[Bug 2074212] Re: [SRU] Enable frame-pointer on Noble in libdmapsharing

2024-10-16 Thread Paul Mars
Fixed diff with the proper version string. ** Patch added: "debdiff-libdmapsharing-noble.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdmapsharing/+bug/2074212/+attachment/5828521/+files/debdiff-libdmapsharing-noble.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2074212] Re: [SRU] Enable frame-pointer on Noble in libdmapsharing

2024-10-15 Thread Paul Mars
** Description changed: [ Impact ] In order to help developers with profiling, Ubuntu enabled frame- pointers for packages in the main archive. https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-performance-engineering-with-frame- pointers-by-default The `Affects` packages were missed due to the

[Bug 2074212] Re: [SRU] Enable frame-pointer on Noble in libdmapsharing

2024-10-15 Thread Paul Mars
** Description changed: [ Impact ] In order to help developers with profiling, Ubuntu enabled frame- pointers for packages in the main archive. https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-performance-engineering-with-frame- pointers-by-default The `Affects` packages were missed due to the

[Bug 2074212] Re: [SRU] Enable frame-pointer on Noble in libdmapsharing

2024-10-14 Thread Paul Mars
See upload in my PPA https://launchpad.net/~upils/+archive/ubuntu/test- ppa/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074212 Title: [SRU] Enable frame-pointer on Noble in libdmapshari

[Bug 2074212] Re: [SRU] Enable frame-pointer on Noble in libdmapsharing

2024-10-14 Thread Paul Mars
** Patch added: "debdiff-libdmapsharing-noble.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdmapsharing/+bug/2074212/+attachment/5828023/+files/debdiff-libdmapsharing-noble.diff ** Changed in: libdmapsharing (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Confirmed => New -- You received this bug notific

[Bug 2074212] Re: [SRU] Enable frame-pointer on Noble in libdmapsharing

2024-10-14 Thread Paul Mars
** Description changed: - Despite the distribution having enabled frame pointers globally, the - binaries shipped by libdmapsharing don't have frame pointers. + [ Impact ] - It is likely due to the build system being pretty screwed up: it builds - the library once using the CFLAGS, then rebuild

[Bug 2074212] Re: [SRU] Enable frame-pointer on Noble in libdmapsharing

2024-10-14 Thread Paul Mars
** Also affects: libdmapsharing (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libdmapsharing (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libdmapsharing (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Mars (upils) -- You received th

[Bug 2074212] Re: [SRU] Enable frame-pointer on Noble in libdmapsharing

2024-10-14 Thread Paul Mars
** Summary changed: - libdmapsharing doesn't have frame pointers enabled + [SRU] Enable frame-pointer on Noble in libdmapsharing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074212 Title: [SRU] E

[Bug 2081684] Re: Things depending on libmount1 complain MOUNT_2_40 not found

2024-10-03 Thread Paul Mars
** Description changed: - I have upgraded to the oracular beta yesterday on my home machine. After - upgrading I started to notice errors issued by libgio that MOUNT_2_40 - could not be found despite having libmount1 2.40.2 installed as part the - upgrade. + In April 2024, while handling the t64 t

[Bug 2081684] Re: Things depending on libmount1 complain MOUNT_2_40 not found

2024-10-03 Thread Paul Mars
Then I guess it confirms the hypothesis we had, you most probably had the bad luck of updating/upgrading during the time frame the package came with libmount1t64 in proposed back in April. I will try to summarize this in the bug description to help anyone else who ended up in this situation, feel

[Bug 2081684] Re: Things depending on libmount1 complain MOUNT_2_40 not found

2024-10-03 Thread Paul Mars
** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081684 Title: Things depending on libmount1 complain MOUNT_2_40 not found To manage notifications about this bug go to

[Bug 2081684] Re: Things depending on libmount1 complain MOUNT_2_40 not found

2024-10-03 Thread Paul Mars
We kept digging in the publishing history and we have an hypothesis. Did you upgrade to noble before the release (maybe sometimes between 2024-04-18 and 2024-04-23)? Do you use the proposed pocket? During the t64 transition and the rebuild/republish of some packages just prior the release maybe

[Bug 2081684] Re: Things depending on libmount1 complain MOUNT_2_40 not found

2024-10-03 Thread Paul Mars
Thanks for the detailed explanation. I believe the issue was then due to the interrupted upgrade process. The system probably ended up in a undefined state. Moreover I do not think I can reasonably reproduce. There is most likely nothing wrong with the packages. I am marking it as Invalid and w

[Bug 2081684] Re: Things depending on libmount1 complain MOUNT_2_40 not found

2024-10-03 Thread Paul Mars
Hello borgdylan, I understand the similar issue in arch was caused by glib2 2.80 being built against a version of util-linux not yet published. I understand it was fixed when `util-linux-2.40rc2-1` was made available. In our case, I checked that our current version of glib2 (https://launchpad.net

[Bug 2081684] Re: Things depending on libmount1 complain MOUNT_2_40 not found

2024-09-26 Thread Paul Mars
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Mars (upils) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081684 Title: Things depending on libmount1 complain MOUNT_2

[Bug 2081178] Re: unable to clean up mess surrounding './etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10periodic'

2024-09-26 Thread Paul Mars
yizhongzhang would you mind providing the command line you used to run ubuntu-image? Did you run it as root or with sudo? Could you also provide build logs? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 2081717] Re: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-23 Thread Paul Mars
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1074915 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074915 ** Also affects: discount (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074915 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: discount (Ubuntu) Import

[Bug 2081721] Re: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-23 Thread Paul Mars
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1075540 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075540 ** Also affects: startup-notification (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075540 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: startup-notific

[Bug 2081721] Re: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-23 Thread Paul Mars
See https://launchpad.net/~upils/+archive/ubuntu/test-oracular/+packages ** Patch added: "LP2081721.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/startup-notification/+bug/2081721/+attachment/5821117/+files/LP2081721.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2081721] [NEW] FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-23 Thread Paul Mars
ESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 make: *** [debian/rules:7: build] Error 25 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit status 2 ** Affects: startup-notification (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Paul Mars (upils)

[Bug 2081717] Re: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-23 Thread Paul Mars
See https://launchpad.net/~upils/+archive/ubuntu/test-oracular/+packages for successful builds. ** Patch added: "LP2081717.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/discount/+bug/2081717/+attachment/5821092/+files/LP2081717.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 2081717] [NEW] FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-23 Thread Paul Mars
^~ make[1]: *** [Makefile:128: main.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>' dh_auto_build: error: make -j1 "INSTALL=install --strip-program=true" returned exit code 2 ** Affects: discount (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Paul Mars

[Bug 2080254] Re: autopkgtest failures due to outdated checksum in tests

2024-09-19 Thread Paul Mars
Patch submitted to debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080254 Title: autopkgtest failures due to outdated checksum in tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://

[Bug 2080254] Re: autopkgtest failures due to outdated checksum in tests

2024-09-19 Thread Paul Mars
** Changed in: pbdagcon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080254 Title: autopkgtest failures due to outdated checksum in tests To manage not

[Bug 2080254] Re: autopkgtest failures due to outdated checksum in tests

2024-09-19 Thread Paul Mars
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1082216 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082216 ** Also affects: pbdagcon (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082216 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 2080596] Re: xmms2 0.8+dfsg-26build1 FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-13 Thread Paul Mars
** Changed in: xmms2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: xmms2 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080596

[Bug 2080254] Re: autopkgtest failures due to outdated checksum in tests

2024-09-13 Thread Paul Mars
** Changed in: pbdagcon (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080254 Title: autopkgtest failures due to outdated checksum in tests To man

[Bug 2080640] Re: xmms2 0.8+dfsg-26build1 FTBFS with ffmpeg 7.0

2024-09-13 Thread Paul Mars
** Changed in: xmms2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080640 Title: xmms2 0.8+dfsg-26build1 FTBFS with ffmpeg 7.0 To manage notificati

[Bug 2080640] Re: xmms2 0.8+dfsg-26build1 FTBFS with ffmpeg 7.0

2024-09-13 Thread Paul Mars
The patch also contains the fix for LP: #2080596 since it is needed to go further on the build. See xmms2 - 0.8+dfsg-26ubuntu2 in https://launchpad.net/~upils/+archive/ubuntu/test-oracular/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 2080640] Re: xmms2 0.8+dfsg-26build1 FTBFS with ffmpeg 7.0

2024-09-13 Thread Paul Mars
** Patch added: "LP2080640.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xmms2/+bug/2080640/+attachment/5816878/+files/LP2080640.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080640 Titl

[Bug 2080640] [NEW] xmms2 0.8+dfsg-26build1 FTBFS with ffmpeg 7.0

2024-09-13 Thread Paul Mars
Public bug reported: See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072462 ** Affects: xmms2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Paul Mars (upils) Status: Confirmed ** Tags: ftbfs update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2080596] Re: xmms2 0.8+dfsg-26build1 FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-13 Thread Paul Mars
It still FTBFS but this is now due to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072462 PPA https://launchpad.net/~upils/+archive/ubuntu/test-oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 2080596] Re: xmms2 0.8+dfsg-26build1 FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-13 Thread Paul Mars
** Patch added: "LP2080596.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xmms2/+bug/2080596/+attachment/5816776/+files/LP2080596.patch ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1072462 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072462 -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 2080596] [NEW] xmms2 0.8+dfsg-26build1 FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-12 Thread Paul Mars
Public bug reported: xmms2 0.8+dfsg-26build1 fails to build from source with gcc-14 ** Affects: xmms2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Paul Mars (upils) Status: Confirmed ** Tags: ftbfs update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2080493] Re: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-12 Thread Paul Mars
Thanks! And thanks for the reminders. I was not sure if ubuntu-sponsors should be subscribed when someone was already overseeing the main issue (here the ffmpeg transition). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Bug 2080493] Re: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-12 Thread Paul Mars
** Patch removed: "LP2080493.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplayer/+bug/2080493/+attachment/5816136/+files/LP2080493.patch ** Patch added: "LP2080493.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplayer/+bug/2080493/+attachment/5816209/+files/LP2080493.patch -- You

[Bug 2080493] Re: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-12 Thread Paul Mars
** Patch added: "LP2080493.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplayer/+bug/2080493/+attachment/5816136/+files/LP2080493.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080493 Ti

[Bug 2080493] Re: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-12 Thread Paul Mars
See the test PPA with the patch https://launchpad.net/~upils/+archive/ubuntu/test-oracular/+packages ** Changed in: mplayer (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Mars (upils) ** Tags added: ftbfs oracular update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 2080493] [NEW] FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-09-12 Thread Paul Mars
Public bug reported: Reported in debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075294 ** Affects: mplayer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. htt

[Bug 2080254] Re: autopkgtest failures due to outdated checksum in tests

2024-09-11 Thread Paul Mars
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~upils/ubuntu/+source/pbdagcon/+git/pbdagcon/+merge/472987 ** Changed in: pbdagcon (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 2080254] [NEW] autopkgtest failures due to outdated checksum in tests

2024-09-10 Thread Paul Mars
Assignee: Paul Mars (upils) Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse ** Changed in: pbdagcon (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Mars (upils) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 2059074] Re: proposed-migration for krita 1:5.2.2+dfsg-2build5

2024-05-15 Thread Paul Mars
An amrhf binary package is now available in oracular. ** Changed in: krita (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059074 Title: proposed-migratio

[Bug 2059074] Re: proposed-migration for krita 1:5.2.2+dfsg-2build5

2024-05-15 Thread Paul Mars
** Changed in: krita (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Mars (upils) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059074 Title: proposed-migration for krita 1:5.2.2+dfsg-2build5

[Bug 2060628] Re: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'numpy.distutils'

2024-04-09 Thread Paul Mars
Patch to replace numpy.disutils. This is building and testing fine in my ppa. See: - https://launchpad.net/~upils/+archive/ubuntu/test-ppa/+build/28041617 - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble-upils-test-ppa/noble/amd64/a/astrometry.net/20240409_120043_9df8a@/log.gz ** Pat

[Bug 2060628] [NEW] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'numpy.distutils'

2024-04-08 Thread Paul Mars
.astrometry.net_0.93+dfsg-1.1build3_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Affects: astrometry.net (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Paul Mars (upils) Status: Confirmed ** Tags: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-03-29 Thread Paul Mars
Updated patch with enr0n's fix to properly link against the installed lib and avoid building and linking to the LIBTRACEEVENT_STATIC. ** Patch added: "libtraceevent_1.8.2-1ubuntu1.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtraceevent/+bug/2055258/+attachment/5760653/+files/libtraceeve

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-03-29 Thread Paul Mars
Here is a patch with your suggested changes: - a friendly name on the autopkgtest - the patch to override the LIBTRACEEVENT_STATIC var added back - a note about the hijack of this var - patches 0002 and 0003 forwarded upstream - Forwarded headers added autopkgtest is currently running in my PPA.

[Bug 2012958] Re: ubuntu-image: failures in ADT: TestExtraSnapsWithFilesystem + 2 more

2024-03-21 Thread Paul Mars
** Changed in: ubuntu-image (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012958 Title: ubuntu-image: failures in ADT: TestExtraSnapsWithFilesystem + 2 m

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-03-15 Thread Paul Mars
Correction of the previous patch using dpkg -L to get the lib path again, because this is working and the previous method was not. Maybe we can improve later. ** Patch added: "libtraceevent_1.8.2-1ubuntu1.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtraceevent/+bug/2055258/+attachment/57

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-03-15 Thread Paul Mars
Thanks for the review bdrung. > 2. Have you forwarded 0002-fail-unitest-when-test-fail.patch and 0003-fix-tests-on-big-endian.patch to upstream? No, because I would rather be sure this is reviewed and validated before forwarding. > 3. A newline at the end of debian/rules is missing. Thanks, now

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-03-15 Thread Paul Mars
** Changed in: libtraceevent (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055258 Title: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest To manage not

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-03-13 Thread Paul Mars
Updated patch. Autopktests in progress, I will update this comment when they are done. ** Patch added: "libtraceevent_1.8.2-1ubuntu12.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtraceevent/+bug/2055258/+attachment/5755662/+files/libtraceevent_1.8.2-1ubuntu12.diff -- You received this

[Bug 2051916] Re: [MIR] promote libtraceevent as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-03-13 Thread Paul Mars
> FWIW, the convention for ppa uploads is to append ~ppaX to the new version number. Oh my bad, I forgot about that! > This was causing me a lot of confusion Sorry about that, it was not clearly mentioned. > If you want to keep using LIBTRACEEVENT_STATIC for this purpose, I did this because I

[Bug 2051916] Re: [MIR] promote libtraceevent as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-03-11 Thread Paul Mars
> The version number for the package also looks wrong still. Yes, because for now I am submitting the patch I am generating from the build I submit to my PPA to test. I will fix this once everything is done. > Are you intentionally populating LIBRARY_STATIC with a path to a *shared* library? Yes

[Bug 2055309] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-03-11 Thread Paul Mars
I spent some time investigating today the uprobes tests failure. I understand these test fail because the call to tracefs_event_enable() in check_probes returns -1. It also encounters errno=524, which is (apparently) the err number returned by seccomp when failing to load a filter. (see https://git

[Bug 2051916] Re: [MIR] promote libtraceevent as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-03-11 Thread Paul Mars
Is that what you had in mind? Because it looks like this is working as I expected See https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble-upils-test- ppa/noble/amd64/libt/libtraceevent/20240311_132302_36e50@/log.gz Did I miss something? ** Patch added: "libtraceevent_1.8.2-1ubuntu11.diff"

[Bug 2051916] Re: [MIR] promote libtraceevent as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-03-11 Thread Paul Mars
Thanks for the review enr0n! I like your solution of setting LIBTRACEEVENT_STATIC in debian/tests/utest to have minimal changes in the Makefile. > Shouldn't this be libtraceevent.a? Further, wouldn't it be better to make > this `LIBTRACEEVENT_STATIC = -l:libtraceevent.a`? In its review didrock

[Bug 1663193] Re: snap download doesn't work on arm64

2024-03-08 Thread Paul Mars
** Changed in: ubuntu-image Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663193 Title: snap download doesn't work on arm64 To manage notifications abo

[Bug 2051916] Re: [MIR] promote libtraceevent as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-03-07 Thread Paul Mars
I now have a patch adding (and fixing) tests running at build and in autopkgtest. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtraceevent/+bug/2055258/comments/11 I am now waiting for sponsorship on this upload. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-03-07 Thread Paul Mars
Here is new patch. Thanks to mkukri for finding the root cause of the failing tests on s390x. sudipmuk I have split the change in 3 different patch so this will be easier to upstream. ** Patch added: "libtraceevent_1.8.2-1ubuntu8.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtraceevent/+

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-02-29 Thread Paul Mars
Current patch. 3 tests still fail. ** Patch added: "libtraceevent_1.8.2-1ubuntu7.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtraceevent/+bug/2055258/+attachment/5750727/+files/libtraceevent_1.8.2-1ubuntu7.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 2054925] Re: Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7

2024-02-29 Thread Paul Mars
Building an noble image with ubuntu-image, using debootstrap 1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7, worked (on a amd64 Jammy). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925 Title: Debootstrap fails for Nobl

[Bug 2055309] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-02-29 Thread Paul Mars
I have a patch to run tests in autopkgtest but these tests are failing. I checked and they are failing without any change on my side. 2 out of 36 tests are failing. I will try to diagnose these failures. # sudo ./utest/trace-utest CUnit - A unit testing framework for C - Version 2.1-3

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-02-29 Thread Paul Mars
I made some progress. It looks like part of the dataset used to run test is adapted to big endian (via #if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__) but this is not needed (and even problematic). I am not able to run 9 out of 11 tests successfully and I am still trying to find a solution for the

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-02-28 Thread Paul Mars
sudipmuk do you happen to know if unit tests ever worked on s390x? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055258 Title: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest To manage notifica

[Bug 2051925] Re: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-02-28 Thread Paul Mars
I have opened a dedicated bug to work on the patch. See LP: #2055309 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051925 Title: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency To manage notifi

[Bug 2055309] [NEW] No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-02-28 Thread Paul Mars
Public bug reported: Track the addition of a test suite to be run at built time and during autopkgtest. ** Affects: libtracefs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-02-28 Thread Paul Mars
Hey sudipmuk. Thanks for the insight anyway, because I thought of executing the samples at first, so I could have hit these issues. By the way, If you have any idea why test on s390x fails, I am interested! So far I suspected the endianness in dyn_str_data (since s390x is big endian) but it looks

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-02-28 Thread Paul Mars
Failure on s390x https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- noble-upils-test- ppa/noble/s390x/libt/libtraceevent/20240228_090511_c0996@/log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205

[Bug 2051916] Re: [MIR] promote libtraceevent as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-02-28 Thread Paul Mars
I have opened a dedicated bug to work on the patch as discussed with slyon. See LP: #2055258 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051916 Title: [MIR] promote libtraceevent as a trace-cmd d

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-02-28 Thread Paul Mars
Current patch. ** Patch added: "libtraceevent_1.8.2-1ubuntu5.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtraceevent/+bug/2055258/+attachment/5750087/+files/libtraceevent_1.8.2-1ubuntu5.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 2055258] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-02-28 Thread Paul Mars
Updated patch. The test binary will now return 1 if at least one test failed. I will run autopkgtest when the pkg is published, and I expect it will fail (and correctly report this failure) for s390x. We should then decide if this failure is blocking the MIR process or not. The ppa: https://launc

[Bug 2055258] [NEW] No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-02-28 Thread Paul Mars
Public bug reported: Track the addition of a test suite to be run at built time and during autopkgtest. ** Affects: libtraceevent (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Paul Mars (upils) Status: New ** Changed in: libtraceevent (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => H

[Bug 2051925] Re: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-02-27 Thread Paul Mars
Here is the current patch. As mentioned in my previous comment tests are failing but at least the reviewer can see if I am heading in the right direction. ** Patch added: "libtracefs_1.8.0-1ubuntu4.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtracefs/+bug/2051925/+attachment/5749793/+fil

[Bug 2051925] Re: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-02-27 Thread Paul Mars
I am struggling to tell the builder to run the dh_auto_test as root. I tried "export DEB_GAIN_ROOT_CMD='sudo -nE --'" in d/rules. And I tried to make sense of the documentation regarding Rules-Requires-Root but this is very confusing and so far I failed. Aside from this, I added 2 autopkgtest rul

[Bug 2051916] Re: [MIR] promote libtraceevent as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-02-27 Thread Paul Mars
Updated patch. The test binary will now return 1 if at least one test failed. I will run autopkgtest when the pkg is published, and I expect it will fail (and correctly report this failure) for s390x. We should then decide if this failure is blocking the MIR process or not. ** Patch added: "libtr

[Bug 2055059] Re: Merge python-ldap 3.4.4-1 from debian unstable into noble

2024-02-27 Thread Paul Mars
Closed in favor of LP: #2055138 since there is no delta anymore. ** Changed in: python-ldap (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Mars (upils) ** Changed in: python-ldap (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 2055138] [NEW] Sync python-ldap 3.4.4-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-02-27 Thread Paul Mars
Public bug reported: Please sync python-ldap 3.4.4-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: * There is no Ubuntu delta anymore. * Drop patch solving LP: #2044546 (now in upstream) Changelog entries since current noble version 3.4.3-2ubun

[Bug 2055059] [NEW] Merge python-ldap 3.4.4-1 from debian unstable into noble

2024-02-26 Thread Paul Mars
Public bug reported: Merge python-ldap 3.4.4-1 from debian unstable into noble. This is a tracking bug. ** Affects: python-ldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2051916] Re: [MIR] promote libtraceevent as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-02-26 Thread Paul Mars
Here is a patch to run utest at build time and build+run it with the installed lib in autopkgtest. I will update with the log of a successful autopkgtest run once this is done. ** Patch added: "libtraceevent_1.8.2-1ubuntu3.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtraceevent/+bug/205