This version has expired
** Changed in: initramfs-tools
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
Title:
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing
Exactly the same bug is still on 11.10, fresh install. But the v86d fix
does not work (blank screen) on this version so Ubuntu seems to have
regressed here. Also the consoles (Ctrl+Alt+F1 etc) do not work which
may be related, or maybe they are related to Bug #728745 I dont know. I
pin my hopes on
Sorry, I should say 11.10 is the same as 11.04. There is random black
and white stripes, not big Ubuntu logo. So far its getting worse on
every new release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I confirm #140: With my Nvidia video card, after a clean install of
11.10, the monitor only shows Video mode not supported from boot until
gdm.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
I predict that this bug will affect that next LTS too. The frame buffer
doesn't support my monitor's resolution either, as I tried this fix
manually already. And it's a common resolution (1920x1080). The release
after the next should have been the one to include plymouth. Not 10.04.
--
You
Actually, it's better in 10.04, because at least it shows the logo, even
if it's big and ugly. It screws up in all kinds of interesting ways in
10.10 and 11.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
For me clean install of Kubuntu 11.10 64b fixed this problem. I have
NVidia GeForce480 GS in Dell Precision T5500 and the boot process now
displays the full resolution (as far as I can tell) Kubuntu logo and
asks for pasword for encrypted discs with nice graphic prompt.
--
You received this bug
Actually sorry, the computer where the problem is fixed was an upgrade
from 11.04, not a clean install. In either case it improved since in
11.04. In 11.04 the logo wasn't grahics, just text mode and the password
prompt was in a text mode as well. Now it is all graphic. The fix I have
applied in
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:29:01AM -, Andrew Schulman wrote:
I confirm #140: With my Nvidia video card, after a clean install of
11.10, the monitor only shows Video mode not supported from boot until
gdm.
Unfortunately, VBE doesn't give us EDID information about supported monitor
** Also affects: initramfs-tools
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
Title:
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia
In natty and above, it's possible to fix this by making sure we have
vesafb access to the framebuffer that grub2 passes us at boot time.
This needs one small fix in initramfs-tools for oneiric.
** Package changed: plymouth (Ubuntu) = initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: initramfs-tools
Someone attempted to make a fix for Ubuntu 10.04 and newer:
http://kyleabaker.com/2010/07/11/how-to-fix-your-ubuntu-boot-screen/
For me (Ubuntu Xubuntu 11.04, nVidia proprietary driver, BURG on Dell
XPS M1730 with nVidia 8700GT SLI) it only reactivates the graphical logo
during shutdown, and I
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/initramfs-tools
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
Title:
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia
proprietary graphics driver
This bug was fixed in the package initramfs-tools - 0.99ubuntu6
---
initramfs-tools (0.99ubuntu6) oneiric; urgency=low
* scripts/init-top/framebuffer: fall back to vesafb if no other
framebuffer is found/configured, so we can take full advantage of the
grub gfxpayload
This bug affects me. The workaround from idyllic only works on my
machine if Ubuntu Meerkat is installed. With Ubuntu Narwhal, it does not
work.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
Which Ubuntu version is that working on? I cant find
libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental for 10.04
I did try it on natty beta2 (called experimental 3D driver in jockey driver
list) and it worked well, but it seems to have vanished now natty has been
released. Plymouth does not work at all on natty,
The new experimental open source nVidia driver, libgl1-mesa-dri-
experimental, is fantastic! It's so nice to be able to display my boot
screen correctly without having to fiddle with my system. The only
change I woulda made woulda been to install it be default, but all in
good time, I suppose.
It was a bug for me, but after upgrade to Natty i'm having this (bug
771905). It is sad
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
Title:
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing
I cannot even get the nvidia drivers to work on 11.04. But have tried
the v86d fix. It is functional, but the largest mode I am allowed is
1280 x 1024 (on a 1680 x 1050 monitor). The result is a logo thats
still a bit fuzzy, and the background is sort of chequered stripes, with
a gap for the
Still a problem with 11.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
Title:
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia
proprietary graphics driver
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
Title:
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia
This is *not* a question of opinion. The splash screen *is* rendering
incorrectly when using the binary drivers, and this is something that
needs to be fixed; it just isn't done yet because it's a difficult bug
to fix and other bugs have taken priority.
Please don't mark as 'Opinion' a bug that
„How hard can it be to understand the following simple sentence:
THE USER DOESN'T CARE.
Pushing the blame around doesn't help anybody.”
-- Linus Torvalds
The user really doesn't care if his problem is caused by incompatibility
between the driver and the OS or lack of cooperation between
They need to branch out into a hardcore linux guru version and a
window convert version if they want to keep pursuing these two
completely different career paths.
Yes that is the point. In a month we wil have Unity instead of Gnome. I
am comfortable with that but my users probably will not be. Ik
The real problem here is people who pretend that the greatest thing a
linux distribution can do is immediately embrace new technologies that
are not yet fully supported by vendor drivers, yet continue to harass
users to install vendor drivers right after installing their OS. When
you go even
In response to #116:
Microsoft charges you $200 and up for a full version of Windows 7, they
do not run an X-server environment but rather have direct input and
cooperation with the drivers and their respective manufacturers. They
don't run a X server because they have full on mutual cooperation
gslack,
You sure went all out on that rant. But the fact of the matter is,
every one of us here knows more than enough about how hardware vendors
don't fully support linux. After ten years I'm getting tired of hearing
excuses about Microsoft whispering sweet nothings into ATI and nvidia's
ears
And I don't want to hear any more excuses about vendors not being as
fully into the Linux game as we wish they were. They devote as much
time and resources as they can and as their market allows. They
actually are putting effort into their drivers, but KMS was sprung on
them at the last second.
Canonical has no interest in reverting Plymouth, and cannot force Nvidia
or ATI to add the required hooks to their drivers. Nothing else needs
to be said about this, so please give 140 inboxes a rest. If this still
bothers you, go contribute your time to another project, as I did.
--
You
On 27/03/11 09:56, Jason Wagner wrote:
Canonical has no interest in reverting Plymouth, and cannot force Nvidia
or ATI to add the required hooks to their drivers. Nothing else needs
to be said about this, so please give 140 inboxes a rest. If this still
bothers you, go contribute your time
Since this is a heated topic and quite important to me, I'll add my
opinion and ask a question too.
This may not be a usability issue for those that are familiar with
computers and linux, but those who are not and see this will assume
they did something wrong when installing vendor drivers or
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:14:49AM -, Rachel Greenham wrote:
On 27/03/11 09:56, Jason Wagner wrote:
Canonical has no interest in reverting Plymouth, and cannot force Nvidia
or ATI to add the required hooks to their drivers. Nothing else needs
to be said about this, so please give 140
I was the person who started this bug report nearly one year ago now. I
intended to alert the developers to the presence of a bug I thought might
affect my graphics card only. I didn't start it with the desire of creating a
rant page as seen in forums. I felt a bit awkward when I sent it off -
Nathaniel, I too am sorry you felt you had engage capslock.LOL
You said it embarrassed you when friends looked over your shoulder while
the loading screen was displayed. As another poster pointed out thats
the real problem here. Many of us here told you how to fix it, you can
try one of those
The work arounds work to varying degrees for most people experiencing this
issue, and I won't rehash them. That being said, I run the ATI proprietary
driver in Ubuntu 10.10 and had this issue as well. This is an issue with
proprietary drivers and NOT plymouth itself or Ubuntu. This is a prime
The issue here is not necessarily that the display method used by
plymouth is incompatible with proprietary drivers. I would say the
issue is that the developers made an unnecessary switch to this display
method knowing full well that the proprietary drivers didn't support it
yet.
I'm with
if I catch them looking over my shoulder as ubuntu is booting up, I feel
embarrassed.
this pretty much sums up the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
Title:
Ubuntu
This bug is the one and only bug I have been able to notice after an
upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10.
That means that the 10.10 install would be working 100% perfectly for
me, if this bug was fixed. Instead, the crucial first ten second
impression is ruined by a scary and broken looking boot screen.
completely disagree with people who say this is a minor bug. it's a
major show stopper for the whole project. just wonder why it takes so
long for Canonical team to fix it. Ubuntu is loosing face, literally...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
On 17/03/2011 09:25, Kom-Si wrote:
completely disagree with people who say this is a minor bug. it's a
major show stopper for the whole project. just wonder why it takes so
long for Canonical team to fix it. Ubuntu is loosing face, literally...
does seem to be substantially resolved in natty
But it is there in Lucid. And Lucid is LTS and aimed at the more
professional market. You can't have a bug like this in an LTS version.
It's just plain stupid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
But it is there in Lucid.
and in Maverick, too. and nobody's gonna jump to Natty simply because the
'stupid' splash screen bug is fixed there.
I'd rather keep on using 10.10 with a decent splash screen.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Exactly. But you shouldn't have gone to this broken boot-up software in
the first place before you had the bugs out of it. When it doesn't work
on essentially all high end graphics hardware and a good portion of low
end hardware, it doesn't work. I'm sick of Ubuntu repeated replacing
working
Whoa there, fella. Take it easy.
Plymouth mostly looks and works great. This is a bug, and they're
fixing it. There's no call for abuse.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
What I meant is that I don't see what was wrong with the late X approach
of 9.10. It completely avoided the need for driver support.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
Title:
To me, the point is this. Canonical draw attention to this new feature
by advertising it as an improvement. Then after the first boot, the user
is *prompted*, by the system, to install the nvidia drivers. Then it
goes all crappy. I just look away while its booting :-\
--
You received this bug
And it works fine until user decides to install a proprietary driver which
does not like some other
driver to be loaded before it. The behaviour cannot be changed because
the driver is proprietary (try forcing Nvidia and ATI to amend this).
So why is it working on Natty then? And why is one
Use open drivers - a default choice for most users
2 apienk: who says that? any statistics? visual effects don't work without
proprietary drivers, the whole GUI experience using 'nouveau' is abhorrent.
of course I tried 'nouveau', and I can surely say that it's lame. it's not just
eye-candy
Ok, we all agree that this is a bug. Nouveau has several issues (bug 553789
being one of the rather grave ones that affect me personally) so just
suggesting to use that rather than the nvidia driver doesn't help many of us.
As for why plymouth is there: It functions as a message manager between
I completely disagree with the people who consider this to be a low
priority issue. On systems with encrypted drives (LUKS/cryptsetup/dm-
crypt) the splash screen serves the purpose of entering passphrases to
decrypt the drives. The usability in low resolution mode is complete
different than in
This bug report is about the aesthetic difference when running on
proprietary video drivers. If you have encountered a *usability*
problem when running with such a proprietary driver, please file a
separate bug report for that; the prompts should work the same
regardless of the display
The fix posted by Mauricio Parra Casado worked on my ATI laptop
(Maverick.) Unfortunately my screen's native resolution wasn't
available, but at 1024x768, it's still a lot better than before.
I'd like to say to anybody that brushes this problem aside as
unimportant because the boot splash is
All the work arounds are great, glad we figured them out. However this is a
bug, not a bug to work around but a bug to be fixed. Its been many months
since this issue has existed. Quite frankly I think it might be best to
start looking into alternate means of splash screens besides plymouth since
The script does not work for me (NVidia Geforce 8800 GT, ubuntu 10.04).
The boot menu now appears in the high resolution, after this the splash
screen appears in the know ugly way.
Because the boot menu is shown in the high resolution, I don't think,
that it is the wrong resolution.
@Mauricio:
Here's a script that fixes it: http://www.webupd8.org/2010/10/script-to-
fix-ubuntu-plymouth-for.html (it basically uses Mauricio Parra Casado's
steps above, but automatically).
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
I didn't try with ATI, but with NVidia works perfectly... This is what
i've done:
1- Open a terminal and type this:
$ sudo su
and type your password
2- Install this:
# apt-get install v86d hwinfo
3- Execute the next command on the console
# hwinfo --framebuffer
this shows a list of
A workaround for Lucid is to uninstall every package called plymouth-
theme-*. That way you have just text, which is actually the way I like
it. I never understood why there is no way to monitor the boot processes
in Ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia
Startupmanager fix didn't work for me (lucid). No splash screen at all.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
A workaround for the ugly text bootsplash (in Maverik Meerkat) is to
uninstall plymouth-theme-kubuntu-text and plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text.
You will get the text messages of boot proccess, instead of the ugly
text logo.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
according to the Ubuntu 10.10 Release notes, this is currently broken
and only shows text :-(
The logo will not display during boot when using the Nvidia
proprietary driver. (653274)
Well, this is also happening with the ATI proprietary driver and not
only with the Nvidia
The 'startupmanager' solution solved the problem for me. I get a splash
screen during bootup and shutdown.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a
according to the Ubuntu 10.10 Release notes, this is currently broken
and only shows text :-(
The logo will not display during boot when using the Nvidia proprietary
driver. (653274)
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
Come on get this fixed immediately... this should work out of the box.
We have year 2010. Fedora obviously got it fixed too, so why can't
Ubuntu do the same? Why does this issue still persist in 10.10? Make a
presentation with about and with Ubuntu and all people will vomit once
they see the ugly
Same thing in ubuntu 10.10
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
There is speculation about what uses plymouth wrong horizontal
frequency, unlike a mode proprietary drivers
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a
Assuming you've changed the resolution in startupmanager, edit the file
/etc/default/grub as root $(sudo gedit /etc/default/grub) and look for a
line that says vga=xyz, e.g.:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= splash vga=795
Then remove the vga argument (so it's just splash in this example) and
save. Now run
I tried installing startupmanager and didn't solve the problem (it didn't
display any screen at all!) wonder how to restore it again.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Paul van Genderen
563...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Here's what I did (worked for me):
First, I installed the package
Here's what I did (worked for me):
First, I installed the package startupmanager (like so: sudo aptitude
install startupmanager). It should appear in the Gnome menu under System
Administration StartUp-Manager. From there, select a resolution and
set colour depth to 24 bits. Enable Show boot
nVidia 9600 GT
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Same here. I have a laptop with 16:10 ratio. It has 1366x768 resolution.
Also it has an ATi HD Mobility Radeon 5470.
With or without proprietary drivers, It still looks like sh*t.
** Tags added: apport-collected
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
I have this issue with both my home PC (nvidia MX400) and work PC
(nvidia Geforce 7300). I changed from the Nouveau driver on my work PC
because it is buggy. Small fonts have bits missing in them making some
words unreadable. But the huge ugly Ubuntu logo with the nvidia driver
is embarrassing in
Not just an nvidia issue - ATI Catalyst with open source drivers also
fails to render it correctly.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
It's not a paper cut, but it *is* being worked on. See Colins mail on the
ubuntu-devel mailing list:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2010-July/030995.html
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
I am also experiencing this after installing the proprietary nvidia driver.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Fix-the-Big-and-Ugly-Plymouth-Logo-in-Ubuntu-10-04-140810.shtml
help me partially. Now splash moved to the left on 1-2 cm.
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged =
Did anyone tried the latest x-swat drivers? they worked for me with
maverick as i said before.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
@madbiologist: Thanks for the link but NV50 has TODO status for TV out.
Combined with this message: Please note, that each item in the matrix
is either a big or a huge piece of functionality, so the matrix is
updated rarely. I think this is gonna take ages.
I think it would be wiser to wait for
I think i give up, I've tried everything and nothing works for me, btw I
have a NVidia GeForce GT 130M on a HP HDX-16 1370
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification
Just to let you know everything is working fine for me now i use maverick with
the latest x-swat fglrx-installer and at log of and log on i have ubuntu login
working perfectly he's slightly bigger then when using xorg but he's still good
enaf for me he's not hugh or anything and he's sleek so
ubuntu logo i meant if i could i would upload pictures later my problem is that
ubuntu doesn't support my v3m mobile
phone so it's quite difficult to take pictures and upload them i posted a new
bug about that.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
You will probably want to monitor the page at
http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/FeatureMatrix
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I use the Nvidia proprietary driver to get the TV-out working.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Thanks, this is useful.
If you are experiencing the same issue as bug #570879 please click the
link This bug affects 13 people. Does this bug affect you? on that bug
and subscribe to that bug as well so that you receive updates.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia
The last report I could find about NVIDIA TV-out with the open source Nouveau
driver was http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=NzgzNA
I did find a later report about benchmarking Fedora which briefly mentioned
that Nouveau TV-out is still being worked on. Maxim - what model is your
GeForce 8400 GS
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Same problem here. I have a Kubuntu box I don't even use because I can't
stand to see that and would be embarrassed if anyone else did.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug
Every cloud has a silver lining - have been trying to get my better half
to ditch XP on her laptop for over a year. A week ago XP had a bit of
melt down and needed a reinstall - an opportunity not to be missed; I
admit to telling a little white lie, something along the lines of the
graphic card
@James Ronald Collings - I guess you have an Iphone too. That's fine,
but personally I'm much more interested in how well it works and whether
it gets the job/s done properly than how it looks, especially if it's
only a temporary look. The wife of James in comment #50 seems to agree.
Speaking of
well personally I am using the proprietary Nvidia Driver.
If I might add my two cents here, I think we all would like both sides
of the coin in this ideally, that is shininess and efficiency (at least
I would), and one of these sides right now is severely lacking.
Possible temp fix for NVidia
FYI, I own an old iPhone which I use as a pod but I make calls with my Nexus
One.
Sent from my Nexus One running Android
On Jun 21, 2010 8:15 AM, madbiologist s.j.tur...@uq.net.au wrote:
@James Ronald Collings - I guess you have an Iphone too. That's fine,
but personally I'm much more
On 6/21/10 5:07 AM, madbiologist wrote:
Speaking of getting the job done, can I ask everyone why you are using
the fglrx (Catalyst) driver instead of the open-source radeon driver?
If you have an Evergreen series (HD5xxx) card I understand - there is no
need to reply, but what about other
Just adding a +1 for experiencing this bug. Also want to reiterate
earlier comments that this bug does not provide a user with a warm and
fuzzy feeling during the boot sequence. Frankly, it makes this LTS
release look like a beta.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia
I too think that lucid with all it's problems is looking like beta that
is why i use maverick right now it's installer(ubiquity)is much better
but it still have problems with Ubuntu splashscreen and that is that
after installing fglrx there is no logo at all just a purple screen at
boot only with
Exactly, I have two Ubuntu converts among my friends also and another
one who wants to try it out. I will not install Lucid on their comps
because I can't explain this bug to them. I'm actually looking if
another distro could be a better option in the future. Ubuntu changes
too much too fast,
Same issue here. I've got 10.04 running on my HD Home Theatre PC (in
fact, that I bought especially to run Lynx on).
Splash was working beautifully (sort of) until I installed the nVidia
proprietary drivers (essential for decent video experience etc). Now, I
have the flashing cursor / big,
Same problem here (ugly splash screen), but only with Nvidia driver. I
solved it following step-by-step this guide in Italian:
http://www.linuxqualityhelp.it/supporto/viewtopic.php?f=25t=5950
Now it works perfectly.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
I am effected by this as well, and if I may put in my two cents as an
ubuntu user, for me personally, graphics trump speed, especially with
the (formerly) sleak splash. so to all who say that speed is more
important that a shiny splash, and that it goes so fast it doesnt
matter, as an ubuntu user,
Same problem here. It would be nice if this was fixed sooner rather than
later.
--
Ubuntu splashscreen big and ugly after installing ATI/nVidia proprietary
graphics driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Well i hope they fix it till 10.04.1 would be releasd in july because to
be honest i am not thrilled about reinstalling ubuntu any time soon with
all this bugs still there.
The plymouth problem and the fglrx not working with higer kernels and
etc all the bugs i posted or replied in them.
--
I agree with aviramof completely. This bothers so much, that I won't
install this ubuntu release nor recommend it to anyone as long as this
ridiculous bug exists.
I can confirm it too btw. - happens after ATI driver install. This is
annoying and makes bad impression, looks like a broken product.
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
