> > Removing nautilus-cd-burner wouldn't fix the problem you describe: > unnecessary UI inconsistency would still exist with Brasero vs. Nautilus > itself. Why is creating a new folder done one way in Nautilus, and > another way in Brasero? Why is removing files from a folder done way in > Nautilus, and another way in Brasero? Why does the confirmation alert > for replacing an item with the same name have different text and buttons > in Brasero than it does in Nautilus? Why does Brasero refer to > non-existent "projects"? And so on.
I think those would only qualify as inconsistencies if the user happens to expect a burning app to have the same interface as the file manager, which I think is not the case. I mean, we have a photo management app that does NOT look exactly like the file manager and a music management app that does NOT look exactly like the file manager, and there was never a problem with those. What makes you believe that it would be otherwise with CD burning? Why do you think NOT looking and behaving exactly like a file manager makes a burning app more complex to use? I'm eager to do some testing with family and friends, BTW. Get them to burn some stuff with Brasero, see if they have any problems or raise any of the afforementioned issues.
-- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
