[Bug 1164016] Re: restore type-ahead find

2013-05-02 Thread Alfredo Matos
I would say that this is a long way from Low Importance. As a desktop user I hit this bug dozens of times per day, and over time this is incredibly frustrating to the point of having installed several alternatives, and even considering dropping Unity/Gnome in favor of KDE (or something sane). --

[Bug 1164016] Re: restore type-ahead find

2013-05-02 Thread Alfredo Matos
Best workaround so far is to install nautilus 3.4 in 13.04: http://www.webupd8.org/2013/04/get-nautilus-34-features-back-in-ubuntu.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164016 Title:

[Bug 879950] Re: pidgin not showing up

2012-08-03 Thread Alfredo Matos
The fact that this bug is such a big problem, affects all Ubuntu pidgin users, and still isn't fixed, after almost a year, completely baffles me. No, I will not change to empathy because it's simply daunting from a functional perspective. If that was the intended underlying motivation to not fix

[Bug 751174] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in free()

2012-04-05 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/751174 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in free() To manage notifications about this

[Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled

2012-04-05 Thread Alfredo Matos
After 4 years of bug, moved on to Thunderbird more than two years ago. Unsubscribing from this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275952 Title: Unread search folder removes messages

[Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled

2011-08-25 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #562912 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562912 ** Changed in: evolution Importance: High = Unknown ** Changed in: evolution Status: Invalid = Unknown ** Changed in: evolution Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #546637 = GNOME Bug

[Bug 819925] Re: iwlwifi driver exports all packets through netlink

2011-08-03 Thread Alfredo Matos
I can confirm that this fixes the problem. I'm not seeing anymore packets being transferred to userspace! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819925 Title: iwlwifi driver exports all

[Bug 819925] Re: iwlwifi driver exports all packets through netlink

2011-08-02 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Attachment added: Kernel configuration file, with the offending option activated. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819925/+attachment/2249865/+files/config-3.0.0-7-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 819925] [NEW] iwlwifi driver exports all packets through netlink

2011-08-02 Thread Alfredo Matos
Public bug reported: A new option present in Kernel 3.0 enables exporting all wifi packets on the iwlwifi driver through (generic) netlink, for debug purposes (an intel undisclosed svtool). This should not be enabled by default, as it forces all wifi packet to be delivered through netlink

[Bug 819925] Re: iwlwifi driver exports all packets through netlink

2011-08-02 Thread Alfredo Matos
I've tested it, and it indeed the kernel you shared packets are not transferred over the netlink interface. I would just point out that you shared a 2.6.39, while oneiric is on 3.0 :). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 816885] Re: Lightdm isn't staring after the update this morning

2011-07-27 Thread Alfredo Matos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 816646 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816646 To fix it just install lightdm-gtk-greeter on a console: sudo apt-get install lightdm-gtk-greeter ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 816646 new update in oneiric broke start-up -- You

[Bug 816809] Re: lightdm does not start

2011-07-27 Thread Alfredo Matos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 816646 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816646 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 816646 new update in oneiric broke start-up -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 815847] Re: LightDM not loading/working (only blank screen) on Oneiric Alpha 2

2011-07-27 Thread Alfredo Matos
Could it be the missing dependency as seen in Bug #816646 ? Try installing lightdm-gtk-greeter -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815847 Title: LightDM not loading/working (only blank

[Bug 751174] [NEW] compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in free()

2011-04-05 Thread Alfredo Matos
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz Random compiz crashes with unity. E.g. Resizing a window with alt +middle-mouse-button. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: compiz-core 1:0.9.4git20110322-0ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname:

[Bug 751174] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in free()

2011-04-05 Thread Alfredo Matos
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/751174 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in free() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled

2008-11-25 Thread Alfredo Matos
Just updated to proposed using the following packages: evolution 2.24.1.1-0ubuntu1 evolution-data-server 2.24.1.1-0ubuntu1 The problem still persists. Upstream also doesn't seem to be fixed, despite a tentative fix released. Is there a 2.24.2 update coming through the pipe ?

Re: [Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled

2008-11-25 Thread Alfredo Matos
After I deleted the Unread search folder and created it again, it worked. It seems that the unread status is back up. What changed was evolution-data-server to version 2.24.2-0ubuntu1. This is step in the right direction, although other criteria don't work. -- Unread search folder removes

[Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled

2008-10-30 Thread Alfredo Matos
In spite of being marked as fix release upstream, it has not been, it was a poor hack that doesn't actually work. So this bug is very much alive and annoying, making search folders both useless and annoying. ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Unread

Re: [Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled

2008-10-27 Thread Alfredo Matos
I agree. It doesn't work at all. It just removes the messages when marked read. I have the following evolution packages: evolution 2.24.1-0ubuntu2 evolution-common2.24.1-0ubuntu2 evolution-data-server 2.24.1-0ubuntu1 evolution-data-server-common2.24.1-0ubuntu1 -- Unread

Re: [Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled

2008-10-27 Thread Alfredo Matos
I have a search folder called 'Unread' with a single rule: status if not read for all Local and Active Remote Folders. This doesn't work either. So I'm not sure to which use case you are referring, since nothing workings. -- Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is

[Bug 275952] Re: Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled

2008-10-26 Thread Alfredo Matos
I'm running 2.24.1-0ubuntu1 and this is not fixed. This is not even released in upstream stable release. -- Unread search folder removes messages as soon as their unread flag is toggled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 192888] Re: firefox crashes on flash contents when using libflashsupport

2008-08-12 Thread Alfredo Matos
4 months into the hardy releasy and six into this bug, and flash is still not working. I've seen some possible fixes in this bugreport, but no definitive solutions. I have seen many new users change back to Windows or to other distros because of this bug. Sorry guys, but this really needs

Re: [Bug 192888] Re: firefox crashes on flash contents when using libflashsupport

2008-08-12 Thread Alfredo Matos
Since beta 1, Flash 10 is compatible with PulseAudio sans libflashsupport, as long as you set the correct PulseAudio device as per bug #198453 (which should be considered mandatory for a proper PulseAudio setup anyway). Yes! It works. I agree with Alexander, it should be present in the bug

Re: [Bug 192888] Re: firefox crashes on flash contents when using libflashsupport

2008-08-12 Thread Alfredo Matos
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 22:10 +, alecwh wrote: So, how would an Ubuntu Hardy user upgrade Flash from 9 to 10 (in order to fix this bug)? Can a tutorial/wiki be setup for this? Just enable hardy-backports for multiverse. This line on your /etc/apt/sources.list should suffice: deb

[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin

2008-04-11 Thread Alfredo Matos
Moving libflashsupport.so out of the way fixes my issues. Thanks a lot. The problem is that it is not easy to debug firefox, and apport is failing (invalid retrace). So it would it would be nice to have some understanding of how to provide useful backtraces, even if just to tell apart bugs. If

[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin

2008-04-10 Thread Alfredo Matos
I think we need to reopen this, since it is so easily reproducible. I don't see any debug symbols for firefox-3.0, what are the steps to get proper debug information for firefox+flashplugin ? ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- firefox crashed with

[Bug 212877] Re: [hardy] [regression] Firefox 3 Beta 5 SEGFAULTs constantly when switching flash pages

2008-04-10 Thread Alfredo Matos
Is this the same as bug 213948 ? Looks quite similar... -- [hardy] [regression] Firefox 3 Beta 5 SEGFAULTs constantly when switching flash pages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212877 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 197898] Re: Website get rerouted to a Japanese version

2008-04-10 Thread Alfredo Matos
Hi. Thanks for reporting this behavior, but this is a Google feature which detects the connecting IP address and redirects to the localization it thinks is best suited. Pressing the go to Google.com in English button fixes this. There is currently no way for the browser to hide you current IP

[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin

2008-04-10 Thread Alfredo Matos
This is currently being followed up elsewhere also, I believe. See bug 212877. -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 209516] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()

2008-04-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 213948 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 Any special reason to ignore this ? This has been seen in other reports. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 213948 firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin -- firefox crashed with

[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin

2008-04-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Tags added: epiphany firefox flashplugin-nonfree gecko -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 209516] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()

2008-04-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 213948 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 213948, so it is being marked as such, since it

[Bug 192070] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()

2008-04-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
This also looks like a duplicate of bug 213948 . There seem to be a lot of them. This also happens in epiphany, so it might be a xulrunner-1.9 bug ? As steps to reproduce in other bugs, I just put a URL that crashes firefox/epiphany every time. http://www.bwin.com seems to crash every time,

[Bug 192070] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()

2008-04-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
bug 196248 also seems to be a duplicate. Maybe merge all of them together ? -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192070 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 209516] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()

2008-04-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
Ok. So, since this is not reproducible anymore, and no full details are available to mark it as fixed release, I will mark it as invalid. Thanks for your time in reporting this bug, and please do not hesitate to report it again if you see a similar behavior in the future. ** This bug is no

[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin

2008-04-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
I do not agree with closing this bug as invalid. The apport stack trace might not have yield the necessary results. But this is still a very important and annoying bug. I am prepared to provide more info than just the apport information. Please note that this has 7 duplicates, and possibly more,

[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin

2008-04-08 Thread Alfredo Matos
From the bugs marked as duplicate: Steps to reproduce this bug 1. Go to http://www.bwin.com (for example) 2. Wait a few seconds or try to click on any flash button Also, i don't believe it's very friendly to mark the original bug reports as duplicates of your report, which is actually more

Re: [Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin

2008-04-08 Thread Alfredo Matos
Ok, my bad then. Maybe it's a feature. -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 212883] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() - Flashplugin nonfree

2008-04-06 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Visibility changed to: Public -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() - Flashplugin nonfree https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 148711] Re: SCSI HardDisk Not Detected on Toshiba RAID controller in Toshiba Qosmio G20 Laptop

2007-12-26 Thread Alfredo Matos
I tried Alpha2 (http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/hardy/alpha2) and it properly recognized the hard drives, so it's working up to that point. It's not my laptop, so i cannot test a clean install on it. I say this because the feisty install also required some major tricking to boot once installed. On

[Bug 148711] Re: SCSI HardDisk Not Detected on Toshiba RAID controller in Toshiba Qosmio G20 Laptop

2007-10-05 Thread Alfredo Matos
Smacked against the same problem on the Qosmio G20. Gutsy Beta 1 will not recognize the hard drives out of the box. I managed to get it to recognize the hard drives as follows: Press F6 on the Grub menu while over the first menu option (Other Options): Append the following options to the boot

[Bug 148711] Re: SCSI HardDisk Not Detected on Toshiba RAID controller in Toshiba Qosmio G20 Laptop

2007-10-05 Thread Alfredo Matos
Also, this bug relates to bugs: Bug #139790 - Installed successfully (Gutsy Tribe 5) but failed to boot , Qosmio G20 (ata_piix problem) Bug #133892 - Failed to boot after upgrade edgy to fesity - Qosmio G20 (ata_piix problem) And is possibly a resurface of: Bug #26013 - Toshiba Qosmio G20

[Bug 110151] Re: mplayer not compiled with nas audio support

2007-06-21 Thread Alfredo Matos
mplayer (2:1.0~rc1-0ubuntu11) gutsy; urgency=low * Added Network Audio System (NAS) support (LP: #110151) -- Alfredo Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:53:04 +0100 ** Changed in: mplayer (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- mplayer not compiled with nas audio

[Bug 89245] Re: brightness-applet does not move slider when hardware keys used

2007-06-13 Thread Alfredo Matos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 79135 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79135 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 79135 gnome-power-manager and a problem with the brightness -- brightness-applet does not move slider when hardware keys used

[Bug 114950] Re: brightness applet doesn't show changing brightness levels

2007-06-13 Thread Alfredo Matos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 79135 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79135 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 79135 gnome-power-manager and a problem with the brightness -- brightness applet doesn't show changing brightness levels

[Bug 79135] Re: gnome-power-manager and a problem with the brightness

2007-06-13 Thread Alfredo Matos
I can see this bug also on a T60. But, gnome-power-manager adjusts the slider and the OSD through information received through hal, therefore this bug relates to HAL and ibm-acpi. HAL is capable of picking up the information supplied by gnome-power-manager, but does not pickup the correct level

[Bug 119244] Re: Wake-up from suspend not working, Thinkpad z61m

2007-06-13 Thread Alfredo Matos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 84991 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84991 Thank you for you bug report. There has been some activity regarding fglrx recovering from suspend. It's discussed on Bug #84991 . Feel free to try the mentioned setups or add more information if you don't

[Bug 112188] Re: screen saver bug in dual-head setup

2007-06-13 Thread Alfredo Matos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 96440 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96440 Thank you for your bug report. The behavior you mention is already described in Bug #96440 . Feel free to follow up the discussion on that bug. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 96440 Do not

[Bug 39614] Re: Mouse Pointer in kind of underlined.

2007-06-12 Thread Alfredo Matos
Latest ATI driver releases properly fall back to 2D support when acceleration fails to load, without display artifacts. ** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Mouse Pointer in kind of underlined. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39614 You received this bug notification

[Bug 110151] Re: mplayer not compiled with nas audio support

2007-06-07 Thread Alfredo Matos
Added the debdiff between -ubuntu10 and -ubuntu11 versions of mplayer, as request. Built on a gusty machine and on a gutsy pbuilder chroot. ** Attachment added: mplayer.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8021637/mplayer.debdiff -- mplayer not compiled with nas audio support

[Bug 110151] Re: mplayer not compiled with nas audio support

2007-06-07 Thread Alfredo Matos
Sorry, did not refresh my browser before posting the new debdiff. Using bzr is a whole new ball game for me. Couldn't a maintainer pick up the debdiff and push into the mplayer bzr tree ? -- mplayer not compiled with nas audio support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110151 You received this bug

[Bug 110151] Re: mplayer not compiled with nas audio support

2007-05-14 Thread Alfredo Matos
This should be sufficient. Not much of an achievement, but i'm practicing my packaging skills and pbuilder cycles. Besides the enable flag, a new dependency on libaudio-dev is required. Check the attached debdiff. ** Attachment added: debiff

[Bug 114057] Re: [apport] evolution-2.10 crashed with SIGSEGV in e_memchunk_free()

2007-05-11 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Tags added: need-i386-retrace ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info -- [apport] evolution-2.10 crashed with SIGSEGV in e_memchunk_free() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114057 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 92291] Re: modprobe kvm-intel fails

2007-03-15 Thread Alfredo Matos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 92159 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 92159 Cannot load kvm and subsequent oops -- modprobe kvm-intel fails https://launchpad.net/bugs/92291 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 92159] Re: Cannot load kvm and subsequent oops

2007-03-15 Thread Alfredo Matos
I can confirm this. modprobe kvm fails, kvm-intel fails, and a subsequent oops is bound to happen (and did). Attaching dmesg of the failed symbols ** Attachment added: dmesg http://librarian.launchpad.net/6823721/dmesg.txt -- Cannot load kvm and subsequent oops

[Bug 92159] Re: Cannot load kvm and subsequent oops

2007-03-15 Thread Alfredo Matos
Also attached a cpuinfo for information. ** Attachment added: cpuinfo http://librarian.launchpad.net/6823723/cpuinfo.txt -- Cannot load kvm and subsequent oops https://launchpad.net/bugs/92159 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 92159] Re: Cannot load kvm and subsequent oops

2007-03-15 Thread Alfredo Matos
Attached the Oops dmesg trace so we can cleanup the bug description. ** Attachment added: dmesg-oops http://librarian.launchpad.net/6823929/dmesg-oops.txt ** Description changed: Binary package hint: kvm Hi, This on Core 2 Duo E6600, Asrock 775-VSTA, nvidia-glx and Atheros.

[Bug 92291] Re: modprobe kvm-intel fails

2007-03-15 Thread Alfredo Matos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 92159 *** Marked this bug as duplicate of Bug 92159 because it is in fact the same problem, since after a while kernel oops occur even though people may not notice it. -- modprobe kvm-intel fails https://launchpad.net/bugs/92291 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 92159] Re: Cannot load kvm and subsequent oops

2007-03-15 Thread Alfredo Matos
Added lspci -vvnn log as requested in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelProblems ** Attachment added: lspci-vvn http://librarian.launchpad.net/6823971/lspci-vvnn.log -- Cannot load kvm and subsequent oops https://launchpad.net/bugs/92159 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 92159] Re: Cannot load kvm and subsequent oops

2007-03-15 Thread Alfredo Matos
Added uname -a log, as requested in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelProblems ** Attachment added: uname-a http://librarian.launchpad.net/6823973/uname-a.log ** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- Cannot load kvm and subsequent oops

[Bug 92159] Re: Cannot load kvm and subsequent oops

2007-03-15 Thread Alfredo Matos
The linux-2.6.20-11 kernel release fixes the kvm problems. ** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Cannot load kvm and subsequent oops https://launchpad.net/bugs/92159 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX

2007-03-14 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Description changed: Running Feisty with all updates and using latest xorg-fglrx-driver on an ATI X700 graphics card. Laptop will suspend via buttons on power manager or when closing the the laptop, however, it will not resume from suspend to ram. All I get is a black screen and only a

[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX

2007-03-14 Thread Alfredo Matos
Added these findings to http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Feisty_Installation_Guide and to the upstream bug report, so that users can find them, not just here. -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 90961] Re: UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver

2007-03-13 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info = Fix Released -- UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 90883] Re: Cannot turn off wireless

2007-03-12 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Changed in: ipw2100 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Alfredo Matos = (unassigned) Status: Needs Info = Confirmed -- Cannot turn off wireless https://launchpad.net/bugs/90883 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 87687] Re: New git snapshot required for xorg 7.2/feisty

2007-03-12 Thread Alfredo Matos
What is the status of this ? Is the new package going to pass the UVF or not ? -- New git snapshot required for xorg 7.2/feisty https://launchpad.net/bugs/87687 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 87687] Re: New git snapshot required for xorg 7.2/feisty

2007-03-12 Thread Alfredo Matos
John Dong, i tried your package, it work great (and fast too). But you seem to have dropped the Xinerama stuff. Could this be why my windows (gnome-panel, splash, etc) are appearing between screens ? My dual monitors are like one big screen, with windows and panels spanning across both screens.

[Bug 87687] Re: New git snapshot required for xorg 7.2/feisty

2007-03-12 Thread Alfredo Matos
After some code checking, the Xinerama stuff is already in the git package that John Dong put together. The patch fails to apply because it's already there. After some investigation along with John, Xinerama works !great!. There is an explicit need to +xinerama to the XGL startup script, but after

[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX

2007-03-11 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info = Confirmed -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 89141] Re: fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60

2007-03-10 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Assignee: Alfredo Matos = (unassigned) Status: Needs Info = Confirmed -- fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60 https://launchpad.net/bugs/89141 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https

[Bug 74908] Re: Thinkpad wireless hotkey won't work

2007-03-10 Thread Alfredo Matos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 90833 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 90833 Some spelling errors -- Thinkpad wireless hotkey won't work https://launchpad.net/bugs/74908 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 90883] Re: Cannot turn off wireless

2007-03-10 Thread Alfredo Matos
I can confirm this behavior on a ipw3945 also. But it seems that it's more a sysfs problem of the driver rather then permissions... -- Cannot turn off wireless https://launchpad.net/bugs/90883 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 90883] Re: Cannot turn off wireless

2007-03-10 Thread Alfredo Matos
Can you post kernel version and ipw2100 driver version please ? To get the kernel version: uname -r For ipw2100 try: cat /var/log/message | grep 2100 | grep driver this should yield some information ** Changed in: ipw2100 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Alfredo Matos Status

[Bug 90883] Re: Cannot turn off wireless

2007-03-10 Thread Alfredo Matos
Filled Upstream: http://bughost.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1238 Feel free to comment on the upstream also, adding valuable information. Thanks. -- Cannot turn off wireless https://launchpad.net/bugs/90883 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 89141] Re: fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60

2007-03-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
Could you post your package version from gnome-power-manager ? You can get in a terminal or in synaptic (terminal follows): dpkg -l | grep gnome-power-manager ** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: acpi-support = gnome-power-manager -- fn f4 key no longer generates suspend

[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX

2007-03-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
Submited an UVF Exception see Bug #90961 Feel free to edit/add/comment on it. -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 90961] Re: UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver

2007-03-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = MOTU UVF Team -- UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX

2007-03-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
We should probably open a UVF Exception. -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 90961] UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver

2007-03-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
Public bug reported: Upstream release contains fixes that solve reported suspend failures on some devices (ex. ATI X700, See Bug #84991), and supports more ATI hardware Release notes contain: - introduces support for the ATI Xpress™ 1250 IGP for AMD based motherboards - A system hang no

[Bug 90961] Re: UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver

2007-03-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Attachment added: Attached a diffstat from ATI provided install packages. http://librarian.launchpad.net/6722145/diffstat.txt -- UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 90961] Re: UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver

2007-03-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
Is it necessary to have packages handy and ready for upload even for binary packages that affect the restricted-modules ? -- UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 90961] Re: UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver

2007-03-09 Thread Alfredo Matos
Ok thanks. Could their be a note on that on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess ? Because I tried to follow the process and add the motu-uvf as explained... -- UVF Exception - ATI fglrx 8.34.8 binary driver https://launchpad.net/bugs/90961 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 89141] Re: fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60

2007-03-08 Thread Alfredo Matos
There isn't any attachment on the bug report, could you directly upload it here on launchpad ? Did you manage to put the laptop to sleep using Fn+F4 and the sleep.sh script ? It would be nice to get everything going through g-p-m, since it is already working here, and for most people. But we can

[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX

2007-03-08 Thread Alfredo Matos
Nice catch. If that doesn't work, i can only assume that it is X700 specific. I would recommend that you take the following steps: 1. Try the new driver release 8.34.8 and see if it works. You can find information on how to install here:

[Bug 90591] Re: UVF: gimmie 0.2.1 - 0.2.4

2007-03-08 Thread Alfredo Matos
+1. I was hit by: * Fix bug with missing .gtk-bookmarks file Now i'm with: * Fix crash opening People pane (bug #404909) Hope this bypasses the freeze... -- UVF: gimmie 0.2.1 - 0.2.4 https://launchpad.net/bugs/90591 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX

2007-03-06 Thread Alfredo Matos
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gnome-power-manager --no-daemon --verbose g-p-m.log Well, guess g-p-m uses stderr: Try instead: $ gnome-power-manager --no-daemon --verbos g-p-m.log After having g-p-m running, suspend the laptop. Then check the file for errors. If you need to paste the entire log file,

[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX

2007-03-06 Thread Alfredo Matos
$ gnome-power-manager --no-daemon --verbose g-p-m.log (had a typo) -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX

2007-03-05 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Description changed: Running Feisty with all updates and using latest xorg-fglrx-driver on an ATI X700 graphics card. Laptop will suspend via buttons on power manager or when closing the the laptop, however, it will not resume from suspend to ram. All I get is a black screen and only a

[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX

2007-03-05 Thread Alfredo Matos
Can you check what's going on in gnome-power-manager ? killall -9 gnome-power-manager gnome-power-manager --no-daemon --verbose g-p-m.log And then please report back with what is going on. ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Needs Info --

[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving

2007-03-04 Thread Alfredo Matos
After a few hours messing about with xorg-driver-fglrx, linux- restricted-modules and the ATI driver installer, I don't see that the package tries to pack the files in question. But I also missed to see that being done in Edgy packages. One question, did you by any chance install the driver in

[Bug 89141] Re: fn f4 key no longer generates suspend with feisty on thinkpad t60

2007-03-04 Thread Alfredo Matos
: killall -9 gnome-power-manager and the run gnome-power-manager --verbose --no-daemon And compare the outputs, and paste here any relevant findings ** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Alfredo Matos Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info -- fn f4 key no longer

[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving

2007-03-04 Thread Alfredo Matos
Feisty is to supported by the ATI installer yet. Only the following: Ubuntu Packages: Ubuntu/warty Ubuntu/4.10 Ubuntu/hoary Ubuntu/5.04 Ubuntu/breezy Ubuntu/5.10 Ubuntu/dapper Ubuntu/6.06 Ubuntu/edgy Ubuntu/6.10 I'm

[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving

2007-03-04 Thread Alfredo Matos
s/clause/closed -- fglrx power saving https://launchpad.net/bugs/85844 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX

2007-03-04 Thread Alfredo Matos
Could you try editing the following file, and the mentioned changes: /etc/default/acpi-support POST_VIDEO=true to POST_VIDEO=false And then test if it works ? -- Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX https://launchpad.net/bugs/84991 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 84991] Re: Resume from suspend fails with FGLRX

2007-03-04 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Description changed: Running Feisty with all updates and using latest xorg-fglrx-driver on an ATI X700 graphics card. Laptop will suspend via buttons on power manager or when closing the the laptop, however, it will not resume from suspend to ram. All I get is a black screen and only a

[Bug 84766] Re: F-spot (not gthumb) should be used to import photos

2007-03-02 Thread Alfredo Matos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 80856 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 80856 F-Spot as default for importing photos -- F-spot (not gthumb) should be used to import photos https://launchpad.net/bugs/84766 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving

2007-03-02 Thread Alfredo Matos
I can confirm this. Both files are missing. /etc/acpi/fglrx-powermode.sh /etc/default/fglrx And while on Battery I'm in default state, not powersave: core/mem [flags] - 1: 128/135 MHz [low voltage] 2: 324/135 MHz * 3: 392/324 MHz [default state] -- fglrx power

[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving

2007-03-02 Thread Alfredo Matos
** Tags added: ati fglrx laptop -- fglrx power saving https://launchpad.net/bugs/85844 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving

2007-03-02 Thread Alfredo Matos
Were those files present on Edgy ? -- fglrx power saving https://launchpad.net/bugs/85844 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 85844] Re: fglrx power saving

2007-03-02 Thread Alfredo Matos
Requires further info to determine if this is a wishlist item or a bug. ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info -- fglrx power saving https://launchpad.net/bugs/85844 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

  1   2   >