In a message dated 6/30/2007 9:58:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(while responding to Melani)
I've suggested that wendell could have
acknowledged -- candidly and constructively -- that fenton
is now working for blackwell,
In case Wendell doesn't know how to prais
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote:
two weeks ago uc review reported a serious rift between ucd and
blackwell, between ucd and the community. in his interview in the uc
review this week, wendell does not seem to have appreciated that. and
now you're asking for positive suggestions for change, what wende
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
melani, when wendell was interviewed by uc review, maybe he
could have mentioned, for the readers' benefit, that fenton
works with blackwell now.
Melani Lamond wrote:
How would a statement about John's current employment have improved Lewis'
: UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: University City List
Sent: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 6:36 pm
Subject: Re: [UC] Re: UCD - Lewis Wendell and His UCD Lashes Out
Turner,Kathleen wrote:
> If I were to leave my current position and accept a position with >
another employer in the area
y City List
*Subject:* Re: [UC] Re: UCD - Lewis Wendell and His UCD Lashes Out
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There have been a number of "what would YOU do?" questions asked on the
> listserv during this investigation. I didn't see anyone offer up a
> great plan that everyo
ty City List
Sent: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 6:36 pm
Subject: Re: [UC] Re: UCD - Lewis Wendell and His UCD Lashes Out
Turner,Kathleen wrote:
> If I were to leave my current position and accept a position with > another
> employer in the area, I really do not believe that my former > employer
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote:
melani, when wendell was interviewed by uc review, maybe he could have
mentioned, for the readers' benefit, that fenton works with blackwell
now.
Brian Siano wrote:
Oh, yeah. Saying that makes all the world of a difference.
Maybe he could have said something posi
Turner,Kathleen wrote:
If I were to leave my current position and accept a position with
another employer in the area, I really do not believe that my former
employer would have the right to make public any information about my
new employment.
I could, my new employer could, but I think it wo
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have been a number of "what would YOU do?" questions asked on
the listserv during this investigation. I didn't see anyone offer up
a great plan that everyone else endorsed - that ANYONE else
endorsed. Please correct me if I missed so
illegal (Paul?) for my former employer to do so.
Kathleen
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
Sent: Thu 6/28/2007 2:17 PM
To: University City List
Subject: Re: [UC] Re: UCD - Lewis Wendell and His UCD Lashes Out
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
In a message dated 6/28/07 2:21:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> melani, when wendell was interviewed by uc review, maybe he
> could have mentioned, for the readers' benefit, that fenton
> works with blackwell now. [wendell must have known that, no?
> and if he didn't, that's pretty worrisome, n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have been a number of "what would YOU do?" questions asked on the
listserv during this investigation. I didn't see anyone offer up a
great plan that everyone else endorsed - that ANYONE else endorsed.
Please correct me if I missed something that Lewis could have
In a message dated 6/28/07 1:19:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> this week's uc review interviews lewis wendell in an attempt
> to 'reach out to readers' with 'candor' and 'a forthright
> manner'. unfortunately, it backfires.
>
Sharreiff Ali wrote:
> *Lewis Wendell tries to bury John on th
Brian Siano wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lewis Wendell's comment, the UCD has only been working on a BID
scenario for approximately two years is so off the mark, I can only
assume the current UCD Board treats him as some U.S. Presidents have
treated their chief press officers - don't give
> Sharreiff Ali wrote:
*Lewis Wendell tries to bury John on the cover of today’s UC-Review*.
...
You must read it on-line. ... *http://www.weeklypress.com/*
Craigsolv wrote:
His now public commentary reaffirms the utter ineptitude of Lewis
Wendell's command of the UCD...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Lewis Wendell alleges as a series of missteps on John's part are
in fact the gravest indictment of his own inadequate leadership, after
nearly two years at the helm, of the administration of the UCD, and as
a mature organization UCD's failure to develop, implement
>I'd give him a straight F on the University City Report Card.
But you would have done that before the interview anyway, wouldn't you?
I find it fascinating how some people, not necessarily Al -- but you can
all troll through the back posts and see who -- saw this incident and
said "Holy smoke
In a message dated 6/27/2007 2:51:54 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
His now public commentary reaffirms the utter ineptitude of Lewis Wendell's
command of the UCD and most cogently answers highly regarded local attorney
Karen Allen's question of yesterday:
Of cour
18 matches
Mail list logo
