Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-19 Thread Chipp Walters
Xavier, Grow up. Check out my Geometry Manager tips... on page: http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/RunRev/VideoTutorials.htm for helpful ways on debugging the GM. Or, just rewrite the parts you need (like the rest of us do). --Chipp MisterX wrote: Jacque, I have a lot of respect for you, but

RE: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-19 Thread Heather Nagey
After writing a bugzilla and to you directly, I would expect that support is aware of the problem. Nonetheless, thanks for aknowledging the fact that you are looking into it. Just in case anyone else is making this assumption, this is a very dangerous assumption to make. If you don't write to

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-19 Thread Frank D. Engel, Jr.
I thought bugzilla automatically informed the person to which a bug was assigned? Or should we still eMail support, because I for one have a number of outstanding Bugzilla reports which have still been marked Unconfirmed for some time with little or no real reply (2223, 2244, 2247, 2300,

Re: Technical strike

2004-11-19 Thread ambassador
I'm stuck in an Internet cafe in what is widely regarded as one of the least Internet-access-friendly cities in the world, Rome. It took some time to find this place, and as with most such locations here there is no wi-fi (most here have never even heard of it), so I'm patiently typing on an

Re: Technical strike bug 2341 (OT)

2004-11-19 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 11/18/04 8:39 PM, Marian Petrides wrote: (-) (-) []- - [] ][][ Xavier and Jacque kissing and making up. ;-) M (Sorry. Couldn't resist ;-) Don't you dare tell my husband. :) -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] HyperActive Software |

RE: Technical strike bug 2341 (OT)

2004-11-19 Thread MisterX
at least it's a big hug! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Landman Gay Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 18:23 Cc: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: Technical strike bug 2341 (OT) On 11/18/04 8:39 PM, Marian Petrides wrote

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-19 Thread Heather Nagey
I thought bugzilla automatically informed the person to which a bug was assigned? Or should we still eMail support, because I for one have a number of outstanding Bugzilla reports which have still been marked Unconfirmed for some time with little or no real reply (2223, 2244, 2247, 2300,

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-19 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 11/19/04 8:06 AM, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote: I thought bugzilla automatically informed the person to which a bug was assigned? Or should we still eMail support, because I for one have a number of outstanding Bugzilla reports which have still been marked Unconfirmed for some time with little

Re: Technical strike

2004-11-19 Thread Klaus Major
Hi Richard, I'm stuck in an Internet cafe in what is widely regarded as one of the least Internet-access-friendly cities in the world, Rome. It took some time to find this place, and as with most such locations here there is no wi-fi (most here have never even heard of it), so I'm patiently

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-19 Thread Derek Bump
The only thing this thread has managed to do is confuse me as to the appropriate route to take. My suggestion would be to follow this chain-of-events for resolution of a problem. So here it goes... I've found something that isn't working properly, what do I do?!!! Step 1. Use Google and

Re: Technical strike

2004-11-19 Thread Pierre Sahores
Salut Ami Klaus ! Ton français, parfois un brin châtié, ne prouverait-il pas que tu es polyglotte jusqu'aux détails les plus autochtones. Chapeau Monsieur ! En combien de patois indo-européens différents pratiques tu l'ironie des mots qui nourrissent la gentillesse et l'élégance ? Et c'est

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-19 Thread Frank D. Engel, Jr.
Thank you, I think this is rather clear now. Makes perfect sense. On Nov 19, 2004, at 12:59 PM, Heather Nagey wrote: I thought bugzilla automatically informed the person to which a bug was assigned? Or should we still eMail support, because I for one have a number of outstanding Bugzilla

RE: Technical strike - last of the threads...

2004-11-19 Thread MisterX
Dear List, Klaus, Pierre, Richard, Jacque, Heather, and Kevin, bla bla bla ROFLOL :-D I almost wet my pants, Richard, very good one :-) ok so this should make me angry and challenge me to respond in a most innapropriate way probably. I dont want to damage you... Sorry to disappoint you, i

Re: Technical strike - last of the threads...

2004-11-19 Thread Thomas McGrath III
Could have done without this rant! On Nov 19, 2004, at 3:53 PM, MisterX wrote: What can I say more? I am glad I and you could voice opinions on this in this list, really. I'll remain a loyal RR user and evangelist, and i'll gladly update any mention of your site on MonsieurX.com. XOS will come

Re: Technical strike - last of the threads...

2004-11-19 Thread Bill
Send him to: http://we.hates-software.com/index_1.html Next, at least that is the place where people are expecting rants. On 11/19/04 5:24 PM, Thomas McGrath III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could have done without this rant! On Nov 19, 2004, at 3:53 PM, MisterX wrote: What can I say

Technical strike

2004-11-18 Thread MisterX
of that, a dozen bugzilla reports and a good 4 hours writing/editing time for Rev's benefit. So Im on a technical strike! I cannot use RunRev anymore due to Technical instability in the RUNREV IDE GEOMETRY MANAGER and blocker bug 2341. I have reported this bug and since then cannot use runrev

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread FlexibleLearning
Your frustration is evident. If the Rev geometry manager needs fixing I am sure it will be done, but probably not within a week as you hoped for! Meanwhile, can you not continue your development using MC instead? /H ___ use-revolution

RE: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread MisterX
, rewriting the resizestack handler is overkill... X8 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 15:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Technical strike bug 2341 Your frustration

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread Mark Talluto
On Nov 18, 2004, at 7:02 AM, MisterX wrote: MC doesn't help. I've already done all that scripting. The GM in the RR IDE is the only blocking level stopping me at one point or the other from having a stabile app. Once it was stable GM wise, it started crashing! Or viseversa... go nuts on that for a

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread Derek Bump
Would it be possible to write your own geometry management code? I have found that to be the best thing for my apps. In the amount of time it looks like you have spent trying to get the GM to function for you, you probably could have written the routines you need to do the work with

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread Mark Talluto
On Nov 18, 2004, at 9:37 AM, Derek Bump wrote: Would it be possible to write your own geometry management code? I have found that to be the best thing for my apps. In the amount of time it looks like you have spent trying to get the GM to function for you, you probably could have written the

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 11/18/04 9:02 AM, MisterX wrote: The GM in the RR IDE is the only blocking level stopping me at one point or the other from having a stabile app. There's a problem here: as of Rev 2.5, the GM is no longer supported. It has become a legacy tool that customers can download separately and use

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread Gordon Tillman
Hi Jacqueline, About this... On Nov 18, 2004, at 13:52, J. Landman Gay wrote: There's a problem here: as of Rev 2.5, the GM is no longer supported. It has become a legacy tool that customers can download separately and use as-is, but no further support or fixes will be provided. That's why your

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread Frank D. Engel, Jr.
The Geometry Manager is working fine for me in 2.5... well, as well as it works, anyway... On Nov 18, 2004, at 3:04 PM, Gordon Tillman wrote: Hi Jacqueline, About this... On Nov 18, 2004, at 13:52, J. Landman Gay wrote: There's a problem here: as of Rev 2.5, the GM is no longer supported. It

RE: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread MisterX
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 20:52 To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: Technical strike bug 2341 On 11/18/04 9:02 AM, MisterX wrote: The GM in the RR IDE is the only blocking level stopping me at one point or the other from having a stabile app. There's a problem here: as of Rev

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread Kevin Miller
On 18/11/04 8:04 pm, Gordon Tillman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: About this... On Nov 18, 2004, at 13:52, J. Landman Gay wrote: There's a problem here: as of Rev 2.5, the GM is no longer supported. It has become a legacy tool that customers can download separately and use as-is, but no

RE: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread MisterX
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 21:40 To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: Technical strike bug 2341 On 18/11/04 8:04 pm, Gordon Tillman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: About this... On Nov 18, 2004, at 13:52, J

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread Kevin Miller
On 18/11/04 8:59 pm, MisterX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's good to know that the GM is supported. That appeases my fears of a cop out or worse non-support. Yes, there's lots of weird scripts in my stacks and that's because I try to do a a complete job of supporting all my features in full.

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 11/18/04 2:04 PM, Gordon Tillman wrote: Hi Jacqueline, About this... On Nov 18, 2004, at 13:52, J. Landman Gay wrote: There's a problem here: as of Rev 2.5, the GM is no longer supported. It has become a legacy tool that customers can download separately and use as-is, but no further support

Re: Technical strike bug 2341

2004-11-18 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 11/18/04 2:27 PM, MisterX wrote: Jacque, I have a lot of respect for you, but today, that is BS! What a bleak and chicken cop out! The fraging least you could do is tell the customer about it instead of making him wait and get disgusted since February. YES. NINE MONTHS!! Sorry,

Re: Technical strike bug 2341 (OT)

2004-11-18 Thread Marian Petrides
(-) (-) []- - [] ][][ Xavier and Jacque kissing and making up. ;-) M (Sorry. Couldn't resist ;-) On Nov 18, 2004, at 9:32 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: On 11/18/04 2:27 PM, MisterX wrote: Jacque, I have a lot of respect for you, but today, that is BS! What a bleak and chicken cop out! The