox version
That being said, as far as your firefox experience at the moment if you have
orca 16 you should be doing fine, and I certainly agree that there is a
huge difference in orca with firefox comparing current versions with those from
a year and a half ago.
Enjoy
--
B.H.
Registerd Linux
Folks,
Just wanted to say that I gave orca and firefox another try and the
experience seems to be much better than i was used to! this is awesome.
I am running 14.04.
Just to make sure that I got the best that is available, could you
confirm to me which is the orca version that I should be
Hi
I am using Ubuntu 14.04 and just updted firefox a couple late last week.
When I try to run it now I get some form of crash report that I can't read
and if I look at a console it is thrwing multiple disk read errors. I
have run fsck and it tells me my disk is fine. Any ideas on how
Hi,
In Ubuntu 14.04, and FireFox, a strange thing is happening.
I copied my favorites folder from my XP computer and pasted it into the
desktop.
When I open one of the links, for my web eMail page, FireFox keeps opening
tabs, like over 30 tabs, and all I hear repeating from Orca is
Firefox about
Is the latest version of firefox usable under 12.04 with the standard orca
that comes with 12.04? I know firefox 25 a.d 26 had issues and thought I
would ask about 27 before I install it and have to go through the work of
reverting.
Thanks
Tom
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu
Hello list,
Yes I did the update and firefox is now working! so far 14.04 is looking
pretty good.
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility
tty sure was to do with gtk support
>>> with Orca.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>> On 05/03/14 00:43, Jonathan Nadeau wrote:
>>>> Hello list,
>>>>
>>>> I know 14.04 is still in beta but I installed it and found this problem.
>
rote:
>> H,
>> the problem has been resolved and pretty sure was to do with gtk support
>> with Orca.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On 05/03/14 00:43, Jonathan Nadeau wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> I know 14.04 is still in beta but I installed i
list,
>>
>> I know 14.04 is still in beta but I installed it and found this problem.
>> Everything seems to work fine but the only problem is that firefox isn't
>> accessible with Orca. once I open firefox Orca stops speaking. Orca
>> works on the desktop and
H,
the problem has been resolved and pretty sure was to do with gtk support
with Orca.
Rob
On 05/03/14 00:43, Jonathan Nadeau wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I know 14.04 is still in beta but I installed it and found this problem.
> Everything seems to work fine but the only problem is
Hello list,
I know 14.04 is still in beta but I installed it and found this problem.
Everything seems to work fine but the only problem is that firefox isn't
accessible with Orca. once I open firefox Orca stops speaking. Orca
works on the desktop and with other applications but not Firefox.
Hi,
I reported with Firefox 25.0 experienced problem with Ubuntu 12.04
related in Bugzilla, link is following:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=940862
If anybody would like writing other testcases with experienced a11y
related issues with not exists Firefox 24.0, feel free write a
Yes, this is all of course very true, and sometimes it's actually easier for a
person with a stable life/employment to set asside a few hours a week to
contribute to something important.
In Spanish a word for will/willingness is voluntad. It takes a certain level of
will, and a willingness to
I agree with this, but I do have a few caveats. First, looking for a
job, whether you're between jobs or between projects, can be a pretty
time consuming effort requiring a lot of hard work and a lot of mental
toughness. Someone in this position may not have a lot of time to do
some programming
one more clue, we are looking for a competent IOS developer. who is blind
looking for work. email me directly at
gabe.v...@commtechusa.net
Thanks
Gabe Vega
CEO
Commtech LLC
Web: http://commtechusa.net
FaceBook: http://facebook.com/commtechllc
Twitter: http://twitter.com/commtechllc
Email: i...@co
Of course. The other part of this includes more willingness to back such
projects financially, but the other angle to consider is that so many blind
people are unemployed now. Even if they become pretty good programmers there's
not likely going to be work for them all, and even less traditional
I agree with this sentiment, but one challenge I see is that it's hard
to make a living doing accessibility programming. If a blind person has
the aptitude and becomes a programmer then they may have a hard time
getting paid to do any accessibility related coding. Of course they
could do this i
these days, even though Adobe still controls the
format as far as I knoe. I am able to read the files for the most part,
but some still have some layout issues that are making them difficult to
read. Everything related to the website appears to be fullly accessible
to Orca using Firefox, although I h
p by the second or third page during conversion. I was
able to read the HTML version of the same document, but the PDF version
says it's modified from the original, but I'm not sure how it's
modified. Both Evince and Firefox are jumbling it a bit, as are
pdftotext and pdftohtml. I rea
ion of the same document, but the PDF version
says it's modified from the original, but I'm not sure how it's
modified. Both Evince and Firefox are jumbling it a bit, as are
pdftotext and pdftohtml. I really do like the concept though, and hope
either their text or our reading tools
om the original, but I'm not sure how it's
modified. Both Evince and Firefox are jumbling it a bit, as are
pdftotext and pdftohtml. I really do like the concept though, and hope
either their text or our reading tools will improve soon.
~Kyle
http://kyle.tk/
--
"Kyle? ... She calls
Nuke degrees. I am not the best at math, but I have real savant skills when it
comes to anything with a digital component. I am working with
tutorials to try and catch up on the stuff that I didn't have access to in
school. I like coding, in fact, it's what I actually got this machine for,
a
Ah_men!
Sadly, neither drugs nor prayer seem to be able to give many blind folk that;
and I think we all know of more than a couple bind folks who have both 1 or
more degrees and above average inteligence who are unemployed.
One alternative is for more of those who have some potential as far
No, the thing we need is to become those rich visionaries. How in infinity can
we do it? What is the over night, have nothing to have it all quick
fix approach to getting blind people into areas of work where they will have
real incomes and earn that kind of money so that each of us might be
You hear! That's important!
You'll also hear that droid accessibility sucks form others, and I
discount both of these as I don't have access to a modern droid device
running a recent version to t4est.
Besides this, the other points that CJ makes are also important.
There may or may not not be more
So, Does anyone really think that if Ubuntu accessibility was say as
good as anything out there now in all areas where it's now behind that
there’s be enough blind people willing to spend any money to help defray
the cost of accessibility work?
Hell no! Blind people are probably a tighter lot than
It is just that it is an ICT and as far as android is concerned, for
what ever it is ment, they take accessibility seriously.
Ubuntu is also an ICT (software/ OS of any kind is an important ICT
component ).
So it is natural to think of accessibility and compare.
yet I agree that Google may have
I don't understand the analogy with Android. Android runs on smart
phones and tablets and a few other devices. It doesn't run on laptops,
desktops or servers. It isn't clear what the future relationship will be
between Android and ChromeOS.
Canonical has 500 employees, the last I knew, and not
Well, I see that Ubuntu wishes to be on tabs or phones or all other such
machines, but I don't clearly see that the vission has accessibility
that seriously.
These days I hear that android is quite improved on accessibility and
has done so pritty quickly.
This is what it means by being serious
+1 on issues vs priority.
I am thinking myself that if gnome shell gets a bit more accessible in
next few months and if there is a good talking installer for some other
distro, I will go away from Ubuntu and shift to that distro full time.
Just tryed Sonar and would wait for manjaro to become s
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Nolan Darilek wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 11:19 AM, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> > If there were more resources, more effort could be put into supporting
> > interim releases. Luke
>
> I agree. It's a shame that Canonical is so focused on replacing GNOME
> with Unity, replaci
On 10/30/2013 02:19 PM, Nolan Darilek wrote:
On 10/30/2013 11:19 AM, Luke Yelavich wrote:
If there were more resources, more effort could be put into supporting
interim releases. Luke
I agree. It's a shame that Canonical is so focused on replacing GNOME
with Unity, replacing Wayland with Mir,
On 10/30/2013 11:19 AM, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> If there were more resources, more effort could be put into supporting
> interim releases. Luke
I agree. It's a shame that Canonical is so focused on replacing GNOME
with Unity, replacing Wayland with Mir, building its own cloud
deployment solution,
terim
releases.
Do we know if this is fixed with a newer at-spi? I too wish we had more
resources to make the interim release, as well as the LTS releases more
accessible, but I've seen accessibility regressions with Firefox and
thunderbird even with newer versions of the accessibility stac
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:14:48AM PDT, Nolan Darilek wrote:
> FWIW, the upgrade went fine under 13.04, no problems whatsoever. That's
> my biggest criticism with only making LTS releases accessible. The
> accessibility infrastructure moves on and improves, and browsers rapidly
> acquire new and ga
. Yet, unless I misunderstand, 12.04 is still stuck on an
older AT-SPI that may break when a browser upgrades.
On 10/30/2013 10:56 AM, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:04:59PM PDT, Hammer Attila wrote:
>> Hi Luke,
>>
>> Usual I get this crash after I launched
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:04:59PM PDT, Hammer Attila wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> Usual I get this crash after I launched Firefox 25.0 and doed some
> heading level navigations and scrolling, for example following webpages:
> http://vakbarat.index.hu
Ok, mind filing a bug in launchpad
Hi Luke,
Usual I get this crash after I launched Firefox 25.0 and doed some
heading level navigations and scrolling, for example following webpages:
http://vakbarat.index.hu
Official way how can possible reverting this upgrade? After upgrade I
doed unfortunately sudo apt-get clean command.
Now I
der
> temporary rename is not helped.
> I looked the /var/crash folder after I try navigating some webpages, and
> I found the at-spi2-core service is crashed.
> I attaching the crash file.
Are you able to regularly reproduce the crash? If so, does the crash occur at
login or when
Hi,
This day morning Firefox upgraded with latest 25.0 release my Ubuntu
12.04 machine.
After the upgrade, the browser me machine is unusable with Orca.
An example webpage with I experienced this issue:
http://www.origo.hu/hirmondo/techbazis/internet/20131029-4g-re-gyur-a-telekom.html
This
Hy,
Luke, sorry the lot of questions, but I not see clear following problem
related:
In Firefox 4 have following bug, with I think not fixed yet (status not
showed this):
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619002
In Orca list I see following letter, the thread is Firefox 4.0 Rc2
Hy,
Luke, now Natty containing Firefox 4.0 b10 I think.
In Firefox 4.0 now have an important accessibility related bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619002
This bug producing if an user write an Edit box with Firefox and press
Backspace key, he not hear the deleted character if
Hello,
As a suggestiom, have you tried to talk to folks who coded the
vbuffers to firefox for NVDA?
I know that there are two diferent operating systems here and such and
such, but if the firefox is coded the same way (I do think it is so
cinse it wouldm be hard to maintain two diferent flavours
If there are C++ coders on this list who hate the problems when using
Orca with Firefox, please consider joining my Firefox debugging team.
We have many bugs to track down, and by myself, it will take many
months. Together, I bet we could fix Firefox in weeks.
Feel free to reply to this post, or
Firefox 3.6 is not very accessible. I may have to down-grade to
Firefox 3.5 for the Vinux 3.0 release based on Lucid, but I'd rather
have all our users testing the newer firefox code. I've compiled and
installed code directly from Mozilla's mercurial repository for 3.7
(Minefield
code in more depth.
Bill
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 07:11:35AM EST, Bill Cox wrote:
>> I've tracked down the structural navigation issue with Firefox and
>> Orca, and submitted a patch to the Mozilla guys. I would like
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 07:11:35AM EST, Bill Cox wrote:
> I've tracked down the structural navigation issue with Firefox and
> Orca, and submitted a patch to the Mozilla guys. I would like to go
> ahead and patch firefox and make it available through the Vinux PPA,
> so Vinu
Thanks.
As I said in my message, a dumb question HEHEHE.
It is installed.
As a first observation, if I press h key and the tab key, the link
focused is a link before the header.
I am not sure if it happens in all pages but can be reproduced at
http://schuchert.wikispaces.com/JPA+Tutorial+1+-+
Hy Jose,
Of course Yes, this is easy.
You do following command if the vinux/vinux-lucid repository is not
containing with your Lucid system:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:vinux/vinux-lucid
After this, run apt-get update and apt-get upgrade command.
With PPA repositoryes the build farm always maked
Hi,
Perhaps a dumb question, but is it possible to test in my 64-bit ubuntu
lucid installation?
Thanks.
On 04/04/2010 07:38 AM, Bill Cox wrote:
> I've uploaded a version of Firefox to the Vinux/Ubuntu Lucid PPA.
> Anyone testing Vinux 3.0 Beta should run 'sudo apt-get update
I've uploaded a version of Firefox to the Vinux/Ubuntu Lucid PPA.
Anyone testing Vinux 3.0 Beta should run 'sudo apt-get update; sudo
apt-get upgrade'. This should install the patched version of firefox
for testing with Orca.
Unfortunately, there are still some navigation issue
Hi,
When I click in the link to access the bug, the bug is not shown and I
receive the following:
You apparently didn't choose any bugs to modify.
On 04/02/2010 05:11 PM, Bill Cox wrote:
> I've tracked down the structural navigation issue with Firefox and
> Orca, and submitte
I've tracked down the structural navigation issue with Firefox and
Orca, and submitted a patch to the Mozilla guys. I would like to go
ahead and patch firefox and make it available through the Vinux PPA,
so Vinux users can start testing it. Hopefully there aren't any more
bugs in Orca
u wouldn't have to listen to "The last Firefox release broke
accessibility". The Ubuntu team have a lot of things to focus on, the
Firefox team at Mozilla have only Firefox to worry about.
Just my $0.02
Keep up the good work.
Regards,
Phill.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Luke Y
tu team supposedly has to it? They're not even willing to take steps
> to fix Firefox for accessibility. The web browser, a core program we *need*.
May I suggest that if anyone wants to push Canonical to focus on more
accessibility, then you need to tell them. I can only do so much, and as par
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Look, I don't mean to offend, but you do realize what things like this
do to the impression of Ubuntu's accessibility and the commitment the
Ubuntu team supposedly has to it? They're not even willing to take steps
to fix Firefox for acc
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 03:13:03AM EST, Jacob Schmude wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi
> Does Lucid not have the absolute latest Firefox 3.6.2? I've been using
> it on Karmic for a week or so now and actually prefer it to 3.5 due to
> some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, that explains it. That's not the latest gecko revision, the latest
is 1.9.2.2. My Firefox 3.6.2 revision reads as follows (note I'm using
the Mozilla binary):
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.2) Gecko/20100316
Firefox/3.
Hi,
I am running the following version:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100308
Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6
On 03/31/2010 01:13 PM, Jacob Schmude wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi
> Does Lucid not have the absolute
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Does Lucid not have the absolute latest Firefox 3.6.2? I've been using
it on Karmic for a week or so now and actually prefer it to 3.5 due to
some serious speed improvements. I remember seeing that bookmarks
weren't accessible in 3.6 eith
Jose, I absolute agree your letter.
For example, try ubuntuzilla package (not part with Ubuntu repository).
The possible download links is following:
http://ubuntuzilla.com/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ubuntuzilla/files/ubuntuzilla/4.4.3/
I think Ubuntuzilla supports switch you another firefox
Hi all,
I'd like to use the 3.5 version of firefox at ubuntu 10.04 instead of
version 3.6.
In my opinion the accessibility with version 3.6 is not very good.
What can I do?
Thanks.
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/ma
Dear List,
This letter I already sent with Vinux mailing list, but I would like ask
your hints:
Unfortunately, Firefox 3.6 version containing some possible important
accessibility related bugs, with now yet not full fixed:
For example:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608149
https
Dear List,
If anybody see this prewious described problem after early morning
installed updates, please try install actual updates again.
My machine Firefox 3.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 package version is solved this
problem, awailable with normal official update.
Attila
--
Ubuntu-accessibility
Dear List,
This day morning I installed actual Lucid updates. The upgrade process
running without any error.
Firefox 3.6 is updated yesterday afternoon and this morning.
After the this morning upgrade process is finished, I see following
interesting problem, I am very surprised:
When I launched
Hi Mike,
Take a look at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608149
On 02/12/2010 04:07 PM, Mike Coulombe wrote:
> Hi, I haven't used firefox in linux for some time. When I tried to use it in
> the latest live cd of lucid today I found it didn't work as well as it has in
Hi, I haven't used firefox in linux for some time. When I tried to use it in
the latest live cd of lucid today I found it didn't work as well as it has in
the past. For example, the arrow keys didn't read as much information. Does
anyone know if a fix is in the works?
Thanks Mi
Hi, I want to transfer bookmarks from my computer to a version of firefox I
have on a jumpdrive. Does anyone know how to do this?
Firefox has a import, but it only offers to do this from Internet explorer.
I want to get the bookmarks from another computer that has firefox.
Mike.
X-Antivirus
2009/1/28 mike :
> Hi, is there a easy way to delete bookmarks in firefox? In windows for
> internet sites you save this can be done by
In FFx 2.0
bookmarks -> organise bookmarks
and you can then select all in the various lists and delete them.
Steve Lee
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mai
Hi, is there a easy way to delete bookmarks in firefox? In windows for internet
sites you save this can be done by simply removing them in the favorites
directory. But I don't see anything like this in firefox.
Thanks Mike.
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessib
Hi, I noticed today that not only can't I use the arrow keys in firefox. It now
says html content like it used to do when it wasn't accessible. Is anyone else
having this problem?
Mike.
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.c
Hi, I haven't needed firefox for a few days. But when I tried to use it in
intrepid this morning I was no longer able to brows using the arrow keys.
Has anyone else had this problem?
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 081003-0, 10/03/2008), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Mike.
--
U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:30:44AM EST, mike wrote:
> Hi, maybe I have been using the wrong key in firefox for this. When on a page
> I can usually use backspace or alt left arrow to go back to the previous page.
> But today I have bee
Hi, maybe I have been using the wrong key in firefox for this. When on a page I
can usually use backspace or alt left arrow to go back to the previous page.
But today I have been on some sights where this didn't work. Is there another
key you are suppose to use to get to the previous web
>>>>> "JM" == Jan Mura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> Hello,
JM> it's strange I know but I am not able to work with Orca and
JM> Firefox. As I read somewhere in Help it shuld work similarly to
JM> any other Screen reader. So after
Hello,
it's strange I know but I am not able to work with Orca and Firefox. As I
read somewhere in Help it shuld work similarly to any other Screen reader.
So after pressing h you should jump to header and so.
But nothing works for me. Do you know where a mistake could be? Maybe I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:27:01AM EST, mike coulombe wrote:
> Hi, In windows I see the update option in the help menu of firefox.
> I recently looked for this in the linux version, and didn't find it. Is the
> update option in a diffe
Hi, In windows I see the update option in the help menu of firefox.
I recently looked for this in the linux version, and didn't find it. Is the
update option in a different place, or is it missing. I thought I did find it
there a few weeks ago, but it definitely isn't there
nline converter such as
http://cgi.w3.org/cgi-bin/html2txt, then save the result.
--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
mike coulombe wrote:
> Hi, I went to save a web page in firefox and didn't see the option to save it
> as a txt file.
> Is this possible or does firefox only save as html.
>
Hi, I went to save a web page in firefox and didn't see the option to save it
as a txt file.
Is this possible or does firefox only save as html.
It did say save as, so I would assume different formats are possible. The name
was the only thing I saw using the tab that could be changed.
Hi, has anyone else noticed todays version of firefox doesn't seem to work very
well.
I went to www.doom9.org, and using the arrow keys had a very hard time getting
orca to read.
I did the insert f12 and it didn't help much.
Mike.
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000739-1, 05/10/2007), Outbou
mike coulombe writes ("firefox"):
> Hi, does anyone have the link to the nightly builds of firefox.
> I seem to have lost the one I had.
Hi Mike,
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/
Best regards, Lukas
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubun
Hi, does anyone have the link to the nightly builds of firefox.
I seem to have lost the one I had.
Mike.
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility
> My other question is in terminal at times when running what I thought was a
> program
> for example userlist I get a message the program isn't installed,
> and that it can be installed using apt-get followed by a name.
> At times this name is different than the program. Is there a way to save th
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
