Hi Gary,
Welcome to Revolution! A good place I've found to start learning about
RevCGI is at Jacque Landman Gay's site,
http://www.hyperactivesw.com/cgitutorial/
She has links to other resources along the same vein as well.
Good luck!
Cheers,
Kat
http://rugusa.linguistix.net
Gary Thompso
Hello All,
When I purchased Runtime Revolution last month one of the things that
interested me was the capability to quote the web site "Let
Transcript run facelessly on your server as a script language."
I would like to experiment with this concept under OS X. I'm running
Tiger if that h
OS 10.3.7 Revolution 2.5.1 version released a day or two ago.
RevOnLine and documentation both work fine.
In fact, RevOnLine seems much more responsive than I remember in the past
(though I have not used it much).
Bruce
At 7:32 AM -0800 3/18/05, Jim Hurley wrote:
>
>Using 2.5 I cannot access ei
Little help please.
We (Run Rev support and I) are trying to decide whether my problems
with the new 2.5 version of Run Rev are system related or not.
Using 2.5 I cannot access either the "rev OnLIne" or the
"Documentation" windows. They are completely intert: Can't close or
move them. Can't a
Hi Folks,
I remember seeing threads here about Rev 2.5 engine not loading the
database externals and the mysql database driver. My memory might be
faulty, can someone point me if there's any bug in 2.5 release that
would stop a CGI running under apache with plain 2.5 engine, database
exte
Yes, and I know I brought up the issue some time ago with respect to the
educational community, in which Win 98 or even Win95 can be a deployment
issue.
I had to deploy my master's project stack on old Windows with I think
something like either 32 or 64 MG RAM. Tops. As in, "extremely painful".
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:55:32 -0600, curry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
(6. And this should be parenthetical because it is not the
issue--this is not about my personal computing happiness or me
"holding out" on 10.1. My intent is to make apps for others and I
want to know that the minimum requ
Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, curry wrote:
It's hard to believe, and a bit troubling, that the majority of
responses to my report about Rev 2.5 crashing on OS 10.1 have been
suggestions for me to upgrade. I'm sure this is meant well, but it's
not relevant. When I posted that I thou
Recently, curry wrote:
> It's hard to believe, and a bit troubling, that the majority of
> responses to my report about Rev 2.5 crashing on OS 10.1 have been
> suggestions for me to upgrade. I'm sure this is meant well, but it's
> not relevant. When I posted that I tho
It's hard to believe, and a bit troubling, that the majority of
responses to my report about Rev 2.5 crashing on OS 10.1 have been
suggestions for me to upgrade. I'm sure this is meant well, but it's
not relevant. When I posted that I thought surely this is obvious
enough to n
Curry
That was a very clear post. I appreciated it.
I suspect RR would be better off NOT trying to claim support for OS X
prior to at least 10.1.5 and perhaps not before 10.2. I haven't seen
any figures lately, but I don't think there are a lot of everyday Mac
users out there running a versi
absolutely do the upgrade..
You might want to wait until tiger is out though
tom
On Feb 23, 2005, at 9:59 PM, James Cass wrote:
I'm using Rev 2.0.3 and I was going to try out Rev 2.5, but it
crashes on OSX 10.1.
Are you not even using 10.1.5? Man, you really need to at least move
to J
On Feb 23, 2005, at 6:22 PM, curry wrote:
I can't really try out 2.5 much because it crashes in too many
situations with OSX 10.1, but I see enough to raise some questions.
Yeah, you should upgrade to OSX 10.2 or 10.3. Lots of good, non-Rev
reasons to do so.
Does the RevOnline window always ope
Take a look at the official RunRev operating system requirements.
It's *supposed* to work with 10.1. You don't think it's any big deal
when the listed requirements don't match? Just upgrade as often as
necessary?
If I upgraded, then I wouldn't know the difference, wouldn't I? (And
apparently,
On Feb 23, 2005, at 7:59 PM, James Cass wrote:
I'm using Rev 2.0.3 and I was going to try out Rev 2.5, but it
crashes on OSX 10.1.
Are you not even using 10.1.5?
I have a 10.1.5 that I test Rev against when I feel inclined. Curry, I
guess you have to be the 10.1 beta tester. (Personal
I'm using Rev 2.0.3 and I was going to try out Rev 2.5, but it crashes
on OSX 10.1.
Are you not even using 10.1.5? Man, you really need to at least move
to Jaguar (MacOSX 10.2.8). It is a highly regarded opinion that 10.1
had lots of problems that were finally fixed by 10.2. That
I can't really try out 2.5 much because it crashes in too many
situations with OSX 10.1, but I see enough to raise some questions.
Does the RevOnline window always open when you open Revolution, or
will it stay shut next time if you close it and quit (without
crashing)?
I prefer selecting an o
I'm using Rev 2.0.3 and I was going to try out Rev 2.5, but it
crashes on OSX 10.1. This leads me to assume that there must be no
beta testers for Rev with 10.1--because the same thing happened with
Rev 2.1, I reported a crash and it was later fixed. But 10.1 is
officially supported,
Robert Brenstein wrote:
I suspect it won't be changed, because it's common to create and
manipulate "invisible" windows by positioning them off-screen, and it
would be hard to figure the difference between that technique and the
case where the user has switched from dual monitor to single monito
Silver, Jason wrote:
[ ... window off screen ...]
I'm sure there's a workaround (e.g. typing some "move" command into the
Message Box), but I was hoping that this issue could be looked at, and
possibly changed in forthcoming releases of the software.
msg box, and type
set the loc of stack "revdoc
Le 5 févr. 05, à 15:00, Alex Tweedly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Perhaps a right-click menu item in the app browser could be used to
move a window to the primary screen. (Or when Revolution figure out
multiple monitors, to the closest one.)
That would be a good idea - though in this case, the pr
Dar Scott wrote:
On Feb 4, 2005, at 4:58 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
I suspect it won't be changed, because it's common to create and
manipulate "invisible" windows by positioning them off-screen, and it
would be hard to figure the difference between that technique and the
case where the user has sw
On Feb 4, 2005, at 4:58 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
I suspect it won't be changed, because it's common to create and
manipulate "invisible" windows by positioning them off-screen, and it
would be hard to figure the difference between that technique and the
case where the user has switched from dual
Silver, Jason wrote:
[ ... window off screen ...]
I'm sure there's a workaround (e.g. typing some "move" command into the
Message Box), but I was hoping that this issue could be looked at, and
possibly changed in forthcoming releases of the software.
msg box, and type
set the loc of stack "rev
I'm not sure this is classified as a "bug", but I've noticed an issue in
Revolution that irks me. The computer provided to me by my company is a
laptop; while in the office, I have it connected to a docking station
which connects to an external monitor. This lets me use the big 21" CRT
as my prim
Bob Hartley wrote:
At 19:39 24/01/2005, you wrote:
Fix docs is now on revonline under utilities or nijinsky's user space.
Put there on behalf of Ken.
Thanks Bob. But especially, thanks Ken.
This is really cool ! In fact, I was inspired by this to modify the
stack to fix my own favourite annoyance
At 19:39 24/01/2005, you wrote:
Fix docs is now on revonline under utilities or nijinsky's user space.
Put there on behalf of Ken.
Cheers
Bob
Until RunRev delivers a fully revised set of docs that includes this, I've
created a "patch" stack that will change your current version of the Rev
Docs so t
Good job Ken. I was dreading using that stupid field each time I open
the docs. Monte should've released this!
-Chipp
J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 1/24/05 1:39 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
Until RunRev delivers a fully revised set of docs that includes this,
I've
created a "patch" stack that will change your
On 1/24/05 1:39 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
Until RunRev delivers a fully revised set of docs that includes this, I've
created a "patch" stack that will change your current version of the Rev
Docs so that it will no longer attempt to search or filter after typing, but
*only* after you hit . This eliminates
Thanks, Ken -- you rock.
The search thing was driving me nuts!.
sqb
Until RunRev delivers a fully revised set of docs that includes this, I've
created a "patch" stack that will change your current version of the Rev
Docs so that it will no longer attempt to search or filter after typing, but
*only
Until RunRev delivers a fully revised set of docs that includes this, I've
created a "patch" stack that will change your current version of the Rev
Docs so that it will no longer attempt to search or filter after typing, but
*only* after you hit . This eliminates the annoying "No match"
dialog box
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeanne A. E.
DeVoto
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 11:06 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: revCopyFolder problems in Rev 2.5
At 6:27 PM -0700 12/14/2004, Dar Scott wrote:
>On Dec 14, 2004, at 4:33 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
&
h other values for System 9 and Windows.
-- Frank
Web Photos Pro: Software for Photo Bloggers and Other Photo Power Users
See us on the web at http://www.webphotospro.com/
On Dec 15, 2004, at 2:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Subject: Re: revCopyFolder problems in Rev 2.5
To: How to use Rev
At 6:27 PM -0700 12/14/2004, Dar Scott wrote:
On Dec 14, 2004, at 4:33 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
To copy an app bundle, you need to use revCopyFile - even though it
is really a folder :-)
The doc entry for revCopyFile says the opposite. Is the doc wrong?
I think this behavior changed a version o
I didn't read the docs, I just tested it :-)
If you use "answer folder" or it's AppleScript equivalent, you can't
select an app bundle. Only "answer file" allows you to select an app
bundle, so I assumed that Rev would treat it like a file and copy it
using revCopyFile. On testing, this did inde
the first place. Sorry.
Chris Sheffield
Software Development
Read Naturally
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sarah
Reichelt
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 3:31 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: revCopyFolder problems in Rev 2.5
D
On Dec 14, 2004, at 4:33 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
To copy an app bundle, you need to use revCopyFile - even though it is
really a folder :-)
The doc entry for revCopyFile says the opposite. Is the doc wrong?
Dar Scott
DSC
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
Does anyone know if revCopyFolder is broken in Rev 2.5 build 2? I'm
having
problems with it. Calling "the result" right after it returns
"execution
error". If I revert back to Rev 2.2 it works fine. Anyone else had
problems with this?
Thanks,
Chris Sheffield
f Of Sarah Reichelt
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 3:31 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: revCopyFolder problems in Rev 2.5
> Does anyone know if revCopyFolder is broken in Rev 2.5 build 2? I'm
> having
> problems with it. Calling "the result" right after it ret
Does anyone know if revCopyFolder is broken in Rev 2.5 build 2? I'm having
problems with it. Calling "the result" right after it returns "execution
error". If I revert back to Rev 2.2 it works fine. Anyone else had
problems with this?
Thanks,
Chris Sheffield
Hi Chipp,
Still there:
http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/RunRev/Tutorials.htm
Oooops, sorry for not searching hard enough :-)
-Chipp
Klaus Major wrote:
there is was, apparently :-( this little stack on Chipp's website
called "MacMetalLook"
which works without crashing OS X here (10.3.6) and it i
Still there:
http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/RunRev/Tutorials.htm
-Chipp
Klaus Major wrote:
there is was, apparently :-( this little stack on Chipp's website called
"MacMetalLook"
which works without crashing OS X here (10.3.6) and it is using a
stretched PNG image...?
And that looks almost
Hi all,
Recently, Frank Leahy wrote:
Having read about the various problems with metal windows in 2.2 and
2.5 I decided to see if I couldn't fake it with a metal
backgroundPattern. I tweaked a pattern I found on the web, and it
looks pretty good, with no obvious lines between the tiles. If anyone
Recently, Frank Leahy wrote:
> Having read about the various problems with metal windows in 2.2 and
> 2.5 I decided to see if I couldn't fake it with a metal
> backgroundPattern. I tweaked a pattern I found on the web, and it
> looks pretty good, with no obvious lines between the tiles. If anyon
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Metal .gif available [was Rev 2.5 Redraw Problems]
>
> Having read about the various problems with metal windows in 2.2 and
> 2.5 I decided to see if I couldn't fake it with a metal
> backgroundPattern. I tweaked a pattern I found on the web,
> and it
b Photos Pro: Software for Photo Bloggers and Other Photo Power Users
See us on the web at http://www.webphotospro.com/
On Nov 18, 2004, at 6:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Gregory Lypny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Rev 2.5 Redraw Problems
To: Revolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 4:55 pm -0500 17/11/04, Gregory Lypny wrote:
[...]
>resolved in some sort of update. In my version, working in OS X, all
>controls disappear (it's scary) from metal-look windows when I switch
>from one of the pointer tools in the Object Inspector to the stack
>itself. This happens quite ofte
Hello everyone,
I'm curious to know whether the redraw problems in 2.5 have been
resolved in some sort of update. In my version, working in OS X, all
controls disappear (it's scary) from metal-look windows when I switch
from one of the pointer tools in the Object Inspector to the stack
itself.
At 15:17 08/10/2004 -0300, Andre Garzia wrote:
Hi Folks,
I checked here that if I switch down my cable modem, or better, if my
cable modem receives no valid ip, thus making MacOS X self-give an unreal
IP to itself, then starting rev 2.5 will stop launching, not stop in the
sense of crash, but
On Oct 8, 2004, at 4:36 PM, Derek Bump wrote:
Turn off revOnline in your preferences and then open it after your
Internet connection is up.
Derek,
Thanks, I did that, I justed want to shout that revOnline shouldn't
block (if this is indeed what happened).
Cheers
andre
Derek Bump
Dreamscape So
com
- Original Message -
From: "Andre Garzia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "How to use Revolution" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 12:17 PM
Subject: about Rev 2.5 freezing on no net connection...
> Hi Folks,
>
> I checked here tha
Hi Folks,
I checked here that if I switch down my cable modem, or better, if my
cable modem receives no valid ip, thus making MacOS X self-give an
unreal IP to itself, then starting rev 2.5 will stop launching, not
stop in the sense of crash, but in the sense of freeze just when the
revOnline
On Sep 25, 2004, at 12:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Dan Shafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Rev 2.5 Hang at Launch on OS X Bugzilla'd
loading menus and plugins, and then hangs. Until today, I didn't find
anything short of a reinstall that helped. I think I disco
The same thing happens to me once or twice a day.
At first I thought it was a plugin stack I created to open at startup, but
most of the time removing that stack did not make any difference. I too
have been keeping a copy of the disk image along with my registration
number and simply reinstall fre
On Sep 24, 2004, at 5:09 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
Mark.
Don't know if you'll find this as well, but the advice in another
thread here was to take the revpreferences.rev stack in your
components->save folder, stuff it and put it somewhere handy. Then if
this happens again, just unstuff the prefs
On Sep 24, 2004, at 4:43 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:
Well, I think you cursed me Dan - I just had this happen under 2.5
;-) Rev locked up when quitting and I had to force quit. After that
it locked up at the loading menus, plugins part of the launch. I am
downloading a new version so I can get a
Mark.
Don't know if you'll find this as well, but the advice in another
thread here was to take the revpreferences.rev stack in your
components->save folder, stuff it and put it somewhere handy. Then if
this happens again, just unstuff the prefs stack and replace the one in
your current fol
On Sep 24, 2004, at 4:23 PM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Sep 24, 2004, at 3:38 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
Trevor
I'm glad to hear that. I had it this afternoon for the second time
this week on 2.5.
Well, I think you cursed me Dan - I just had this happen under 2.5 ;-)
Rev locked up when quitting and
On Sep 24, 2004, at 3:38 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
Trevor
I'm glad to hear that. I had it this afternoon for the second time
this week on 2.5.
Well, I think you cursed me Dan - I just had this happen under 2.5 ;-)
Rev locked up when quitting and I had to force quit. After that it
locked up at
Trevor
I'm glad to hear that. I had it this afternoon for the second time this
week on 2.5.
Dan
On Sep 24, 2004, at 3:27 PM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Sep 24, 2004, at 3:22 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
I've about had it with this bug, which I was sure I'd reported and
BZed before, but apparently not.
Trevor
I'm glad to hear that. I had it this afternoon for the second time this
week on 2.5.
Dan
On Sep 24, 2004, at 3:27 PM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Sep 24, 2004, at 3:22 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
I've about had it with this bug, which I was sure I'd reported and
BZed before, but apparently not.
On Sep 24, 2004, at 3:22 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
I've about had it with this bug, which I was sure I'd reported and
BZed before, but apparently not.
If you can confirm that this bug arises, please go add to my
description.
Essentially, trying to launch Rev (this has been true for 2.2 and is
stil
I've about had it with this bug, which I was sure I'd reported and BZed
before, but apparently not.
If you can confirm that this bug arises, please go add to my
description.
Essentially, trying to launch Rev (this has been true for 2.2 and is
still true in 2.5 though less frequent), the splash
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:02:40 +0200, Yves COPPE wrote:
> Hi klaus,
>
> I think I've found a serious subject of discussion...
I've the same bug.
Perhaps this bug is related to an other :
http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2004-March/034662.html
Ludovic
_
Le 21 sept. 04, à 18:42, Klaus Major a écrit :
Hi all,
...
put "1999,1,9,0,0,0,0" into tDate
convert tDate to short system date
answer tDate
gives "09/01/1999" in Rev 2.5
on windows
But "08/01/1999" on the mac!
Any comments from *nix users?
And it's getti
Hi all,
...
put "1999,1,9,0,0,0,0" into tDate
convert tDate to short system date
answer tDate
gives "09/01/1999" in Rev 2.5
on windows
But "08/01/1999" on the mac!
Any comments from *nix users?
And it's getting better every time :-D
on mouseUp
put "
y: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/21/04 12:36 PM
Please respond to How to use Revolution
To: How to use Revolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: Date in Rev 2.5
Hi all,
> Am 21.09.2004 um 18:21 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Not with my copy...
>
Hi all,
Am 21.09.2004 um 18:21 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not with my copy...
put "1999,1,9,0,0,0,0" into tDate
convert tDate to short system date
answer tDate
gives "09/01/1999" in Rev 2.5
on windows
But "08/01/1999" on the mac!
Any comments from *nix users?
Not with my copy...
put "1999,1,9,0,0,0,0" into tDate
convert tDate to short system date
answer tDate
gives "09/01/1999" in Rev 2.5
/H
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/
Perhaps Rev considers midnight to be the last instant of the previous
day, rather than the first instant of the next day?
On Sep 21, 2004, at 11:52 AM, Klaus Major wrote:
Bonjour Yves,
Hi list,
I experiment something strange
mac OS X 10.3.5 : French sytem : short system date is dd/mm/yy
Rev 2.5
Bonjour Yves,
Hi list,
I experiment something strange
mac OS X 10.3.5 : French sytem : short system date is dd/mm/yy
Rev 2.5
on mouseUp
put "1999,1,9,0,0,0,0" into tDate
convert tDate to short system date
answer tDate
end mouseUp
I get : 08/01/99"
with rev 2.2
I get : 09/
Hi list,
I experiment something strange :
mac OS X 10.3.5 : French sytem : short system date is dd/mm/yy
Rev 2.5
on mouseUp
put "1999,1,9,0,0,0,0" into tDate
convert tDate to short system date
answer tDate
end mouseUp
I get : 08/01/99"
with rev 2.2
I get : 09/01/99 : that&#
Thanks Mark. Went there, read it, added my comments and voted for it.
Mark MacKenzie
Mark Wieder wrote:
Mark-
Bugzilla #1377.
http://support.runrev.com/bugdatabase/show_bug.cgi?id=1377
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.run
Mark-
Bugzilla #1377.
http://support.runrev.com/bugdatabase/show_bug.cgi?id=1377
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
I have looked in bugzilla but have not been able to find a report on
this problem. However, thay may be a result of my unfamiliarity with
buzilla.
Using Rev 2.5 (release 1) with the script window open I get garbled text
lines when I print the script out.
This is on Windows XP and using a
Hi list,
Does anyone know when the trial version for MacOS 9
will be available ?
Thanks,
JB
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Hello,
With Rev/DC 2.5, show the msg box, put it on the top-middle of the
stack,
Close the stack with the widget btn (to show the alert window for
saving the stack) and look.
Fun and helpful
Ludovic
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has the underlying engine also been modified, or Rev only? If so, is there a
list of what has been modified?
The Whats_New.txt file included in the package summarizes the changes.
While it doesn't differentiate between engine and UI, as a general rule
any command or fun
Has the underlying engine also been modified, or Rev only? If so, is there a
list of what has been modified?
/H
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
I agree:
I also had to pause my mouse over the new tools palette, but I think it
was because I was doing the Rosetta Stone thing in my brain. The new GUI
does look modern, which has to help it in the credibility market.
Also, am I mistaken, or did the new tools palette do away with my
observed m
Ummm, maybe it's because I'm a really crappy scripter, but my "intro to
Rev/mouse events" project I think ended up being 6 MB..
I guess I would have to go back and check to see how much space is due to
my assuming (probably correctly) that the low-end PCs wouldn't do TTS, so
I recorded my Mac doin
At 15:35 22/07/2004 -0600, Devin Asay wrote:
On Jul 22, 2004, at 3:07 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
I do see an issue with the ctrl-alt-click in execute mode - it appears to
open the script editor BUT ALSO trigger a mouse click to the stack -
which I don't think it should.
Do you see that behaviour to
On Jul 22, 2004, at 2:07 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
I do see an issue with the ctrl-alt-click in execute mode - it appears
to open the script editor BUT ALSO trigger a mouse click to the stack
- which I don't think it should.
Do you see that behaviour too ? Should it do that ? Should I Bugzilla
i
On Jul 22, 2004, at 11:01 AM, Devin Asay wrote:
2. Proportional resizing of image objects! Holding down the Shift key
now constrains images proportionally instead of forcing it to a
square.
I have not been able to make this happen. I have tried this with many
images and see them resizing as a s
On Jul 22, 2004, at 3:07 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
I do see an issue with the ctrl-alt-click in execute mode - it appears
to open the script editor BUT ALSO trigger a mouse click to the stack
- which I don't think it should.
Do you see that behaviour too ? Should it do that ? Should I Bugzilla
i
At 12:01 22/07/2004 -0600, Devin Asay wrote:
I know we are trying to air out the bugs and frustrations, but may I just
comment on some of the hits?
Things I love about the new version:
6. Command(control)-alt-click to edit scripts instead of the unnerving
command-alt-hover.
Yes - I agree 100%.
I know we are trying to air out the bugs and frustrations, but may I
just comment on some of the hits?
Things I love about the new version:
1. The improved image library. Finally, a really clean, usable library.
Although I'd still like to see thumbnails of large imported images
rather than a ch
on 7/22/04 5:31 AM, Malte Brill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think it could be useful if the player would allow Autoplay for CD Roms.
> This could be implemented by looking for a simple text file e.g. toc.txt
> with only one line of text holding the relative path to the stack that
> should be p
On 22/7/04 1:31 pm, "Malte Brill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2.) Rev-online. I think this could become a cool place if it gets used. What
> I really would love to see is how big in KB/MB the stacks are (I just looked
> at it, so maybe this is somewhere I havent found yet) I created an account a
Hi all,
first of all I would like to say thanks for this Beta. I see the Rev-Team
has put lots of effort into it. :-)
1.) Performance. I am glad to see that my ErcSneak stack now runs as fast
under X as it does under 9. It slows down a bit with 2.1/2.2
This is Great!
2.) Rev-online. I think thi
On 3/2/03 12:56 pm, Mark Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Upgrading costs $299 at the moment. You can find that information on their
>> website at the online store under Professional User License.
>
> I saw that at the website. So what happens if I wait more than one year
> before upgrading
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 19:32:57 +0100; Terry Vogelaar Wrote:
>> searched their website for the upgrade policy and could not find information
>> on future upgrades or time limits for free upgrades when you purchase
>> Revolution.
> Upgrading costs $299 at the moment. You can find that information o
Mark Brownell heeft op zondag, 2 feb 2003 om 17:12 het volgende
geschreven:
I was wondering if anyone knew about the cost to upgrade if you have
the
aprox $999.00 pro licensed version of the current Rev development app.
I
searched their website for the upgrade policy and could not find
informa
n future upgrades or time limits for free upgrades when you purchase
Revolution.
To be specific I've been talking with people that are developing
future XML
capabilities for Revolution that might get added to Rev 2.5 but not be
available in Rev 2.0. So if I purchase the full priced Rev 2.0,
when you purchase
Revolution.
To be specific I've been talking with people that are developing future XML
capabilities for Revolution that might get added to Rev 2.5 but not be
available in Rev 2.0. So if I purchase the full priced Rev 2.0, aprox $999,
what will be the costs when new versio
95 matches
Mail list logo
