> I would also like to argue for this: Brasero does everything n-c-b > does, and more. One of the goals/specs set for hardy is reducing > duplication within Ubuntu. If we would add brasero but keep n-c-b as > well we will be increasing the amount of duplicate functionality. > > What is even more important is that ncb and brasero have a very, very > similar user interface, but not exactly the same. This can be very > confusing, as it feels like you are working with the same application > but then e.g. suddenly the burn cd button has moved to a different > location. > > Some concerns have been raised about brasero being a more advanced > program with more options that you don't really need, but I think that > is not the case. The programs, if you disable the sidebar in both, > look almost identical. There is no options or preferences dialog in > brasero. It does all things ncb does with equal ease, but at the same > time it doesn't have the limitations that I mentioned in my first > email.
That's exactly my point. In Bug #183130 Sebastien says that "nautilus-cd-burner is easier to use for simple task", but how exactly is that so? I have both open now and they look basically the same to me, except brasero has a bar indicating how much free space I have left.
-- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
