Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] LiveFS ubuntustudio/yakkety/amd64 failed to build on 20160820

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016, at 07:57 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > On 08/20/2016 10:50 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > > On 08/20/2016 10:23 AM, CD Image wrote: > >> The following information may help to resolve the situation: > >> > >> The following packages have unmet dependencies: > >> gnupg1 : Breaks: gnupg (<

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Please help testing ardour5 for yakkety

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016, at 07:21 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016, at 06:48 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > > On 08/22/2016 06:28 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > A new ardour has appeared in unstable, so now would be good to do a > > > sync-request. I'm unable to do i

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Please help testing ardour5 for yakkety

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016, at 06:48 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > On 08/22/2016 06:28 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > A new ardour has appeared in unstable, so now would be good to do a > > sync-request. I'm unable to do it atm. But, will check back tomorrow. > > > Someone beat me to it

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Please help testing ardour5 for yakkety

A new ardour has appeared in unstable, so now would be good to do a sync-request. I'm unable to do it atm. But, will check back tomorrow. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] support for wine-rt out-of-box?

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016, at 04:45 PM, Len Ovens wrote: > On Sat, 20 Aug 2016, Set Hallstrom wrote: > > > I'm not 100% sure, but i think wine isn't distributed because of the > > license. However, your idea of creating good instruction on how to set > > The main reason we have not included wine is a

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] support for wine-rt out-of-box?

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > Hi Hank! > > On 2016-08-19 08:47, Hank Stanglow wrote: > > Hello, I am a Web Developer, Artist, Musician, and long time user of > > Ubuntu Studio. You guys do a great job! This distribution gives me the > > best out-of-box experience for

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Petri-foo

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016, at 11:24 AM, br...@linuxsynths.com wrote: > > > Ok, I logged into Launchpad and am ready to post the bug. Here is > what the terminal gave me: > > /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk:16: > PyGIWarning: Wnck was imported without specifying a version first. Use >

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Please help testing ardour5 for yakkety

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016, at 11:10 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > On 08/19/2016 09:15 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > Actually, not all of the packages are published on the PPA yet, but for > > yakkety it's just a matter of minutes. xenial should follow within an > > hour, with any luck. >

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Petri-foo

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016, at 11:04 AM, br...@linuxsynths.com wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > I have the latest version (Xenial) of Petri-foo > installed on my 32-bit laptop with Ubuntu Studio (15.10 recently updated > to 16.04). Unfortunately I can't get it running, I get a core dumped > message.

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.10 Beta 1 Freeze

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016, at 10:53 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > tisdagen den 16:e augusti 2016 kl. 22:55:37 CEST, Set Hallstrom > skrev: > > > > Ok, thanks guys! I'll let the release team know we are in. > > Regarding the theme changes, if i understood Kaj correctly on IRC

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Please help testing ardour5 for yakkety

Actually, not all of the packages are published on the PPA yet, but for yakkety it's just a matter of minutes. xenial should follow within an hour, with any luck. And, to be clear, you need to add the PPA no matter how you decide to test. So, at the end, always do sudo add-apt-repository

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Please help testing ardour5 for yakkety

# Help testing ardour was recently updated to v5. The package was updated just before Debian Import Freeze, and had at least one problem - which now is fixed, but not yet uploaded. There may be other problems. So, I'm asking for help with testing ardour and making sure we don't release a half

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Ardour5 bug probably causing build failure - WAS:Re: Ardour 5 just landed in debian

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016, at 10:45 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > Just checked the error log, and it seems ardour5 is what is causing the > > build failure. I will remove it from our meta and do a bug report for > > it. Once the bug is fixed, it can be readded. > > > > T

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Ardour5 bug probably causing build failure - WAS:Re: Ardour 5 just landed in debian

> Just checked the error log, and it seems ardour5 is what is causing the > build failure. I will remove it from our meta and do a bug report for > it. Once the bug is fixed, it can be readded. > > This could be the cause. We had a talk about it on IRC as well. >

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Ardour5 bug probably causing build failure - WAS:Re: Ardour 5 just landed in debian

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016, at 07:26 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Just checked, and Ardour 5 is in yakkety. > > On 08/16/2016 05:43 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Len just announced on IRC that Ardour 5 landed in debian > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/a/ardour.html > > > > Do i read this

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.10 Beta 1 Freeze

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 09:07 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 08:37 PM, Len Ovens wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Len Ovens wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Set Hallstrom wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> &g

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.10 Beta 1 Freeze

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 08:37 PM, Len Ovens wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Len Ovens wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Set Hallstrom wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Do we want to participate in Beta 1 Freeze next week? > >> Beta 1 Freeze (Monday), and Beta 1 release on Thursday... > >> > >>

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.10 Beta 1 Freeze

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 08:29 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > Hi all, > > Do we want to participate in Beta 1 Freeze next week? > Beta 1 Freeze (Monday), and Beta 1 release on Thursday... > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/ReleaseSchedule > > Yours, > -- > Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer > > --

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature tour (was: Seventh try )

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016, at 02:33 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > On 2016-06-23 02:00, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote: > > Seventh try ;) Hi here is only a base I will ad to it some more but > > what do you think about this? > > http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0 > > I made a few shots that could work well

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Yakkety Alpha 2 (for opt-in flavors)

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016, at 02:55 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Make it transparent, easy to understand and I will help. > I was referring to helping Ubuntu Studio by becoming a developer. The information is what it is, until someone by their own initiative improves it. And, the only way to do so

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Add and remove packages

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016, at 02:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > I tried to do this since years, but didn't find any explanation on how > to do this. > Did you ever ask for advice on how to dit? The meta is built with the help the tool *germinate*. There's a config file in the source (update.cfg -

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Yakkety Alpha 2 (for opt-in flavors)

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016, at 02:48 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:26:55 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > >Get the latest seeds. Make the changes as specified in the wiki > >(additions, replacements or removals). > > Do you consider > https://wiki

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Add and remove packages

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016, at 02:36 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:57:32 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote: > >i can't find docs on how to remove or add apps to a package, for > >example add drumgizmo to ubuntustudio-audio... > > Just edit the "control" file. With an editor add a package to

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Yakkety Alpha 2 (for opt-in flavors)

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > On 2016-07-24 23:17, Len Ovens wrote: > > > Ya, I haven't seen anything about packages actually being added > > removed... maybe it has been done and I missed it. I just meant that if > > the actual changes to our packages have not been

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.04.1 RC Testing

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > Thank you Kaj! Sorry, i got confused with the alpha2 date next week. But > i've found the schedule for dot releases now [1] > Although it doesn't announce for when .2 is planned. Is there another > wiki page for these schedules? > >

[ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.04.1 RC Testing

Let me just remind everyone that 16.04.1 is to be tested before release on thrusday. If I remember correctly, Ross would is not able to participate for this one. ISOs and test cases can be found here http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/363/builds. If you want to help out, make sure to

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Apologies

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016, at 10:23 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > Hi all, > > First of all: i am very sorry things went so sour in that discussion. I > feel i owe everyone an apology: I apologize for letting my own feelings > take the lead. Kaj, Jimmy and the group as a hole. > I also apologize for the

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Ubuntu Studio policy - Was: Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016, at 01:14 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > On 2016-07-10 12:42, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > > > So, let me say this one last thing about the discussion whether we > > should or should not use Google Hangouts. > > > > This has _nothing_ to do

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > On 2016-07-10 11:48, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > It would evidently exclude one person - the project lead, who is not > > ready to be flexible enough to meet the needs of the rest of the team. > > I'm affraid it is no

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > On 2016-07-10 11:10, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > Just want to mention a couple of things. > > > > The way this communication was handled here has led to that Jimmy left > > our team, which is a bad thing (Jimmy, me an

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016, at 11:10 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > Just want to mention a couple of things. > > The way this communication was handled here has led to that Jimmy left > our team, which is a bad thing (Jimmy, me and Len are the oldest active > members of this commu

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?

Just want to mention a couple of things. The way this communication was handled here has led to that Jimmy left our team, which is a bad thing (Jimmy, me and Len are the oldest active members of this community, currently). Jimmy takes an initiative, but instead of being encouraged he is stopped

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Leaving the community

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016, at 04:56 PM, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: > Hi, > > as most of you already know I've been having a hard time to put in much > time in the project. It's more or less some hit'n'run the last years. In > that aspect and others which I will not dwell upon I've decided to leave > the

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Backports

On Fri, May 27, 2016, at 12:16 PM, Set Sakrecoer wrote: > I read zequence was talking on IRC about finding a good way to warn our > users of the consequences of backports, since it appears backports are > able to break things for people having a project in the making. Hence > please also

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] package proposals - publishing

On Fri, May 6, 2016, at 04:02 PM, Len Ovens wrote: > On Fri, 6 May 2016, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > For now, publishing seems the best fit, though in fact there is no > > correct meta for it yet. > > Now that you bring it up... it seems that there was a sense that:

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] package proposals - publishing

On Fri, May 6, 2016, at 09:45 AM, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: > In terms of writing software (and this is just out of curiosity) why > plume over manuskript? and either way I personally like the idea. There > are other applications besides Plume Creator and Manuskript but from my > tests Plume Creator

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] package proposals - publishing

On Thu, May 5, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 22:39, autumna <'autu...@gmail.com'> wrote: > I added 2 more software packages to the wiki page under "graphics" for > the publishing related workflows. > > (add) calibre: Calibre is a book managing software, but it

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Backports for Ubuntu Studio Xenial

On Tue, May 3, 2016, at 06:33 PM, Len Ovens wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2016, Ross Gammon wrote: > > > On 05/03/2016 08:01 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > >> We could in fact do a round of backports for trusty, as it is still what > >> many people uses. > >> >

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Backports for Ubuntu Studio Xenial

On Mon, May 2, 2016, at 10:23 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > Every now and then there may an important release that could be > important to backport in advance, but otherwise it may be hard to do > quality control on packages in the dev release if we have no > confirmation if they have

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Backports for Ubuntu Studio Xenial

On Mon, May 2, 2016, at 10:04 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi All, > > I am hoping to maintain backports to Xenial for the 10 packages we > decided were important enough to have in the "Mandatory" testsuite on > the the Package Tracker. > > They are listed here: >

[ubuntu-studio-devel] default screen recorder WAS:Re: Package Selection for Yakketi Yak

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 07:53 PM, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote: > If Recordmydesktop is dropped it should be replaced. I have issues with > it but > still use it, as the alternative is to take the time to set up a video > camera aligned > with the screen. > vokoscreen is the proposed

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] libgsl0ldbl, pd-l2ork

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 12:00 AM, Gerhard Lang wrote: > Compilation of pd-l2ork-x86_64-20160227.deb from git works out of the > box, but installation gives erros: missing libgsl0ldbl. Tried to install > libgsl0ldbl_1.16+dfsg-4_amd64.deb faild by incompatibility with libgsl2. > Any suggestions?

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.04 Release Candidate Testing - for release Thursday 21st

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016, at 10:41 PM, Thomas Pfundt wrote: >however I noticed that some of the titles in the slideshow that > are displayed while installing received line breaks, because apparently > the text is too long to be displayed in one line. The problem with this > is that the field in

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] 16.04 Release Candidate Testing - for release Thursday 21st

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016, at 02:30 PM, Thomas Pfundt wrote: > Hi Len, > > thanks for your reply. > > > Thankyou for testing in other languages. I have not noticed this on my > > system, but that is because I can only read english. > > Well, as far as languages go, I could only test Italian and

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Announcing new project leader for Ubuntu Studio

like Set takes over! With that, I hand the torch (which is burning quite bright at the moment) over to Set, which he will carry until the next election, and wish the team good luck in the future with all the fun that flavor development offers! /Kaj Ailomaa - musician and author of Oscar speeches

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] One week until xenial final relase "RecordMyDesktop"

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Grant Frank Burton wrote: > RecordMyDesktop works but not very good. It looks a clunker, takes a long > time to process the video and the quality is not very good. > > Kazam is a much better program but when I installed it, I don't get > to > option to

[ubuntu-studio-devel] ubuntu-bug and system logs WAS:Re: One week until xenial final relase, please help testing

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 07:33 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:23:18 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 07:20 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> There are still issues regarding log files. Assumed somebody doesn't > >> use DHCP, but e.g

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] One week until xenial final relase, please help testing

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 07:20 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > There are still issues regarding log files. Assumed somebody doesn't > use DHCP, but e.g. PPPoE, the password could be provided in plain text > by a log file and even if you don't dial up, be careful when filing a > bug against a MUA. >

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] One week until xenial final relase, please help testing

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:21 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > IMHO nobody should use 'ubuntu-bug ardour' as suggested by Kaj, but > using a browser and logging in and reporting bugs is a good idea, in > addition post links to the list. > Let's just make it clear that this is Ralfs personal opinion,

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] One week until xenial final relase, please help testing

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:33 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 05:21 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > IMHO nobody should use 'ubuntu-bug ardour' as suggested by Kaj, but > > using a browser and logging in and reporting bugs is a good idea, in > > addition p

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] One week until xenial final relase, please help testing

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 03:23 PM, Grant Frank Burton wrote: > Greetings all > > I downloaded xenial and installed it > > Was looking pretty good till I got to Ardour Lot of things wrong. > > Is anyone working on this? > None of us are specifically working on any application, but if

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] One week until xenial final relase, please help testing

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016, at 05:39 PM, Thomas Pfundt wrote: > Hello Kaj, > > I just read your mail on the 16.04 release testing. I started fully > using Ubuntu Studio at the end of last year (been a vanilla Ubuntu user > next to Windows for around two years before). > > First of all, I would like to

[ubuntu-studio-devel] One week until xenial final relase, please help testing

Just a reminder to everyone that we only have one week until release, so please help testing the ISO. As always - if you find bugs, please report them! You can find the latest ISOs at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/dvd/current/ ubiquity (the installer) is still missing a few of our

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Missing applications: Audacious & Shotwell

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016, at 05:46 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi All, > > Prompted by a comment by Len on IRC (about Audacious), I did a quick > check for obvious packages that might have dropped of our DVD without a > conscious action. > > When producing the Package QA Tracker, I prioritised the Test

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] ubuntustudio-screensaver

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016, at 03:03 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > On 2016-04-01 13:24, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > We aren't seeding ubuntustudio-screensaver, which means it's not > > installed in Ubuntu Studio. I haven't looked at the package at all, but > > I'm pretty sure it's one scree

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] ubuntustudio-screensaver

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016, at 11:57 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > On 2016-03-31 22:24, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016, at 08:17 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Whilst looking at something else I came across the > >> ubuntustudio

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] ubuntustudio-screensaver

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016, at 08:17 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi All, > > Whilst looking at something else I came across the > ubuntustudio-screensaver package. It has not been touched for a long > time, and is no longer seeded. > > Knowing that screensavers are not the "in thing" any more (most

[ubuntu-studio-devel] New developer in the team - krytarik

krytarik has been helping out with development recently, and I invited him to become a dev team member, since he seems to know his way around packaging, and he accepted. So, please welcome krytarik to the team of developers! https://launchpad.net/~krytarik -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] DVD authoring software

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016, at 12:25 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > > On 2016-03-11 22:55, Len Ovens wrote: > >> Basically the same info there. devede looks like the the best choice at > >> this point. (best as in at least it seems includable) > >> > >> Comments? > > > I installed both devede and

[ubuntu-studio-devel] ubuntustudio.org email addresses for team members

I would like to set up some new email addresses for new team members. sacrecoer retail-0 (Ross) cfhowlett Am I missing someone? I will also send emails directly to all parties asking which username they would like, and where the @ubuntustudio.org email should point to (it's a redirect), and

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Ubuntu Studio Xenial - Beta 1 ISO Testing

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016, at 04:55 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > On 02/25/2016 01:20 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > the most important part this time was application testing. > > Parole popped up on the tracker at one point as having a crash. > Launchpad reports other crashes as wel

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Ubuntu Studio Xenial - Beta 1 ISO Testing

Beta 1 will not be representative of the final release of Ubuntu Studio, however, the most important part this time was application testing. Even after release of Beta 1, please do help with application testing, and report any bugs you may find, because that will help us be able to fix those

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Ubuntu Studio Xenial - Beta 1 ISO Testing

Found a couple of bugs concerning our desktop: - no CoF in the whisker menu button (even after -default-settings was updated) - additional ubuntu vanilla indicators in the top panel Please do some testing now to find any more bugs, and also do some application testing. To follow discussions

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] last minute uploads

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016, at 05:50 PM, set wrote: > On 2016-02-24 12:29, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > Just uploaded ubuntustudio-default-settings, fixing our whiskers icon > > and ubuntustudio-look with the new wallpapers. > > So, this was the last day we can make changes to the ubun

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] last minute uploads

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016, at 03:31 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:29:19 +0100, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > >Is there anything else that needs to be done before the Beta tomorrow? > >The archive may be frozen any second now, in fact. > > Hi, > > you could d

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Ubuntu Studio Xenial - Beta 1 ISO Testing

I requested a rebuild of the ISO, after recently added packages. There will probably be more rebuilds before the Beta 1 will be released. Our testing at this point is mostly about finding problems. Tomorrow it'll become clear which version of the ISO will be the one released, and we test that to

[ubuntu-studio-devel] last minute uploads

Just uploaded ubuntustudio-default-settings, fixing our whiskers icon and ubuntustudio-look with the new wallpapers. I won't have time to finish enough of -controls to get it up also, so that will have to wait until after Beta 1. Is there anything else that needs to be done before the Beta

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Wallpaper question...

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016, at 10:02 AM, CFH wrote: > Kaj, Ross, Art Team, others > > I appreciate the urgency to submit the package. Are we getting a new > default paper? If assigning one from the existing pool? No, I think we should work on a new one. I've submitted a very simple one as an example

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] ART TEAM ALERT! 16.04 Wallpaper Contest has been decided.

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016, at 06:36 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016, at 06:28 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > On 02/16/2016 01:49 PM, C. F. Howlett wrote: > > > ART TEAM NOTE: Hotwheel, by Lui Li Hua was in the top 3 throughout this > > >

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Application Testing for Ubuntu Studio Xenial 16.04

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016, at 05:11 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > On 02/23/2016 04:55 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016, at 04:42 PM, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote: > >> Kdenlive is STILL version 15.08, which is a buggy mess as well as being > >> old. if that gets

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Ubuntu Studio Xenial - Beta 1 ISO Testing

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016, at 07:37 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi All, > > On Thursday 25th February the 1st Beta (Beta 1) of Ubuntu Studio (and > other flavours) will be released. So please help by occasionally testing > an ISO image from today and especially on the 25th. > > The more testing, the

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] ART TEAM ALERT! 16.04 Wallpaper Contest has been decided.

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016, at 06:28 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi All, > > On 02/16/2016 01:49 PM, C. F. Howlett wrote: > > ART TEAM NOTE: Hotwheel, by Lui Li Hua was in the top 3 throughout this > > election cycle and was #1 in the final tally. Absent objections or > > suggestions, I assign Hotwheel

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper Design, WAS: Re: ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 106, Issue 15

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016, at 03:47 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:02:04 +0100, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 07:25 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> IOW instead of > >> > >>"Blue -violet -orange" con

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper Design, WAS: Re: ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 106, Issue 15

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 07:25 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > If you consider "red" as too aggressiv and perhaps too dominating, then > replacing it by "orange" breaks your idea of "video is a mix of audio > and graphics". > > You could solve it by not replacing "red" by "orange", but instead by >

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Kdenlive [Was: Manual Test Cases]

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 12:24 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > The package set needs to be updated to match the packages we are > interested in now (it looks very old). At the Community Council checkup > meeting in IRC, I was encouraged to become a member. So after the 16.04 > release I might begin

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper Design, WAS: Re: ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 106, Issue 15

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 08:44 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 08:39 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > > I have an idea, which I do think we should be able to get done. It's > > pretty simple, and symbolic. It should not be hard to make it look good. > >

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 106, Issue 15

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 08:39 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > I have an idea, which I do think we should be able to get done. It's > pretty simple, and symbolic. It should not be hard to make it look good. > > These are some possible elements of the image that we could dev

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 106, Issue 15

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 01:48 PM, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: > > > On 17 February 2016 13:11:28 +01:00, C. F. Howlett > wrote: > > > Perhaps it would an opportune moment for our very own team to supply a > > new design?? It *has* been awhile and this will an LTS ... > > > >

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper, WAS:Re: ART TEAM ALERT! 16.04 Wallpaper Contest has been decided.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 03:58 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 03:54 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > I already sent an email to the guy, but realized we have other concerns > > too. For 14.04, the wallpaper was not just a wallpaper. It was a theme > >

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper, WAS:Re: ART TEAM ALERT! 16.04 Wallpaper Contest has been decided.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 02:56 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > I like HotWheel. I'm slightly bothered by the CoF not being in the > middle of the image. I'm sure the artist wanted to make up for the > flames on the left side, but it gives it a slightly skewed impression to > me. Also, it's

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Scripts to help users troubleshooting

On Sun, Feb 7, 2016, at 06:10 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > perhaps Ubuntu Studio should include a few scripts, that could be used > by inexperienced users, to provide troubleshooting information, if they > wish to send a request for help. > Thanks Ralf. I'm going to work on something like

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Destktop/Window Manager

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016, at 12:00 AM, Daniel M Gessel wrote: > Created launch pad account. > > I’m sure this is a total Newbie question, but is there a 25 word reason > for not using compiz/Unity? It feels pretty solid, though I’d like to > have more flexibility controlling the environment with my

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Congrats to Set, our next project lead

Since we only have one candidate so far, and the window for announcing your candidacy is closed as of today, Set automatically becomes next project lead. So, congratulations! I will continue as lead until Xenial is released, but will now help Set in the transitioning and will also stick around

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] New to Ubuntu Studio!

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016, at 05:11 PM, Daniel M Gessel wrote: > Thanks for the info - it’s going to take me some time to get up to speed > on joining all the online communities and things on the tech side. > Getting older, I guess. ;) > > If these kinds of directions have already been pursued,

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Wallpaper contest + [PR]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016, at 12:41 AM, set wrote: > Re, wallpap-PR :) > I created a draft here: > https://ubuntustudio.org/wp-admin/post.php?post=1206=edit > > I think it was fairly urgent given the time frame for the competition > Please confirm i can post it, or i will do it! :D I added the repo as

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] [PR] Twitter account access

I've sent passwords for all sites where there is an Ubuntu Studio account in encrypted files to Set, Jimmy and Set, since you are the only active people in PR at the moment. cfhowlett can decide if he wants to make use of them at all. Probably best if cfhowlett just focuses on content mostly and

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Art Team: Ubuntustudio Design Assets questions

The current-standard repo is updated - lp:~ubuntustudio-art/ubuntustudio-artwork/current-standard I had forgotten what the defect in the CoF was, and noticed earlier that it was actually present in the CoF I had provided, which makes the ones cfhowlett provided correct (somehow, my eye is telling

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Art Team: Ubuntustudio Design Assets questions

I've done some cleaning up of our artwork branch, and set up a new routine for us when dealing with artwork material. There are now three branches as you can see here https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntustudio-artwork Before I explain a bit more, I want to clarify one thing about the LP urls.

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Wallpaper Contest site and design resources: comments invited

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016, at 03:10 PM, C. F. Howlett wrote: > Ubuntustudio Artwork User Showcase > > > I've set up a page to showcase User Created Content. The first project > on this page will be the 16.04 wallpaper contest.

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] [LAU] Nama 1.204 is now in Debian unstable (fwd)

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015, at 08:44 PM, Len Ovens wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message -- > > Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:21:20 -1000 > > From: Joel Roth > > To: linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org > > Subject: [LAU] Nama 1.204 is now in Debian unstable > > > > Thanks to

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Voting System, WAS:Re: Next project lead

Ok, let me give you an update on how condercet works. It's pretty simple once you figure it out. It all comes to ranking, and how often a choice is ranked higher than other choices, no matter if a choice is ever ranked first. Here's an example of an election with three candidates and seven

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Voting System, WAS:Re: Next project lead

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015, at 01:19 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > The problem with this method becomes apparent when 30% vote on A, 30% on > B and 30% on C, while all of them believe that if they're favorite does > not win, they all would prefer D as the second choice. But, no one voted >

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Voting System, WAS:Re: Next project lead

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015, at 11:06 PM, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Kaj Ailomaa <zeque...@mousike.me> > wrote: > > > > > The common voting system is when each voter has one vote, and can put it > > on one candidate. The one who gets

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Voting System, WAS:Re: Next project lead

I will confirm the date for the vote next week, if no one objects by then, and announce it. ...but, we still need a method for the vote. I'm making some proposals here based on what other Debian/Ubuntu communities use. # VOTING SYSTEM (information and proposal) The common voting system is when

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Next project lead

On Fri, Dec 25, 2015, at 12:38 PM, set wrote: > On 2015-11-19 10:00, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > Oh, and the link to the interesting part of the page - > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/ProjectLeadVote#Announcing_your_candidacy > > > > Here's the template that

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Next project lead

Btw, let's discuss when we have the vote, and when we close the window for new candidates. I think it's important that we have a chance to review candidates a few days before a vote, so my suggestion is one week before the vote we don't accept new candidates. How about we have the vote the first

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Wallpaper contest

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015, at 11:08 AM, C. F. Howlett wrote: > Yeah about that: > > I have looked at the art work produced for the other derivatives, and I > admit to a great deal of envy for ubuntukylin's design and prodigious > output. > > I am unconvinced that we are fully obligated to comply

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Boot partition and old kernel images - are we alone with this problem?

I'm sure some of you have noticed that if you have a small boot partition (UEFI installs, generally), old kernel images are not being autoremoved, and when you do your third or whatever update you get a message that there's not enough room for the update. I haven't actually used a vanilla Ubuntu

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Introduction to feature definition (for all you newcomers, and memory refresh for the rest)

All contributors who don't know what this is, please ready through this, as it is crucial for how we organize our development. # Introduction to feature definitiion ## What is feature definition? Typically, at the beginning of a development cycel (6 months), some sort of plan is laid out on

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Introduction to feature definition (for all you newcomers, and memory refresh for the rest)

Btw, since we most certainly do not make use of all of our blueprints, and many of them are not really specified for a single release (like some of our applications), I will be doing some reorganization. I'd like to make things as simple as possible now. Once I'm done with that, I'd like us to do

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >