With the svn read-only mirror and the other discussions that have taken place around governance, my vote is now a +1.
cheers, Steve On 30/09/2011, at 7:45 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote: > The GitHub migration vote currently stands at: > > Binding: > 3 +1 > 1 0 > 0 -0 > NonBinding: > 2 +1 > 0 0 > 0 -0 > > This is enough to pass by the project voting standards but I wanted to bring > this up one last time before scheduling the migration for additional input. > The 4.0.1 release will be cut Friday the 30th and announced on Monday. If > there is no objection from this discussion I'll work on planning the > migration to GitHub after the announcement. > > One thing I'd like anyone here who contributes code to uPortal, either > directly or through patches, is to take a look at this REALLY good git > workflow documentation: > https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/wiki/Git-Workflow It is a great example > of how get helps provide a much nicer workflow for both developers and the > project/branch leads as far as committing and merging in changes. > > The full proposal is on the wiki: > https://wiki.jasig.org/display/UPC/Git+Migration+Proposal > > -Eric > > -- You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
