On Wed, Apr 28, 2010, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> init: plymouth main process (979)
> killed by SEGV signal
> init: plymouth-splash main process (1724) terminated with status 2
Probably not the issue breaking lucid for you, but we discussed this
SEGV issue today
I have beta 2 working -- I can upgrade it now and see.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Has anybody had success running current lucid on a linode
> (www.linode.com) machine? I get plymouth errors during boot:
>
> (...)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2010 06:09 PM, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
> Right, pv-grub-* is used to boot custom kernels. You can read more about
> it at http://library.linode.com/advanced/pv-grub-howto and
> http://www.linode.com/wiki/index.php/PV-GRUB (I think it require
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 18:02 -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> No, I didn't change it to pv-grub-*. In fact, I never heard of it
> before, what does it do? It uses the guest kernel? "pv" sounds
> suspiciously like "para-virtual" ;)
Right, pv-grub-* is used to boot custom kernels. You can read more ab
On 4/28/2010 3:25 PM, Preston Hagar wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Dr. Nils Jungclaus
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using 8.04 on several (well equipped) servers and experience the
>> following problem on all of them:
>>
>> When doing larger I/O jobs like backup, I always get a ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2010 05:50 PM, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 17:09 -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Has anybody had success running current lucid on a linode
>> (www.linode.com) mach
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 17:09 -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Has anybody had success running current lucid on a linode
> (www.linode.com) machine? I get plymouth errors during boot:
>
Hmm.. I've just managed to reproduce your issue with the
2.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Has anybody had success running current lucid on a linode
(www.linode.com) machine? I get plymouth errors during boot:
(...)
Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1252k
init: ureadahead main process (978) terminated with status 5
udevd[1004]:
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 16:24 -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> On 04/28/2010 03:58 PM, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
> > The only downside is that it uses extended schemas to store the
> > information. To work with Andréas's DIT structure, we would need to
> > convert everything to cn=config format. That'
ke, 2010-04-28 kello 14:32 -0300, Andreas Hasenack kirjoitti:
> Having said that, I would certainly be interested in problems with my
> DIT and phpldapadmin or any other tool out there. I can think of one
> already which might break stuff out there, and that is the choosing of
> groups I made whic
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Dr. Nils Jungclaus
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using 8.04 on several (well equipped) servers and experience the
> following problem on all of them:
>
> When doing larger I/O jobs like backup, I always get a very poor interactive
> response of the system. Interactive in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2010 03:58 PM, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
> The only downside is that it uses extended schemas to store the
> information. To work with Andréas's DIT structure, we would need to
> convert everything to cn=config format. That's on my medium-term
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 13:31 -0500, Jorge Armando Medina wrote:
> > thats a quite good idea, at the moment I prefer Apache Directory Studio.
> > When you have got a client system to manage the server, its imo the
> > better solution to administer your DIT.
> > Its available for lnx, win and mac. The
Hi,
I am using 8.04 on several (well equipped) servers and experience the
following problem on all of them:
When doing larger I/O jobs like backup, I always get a very poor
interactive response of the system. Interactive in this case means
performance of database requests, web application re
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 02:32:27PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
>
> In fact, one of the things we talked about in the past UDSs, and which
> was done on the slapd package, is to make it so that other packages
> could hook into slapd and fill it with their schema and trees. This is
>
Benjamin Griese wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> thats a quite good idea, at the moment I prefer Apache Directory Studio.
> When you have got a client system to manage the server, its imo the
> better solution to administer your DIT.
> Its available for lnx, win and mac. Therefore it covers the most
> platfor
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
>
> I think the goal should be to get a starting point that helps newbies to
> at least *see* something when they point an ldap client to the server,
> and also allow more seasoned admins to build upon that tree.
>
> For me, that means:
> -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2010 02:25 PM, Adam Sommer wrote:
> Thanks Andreas for creating openldap-dit. For the last couple of days
> I've been testing it, and after a few updates was able to get it to work
> on Lucid. As you mentioned there are a lot of ways to crea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2010 02:16 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
> On 04/28/2010 09:45 AM, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
>> with reasonable default ACLs, on which new LDAP
>> administrators could build on and have a starting place for whatever
>> setup they wanted
> Do you or wil
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Mathias Gug wrote:
>
> I think this is a great idea. Basing the work on the openldap-dit project
> is a
> good start.
>
> I would focus on:
>
> 1. Identifying which use cases should be covered:
>* user and group management.
> 2. Creating a DIT that
Hi Mark,
thats a quite good idea, at the moment I prefer Apache Directory Studio.
When you have got a client system to manage the server, its imo the better
solution to administer your DIT.
Its available for lnx, win and mac. Therefore it covers the most platforms.
:)
Bye.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 a
On 04/28/2010 09:45 AM, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> with reasonable default ACLs, on which new LDAP
> administrators could build on and have a starting place for whatever
> setup they wanted
Do you or will you consider having phpldapadmin as part of this
"starting place"
Because, administering LDAP
Hi Andreas,
i just took a look on your your work and I agree to Mathia[sz] thats a good
start.
I think of a debconf menu similar to the nss_ldap and openldap-client one's,
that is asking you for your needs to build some ldifs from a base.
I havn't tested your script, maybe its already doing this i
Hi Andreas,
i just took a look on your your work and I agree to Mathia[sz] thats a good
start.
I think of a debconf menu similar to the nss_ldap and openldap-client one's,
that is asking you for your needs to build some ldifs from a base.
I havn't tested your script, maybe its already doing this i
Ubuntu Server Team weekly minutes have been published at:
* https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20100428
Summary:
On track for Lucid release. Get Blueprints filed for Maverick UDS as
soon as possible!
Actions:
1. hggdh, zul to get their release note/early SRU bugs known to ttx
2. ALL
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:17:00PM -0230, Roderick B. Greening wrote:
> > >
> > > Are there plans regarding ldap/kerberos user management and
> > > authentication? Launchpad has quite a few old blueprints around these,
> > > but I haven't been able to find information about long term plans.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/27/2010 04:47 PM, Roderick B. Greening wrote:
> I second this.
>
> I am attempting (unsuccessfully) to get an Open LDAP setup so that I can
> perform authentication across systems and services.
>
> It would be ideal if there were an easy way t
I second this.
I am attempting (unsuccessfully) to get an Open LDAP setup so that I can
perform authentication across systems and services.
It would be ideal if there were an easy way to setup LDAP and via some basic
questions, get you up an running.
I'm all for helping out on such an endevour
Dustin Kirkland kindly requested me not to hijack his thread for this purpose,
so this is a new one. I hereby apologize.
I'm looking for people to confirm https://launchpad.net/bugs/563895
What you need is a system running Lucid on mdadm RAID1 with 1 LVM volume
group, spanning the entire md.
The
29 matches
Mail list logo
