Hey
You can pull mine from master and I'll do PRs as required, but I do need
access to the Sakai and basic lti portlet repos so might need to be left
in, though IMO commit perms should probably be separate to uPortal core?
Cheers
Steve
On 8 Nov 2014 01:09, Andrew Petro apetro.li...@gmail.com
the work to re-implement, of course, but if it’s an
opportunity to make a connection with an adopter interested in
collaborating on patches for uPortal…
Andrew
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Steve Swinsburg steve.swinsb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I did some work a while ago to remove
I did some work a while ago to remove this and instead use mobile detect,
which is what we use in Sakai for detecting if the user is on a mobile or
tablet:
https://github.com/steveswinsburg/mobile-detect
I no longer have the patch (or time to work on uPortal at the moment) but
it would be simple
Nice!
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Drew Wills awi...@unicon.net wrote:
No questions -- just woot!
drew
On 03/20/2014 01:55 PM, Tim Levett wrote:
Milestone 1 of 4.1 has been released. Congratulations thank you to
everyone who has contributed toward a responsive design and other
From the names on the list it doesn't look like it.
Cheers
Steve
sent from mobile device
On 31/10/2013 4:54 AM, James Wennmacher jwennmac...@unicon.net wrote:
I just happened to run across this again. Did Apereo get someone
involved?
https://java.net/projects/portletspec3/members
James
to be involved with a JSR EG is a MUST.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Steve Swinsburg
steve.swinsb...@gmail.com wrote:
From the names on the list it doesn't look like it.
Cheers
Steve
sent from mobile device
On 31/10/2013 4:54 AM, James Wennmacher jwennmac...@unicon.net wrote:
I just
, 2012, at 4:58 AM, Aaron Grant wrote:
Steve,
I think that is a great idea and would be useful for us if this was
implemented, I can think of 5 or 6 portlets that I could use this on right
now.
Aaron
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Steve Swinsburg steve.swinsb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
recommend that its use be configurable,
since different institutions will have different opinions about whether
portlets need to be suppressed.
- Jen
On Jul 11, 2012, at 10:30 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi all,
We have been conducting a security audit of our portal and have
Hi all,
We have been conducting a security audit of our portal and have discovered a
situation where data of another user can be exposed via the Switch Identity
portlet.
For example, an admin user uses the Switch Identity portlet to switch to a
student, then can view that user's timetable
Hi all,
Is there any reason why the following portlets are setup as cross context? It
seems like uPortal should be the only context setup in this way [1]. I don't
recall these portlets sharing any request objects between them, is there some
other reason?
Calendar Portlet
Email Preview Portlet
bytes).
-Eric
On 2/9/12 10:43 AM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi,
The first error is because MySQL has a size limit on the index and
since multiple columns re involved it adds their lengths together.
Develoeprs need to be aware of this when creating column lengths and
then indexes. Does
Hi all,
I've been working on this neat bit of functionality which allows you to
configure a portlet to render in the full 'focus' view on the mobile portal,
rather than having it rendered as just a link.
For example on the home page of the mobile view we want to show some content,
not just a
(JIoEndpoint.java:302)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
2012/1/17 Steve Swinsburg steve.swinsb
Hi Alan,
We have some jMeter scripts we are tidying up for our production release, which
integrates with our local CAS instance and steps a user through each of their
tabs and portlets and gathers some metrics. We'd be happy to donate those to
the cause.
cheers,
Steve
On 16/01/2012, at
Hi all,
Is anyone running uPortal 3.2 on Tomcat 7 in production? I presume with the
same classloader layout configuration as is required for TC6 that it should be
ok. The reason I ask is because the Sakai CLE is skipping TC6 and moving
directly to 7 so I want to align our stacks.
cheers,
Hi all,
I've been working through addressing some issues I discovered with locked
layouts and user permission to modify things.
Basically, if you turn off certain permissions in fragments or columns (Add
channels, add columns etc) the user still has access to do these things, but it
throws
Hi,
I have a bunch of portlets that I want to convert over to be compatible with
the uPortal 4 registration and publishing format.
In uPortal 3 there are three things I have which I think I will need convert.
1. A channel-type - for allowing others to create portlet instances from my
portlet.
being the cause? Just curious to make sure we don't have a
problem in any of our project releases?
-Eric
On 11/8/11 11:52 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi Drew,
That is exactly what I thought was happening, the plutofication /
plutotisation (the pluto process!) was running twice. Those
Hi all,
I'm getting an error with the email-preview portlet in a current uP 4 trunk
install. It is complaining that the web.xml for the email-preview webapp
contains duplicate servlet-names. Inspecting the generated web.xml, it does:
Nov 9, 2011 2:54:17 PM
definitions listed in portlet.xml. If this process happens
twice, it's bad.
I hope this issue turns out to be what I think it is. But if it isn't,
please keep me posted because I'll follow up directly.
cheers,
drew
On 11/8/2011 9:03 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm getting
to create a locked-down column.
- Jen
On Oct 26, 2011, at 10:45 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi all,
We are experiencing an issue after upgrading to 3.2.5 where if you add a
tab, change the column layout and then immediately attempt to add a portlet
to it, you receive a error saying
, the assumption is
that if you're commit directly on a primary branch (master or rel-*) the
change is a very simple no-brainer that doesn't need review or the history
advantages of a temp branch.
-Eric
On 10/27/11 8:28 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Ok now we are in business, that makes a lot more
Is the whole repo moving, or just the uPortal part? I am getting ready to
commit the source for a few incubating portlets so presume that still goes into
SVN?
cheers,
Steve
On 20/10/2011, at 5:52 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
A reminder that uPortal will be moving to GitHub tomorrow (Thursday
We also use world weather online, but via a different weather portlet. No
issues so far.
Sent from my iPhone
On 15/10/2011, at 0:06, Eric Dalquist eric.dalqu...@doit.wisc.edu wrote:
We've been using World Weather Online without any problems. Even with peaking
above 100k logins/day we've
structure name=DLM Tabs and columns/
theme name=DLM XHTML/
/profile
/layout
then, in portal.properties we reference that empty-usr here:
org.jasig.portal.services.Authentication.defaultTemplateUserName=empty-usr
does this help?
tc
On Oct 10, 2011, at 10:23 PM, Steve Swinsburg
, at 3:52 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi Tim,
It does, thanks!
However I note that the 3.2 version of portal.properties is set like:
org.jasig.portal.services.Authentication.defaultTemplateUserName=defaultTemplateUser
And defaultTemplateUser already has a layout.
But what was odd
Hi all,
We are having an issue with our layouts becoming unlocked after they are
imported.
We have setup fragments (eg welcome-lo) with portlets locked etc, and then we
export them (exports as .layout though so we rename to .fragment-layout)
In the exported CRN we have something like:
channel
With the svn read-only mirror and the other discussions that have taken place
around governance, my vote is now a +1.
cheers,
Steve
On 30/09/2011, at 7:45 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
The GitHub migration vote currently stands at:
Binding:
3 +1
10
0 -0
NonBinding:
2 +1
Hi Anthony,
Just posted a comment in the Jira. Can you provide steps to reproduce this?
https://issues.jasig.org/browse/UP-2960
cheers,
Steve
On 21/09/2011, at 10:07 AM, Anthony Colebourne wrote:
Hi,
I've seen a few posts that talk about a uP 3.2.5 release.
The issue UP-2960 is
Hi Eric,
I could help on getting 3.2 patch releases done. I've committed a bunch of
stuff which will appear in 3.2.5.
cheers,
Steve
On 16/09/2011, at 3:10 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
I'm going to try my best to do monthly patch releases of the latest uPortal
release. That would mean that
Nice work, thanks Eric.
cheers,
Steve
On 14/09/2011, at 7:14 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
FYI Contegix got us on the latest fisheye release and it appears to be
working (crosses fingers).
-Eric
On 09/07/2011 07:18 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
I think I know where this is heading... Send me
git-svn post git commit to keep things in sync.
-Eric
On 9/11/11 6:00 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi Eric,
A could of responses inline:
On 12/09/2011, at 1:01 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
Since the concerns need some actual discussion I'll see if I can answer
them here, my answers
number.
Steve
On 29/08/2011, at 1:27 PM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
I can check with Contegix but I don't believe they support a ViewVC install.
Hopefully if we can get uPortal moved to github we can do some magic to get
fisheye working on the rest of the repo.
On 8/28/11 9:39 PM, Steve
Not officially voting just yet as I'd like to see this really thrashed out.
Switching to a different SCM system can isolate users who don't know how to use
it. Git is complex. Much more so than Subversion. It may be more powerful but
that doesn't mean a lot to the average user who wants to fix
Hi Eric,
I'm not sure how much work this is, but would you consider porting
https://issues.jasig.org/browse/UP-2934 to uP4?
It's off by default but would be very useful for those wanting to use Basic LTI
portlets in uPortal as it allows a manual restart of the portlet in case the
other end
Hi,
Can we please get Fisheye or ViewVC (re)enabled on the Jasig SVN? I was told
there was an issue with Fisheye crashing on a large merge so that might rule
out Fisheye, but ViewVC should be able to handle it and just use the Subversion
plugin for Jira to link it in.
encounter
any issues, definitely let us know so we can fix it :) If I've
misinterpreted what functionality you're hoping for, let me know.
- Jen
On Aug 23, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi all,
is it possible to have individual fragments owned by different people? Say I
Hi Eric,
How does uPortal 4 compare with uPortal 3.3? Is it because there was a lot of
work in 3.3 that it was decided to be a major release, aka uPortal 4?
cheers,
Steve
On 06/05/2011, at 4:28 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
Well due to the time-sucking wonders that was a state-wide HR system
planning complete support for data migration with the goal of
being able to export from 2.5, 2.6, 3.0, 3.1, or 3.2 and import that data
into 4.0
-Eric
On 5/5/11 6:18 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi Eric,
How does uPortal 4 compare with uPortal 3.3? Is it because there was a lot
of work
Yep 3.2.4
On 02/05/2011, at 10:39 PM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
This is in 3.2 right?
On 5/1/11 11:36 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
This has come up in another portlet we are working on and it's something we
want to get addressed. Eric, can you send through the details of where in
the code
This has come up in another portlet we are working on and it's something we
want to get addressed. Eric, can you send through the details of where in the
code this is handled and we *might* be able to take a look.
cheers,
Steve
On 02/03/2011, at 3:51 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
It's
This looks awesome. Can't wait to work with it!
cheers,
Steve
On 01/04/2011, at 2:49 AM, Gary Thompson wrote:
Hey,
I wanted to give an update on the work being done for UP-2921. This work has
two parts, 1) to make improvements to FSS (which uPortal uses as the base for
skins), and 2)
I can see the benefit of retaining the identifier and adding the .xml extension.
So we'll end up with files like:
foo.channel.xml
foo.channel-type.xml
foo.group_membership.xml
foo.fragment-layout.xml
Sounds good to me. It is non-standard but means there is more clarity around
what type of file
Hi,
I have a CPD for a portlet and up until now have been placing it into
uportal-war/src/main/resources/org/jasig/portal/channels/ and then rebuilding
the uPortal war. I then run a crn-import on a .channel-type I have that
references the CPD. It is fine for the channel-type to be external to
Hi all,
Is it possible to exclude some resources when running the resource aggregation
plugin on our skin? We have included hoverIntent in our skin and there is an
issue with aggregating/minifying it.
We have used both the normal version and the minified version of hoverIntent
and both cause
.
-Eric
On 3/2/11 7:56 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to exclude some resources when running the resource
aggregation plugin on our skin? We have included hoverIntent in our skin and
there is an issue with aggregating/minifying it.
We have used both the normal
After discussion with Eric on IM we found the issue was to do with the Unicode
Byte Order Mark.
https://issues.jasig.org/browse/RESSERV-14
Thanks Eric!
cheers,
Steve
On 03/03/2011, at 3:24 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
It looks like the issue is in the aggregation of hoverIntent itself
that
handles the delegation and URL generation.
-Eric
On 2/28/11 9:54 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi all,
It doesn't look like the CONFIG mode passes through render parameters on the
ActionResponse, is this true? Because I am setting them when validation
fails on portlet preferences
be done this way assuming the HTTP request
overhead wasn't too much.
Thanks for all the tips, good info and more planning to be done!
cheers,
Steve
-Eric
On 2/13/11 6:37 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking at adding Basic LTI provider support to uPortal. I already have
Hi all,
I'm looking at adding Basic LTI provider support to uPortal. I already have the
portlet going which means uPortal is a Basic LTI consumer, but I'd like to get
the reciprocal happening, to make it a provider. This will allow us to use the
uPortal portlets in other environments.
Basic
Hi all,
I'm after some docs on how to implement the CONFIG mode for portlets. I've
added it to the portlet.xml and get the option in the Portlet Manager to 'Enter
Rich Configuration' but then what? The only docs I've found is a sentence or
two here:
...@lists.wisc.edu
[mailto:bounce-12860286-23525...@lists.wisc.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Swinsburg
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:03 PM
To: uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org
Subject: Re: [uportal-dev] converting all references to tables to uppercase
From reading the MySQL manual, it says we'd need
Hi all,
We have a situation where our MySQL cluster has been configured as case
sensitive. Thus, the uPortal tables are all uppercase, but several places
references these tables as lowercase (looks like the crns and probably some
hand written SQL), which is obviously failing.
Does anyone
=apiKey
On Nov 30, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi all,
I am wondering how people manage multiple build environments using the one
source tree of uPortal. What I mean is that we have several developers as
well as dev, test, uat and prod environments all with different
Hi all,
I am wondering how people manage multiple build environments using the one
source tree of uPortal. What I mean is that we have several developers as well
as dev, test, uat and prod environments all with different details for the
hostname, tomcat path and database connection details.
FWIW we wrote our own weather portlet using a feed from worldweatheronline.com,
and it uses individual API keys. I think this approach is best as has been
mentioned before, it's impossible to hide URLs or credentials in open source
code.
Can Accuweather reinstate the feed until an appropriate
There is a current JIRA ticket to address this via WURFL which is both a
capabilities list and an API.
https://issues.jasig.org/browse/UP-2778
In Sakai we implemented a 'switch to classic' link when taken to the mobile
version. We can use similar code for uPortal.
cheers,
Steve
On
What about a bit of Javascript/jQuery to scroll to the desired location?
cheers,
Steve
On 14 Jun 2010, at 15:40, Paul Gazda wrote:
Bummer. Our problem is this. We have a directory list of people in focused
(maximized) mode, and if you click on an entry, it expands that entry within
the
Hi everyone,
Thanks for welcoming me to the community, I look forward to contributing to
uPortal in the near future.
cheers,
Steve
On 05/02/2010, at 7:01 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote:
Well we had 3 +1 votes and no -1 votes so welcome to Steve!
Steve, I'll email you directly with more
59 matches
Mail list logo
