> pe, 2005-10-21 kello 19:30 +0100, Jane Silber kirjoitti:
>
> > We need to sort some of these things out and move on to defining what
> > this team will do in order to get approval from the Community Council
> > and even be a team at all :).
>
> What you're proposing is precisely everything th
> A liasion officer enables focused communication. Weekly reviews by
> leads inter-project provides understanding. Liasion cross-team /
> Foundation / Canonical by liasion officers provides community
> understanding. _Posting_by_non-team_members_leads_ to_confusion_. If
> you want to criticise a pr
pe, 2005-10-21 kello 19:30 +0100, Jane Silber kirjoitti:
> We need to sort some of these things out and move on to defining what
> this team will do in order to get approval from the Community Council
> and even be a team at all :).
What you're proposing is precisely everything that's wrong abo
"We shouldn't have two teams, and we as a community shouldn't want
two. My messages have been an explicit attempt to try to avoid this -
thus my concern about communication methods and membership."
Which is where we began this discussion - it is easy to look back on a
forum and see where, why
Hi everyone -
I'd like to try to defuse this a bit.
Well, the fact that this is primarily revolving around the
perspectives of Canonical Employees. I tell you what - it seems that
I'm in the wrong place - there seems to be 2 marketing teams, and I'm
in the one on the wiki, the one with projec
Malcolm Yates wrote:
Ooops - this should have gone to the list - not just to LLoyd - sorry :-(
;)
making roughly 3 percent of the marketing list having Canonical
responsibility.
6%. ;)
Should it not be 6% of all other teams / bodies, then? Why not just have
one big, single list?
Jeff Waugh wrote:
I agree, thus we would like to post activities (if we're told about them)
and would like to have an _organised_ communication with all other groups
via liaisons. It is obviously an important relationship - but not more
important than with the rest of the communi
Ooops - this should have gone to the list - not just to LLoyd - sorry :-(
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-marketing] If it isn't broken...
Date: Friday 21 October 2005 17:01
From: Malcolm Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 21 October 2005 15:
> I agree, thus we would like to post activities (if we're told about them)
> and would like to have an _organised_ communication with all other groups
> via liaisons. It is obviously an important relationship - but not more
> important than with the rest of the community. Hey, why not bring in a
Just to add my 2 cents to this discussion. Except for a couple of
small emails, I have been mostly luking in this mailing list;
something I do on a bunch of Ubuntu mailing lists, only geting
involved in specific things I'm interested to, or have time for.
I'm not a Canonical employees, but I
Jeff Waugh wrote:
Can we have a Marketing Team mailing list, so we can get some work done,
please? - and please join our team - but not as representatives from
Canonical.
This is the marketing team mailing list. Anyone who works for Canonical is
going to be stuck repre
> Can we have a Marketing Team mailing list, so we can get some work done,
> please? - and please join our team - but not as representatives from
> Canonical.
This is the marketing team mailing list. Anyone who works for Canonical is
going to be stuck representing Canonical no matter what happen
"Defining an exclusive "membership" of the
marketing team is going to be off-putting,
in my opinion."
Please see: "it's an
open team!"
"How exactly does one gain membership in the Marketing Team in
your vision? Subscribe to this
list? Join the new forum? Gain approval from existing team membe
On Friday 21 October 2005 08:56, Jane Silber wrote:
> Lloyd -
>
> > Or just google for "chain letters". We don't need to reward people for
> > spreading Ubuntu. We need to motivate them and work together as a
> > _community_ (as opposed to a community mandated by Canonical employees).
>
> I think t
Lloyd -
Or just google for "chain letters". We don't need to reward people for
spreading Ubuntu. We need to motivate them and work together as a
_community_ (as opposed to a community mandated by Canonical employees).
I think there are obvious differences between what I suggested as a
mark
15 matches
Mail list logo
