[vUDS Blueprint 13.10] Server support for 12.04.3/3.8 kernel

2013-04-30 Thread James Page
Hi List During the last 6 months, we shipped 12.04.2, the most recent point release for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. This included the new hardware enablement kernel from quantal (3.5) which is great; however this update (which was opt-in) broke quite a few DKMS packages which are popular with server

Re: Server Support

2010-06-07 Thread Peter Matulis
On 06/02/2010 03:14 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: How about: Ubuntu Server development, discussion and support | For general (not server specific) questions visit #ubuntu | Get involved: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/GettingInvolved | Be patient. Don't ask to ask, just ask. | Docs and

[Bug 520309] Re: [Patch] Multipath Tools: modify the path priority tool for Intel Modular Server support

2010-06-03 Thread Eduard Gotwig
** Changed in: intel Status: New = Fix Released -- [Patch] Multipath Tools: modify the path priority tool for Intel Modular Server support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

Re: Server Support

2010-06-02 Thread Thierry Carrez
Mathias Gug wrote: In my case, actually having those unanswered questions kind of prevent me from using the channel for random development chat. I don't feel like appearing as an insensitive developer that continues his work and jokes with co-workers while people beg for help on the channel.

Re: Server Support

2010-06-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
Thierry Carrez thierry.car...@ubuntu.com wrote: Mathias Gug wrote: In my case, actually having those unanswered questions kind of prevent me from using the channel for random development chat. I don't feel like appearing as an insensitive developer that continues his work and jokes with

Re: Server Support

2010-06-01 Thread Mathias Gug
I support the idea that having a separate support channel for -server would result in a more lively server development channel, where you could chat about development without (directly) appearing like a careless bastard^H^H overworked person. When/if I have time to do server support, I move

Re: Server Support

2010-05-27 Thread Thierry Carrez
so. So I support the idea that having a separate support channel for -server would result in a more lively server development channel, where you could chat about development without (directly) appearing like a careless bastard^H^H overworked person. When/if I have time to do server support, I move

Re: Server Support

2010-05-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
. When/if I have time to do server support, I move to the other channel and answer questions. There is value in having separated topics. That said, I agree that support should go somewhere well defined, rather than just being removed from topic. I've no opinion on how best to separate them

Re: Server Support

2010-05-27 Thread Neal McBurnett
server development channel, where you could chat about development without (directly) appearing like a careless bastard^H^H overworked person. When/if I have time to do server support, I move to the other channel and answer questions. There is value in having separated topics. That said, I agree

Re: Server Support

2010-05-27 Thread Jorge Armando Medina
Soren Hansen wrote: On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:54:17PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: One of the work items listed in: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-maverick-community is now: + ubuntu-server IRC channel: both support and devel. Change the topic to + remove

Server Support

2010-05-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
to support the server community on IRC? In my experience server people require a different kind of support than desktop users and so I don't think tossing server support into #ubuntu is the right answer. Scott K -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com

Re: Server Support

2010-05-25 Thread dxiri343
I second to that --Mensaje original-- De: Scott Kitterman Remitente:ubuntu-server-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com Para:ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com Asunto: Server Support Enviado: 25 May, 2010 20:54 One of the work items listed in: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server

Re: Server Support

2010-05-25 Thread Jim Tarvid
then, some threads are beyond my cognitive ability. I presume the authors have some purpose in posting but the posts themselves defy comprehension. How about #ubuntu-server-panic for those times when a formerly working server is broken; #ubuntu-server-support for help in adding new features; #ubuntu

[Bug 520309] Re: [Patch] Multipath Tools: modify the path priority tool for Intel Modular Server support

2010-02-12 Thread Colin Watson
** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Patch] Multipath Tools: modify the path priority tool for Intel Modular Server support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 520309] Re: [Patch] Multipath Tools: modify the path priority tool for Intel Modular Server support

2010-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/multipath-tools -- [Patch] Multipath Tools: modify the path priority tool for Intel Modular Server support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools

[Bug 520309] Re: [Patch] Multipath Tools: modify the path priority tool for Intel Modular Server support

2010-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- [Patch] Multipath Tools: modify the path priority tool for Intel Modular Server support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath