Op donderdag 17-01-2008 om 22:29 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Jo-Erlend
Schinstad:
On 17/01/2008, Jan Claeys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op dinsdag 15-01-2008 om 11:51 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Wouter
Stomp:
I would also like to argue for this: Brasero does everything n-c-b
does, and
Op dinsdag 15-01-2008 om 11:51 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Wouter
Stomp:
I would also like to argue for this: Brasero does everything n-c-b
does, and more.
Does it provide all the context menu stuff in nautilus which I think is
actually n-c-b's strongest point?
--
Jan Claeys
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Prieto Ucha wrote:
Removing nautilus-cd-burner wouldn't fix the problem you describe:
unnecessary UI inconsistency would still exist with Brasero vs. Nautilus
itself. Why is creating a new folder done one way in Nautilus, and
another way
Hi again Matthew,
Yes there is. That problem is less serious, because people who use photo
or music management applications typically use them more frequently than
they use nautilus-cd-burner, so they have more time to learn the
inconsistencies. But it is still suboptimal that, for example,
Hi Sebastien,
That has already been discussed to the desktop team meeting some days
ago and we decided to give it a try
Have you thought of the possibility (since Brasero does everything
Nautilus-cd-burner does, and more) to have the places → cd creator menu
item launch Brasero? It would be
I would also like to argue for this: Brasero does everything n-c-b
does, and more. One of the goals/specs set for hardy is reducing
duplication within Ubuntu. If we would add brasero but keep n-c-b as
well we will be increasing the amount of duplicate functionality.
What is even more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wouter Stomp wrote:
...
What is even more important is that ncb and brasero have a very, very
similar user interface, but not exactly the same. This can be very
confusing, as it feels like you are working with the same application
but then e.g.
Removing nautilus-cd-burner wouldn't fix the problem you describe:
unnecessary UI inconsistency would still exist with Brasero vs. Nautilus
itself. Why is creating a new folder done one way in Nautilus, and
another way in Brasero? Why is removing files from a folder done way in
Nautilus, and
On Jan 15, 2008 2:12 PM, David Prieto Ucha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Removing nautilus-cd-burner wouldn't fix the problem you describe:
unnecessary UI inconsistency would still exist with Brasero vs. Nautilus
itself. Why is creating a new folder done one way in Nautilus, and
another way in
On 16/01/2008, Corey Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The difference here is that burning a cd of files is basically the
same as managing files, as where as managing your music/photos is a
very different thing, with defined tasks, etc. For that matter, Fspot
and RB should make it trivial to
Hello all,
I originally posted this to ubuntu-devel-discuss, but I thought it
might interest people on this list as well, so I decided to post my
proposal here as well:
I would like to propose including Brasero in the default Ubuntu
installation. Brasero is an application to burn CD/DVD's for
On lun, 2008-01-14 at 12:55 +0100, Wouter Stomp wrote:
Hello all,
I originally posted this to ubuntu-devel-discuss, but I thought it
might interest people on this list as well, so I decided to post my
proposal here as well:
That has already been discussed to the desktop team meeting some
12 matches
Mail list logo
