"Ante Karamatić" wrote:
>On 16.04.2010 19:45, Douglas Stanley wrote:
>
>> Isn't that more or less what happens when dpkg configures postfix anyway? Am
>> I
>> missing something that would make this task so difficult it's not worth
>> doing?
>
>Unfortunately, it's not that easy. postfix's conf
On 16.04.2010 19:45, Douglas Stanley wrote:
> Isn't that more or less what happens when dpkg configures postfix anyway? Am I
> missing something that would make this task so difficult it's not worth doing?
Unfortunately, it's not that easy. postfix's configuration can be edited
with 'postconf' t
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Aurélien Naldi
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Imre Gergely wrote:
>>
>> Just my two cents... I would agree on the confusion part of the extra
>> dovecot-postfix.conf config file... It's an attempt to make the servers
>> more user friendly, which I'm no
On 04/16/2010 07:00 AM, ubuntu-server-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Imre Gergely wrote:
>
>> >
>> > Just my two cents... I would agree on the confusion part of the extra
>> > dovecot-postfix.conf config file... It's an attempt to make the servers
>> >
Hi,
Here are the minutes of meeting. They can also be found online with the
irc logs here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20100414.
Review ACTION points from previous meeting
* mathiaz to fix a broken script with bug reporting link above (not done)
* ttx to follow up with
On 16.04.2010 00:47, Mathias Gug wrote:
> While the goal is worthwhile the implementation seems to not be the best
> option. Using an alternate configuration file breaks a lot of common knowledge
> to the point that an upstream developer filed a bug [1] with a patch to
> dovecot
> to provide addi
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 07:17:18AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >
> >Fixing shortcomings in the current implementation seems important but
> >please don't stop providing good default configuration and helpers for
> >the common needs.
> >
> >
> Well put. There are a LOT fewer requests for he
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> "Andy Rabagliati" wrote:
>
> >Standard configs only.
> >
> I guess we should also drop the non-standard postfix configuration we ship
> too.
I guess I should have said standard config *paths* only.
Perhaps ship an alternate dovecot-postfix file in
"Aurélien Naldi" wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Imre Gergely wrote:
>>
>> Just my two cents... I would agree on the confusion part of the extra
>> dovecot-postfix.conf config file... It's an attempt to make the servers
>> more user friendly, which I'm not sure is needed... if somebo
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Imre Gergely wrote:
>
> Just my two cents... I would agree on the confusion part of the extra
> dovecot-postfix.conf config file... It's an attempt to make the servers
> more user friendly, which I'm not sure is needed... if somebody wants to
> install/configure/a
"Andy Rabagliati" wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Egbert Jan wrote:
>
>> Drop it. It was the first thing I did when i was building a new server. Just
>> use the standard configs. Much clearer.
>
>I agree. Not dovecot/postfix related, but the extra dhcpd.conf (in a different
>directory!) for the lt
On 04/16/2010 10:48 AM, Andy Rabagliati wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Egbert Jan wrote:
>
>> Drop it. It was the first thing I did when i was building a new server. Just
>> use the standard configs. Much clearer.
>
> I agree. Not dovecot/postfix related, but the extra dhcpd.conf (in a different
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Egbert Jan wrote:
> Drop it. It was the first thing I did when i was building a new server. Just
> use the standard configs. Much clearer.
I agree. Not dovecot/postfix related, but the extra dhcpd.conf (in a different
directory!) for the ltsp config is a major source of confu
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: ubuntu-server-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
> [mailto:ubuntu-server-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] Namens Mathias Gug
> Verzonden: vrijdag 16 april 2010 0:48
> Aan: ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
> CC: iv...@ubuntu.com
> Onderwerp: RFC: remove dovecot-postfix from l
14 matches
Mail list logo
