have just
typed in, or you have used the wrong credentials!
Ian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Henrik Nilsen Omma
Sent: 16 November 2006 10:50
To: ubuntu-accessibility
Subject: Re: User Log In Screen
Ian Pascoe wrote:
However
Hey art list,
Please have a look at the new skinnable on-screen keyboard:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Accessibility/Projects/SOK
The keyboard layouts can be created and modified in Inkscape. The
current one shows the possibility of the flexible use of colour, but is
admittedly rather garish.
Hi,
I'm just giving the website a bit of a face lift before the release. I'm
going to simplify the front page a bit, adding some images and direct
links. I've also updated the side menu a bit.
On secondary pages like http://www.ubuntu.com/community I've added some
grey text to the top of
Thanks to all those who participated in the voting and helped bring this
to a conclusion. I asked you to vote for one usplash option and three
wallpapers and theme options. To rank the latter two I have used a
simple weighting system of 5:3:1, where the top choice gets a weight of
5x, the
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
Thanks to all those who participated in the voting and helped bring
this to a conclusion. I asked you to vote for one usplash option and
three wallpapers and theme options. To rank the latter two I have used
a simple weighting system of 5:3:1, where the top choice
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
Spreadsheet attached ...
- Henrik
Ah, crap, that spreadsheet wasn't complete (I blame OOo constantly
crashing when the accessibility features are turned on ...) Anyway,
this one is correct, really.
- Henrik
art-vote-complete.ods
Description: application
Who wrote:
All thorugh this process it was discussed that we were choosing 5
themes, and there was no discussion of weighting of votes - why was
there such a sudden change?
OK, So looking back at this post:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/2006-April/001216.html
we see that there
Who wrote:
Give me 6 Hours, who do I email the completed .tar.gz to? I can make a
metatheme, but packaging is beyond me.
Please send it directly to dholbach, who is doing the packaging.
Who (question, not my name) is going to make sure the other themes
make it, assembled, to the right people
Who wrote:
Henrik, would Daniel's workload be able to accomodate 2 extra themes,
or even 3 if LegacyHuman is taken as not being an extra theme, but
necessary for continuuity, provided they were ready to package
tonight?
I did actually send him the list of top five and asked him to see what
he
Viper550 wrote:
Let's just make this easy! I'm on IRC right now, we'll vote there!
Freenode
#ubuntu-artwork
You are, but not everyone on the art team has a chance to be on IRC at
this very moment. People have different time zones, work, school, etc.
But, when should we vote? Should we do
Michiel Sikma wrote:
How about the Edubuntu and Xubuntu splash screens (Kubuntu has already
been packaged, one by kwwii)? I've made an Edubuntu one and a Xubuntu
one (the latter which I can fix up to have a correct palette without
any trouble before that deadline). Are we to send propositions
Who wrote:
But, when should we vote? Should we do it ASAP? Now? Or later today?
You can vote on the addresses listed any time before 0700UTC tomorrow.
I really do understand how urgent this is, but I don't think that is
enough time for everyone to vote - It isn't fair to stop someone from
Petr Tomeš wrote:
Hello,
I think this is absolutely great:
http://klepas.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/03/gimp-ubuntu-splash.png
I agree. I think we should use that one.
- Henrik
--
http://www.ubuntu.com
http://www.theopencd.org
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Richard Stellingwerff wrote:
I've made a few new mockups:
http://stellingwerff.com/ubuntu-art/sb.png (svg:
I like the last ones, though I can see that even rounded scroll bar tips
against a rounded edge can look odd.
Here is a version with square stepper edges and rounded scroll bar tips:
Andy Somerville wrote:
I think theres hardly anyone (who doesnt know beforehand) who thinks
the hibernate/sleep functionality is clear. Maybe its been suggested
before, but should we consider renaming these? (regardless of what
other changes are made)
IMO it would be best to only show one of
Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
IMO it would be best to only show one of these options to the average
user. (It would be useful to have some real-world data on which of
these people use most often -- sleep I guess -- and how many people
regularly use both options.
Except
Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
I like the glass effect on our current widgets. There's a strange
greyness to the top half progressbar currently that I don't like, but I
do like the glass effect nonetheless. These new mockups are smoother,
rounder, but don't have the same glass effect that we have
Daniel Borgmann wrote:
The problem is, that two rounded widgets glued together look very
ugly. We avoid this everywhere else in the theme, like the comboboxes
or treeview headers. So if we do rounded scrollbar sliders, I think we
should do something different with the steppers. OS X and Vista
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
You said you wanted the scrollbar-tips slightly rounded, but I would
actually like to see the tips of the progress bars slightly rounded too.
That would make it look like a slightly viscous liquid filling a glass
tube.
Here is a mock-up to illustrate:
http
j Mak wrote:
Hi Henrik,
I've created this splash for the cd browser
http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/4932/ubuntulive4qx.png
What do you think?
Thanks that looks good. A few things:
I notice that you have a black region at the bottom where I presume
progress icons would
Corey Burger wrote:
A quick sanity check: Does the browser take so long to start up that
it needs a splash?
Yes, because it loads the whole thing from the CD. So if you have
slowish drive it can take a while. It's good to let the user know that
something is actually happening.
- Henrik
Julian Turner wrote:
Hi!
You're absolutely right about the exclamation mark - it's just visual
noise. But I found the gloss effect on your version doesn't make it
easier to recognise the arrows: it lessens contrast.
I did a quick gimp-up based on your work (I'm not a great vector artist,
so I
j Mak wrote:
I disagree with Henrik. I think the icon needs a gloss because all the
other icons on the panel have some kind of gloss to them; so
this feature would make it stylistically blend better with the rest.
I also think they should have gloss, but that the arrows should be
painted
Étienne Bersac wrote:
Hello,
I'm wondering if it's such a good idea to use
exactly the same symbol for the update icon as for the restart icon.
Especially when both appear besides each other it looks a bit like we
couldn't think of anything else. :-)
You're right. Maybe a up-arrow should fit
We are working on the high viz icon theme, trying to make it more
complete: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkTeam/AccessibilityIcons
The original author Jakub Steiner notes in his icon development guide:
http://jimmac.musichall.cz/doc/high-contrast/html/index.xhtml
that the icons have been made
Pascal Klein wrote:
Is there a page where I can find a list of what still needs to be done
for the example package?
I've updated this page to reflect the current status:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkTeam/ExampleContent
Also if you look at the latest installed example pack you'll see
Jakub Steiner wrote:
Hi Mark,
the archive above contains both the adobe illustrator source files and
svgs exported with Adobe Illustrator 9. It uses viewbox parameter for
the canvas which causes trouble for some renderers and has weird
scaling. For the new proper theme I suggest using a 48x48px
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
It's seems the bz2 file has them. I'll fire up my secret win32 box and
see if they can be exported to something more open.
Update: so it seems more recent versions of Adobe Illustrator can export
to SVG. I couldn't find any batch conversion utils, but there are only
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
I created the page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkTeam/DapperTasks
Looks great! This is the time for focus :)
Henrik: Should we add the example content package on the page?
Yes, that would be good. I've added a page with an overview of those
items that
Hi,
I've done some rather heavy handed restructuring of the wiki art pages,
but IMO it's a bit more sane now. There are two basic categories:
'Artwork' and 'ArtworkTeam', each with several sub-pages. The first is
for the art itself -- icons and wallpaper, etc, and the second is for
content
Hi,
I've done some rather heavy handed restructuring of the wiki art pages,
but IMO it's a bit more sane now. There are two basic categories:
'Artwork' and 'ArtworkTeam', each with several sub-pages. The first is
for the art itself -- icons and wallpaper, etc, and the second is for
content
volvoguy wrote:
If this is for general artwork that people are doing for themselves
and not for release, I don't really see the point. It's easy to set up
a free website somewhere and we can have a page on the wiki that
points to the various artists work.
If this is for artwork destined to
really respect the work of all you guys so far whom have been involved with
the art.ubuntu.com process, especially by that of Henrik Nilsen Omma, however
I think we, as the Ubuntu art community should decide what CMS we should use,
no? I just began helping out at art.ubuntu.com with the art-web CMS
Hi list,
Currently only volvoguy and I have admin access rights to the art.u.c
site, which means we have to log in often and check for new submissions
and approve and upload them. As we spread the word about the new site,
submissions might pile up.
Are there any other established members of
Benjamin Berg wrote:
The art.gnome.org source supports BBcode, so linking, etc. is possible.
The possible tags are described in the following e-mail:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/artweb-list/2005-July/msg00028.html
The BBcode works for the news items, descriptions and comments.
Oh, cool
35 matches
Mail list logo
