On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 02:32:52PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:36:49 +0300, Janne Jokitalo wrote:
> >Yes, that's moving to more sophisticated usage. And quite frankly, if
> >we're talking about technologically inexperienced people, wouldn't
> >they use a GUI (Software Center
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:36:49 +0300, Janne Jokitalo wrote:
>Yes, that's moving to more sophisticated usage. And quite frankly, if
>we're talking about technologically inexperienced people, wouldn't
>they use a GUI (Software Center?) anyway?
Not in regards to the wiki, help pages or when solving iss
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:27:49AM +0200, br...@linuxsynths.com wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:01:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > apt and apt-get make not much of a difference, it's just that apt does
> > use an easy to understand name instead if dist-upgrade, which is n
> On 30 Aug 2016, at 09:27, br...@linuxsynths.com wrote:
> I would hazard a guess however, that if one of the two has a GUI, then I
> would probably go with that. Newbies like GUIs I think. Lots of people have a
> bad taste in their mouths about linux because it was so terminal-based.
>
Hi,
a
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:01:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon,
29 Aug 2016 10:14:55 +0200, br...@linuxsynths.com [1]wrote:
>
>> Funny!
I would have said about the same thing, but for apt-get.
>
> Hi,
>
>
apt and apt-get make not much of a difference, it's just that apt does
>
use an eas
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:14:55 +0200, br...@linuxsynths.com wrote:
>Funny! I would have said about the same thing, but for apt-get.
Hi,
apt and apt-get make not much of a difference, it's just that apt does
use an easy to understand name instead if dist-upgrade, which is named
full-upgrade and a ne
Funny! I would have said about the same thing, but for apt-get.
It's basically all I ever use.
My 2c..
brian
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016
23:27:02 +0200, Martin Hammerchmidt wrote:
> Hello,
> Personally, I'm
using apt all time. As a user I think it's easier to learn apt to
newcomer. But technic
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 23:27 +0200, Martin Hammerchmidt wrote:
> As a user I think it's easier to learn apt to newcomer.
Hi,
that's my guess, too and I suspect that those still using Ubuntu Studio
precise don't need explanations on how to use apt-get instead of apt.
Let alone, that the precise rel
Hello,
Personally, I'm using apt all time. As a user I think it's easier to learn
apt to newcomer. But technically I have no idea which one is better.
If wikis are slowly switching to apt as you said, maybe the best choice is
to keep "apt". In a few years, apt will be everywhere maybe.
Regards
2
