Re: [uknof] Hyperoptic Dropping NTP UDP/123 on IPv6

this might have been a technical decision, to block udp:123 from ipv6 sources, because of the possibility of DoS amplification, then executed badly? https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/learning/ddos/ntp-amplification-ddos-attack/ but, still, one would think that Hyperoptic would have appropriate

[uknof] actively exploited cisco 0 day with maximum 10 severity gives full network control

Just in case there's someone who hasn't had their coffee yet, you might want to brew a large strong pot right now... https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/10/actively-exploited-cisco-0-day-with-maximum-10-severity-gives-full-network-control/

Re: [uknof] CGNAT Solutions

On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 17:21, Brian Candler wrote: > And frankly, consumers don't care. They buy it, they plug it in, it > works. That's all they want - and it's not them who are holding back the > deployment of v6. I agree that consumers don't and shouldn't need to care. when CGNAT starts

Re: [uknof] CGNAT Solutions

On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 12:52, Brian Candler wrote: ... > Until that changes, CGN will continue to be heavily used (which is what > started this thread). yes, a lot needs to change. But we don't seem to be any closer. Mobile phone networks have managed to obsolete 2G and 3G devices, pushing for

Re: [uknof] CGNAT Solutions

I'm sad that three years after this thought exercise: https://www.mail-archive.com/uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk/msg06597.html we seem no closer to IPv4 being left behind like a relic of the stone age. And with FTTP being rolled out across the country at a reasonable pace, I would hope that the CPEs

Re: [uknof] I want fibre!!!

On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 11:06, Jethro Binks wrote: > while we are a University with our own dark fibre network on campus there was an interesting talk some years ago from Cambridge University about their dark fibre network https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CLJlmcC2c8 which posed interesting

Re: [uknof] Eurostar and tools

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 10:41, Tom Storey wrote: > At least when Im flying I can just buy checked baggage perhaps you should simply fly there, might be less convenient in terms of journey end-points, but more convenient for travelling with tools?

[uknof] Cambridge Fibre using yellow cladded fibre?

Hello, I'm wondering if anyone happens to know what this particular altnet's colour scheme is? thanks, Paul

Re: [uknof] 464XLAT CPE

On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 at 13:11, Paul Mansfield wrote: > version 4.1.7 utilities builds very cleanly, but I can't get DKMS to > build kernel modules without various things not found. Not had the found these patches: https://github.com/NICMx/Jool/issues/379 seems like my problem was that the

Re: [uknof] 464XLAT CPE

A while ago I had jool ( https://www.jool.mx ) working well on an IPv6-only test vlan. Unfortunately since then my firewall's kernel has gone through a few new versions so I needed a new kernel module. Jool version 4.1.7 utilities builds very cleanly, but I can't get DKMS to build kernel modules

Re: [uknof] DHCP relay with different ports

once at PSINet, there were three Pauls working in the same part of the office, Mr Thornton, myself and someone else. across the room, someone called "Paul". we all replied "yes" in perfect sync, they shouted "not you, the other paul", and we all turned back to our computers, and I think the

Re: [uknof] DHCP relay with different ports

On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 at 14:26, Paul Thornton wrote: > Does anyone know of a DHCPv4 relay daemon that accepts requests from does it have to be aware of the DHCP protocol, or could it be a simple forwarder using socat in UDP mode? you might need to run two socat processes, one for outbound, one to

Re: [uknof] Waste heat from data centres

I've thought that maybe a data centre built right next to an office block, hotel and sports complex could make sense, then the low grade heat from the data centre could be used directly to warm the air, and using some heat pumps warm the water in a swimming pool.

[uknof] Waste heat from data centres

I'd be interested to hear what uknoffers think of this video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9b34FfZWuXU I think Dave@Just Have A Think tries v hard to get the facts straight, so how do you think he did? Thanks

Re: [uknof] RIPE Atlas and HitList-rr6.hiTLiST.SDSTroweS.Co.uk

On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 15:12, Stephen Strowes wrote: > Apologies for the servfails; should be fixed. You have a healthy RIPE Atlas > population! thanks for the update. I'm sure we (UKNOF) would be very interested to have you give at least a short talk on how this project is going and how

Re: [uknof] RIPE Atlas and HitList-rr6.hiTLiST.SDSTroweS.Co.uk

it was suggested that he might be willing to give a talk at a UKNOF conference.

Re: [uknof] RIPE Atlas and HitList-rr6.hiTLiST.SDSTroweS.Co.uk

thanks. the scanning must be quite busy to have generated so many dns lookups, as others are also seeing it and not just me, I wonder if he intended it to be such.

[uknof] RIPE Atlas and HitList-rr6.hiTLiST.SDSTroweS.Co.uk

I have seen quite a few DNS resolver lookups from my Atlas probe for HitList-rr6.hiTLiST.SDSTroweS.Co.uk - with a wide variety of mixed case patterns, but always effectively the same host. just me? I was curious about the reason for this and found: https://sdstrowes.co.uk/#research Maybe

[uknof] IPv6 meanderings - was Re: Thoughts on IETF "Unicast Use of the Formerly Reserved 127/8"?

https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2021/11/aws-nat64-dns64-communication-ipv6-ipv4-services/

Re: [uknof] Thoughts on IETF "Unicast Use of the Formerly Reserved 127/8"?

https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html TL,DR: overall, a bit over 35% of traffic is v6, with the UK at just under 34%, so that's quite a decent improvement. Anecdotally, I recently put in a simple firewall state analyser at home which simply counts the output from "conntrack", and

Re: [uknof] Thoughts on IETF "Unicast Use of the Formerly Reserved 127/8"?

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2021/11/update-on-ipv6-plans-for-virgin-media-talktalk-plusnet-and-vodafone.html

Re: [uknof] Thoughts on IETF "Unicast Use of the Formerly Reserved 127/8"?

Friend sent me this https://github.com/schoen/unicast-extensions

Re: [uknof] Thoughts on IETF "Unicast Use of the Formerly Reserved 127/8"?

On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 13:56, Leo Vegoda wrote: > > reservation from 127/8 to 127.0/16 and was just wondering what the > I think it's never going to happen. while we're at it, let's shrink the RFC1918 space down, so 10/8 becomes 10/16, and 172.16/12 becomes 172.16/20 and there's so much space

Re: [uknof] Some recollections from the MTV Europe Music Awards 1996

On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 00:40, Steve Karmeinsky wrote: > In 2000 Demon also netcast the first Big Brother (Nasty Nick) with BT and I > think at peak there were 34,000 streams (17K > each) which was the largest netcast at the time (also using Real Networks > streaming tech). I inherited a

Re: [uknof] whois.ripe.net on ipv6 broken?

On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 12:18, Paul Mansfield wrote: > any RIPE people lurking please? > > Just me? IPv4 working, IPv6 refusing connections. > > $ telnet whois.ripe.net whois > Trying 2001:67c:2e8:22::c100:687... > telnet: connect to address 2001:67c:2e8:22::c100:68

[uknof] whois.ripe.net on ipv6 broken?

any RIPE people lurking please? Just me? IPv4 working, IPv6 refusing connections. $ telnet whois.ripe.net whois Trying 2001:67c:2e8:22::c100:687... telnet: connect to address 2001:67c:2e8:22::c100:687: Connection refused Trying 193.0.6.135... Connected to whois.ripe.net. Escape character is

[uknof] current law on Dubai and VPNs, VOIP etc

Hi, has anyone any (recent-ish) experience of setting up an office in Dubai? In particular on state legislation on network usage, VPNs, VOIP etc. Some years ago there was a big flurry of news about it being illegal to use VPNs, but that might have really been about avoidance paying for government

Re: [uknof] SkyQ VoD Downloading Issues

If it's because sky's systems really don't like seeing many clients behind the same ipv4 address, then the obvious questions are: Does sky q support IPv6 clients, and if it does, are your customers dual stack, and if not why not?

Re: [uknof] SkyQ VoD Downloading Issues

On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 14:25, João Basto wrote: > The behaviour is that when a user attempts to download a on-demand content in > their SkyQ device the download gets interrupted mid-way and never finishes > the download. my first thought is PMTUd. Does the download always stall when a

Re: [uknof] Issues with AWS

most of our stuff is in London and we've not noticed any particular problems; we have mainly legacy and dev things in Ireland so we're less sensitive to problems there but no complaints at the moment.

Re: [uknof] APC self-contained air-cooled systems

if your cooling demand is 35kW, a 16A rack is 4kW ish, so maybe 9 racks? that's not a huge number. can you find a local-ish data centre with some empty space and do a fork-lift shift off premise, and set up your contract to allow you to shrink your footprint on a phased basis? or can you rent a

Re: [uknof] UK interconnects and Brexit

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 15:11, Keith Mitchell wrote: > It's seemed to me for a long time that the culture of British employers > spending resources on the professional development of their IT > operations people most job postings are a laundry list of expected skills, expecting to find a perfect

Re: [uknof] UK interconnects and Brexit

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 12:22, Will Hargrave wrote: > > A reminder as much for myself as anyone else: > https://wiki.uknof.org.uk/Charter > “UKNOF's remit is technical, and any discussion or activities > involving commercial, legal or political issues should be limited to > where they have a

[uknof] UK interconnects and Brexit

Sorry to bring up the B word but is Brexit causing UK operators to have to renegotiate transit and peering arrangements with their continental counterparts? Looking at this: https://www.submarinecablemap.com/ I imagine a fair amount of connectivity into western, central and eastern Europe will be

Re: [uknof] Fixed Wireless Access

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 14:45, Ben Oliver wrote: > Does anyone here have any experience with Fixed Wireless Access? what's the budget, and how long do you think you'll be operating this before fibre might actually make it into your area? if it's worth spending some real money and get some fixed

Re: [uknof] Finding out future Openreach plans for a cabinet

On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 19:00 Alan Ramsay, wrote: > > So it seems that OR are trying to sweat their copper a bit longer at > least. > If some thieves pull all the cabling out of the ground, which actually happened near one of the newly FTTP'd villages in Cambridgeshire, would OpenReach now replace

Re: [uknof] Finding out future Openreach plans for a cabinet

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2020/10/openreach-add-51-areas-to-the-copper-phone-to-fttp-migration.html It seems bt/OpenReach really are getting serious about fibre migration. One in the list is a village about 12 miles from me. Who knows, maybe they'll work their way through to mine,

Re: [uknof] Gamma SIP Trunks

On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 11:01, Paul Bone wrote: > I find it hard to believe there will be an issue with AWS internet > connectivity but the SIP trunks are all provided through Gamma in some way. I see cycle stealing even on machines in AWS which should be adequately provisioned by AWS to not

Re: [uknof] Jared Mauch presents how he become a Telco to get fibre internet

Simon Green, wrote: > Exchange end the fttp net is almost always on a different set of L2Ss to > the fttc net, so you need additional cablelinks to receive it. But yes, > after that each circuit is a vlan. > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020, at 11:18 PM, Paul Mansfield wrote: > > > &

Re: [uknof] Jared Mauch presents how he become a Telco to get fibre internet

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020, 14:54 Alex Threlfall, wrote: > Very interesting, I have a FTTC cabinet right outside my front fence, but > FTTP is still a £1000+ option :( > > I'd be happy to dig the trench through my front lawn and present the fibre > to the rear of the cabinet, but they won't entertain

[uknof] Jared Mauch presents how he become a Telco to get fibre internet

https://youtu.be/ASXJgvy3mEg Am still hoping for Openreach to bridge the 8 metre gap between me and the nearest FTTP duct :-(

Re: [uknof] Issues accessing RIPE services on BT

whois is very very slow but working... # whois --verbose -h whois.ripe.net 88.97.xx.yy Using server whois.ripe.net. Query string: "-V Md5.2 88.97.xx.yy" % This is the RIPE Database query service. % The objects are in RPSL format. % % The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions. % See

Re: [uknof] Issues accessing RIPE services on BT

it's working for me (TM). From Zen FTTC. My probe says it's only been connected for just under 13 hours, and it's 21:00 (BST) now so that means RIPE think it connected at 08:00 ish. https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/12349/#tab-general I know that my connection has been up since 2020-08-21 03:36 BST,

Re: [uknof] TTB Outage

On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 09:13, Simon Lockhart wrote: > There is a catastrophic power failure in HEX 8/9 (Equinix LD8) affecting > floors 1-4. > > Equinix are currently in the process of migrating people to a new UPS system > which they'd been installing. it's a somewhat curious coincidence that

Re: [uknof] Thought for the day: announce the end of IPv4 internet connections by 2026

On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 14:58, Denesh Bhabuta :: UKNOF wrote: > Play nicely folks.. this is UKNOF, not UKNOT.. just in case anyone had > forgotten. ;-) > > > On 22 May 2020, at 14:15, Neil J. McRae wrote: > > > > https://imgflip.com/i/42fn8j By the way, I wasn't offended in any way by Neil's

Re: [uknof] test website with an IPv6 address

http://ifconfig.co might satisfy you, works on both http and https for ipv6, no redirect $ curl -6 http://ifconfig.co 2a02:8011:401d:xx::yy $ curl -6 https://ifconfig.co 2a02:8011:401d:xx::yy $ curl -4 ifconfig.co 52.18.x.x it's quite a handy hostname to use when you want to know your public

Re: [uknof] Thought for the day: announce the end of IPv4 internet connections by 2026

On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 17:12, Brandon Butterworth wrote: > One would be regulation in some manner, eg it becomes part Ofcom last mentioned ipv6 in 2017 as far as I can tell https://www.ofcom.org.uk/search?query=ipv6= > So to answer original question - set up a process that will > result in a

Re: [uknof] Thought for the day: announce the end of IPv4 internet connections by 2026

ah, bbc.co.uk does have IPv6 addresses $ dig +short bbc.co.uk 2a04:4e42:200::81 2a04:4e42:600::81 2a04:4e42:400::81 2a04:4e42::81 but not www.bbc.co.uk which is CNAME to bbc.net.uk according to the SOA for bbc.net.uk there should be a b...@bbc.co.uk who can answer why!

Re: [uknof] Thought for the day: announce the end of IPv4 internet connections by 2026

On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 11:56, Paul Bone wrote: > C:\Users\paul.bone>nslookup www.bbc.co.uk I seem to recall the BBC did have a v6 enabled front end at one point. presumably the licence fee needs to increase before they can afford to run both ;-)

Re: [uknof] Thought for the day: announce the end of IPv4 internet connections by 2026

On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 11:56, Dave Bell wrote: >> https://ipv6.watch/ > > That is quite interesting, but could really do with some information about > what improvements are needed. Netflix is listed, but I've got no clue what > they are expected to do to improve their v6 connectivity. agreed.

Re: [uknof] Thought for the day: announce the end of IPv4 internet connections by 2026

On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 14:55, Leo Vegoda wrote: > Or go to a broker and buy a /24 or whatever from a network that can > make do with fewer addresses. we're coming back to full circle to the suggestion where businesses should list IPv4 as a taxable asset, or, like DNS, should have to pay the

Re: [uknof] Thought for the day: announce the end of IPv4 internet connections by 2026

On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 09:52, Daniel Ankers wrote: > The thing about Y2K and 2038 is that they are absolutely fixed dates. No > amount of arguing or pleading would move them. On the other hand, if a flag > day for IPv4 shutoff was chosen it would be arbitrary and could, if needed, > be

Re: [uknof] Thought for the day: announce the end of IPv4 internet connections by 2026

So is it actually feasible to announce *any* date when IPv6 will be the only connectivity offered to the end user? The thing is that without target dates and deadlines, things will drag on indefinitely. I'll admit I wanted to deliberately put up a challenging statement, but not to troll, really.

Re: [uknof] 9pm data dip

Hopefully Greg can tell us if the bandwidth dips go away now it's the last day of Ramadan, as that seems to be the popular explanation. The first day of Ramadan was 23rd April so the dips should have started then.

Re: [uknof] Thought for the day: announce the end of IPv4 internet connections by 2026

On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 15:26, Neil J. McRae wrote: > > And whilst some on here seem to think that ridiculing peoples opinions and > > suggestions is acceptable, I think that Paul (Mansfield) has made a valid > > suggestion that deserves to be discussed in an adult manner

[uknof] Thought for the day: announce the end of IPv4 internet connections by 2026

Here's a thought. Industry leading bodies* should announce that from 2026 all internet connections sold in the UK will be IPv6 only, and thus all CPEs must support IPv6 on the WAN and the LAN side, with no IPv4 on either. ISPs can then offer a DNS64/NAT64 service for customers, particularly

Re: [uknof] 9pm data dip

Many schools have resumed teaching, mainly online, as of maybe two weeks ago, and I would guess there's more enforcement of children's bed time now? If parents are triggered to send their children to bed because it's getting dark, then their children are likely to be going offline as that time.

Re: [uknof] Fibre internet - was Re: Current State of Multicast on the Internet?

On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 06:34, Neil J. McRae wrote: > > As soon as I know something concrete I’ll let you know! I've been eyeing up the £12B for fibre that BT have announced. Can you "lift the skirt" a little and be any more forthcoming or is it too early yet?

Re: [uknof] 9pm data dip

I can't see an obvious change in traffic on the public LINX stats at 21:00 (BST) but I do see a slight dip at 22:00. https://portal.linx.net/stats/lans#lon1 so when you say 9pm, is that definitely BST or could it be UTC 21:00?

Re: [uknof] 9pm data dip

On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:51, Greg Choules wrote: > > Good morning all. > We have started seeing a dip in traffic levels at 9pm every evening for about > the last 10 days, which we can't yet explain. > Has anyone else started seeing this? Or are we unique? Does this correlate with a change in

Re: [uknof] Public IPv4 Addresses Required

On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 11:16, Tim Chown wrote: >> When I was an undergrad at university I discovered the % method of relaying >> mails >> through other servers. We used to have competitions to have the maximum time >> taken >> for an email to come back, ideally sending email via as many

Re: [uknof] Public IPv4 Addresses Required

On Thu, 7 May 2020, 17:50 Henry Merrett, wrote: > +1 - I clearly remember it being considered good manners to allow public > relay through your SMTP server. > When I was an undergrad at university I discovered the % method of relaying mails through other servers. We used to have competitions to

[uknof] Waiting on more FTTC capacity at a cabinet?

Any BT lurkers who can help? I don't want to pester the obvious person ;-) I want to order FTTC from one of the various providers for property in Witham, Essex, which I believe is on the EAWTH exchange, cabinet 24. The problem is that nobody can take any orders for FTTC service because of lack

Re: [uknof] Public IPv4 Addresses Required

On Fri, 1 May 2020 at 09:23, Paul Bone wrote: > I am an IPv6 proponent but have come up against a real anti-IPv6 sentiment > from the vast majority of customer IT managers. > > I would love to hear from anyone who has managed to successfully push IPv6 > into the SME world in the UK and make

Re: [uknof] VM Network 27/04 since 5pm

just speculating wildly, was this a result of IPv6 deployment going wrong?

Re: [uknof] Public IPv4 Addresses Required

On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 17:22, Keith Mitchell wrote: > > IPv6 is not some new fangled minority interest, the fact that mainstream > > ISPs support it now (BT, Sky, Zen) > It would be even better if one of those did not blow an important > advantage of IPv6 by giving their end-users non-dynamic

Re: [uknof] Public IPv4 Addresses Required

providers who shouldn't be considered for any kind of professional use. On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 16:52, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020/04/27 16:43, Paul Mansfield wrote: > > > > I'm happy to sell the use of 100.64.44.0/23 at £10/ipv4 address. Just > let me know whom to >

Re: [uknof] Public IPv4 Addresses Required

I'm happy to sell the use of 100.64.44.0/23 at £10/ipv4 address. Just let me know whom to invoice. On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 13:32, Paul Bone wrote: > An ISP that I do work for is requiring additional public IPv4 addresses - > a /23 would be enough for what we need to do. > > Is anyone able to

Re: [uknof] [IP] COVID-19 Internet Usage Update (US)

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 11:04, Will Hargrave wrote: > conspiracy theories have accelerated when we are paying somewhere > between three and ten million people to stay at home and do nothing! getting a bit off topic but... I recall reading long ago how cuts to adult education services in

Re: [uknof] UK IPv6 Council round table meeting, 28th April

I think another problem is that people who attend online conferences tend to squeeze them into their normal working day, thus only give half their attention, and maybe rely on watching recordings of the talks later to fill in the bits they miss? How many people who've "attended" UKNOF meetings

Re: [uknof] COVID-19 offers of help and network changes

I'm sure people have it covered already but if anyone needs help getting an L2TP vpn server set up, I can probably assist as I recently did one at work. I want to open-source the puppet module which makes it possible. Also, I can help with openvpn, either with CAs or static key. or, if you've set

Re: [uknof] COVID-19 offers of help and network changes

we were all told today to work from home for the duration. hopefully people have their VPN servers battle-tested!

Re: [uknof] Fibre internet - was Re: Current State of Multicast on the Internet?

Hi Neil, Could it be something to do with this rumour? https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2020/02/openreach-plan-big-fttp-broadband-discounts-for-late-2020.html You can tell us if it's true, you're amongst friends now :-)

Re: [uknof] Fibre internet - was Re: Current State of Multicast on the Internet?

I know patience is a virtue, but four months on and I'm hoping for some news, thanks! On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 11:53, Neil J. McRae wrote: > > Probably worse time to do it! > > I haven’t forgotten about you Paul ! > > Neil > > On 2 Oct 2019, at 11:51, Paul Mansfield wrot

Re: [uknof] Open Source Software

I find Zabbix to be a fairly decent monitoring and measuring system, because you can use it for both snmp and zabbix agent based tests. It's quite easy to add new measurements. The triggers/alerts work well too. It's not as flashy as the latest tools but if set up right it's fairly easy to get to

Re: [uknof] Extortion?

Just because it's protonmail doesn't prevent law enforcement actively doing something https://protonmail.com/law-enforcement They might not be able to read the email body but they can hand over meta data and access logs etc.

Re: [uknof] Wayleave

to get fibre deployed. On Tue, 14 Jan 2020, 18:47 Neil J. McRae, wrote: > Isn’t that what I said? :) > > On 14 Jan 2020, at 18:42, Paul Mansfield > wrote: > >  > > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2020, 17:57 Neil J. McRae, wrote: > >> Agree with Chris / but this is

Re: [uknof] Wayleave

On Tue, 14 Jan 2020, 17:57 Neil J. McRae, wrote: > Agree with Chris / but this is typical landlord make money fast BS. > More likely the management agents being able to pay themselves an hourly rate for dealing with the demands of tenants.

Re: [uknof] Microsoft Voice exams

sorry, but why? https://upperedge.com/microsoft/microsoft-retiring-skype-for-business-online-to-force-teams-use/ On Tue, 24 Dec 2019, 02:17 Ryan Finnesey, wrote: > This may be a bit OT but I am looking for a few people that might have an > interest in taking a few Microsoft Voice exams around

Re: [uknof] Rats eating fibres in ducts

On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, 22:36 Will Hargrave, wrote: > My thoughts: Even CST is considerably more expensive to install, and > also have a general preference to not have metallic sheaths on cables if > it can be avoided. > Isn't there a risk that using metal armoured cable increases the risk of

Re: [uknof] Three hosed. Make it right please!

Although I had a signal all morning, there was no data session, and phone couldn't make calls - "not registered". Then I put phone into airplane mode for a while, and it started working again.

Re: [uknof] Three hosed. Make it right please!

On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, 05:12 Neil J. McRae, wrote: > Network has been down for well over 5 hours Who provides the backhaul for Three from cell sites? Do they have a preferred supplier for connection to any regional PoPs?

Re: [uknof] Fibre internet - was Re: Current State of Multicast on the Internet?

On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 11:53, Neil J. McRae wrote: > > Probably worse time to do it! > > I haven’t forgotten about you Paul ! I don't know whether to be scared or hopeful ;-) Way way back when Virgin Media were still expanding cable coverage, they leafletted every house in the village telling

Re: [uknof] Fibre internet - was Re: Current State of Multicast on the Internet?

On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 12:06, David Derrick wrote: > Any idea when we can expect to see trained dolphins pulling fibre reels > across the Scapa Flow? FTTD (fibre to the dolphin)?? surely there's fibre already to the Island, to support the 5G trials happening up there? plus you've got a Microsoft

Re: [uknof] Fibre internet - was Re: Current State of Multicast on the Internet?

n 19/09/2019, 16:24, "Paul Mansfield" wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 16:41, Neil J. McRae wrote: > > > > Where do you live Paul? > > I gave Neil my address, fortunately he didn't "send the boys round" to > shut me up, unfortunately he didn't send the boys round to install > fibre!! > >

Re: [uknof] Fibre internet - was Re: Current State of Multicast on the Internet?

On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 16:41, Neil J. McRae wrote: > > Where do you live Paul? I gave Neil my address, fortunately he didn't "send the boys round" to shut me up, unfortunately he didn't send the boys round to install fibre!!

Re: [uknof] Ubnt and iOS 12 help

On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, 16:29 Dan Kitchen, wrote: > Sounds like an MTU issue to me. > +1 Possibly coupled with high packet loss I've had a few people come to me recently with Wi-Fi problems on devices, and they're on 2.4GHz Wi-Fi and using Bluetooth. Turning off Bluetooth or switching to 5GHz

Re: [uknof] Amsterdam data centre interconnects

maybe peeringDB will give you a list of useful names? https://www.peeringdb.com/ix/26 https://www.peeringdb.com/fac/1320

Re: [uknof] Parental Controls - Who’s Responsible?

On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 23:12, Bill wrote: > Having said that we as a community should be helping them find and use the > tools needed to do this. TL;DR: we can give the parents a great set of tools to control their children's internal access, but few parents are technically savvy enough to use

Re: [uknof] Office fitout - ISP + Ubiquiti wifi/security cams

Every single candidate, i.e. impossible to fail. On Thu, 6 Dec 2018, 13:23 Catalin Dominte Regarding Sparkies, my brother recently went through the certification to > be able to do electrical installations as well, and out of 3 classes of 20, > anyone cares to guess how many ended up with the

Re: [uknof] Office fitout - ISP + Ubiquiti wifi/security cams

On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 13:57, Alasdair Lumsden wrote: > Our office fitout company wants to take on the connectivity+wifi, but I > thought it would be prudent to ask the collective if they could recommend > anyone. IME, office fit-out companies should be kept away from cabling of all kind, let

Re: [uknof] IPv6 default on EE

On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 12:05, Neil J. McRae wrote: > > Well the league table is meaningless but for us a lot of customers on legacy > hubs that we cant put V6 on. Some progress to come on this but there will > likely be a long tail. how does PlusNet fit into the IPv6 roll-out plans? I note

Re: [uknof] BBC IPv6 over LINX issue

On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 18:51, Paul Bone wrote: > Is anyone else having problems with Hurricane Electric providing IPv6 routes > for bbc.co.uk via Australia over LINX? I was curious, so I checked for records for www.bbc.co.uk (which is a CNAME to www.bbc.net.uk, and that has no

Re: [uknof] Netflix Contact

On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, 14:37 Chris Russell, wrote: > > From other feedback, seeing a number of people been hit by this > recently, so just trying to understand what makes netflix believe these are > VPN's or proxies and we can do to try and help each other ... > There's a rather dodgy vpn

Re: [uknof] Cisco Sup2T Memory

if you can find an old laptop which takes DDR2 SODIMMS, fit them to that, boot linux and run "dmidecode" and see if it tells you something useful? you'll need a machine with a core2 processor, or older, I think.

Re: [uknof] virus in attachment from john.bou...@mobileinternet.com

On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 at 13:30, Pete Stevens wrote: > I contacted him privately, gave him the mail headers and he was able to > track down the source. I don't think I'm at liberty to disclose the > explanation so I suggest you mail him directly if you'd like to know. thanks, I'm happy to know that

[uknof] virus in attachment from john.bou...@mobileinternet.com

I'm wondering how the unique email address I use for UKNOF got leaked. I received a reply to an email from john.bou...@mobileinternet.com, with the body being this: > Hi, > Please see attached, let me know if you have questions! > Thanks > John What makes this remarkable is that the message

Re: [uknof] Three UK Wholesale

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 17:08, Hal Ponton wrote: > Primarily looking at options for reselling mobile data to some of our > customers as either backup or primary connections for off net customers. I've BCC'd someone I know at Three who may be able to help, he's a regular attendee at UKNOF events

Re: [uknof] 5g standardisation progresses

Compared to the kind of price you pay for professional training, £150 is not very much. you're spoiled by UKNOF events which are excellent and paid for by sponsors!

Re: [uknof] BT Phone Number renumbering

On 21 May 2018 at 10:59, Catalin Dominte wrote: > > Sorry for the long rant about 1980's in the 21st century! why are you using 1900's technology - analogue PSTN services, when you could be using 1990's VOIP/SIP technology? then your numbers are fully portable and usable

  1   2   3   >