** Changed in: baltix
Status: New => Invalid
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
u
This bug is irrelevant now.
** Changed in: feisty-backports
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Ba
My apologies to anyone who got that last email. Damn webapp sending out
emails to everyone on my gmail that I ever sent or received an email
from. Gotta be more careful with these things :(
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug not
Updated pidgin from 2.1.1-1ubuntu1 --> 2.1.1-2ubuntu2, and included a
patch to force the offline message emulation plugin to a lower priority,
thus preventing it from interfering with other plugins (like /exec).
Previously, OME would set the message content to NULL to early in the
handling order, a
We've updated our repo with Pidgin 2.1.1 for Feisty. Again,
instructions can be found at www.trausch.us/pidgin on how to use our
repo, or build these backports yourself.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you
Brian Resnik wrote:
> Jo Vermeulen wrote:
>
>> Hmm, I just noticed nautilius-sendto still says "Instant Message
>> (Gaim)", which probably should be replaced by "Instant Message (Pidgin)"
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
> Ok, scratch that. Apparently the package is thoroughly broken. Taking
> it off t
Jo Vermeulen wrote:
> Hmm, I just noticed nautilius-sendto still says "Instant Message
> (Gaim)", which probably should be replaced by "Instant Message (Pidgin)"
> ...
>
>
Ok, scratch that. Apparently the package is thoroughly broken. Taking
it off the repo.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to
Jo Vermeulen wrote:
> Hmm, I just noticed nautilius-sendto still says "Instant Message
> (Gaim)", which probably should be replaced by "Instant Message (Pidgin)"
> ...
>
>
Just updated the repo with a new version of nautilus-sendto. Though
this version is still technically "unstable" i did some
leps wrote:
> Hi guys, I was able to build pidgin no problem but I couldn't really figure
> out how to get the gaim-otr package to work. Did anyone else get it working
> with pidgin? I guess it would be pidgin-otr now.
>
> On 8/16/07, Neatchee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The nautilus-sendt
Hi guys, I was able to build pidgin no problem but I couldn't really figure
out how to get the gaim-otr package to work. Did anyone else get it working
with pidgin? I guess it would be pidgin-otr now.
On 8/16/07, Neatchee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The nautilus-sendto issue isn't something w
The nautilus-sendto issue isn't something we would work on. Submit a
bug report (report à la bug) to the nautilus-sendto developers :)
By request, we've also included pidgin-sipe in our repo, which adds
support for the IM features of SIP/E. As I understand it, the protocol
also works with Live C
Hmm, I just noticed nautilius-sendto still says "Instant Message
(Gaim)", which probably should be replaced by "Instant Message (Pidgin)"
...
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backp
I tried the package and it seems to work fine for me. My settings have
been successfully imported.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty
Scratch that request for help on pidgin-encryption I'm just a little
slow and forgot to change some of the flags in debian/rules We've now
got pidgin-encryption working as well.
In addition to the inclusion of these extra packages, Trausch and I have
also created an apt repository for all of our
Thank you, i386 musictracker works fine...
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-bac
Music Tracker has been added to both extra plugin tarballs, as
requested.
The amd64 package has been tested on my own PC. I don't have an i386
computer that I can test the package on (just one to build it on), so
let me know if it doesn't work.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://b
Hey Neatchee,
could you include http://code.google.com/p/musictracker/ in your extra
plugins tar?
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty
Trausch went to bed, and his website requires that all comments be
approved, so until he wakes up, here's where you can grab the i386 extra
plugins:
http://www.ansemreport.com/pidgin/pidgin-2.1.0-i386_extras.tar.bz2
gaim-xfire is now included in the extras plugin packages, so if you're
looking for
Trausch and I have updated packages available on his website for Pidgin
2.1.0 We have i386 and AMD64 packages available, along with a plethora
of plugins. You can grab them from http://www.trausch.us/pidgin (see
below for more information on what packages are done)
In an attempt to get this movi
I looked at the suggested list, and saw that two of the selections need a
rewrite, which is...
galago-gaim-feed and meta-ul-desktop-base
as for more suggestions, how about the following, and also not forgetting to do
pidgin version 2.0.2.
pidgin-console ( finch in other words )
pidgin-console-db
While pidgin does not properly integrate with nautilus-sendto, this is
more of a convenience issue, isn't it? I've installed nautilus-sendto
with pidgin, and while pidgin does not show up as a send-to option, it
does not otherwise break nautilus-sendto. In addition, the
functionality is still the
I'd like to interject that I don't think a simple backport of pidgin is
possible. Yes, I know that it works fine - I'm using it myself - but
there are integration problems. nautilus-sendto doesn't support pidgin
because it has different dbus paths than gaim, for instance. There are
also a large
The amd64 pkgs work fine :) tkz a lot folks.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-b
This bug is for getting informations for an official backport. This is
not a forum for backporting pidgin. Thanks!
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the regist
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 16:55 +, rageboy wrote:
> I'm getting the impression from the comments on here that an official
> backport in the repos isn't happening anytime soon?
AFAIK, there has been no mention of an official backport.
However, on my page I have:
http://www.trausch.us/pidgin -
I'm getting the impression from the comments on here that an official
backport in the repos isn't happening anytime soon?
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 14:40 +, Neatchee wrote:
> Hey man. The dummy package, gaim_2.0.2-0ubuntu1_all.deb, is available
> from the Gutsy repos and works as-is as far as I'm aware. No
> backporting needed. I can't even TRY to backport it because when
> prevu
> tries to pull the source package
Hey man. The dummy package, gaim_2.0.2-0ubuntu1_all.deb, is available
from the Gutsy repos and works as-is as far as I'm aware. No
backporting needed. I can't even TRY to backport it because when prevu
tries to pull the source packages for the gaim transitional package,
it's referenced to the pi
Eep!
Neatchee, those packages won't cleanly install as an upgrade—it's
missing the dummy package!
There should also be a gaim-2.0.2 package that has next to no bulk to it
whatsoever—it's a dummy compatibility/upgrade package for systems like
Feisty where gaim has to be replaced. Do you have that
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 19:33 +, Neatchee wrote:
> Basically I just downloaded the source for each package, made the
> changes necessary to get it to successfully build on Feisty (in this
> case, change all dependencies on libnss3 to just libnss), built the
> debs
> using preview and installed.
No worries, boss!
Pidgin_2.0.2-0ubuntu1~7.04prevu1_amd64.deb & Pidgin-
data_2.0.2-0ubuntu1~7.04prevu1_amd64.deb, both required to build a basic
working install of Pidgin on AMD64 feisty. Backported from Gutsy source
repositories using prevu. Tarball:
http://www.ansemreport.com/neatchee/pidgin+pi
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 18:51 +, Neatchee wrote:
> Hey Mike, did you get that tarball for x64 that I sent you? Want to
> make sure that it came through alright.
>
> Let me know if you need anything else built (I don't necessarily keep
> up
> to date on Pidgin development)
Hrm. It doesn't se
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 17:58 +, rageboy wrote:
> I'd second but I'm not second. So I'll just say I want this too...only
> I
> want 2.1.0 (which though it hasn't been released yet, probably will be
> by the time this is implemented ;))
Well, if/when 2.1.0 hits Gutsy I will update the packages
Hey Mike, did you get that tarball for x64 that I sent you? Want to
make sure that it came through alright.
Let me know if you need anything else built (I don't necessarily keep up
to date on Pidgin development)
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You
I'd second but I'm not second. So I'll just say I want this too...only I
want 2.1.0 (which though it hasn't been released yet, probably will be
by the time this is implemented ;))
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification be
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:50 +, Neatchee wrote:
> If you want, I can send you the debs built for my amd64 build so you
> don't have to take the time. Built with prevu from Gutsy sources
> pidgin
> and pidgin-data, changing all references of libnss3 to libnss
That should work. If you could
If you want, I can send you the debs built for my amd64 build so you
don't have to take the time. Built with prevu from Gutsy sources pidgin
and pidgin-data, changing all references of libnss3 to libnss
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received
I ran it, and it seemed to work. Well, Pidgin still runs, anyway.
The installer just disappears at the end, though, and I think there might
have been some things that I missed. A pause at the end might be nice (and a
summary, even better).
Thanks for your efforts,
Jamie
On 6/25/07, Michael Trau
I have a new 32-bit version on my site: http://www.trausch.us/pidgin
All of the packages are now backported from Gutsy, and I have a shell
script that will manage the upgrade from my old checkinstall-generated
packages to the ones backported from Gutsy. I can still do a 64-bit
version soonish; I
Just built Pidgin 2.0.2 for Feisty AMD64 using prevu. Had to get source
and change all references of libnss3 to libnss, but the application
still runs flawlessly (since pidgin is designed to work with either
libnss or libnss3 anyway). This was the only dependency I needed to
change in my build.
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 21:33 +, Jamie Jackson wrote:
> I've have installed from repos (via apt) and have installed from
> source
> before. However, I haven't done much, if anything in-between (which
> this
> seems to be). Once this stuff gets in the repos, will I automatically
> get
> updates,
Hi Mike,
I've have installed from repos (via apt) and have installed from source
before. However, I haven't done much, if anything in-between (which this
seems to be). Once this stuff gets in the repos, will I automatically get
updates, etc. (as opposed to when I install from source)?
BTW, here's
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 12:30 +, Mahdi wrote:
> Very good.
> Are there any amd64 builds avaiable other than getdeb's? Their version
> do not seem to be very clean (i.e.: do not replace gaim with a dummy
> pkg).
> Does pidgin have any BIG change, or important feature not in Feisty's
> gaim?
It
Very good.
Are there any amd64 builds avaiable other than getdeb's? Their version do not
seem to be very clean (i.e.: do not replace gaim with a dummy pkg).
Does pidgin have any BIG change, or important feature not in Feisty's gaim?
[]z
M.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 02:05 +, Jamie Jackson wrote:
> Any guess as to when this might be available? I'm trying to weigh my
> options...
I don't know when there will be an official backport... however, I do
have a package available (well, packages) available from
http://www.trausch.us/pidgin/
Any guess as to when this might be available? I'm trying to weigh my
options...
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
--
ubu
http://developer.pidgin.im/roadmap will let you see which bugs have been
closed against future releases... Don't put too much stock in the open
bugs though, some of them get pushed back if they can't meet the
deadline.
2.1.0 will be the next "big" upgrade and only 3 weeks away, so it
probably doe
I'd also like to see the extra Gaim packages backported and renamed for
Pidgin. Is this possible, or will these just not work with Pidgin? I
know that pidgin-libnotify and pidgin-guifications are at least
available on http://getdeb.net, and they work fine with Pidgin in my
Feisty install.
gaim-aut
Is there a way to view the changelog before release? Or will I have to
wait for the release to see what is in it? I have no clue how to use
the SCM system that they are using.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification beca
2.0.2 will be out next week...
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists
Is there a way that I can send my 2.0.1 sources that I built to Ubuntu
for integration/inspection? I could do that. The plugins, however, are
not even debianized, and the last time that I checked, they were not
available from Gutsy’s source repository, either.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to
It should definitely be 2.0.1 which should be backported. But it's not
yet in the repos...
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backport
ah, how cool, I'll look more at this tomorrow and make a decision by the
end of the week.
On 5/29/07, Mikael Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you replace libnss3-dev with libnss-dev in the pidgin Build-Depends,
you don't need an updated eds.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
htt
I backported Pidgin 2.0.0 from the Gusty repo, and then updated it to
2.0.1, and built it along with OTR and Guifications (the two major
external plugins that I use). The Pidgin packages are from Gusty's
source and built (after being updated to Pidgin 2.0.1) and the OTR and
Guifications packages we
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:21:56PM -, John Dong wrote:
> I am currently analyzing if the eds dependency will have any negative
> consequences. Otherwise, it should be good for backporting. We will handle
> the plugins after the backport of pidgin is complete.
If you replace libnss3-dev with li
I am currently analyzing if the eds dependency will have any negative
consequences. Otherwise, it should be good for backporting. We will handle
the plugins after the backport of pidgin is complete.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe
--
Matt Nicholson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/28/07, Mahdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I guess it should be backported as fast as possible.
> Feisty is a final (stable) release, and the amount of beta packages on it
> should be minimized. And since gaim is no longer "mantained" (only pidgin),
> it
I guess it should be backported as fast as possible.
Feisty is a final (stable) release, and the amount of beta packages on it
should be minimized. And since gaim is no longer "mantained" (only pidgin), it
sould be a good idea to backport the latest stable release it to get upstream
support (and
any reason to not backport this package?
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backp
** Also affects: Baltix
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
--
ubuntu-
Pidgin has been in Gutsy for a while now.
There are now several sources to get unofficial .debs from third party
sources. That's a potential security risk, because theres no way of
ensuring the content of the package. However, people seem to want it
badly enough that they'll happily sudo away to
i know guifications has one
encryption has one
On 5/18/07, Lionel Porcheron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should consider all the reverse dependencies before backporting:
> gaim-autoprofile
> gaim-data
> gaim-dbg
> gaim-dev
> gaim-encryption
> gaim-extendedprefs
> gaim-guifications
We should consider all the reverse dependencies before backporting:
gaim-autoprofile
gaim-data
gaim-dbg
gaim-dev
gaim-encryption
gaim-extendedprefs
gaim-guifications
gaim-hotkeys
gaim-irchelper
gaim-otr
gaim-themes
gaim-thinklight
galago-gaim-feed
|gnome-fifth-toe
meta-
So, i held my breath and went to try it. It complained about not having
gaim's dependency pidgin in the repos (turns out dk.archive.ubuntu.com
isn't quite up-to-date with gutsy). Then when i changed it to use a
different mirror that had it, it said the same. So i tried to install
pidgin directly (w
Forgive my possible ignorance, but wouldn't the easiest way to install
it, seeing it's in the gutsy repo's and all, be like this?
sudo cp /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list.pidginbackup
sudo sed -i 's/^deb \([^ ]*\) feisty\(-security\|-updates\|\) \([a-z ]*\)$/deb
\1 gutsy\2 \3/' /etc/ap
If libebook1.2-9 is present:
b/i/r with prevu
+1 feisty
If not:
-> Considering build-dep libebook1.2-dev
-> Trying libebook1.2-dev
-> Cannot install libebook1.2-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some p
same results here, same comments...
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@
b/i/r in prevu
+1 for feisty
the need to backport eds gives me doubts about if this will ever be done
officially.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the regis
The gutsy package builds fine in feisty if you replace the libnss3-dev
with libnss-dev in the build-deps.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for
Same here
b/i/r +1
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
must build evolution-data-server (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/feisty-backports/+bug/114031) first
then re init prevu
then b/i/r under prevu
+1 feisty
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Needs Info => Confirmed
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launch
after successfully backporting evolution-data-server (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/feisty-backports/+bug/114031), pidgin built
without a hitch in prevu, and is running without a problem on my
workstation right now. it even provides a gaim meta/transition package
to help the upgrade path.
b/i/r +
Just tried in prevu now that pidgin hit the repos, fails with:
-> Considering build-dep libebook1.2-dev
-> Trying libebook1.2-dev
-> Cannot install libebook1.2-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some pa
this should be marked as needs info so people feel a little hope
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Rejected => Needs Info
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
It would be cool actually to have it :)
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backpo
Second! Good luck with that.
On 5/5/07, Stephen Seplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry to be so preemptive, I guess; I just wanted to get the idea out
there. Thanks for looking/the vote of confidence.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You recei
Sorry to be so preemptive, I guess; I just wanted to get the idea out
there. Thanks for looking/the vote of confidence.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the r
Hold your horses man, packages haven't even been uploaded to Debian
Experimental yet! When things settle and we get an upload in Ubuntu, I
will take a look. I've already begun to play a bit with Debian SVN
packaging. It looks promising and backportable when it comes out.
Please reopen this bug rep
78 matches
Mail list logo
