-usb-hid-devices-web-apps/
Just a thought.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
On 1/19/16 12:08 AM, Andrew Dent - CTCroydon wrote:
Hi
An existing customer of ours is looking to replace their Weighbridge
software.
I haven't used or implemented the OfBiz POS module before, but for
this customer it
Sorry, I meant to type Pierre.
On 1/30/15 1:14 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hello All:
For those who don't know this, I forgot to mention that there isn't a
way to simply "expire" a product as suggested by "Pierre".
Once the product is installed in the database - it i
#x27;t mean you can't find
ways to make it difficult to find. It means that if you know what you
are doing, you can find the product.
Best Regards
Ruth Hoffman
http://www.aesolves.com
rhoff...@aesolves.net
On 1/30/15 11:18 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hello All:
If you are at all curious wher
elete All Keywords.
Finally, IMHO there should be a way to delete a product from the
database. There are business situations where deleting a product is
valid and expiring a product is not. Unfortunately, the OFBiz Entity
Engine does not support cascading deletes.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hof
+1
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
rhoff...@aesolves.net
On 1/30/15 8:13 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi All,
*Preamble*
Currently community involvement in the project is good, but like in any
other other open source project it could be better. And better is more
favourable than just good or good enough
Hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
http://www.aesolves.com
On 1/23/15 11:13 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
I notice that SIC Codes are listed as a "supported" classification in
the seed data.
http://www.ehso.com/siccodes.php
Are there any seed data files that load the actual SIC Codes.
number.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
http://www.aesolves.net
On 1/22/15 4:33 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Thanks.
Just wanted to be sure that I was not missing anything.
Ron
On 22/01/2015 4:22 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Ron,
Should you feel that this is an improvement the product could benefit
form
ales Rep
To Party = Coyote Enterprises
To Role = Customer
Personally, I try to avoid that type of party relationship because it
encourages fraud.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 1/17/2015 9:04 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Ron:
In the interest of full disclosure, I
gly. So, in that case you will need:
5. From Party = Susan Smith
From Role = Sales Rep
To Party = Coyote Enterprises
To Role = Customer
Personally, I try to avoid that type of party relationship because it
encourages fraud.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
I'll update the blog to allow comments etc. but for
now, if you have any questions or comments concerning the content
posted, please feel free to contact me directly:
rhoff...@aesolves.net
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
On 1/16/15 10:05 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Thanks Adrian.
Can you elab
ogical and wanted.
But if you need more than 1 id to associate 2 parties with the same
roles, as Ron mentioned in this comment, then PartyRelationship is not
enough.
This is the conclusion we got from our discussion inside OFBIZ-3764.
Jacques
Le 14/01/2015 20:07, Ruth Hoffman a écrit :
Hi Jacqu
to the
console and writing to the ofbiz.log file simultaneously. This might not
be possible on a Windows system based on some file locking constraints -
I don't know. But on a Unix system it works just fine.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
rhoff...@aesolves.net
On 1/14/15 12:34 PM, Davide Ciof
Hi Jacques:
Just curious, what do you mean by: "it's not multi valued"? I couldn't
figure out from your reference.
Thanks in advance for the clarification.
Ruth
On 1/14/15 12:58 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I agree with all that PartyRelationship is the way.
Note though that there is a limitation
so much more than you can possible get from adding another attribute
to the Party Entity.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
http://www.aesolves.com
rhoff...@aesolves.net
On 1/14/15 11:15 AM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
Hi Ron,
My preferred way to do something like that is through a PartyRelationship
entry
Hi Ron:
Game On!
That, for sure would be fun.
Ruth
On 1/13/15 9:31 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Can I pose documentation problems?
That might be worth the trip!:-)
Ron
On 13/01/2015 9:25 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Sharan:
Sorry. Maybe the wrong TV show to reference. I don't watch
televisio
Hi Sharan:
Sorry. Maybe the wrong TV show to reference. I don't watch television,
so I don't know many details about what I have assumed is a "reality
cooking show". But from what I have heard this is televised competition
to see who can prepare the best meal given a set of ingredients in a
f
Hi Sharan:
Interesting idea.
Just curious: Which developers and committers have agreed to be there?
Here's another idea: How about something like the "iron chef"?
Ruth
On 1/12/15 3:13 PM, Sharan-F wrote:
Hi All
This may seem a really way out idea but what do people think about trying to
organise
Hi Sharan:
Nice job!
Hope all those users out there realize and appreciate how much work goes
into an effort like this.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
http://www.aesolves.com
On 1/8/15 7:05 AM, Sharan-F wrote:
Hi All
I just wanted to let you know that the updated and re-organised OFBiz
Technical
oduct.
This isn't a problem if the revision never changes. But if you want to
sell products where the only difference from product to product is the
revision level, you could have a problem. Just depends on your business
rules.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
http://www.aesolves.com
On 1/8/
.net
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
d out all the slides (no
narrative) and created a PDF that you can download here (free of charge):
http://www.aesolves.com/store/products/p_TR-0734-CL
Please refer any questions or comments to:
rhoff...@aesolves.net
or
http://www.aesolves.com/control/contact
Thanks
Ruth Hoffman
d out all the slides (no
narrative) and created a PDF that you can download here (free of charge):
http://www.aesolves.com/store/products/p_TR-0734-CL
Please refer any questions or comments to:
rhoff...@aesolves.net
or
http://www.aesolves.com/control/contact
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
the conference. Seems like the current thinking is that
there isn't enough interest. But I'm still willing and able to do this.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
rhoff...@aesolves.net
http://www.aesolves.com
On 12/19/14 1:18 PM, Nicolas Malin wrote:
Hi,
I don't see any reply on this thr
Hi Vincenzo:
The document you refer to:
http://www.lulu.com/shop/ruth-hoffman/apache-ofbiz-developers-introductory-course-workbook/paperback/product-21641125.html
Is in no way affiliated with the Apache OFBiz project. It is the result
of many months of effort on my part to assemble a first
Hi All:
Thanks Pierre for the endorsement!
I am no offering the Catalog Manager book. It is too out of date.
Perhaps if I have time next year I will update it.
I still am selling "OFBiz Ecommerce Out-Of-The-Box". You can get it here:
www.lulu.com/shop/ruth-hoffman/ofbiz-ecommerce-
ublic facing OFBiz webapp, you really can't
stop anyone from seeing any product if they know the productId. (Just
something that I discovered. Actually, truth be told, someone smarter
then I am pointed this out to me - in graphic detail - sometime ago.)
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
Owner
"invalid" about the HTML.
FYI - To get rid of this annoying message, I ended up setting the the
ESAPI.properties file entry:
LogLevel=ERROR
So at least the error messages were not being displayed.
Hope that helps.
Ruth Hoffman
That was obvious to me because of a line I left
Hi Robert:
Having worked on many OFBiz based ecommerce applications (both large and
small), I agree with Paul. Copy over and use the OOTB webapp as a guide
to move forward with your own customizations.
Best of luck.
Ruth Hoffman
On 5/22/13 4:08 PM, Paul Piper wrote:
Hi Robert,
that really
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Ruth Hoffman [mailto:rhoff...@aesolves.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 6:39 AM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading to 12.x
Hi Skip:
Having gone through this exercise several times, here is my opinion
about what to do:
On 4/23/13 6:05 PM,
Hi Skip:
Having gone through this exercise several times, here is my opinion
about what to do:
On 4/23/13 6:05 PM, Skip wrote:
I am upgrading from Ofbiz 9.x to 12.x. I have two questions
1. Do I HAVE to change all all my bsh to groovy. I know how to do it. Its
just that I have a thousand o
n ran out of memory, which not only makes the
system run slower...it comes to a grinding halt :-)
Best of luck.
Ruth Hoffman
On 4/22/13 3:15 AM, Vikas wrote:
using the latest version 11
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/OfBiz-Running-Very-Slow-tp4640790p4640794
project manager is indispensable.
Just my 2 cents.
Ruth Hoffman
http://www.myofbiz.com
http://www.aesolves.com
rhoff...@aesolves.com
On 12/19/12 8:27 PM, jcigala wrote:
Considering the standards used in order to develop the OFBiz framework, what
are the needed skills of an OFBiz focu
6 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Mark:
I also have an example (work in progress :-) of an OFBiz ecommerce
implementation that sells OFBiz related learning materials...books etc.
Please have a look: http://www.myofbiz.com.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
rhoff...@aesolves.com
web: http://www.aesolves.com
Hi Mark:
I also have an example (work in progress :-) of an OFBiz ecommerce
implementation that sells OFBiz related learning materials...books etc.
Please have a look: http://www.myofbiz.com.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
rhoff...@aesolves.com
web: http://www.aesolves.com
On 11/13/12 3:10 AM
Just my 2 cents:
I suspect it has something to do with XML processing. Maybe XML parsing
errors accumulating and taking up memory?
Can't substantiate that claim, but I noticed that on one particular
OFBiz implementation [10.x based] where XML is used in ways I've never
seen before - this hap
d the correct INVENTORY_ITEM record.
From what I have heard, this is still an issue with version 5.6.
Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
On 8/10/12 7:29 PM, Leonard Lin wrote:
Thanks for the hint.
I just checked.
-I'm not getting any sql exception
-timestamp is not part of the key in inventory_item
howeve
Hello All:
If you'd like this document, please send me a separate email:
rhoff...@aesolves.com.
I will consider your request as time permits.
Best Regards,
Ruth
On 7/17/12 7:30 AM, Deepak Agarwal wrote:
Please send to me too.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
On 7/17
On 7/17/12 6:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Ruth Hoffman"
By the time I get into a project and this sort of thing comes up, the
competition has long since be bested by OFBiz and all the other cool
features it offers.
Arg, sorry I don't get this sentence (tried twice
ition has long since be bested by OFBiz and all the other cool
features it offers.
This is something that most OFBiz adopters don't understand and/or don't
see until much later in the development cycle - if at all.
Ruth
On 7/16/12 5:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Rut
On 7/15/12 9:19 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Ruth Hoffman"
Hi Jacques:
IMHO, it would be really useful to have a way to assign OFBiz
"assets" to some type of protection group much like you can now do
with users (though the use of the UserLogin.) By "asset
Hi Jacques:
IMHO, it would be really useful to have a way to assign OFBiz "assets"
to some type of protection group much like you can now do with users
(though the use of the UserLogin.) By "assets", I mean things like a
specific product, a file (as pointed to by a contentId or
dataResourceId
As Scott mentions there are many parts of the OFBiz data model (and
associated business logic) that use a Timestamp within database
tables/entities as a primary-key.
Another example: If you are using any of the content management logic
(blog, content publication and RSS feed come to mind) you
late.
I've been told this has been "fixed" in the lasted (beta?) release of
the JDBC driver.
Personally, I prefer Postgres. Never had a problem and the tools for
maintaining it are the best.
Regards,
Ruth Hoffman (http://www.aesolves.com)
On 6/21/12 2:57 PM, Sanjeev Gu
Hi FooShyn:
There is no relationship between the OFBiz portlet and either of these
specifications. (Or any Java Portlet specification.) Hence my suggestion
(at the time) that this functionality not be named "portlet".
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
Adaptive Enterprise Solutions,
Heidi and
further articulated by Nick are not being met in way that facilitates
easy, efficient and secure product management.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
Adaptive Enterprise Solutions, LLC.
http://www.myofbiz.com
On 5/22/12 4:09 AM, Atul Vani wrote:
Ruth, Nick,
It might be a possible scenario
I'm pretty up-to-date on its
features/functions. Nice job!)
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
Adaptive Enterprise Solutions, LLC.
http://www.myofbiz.com
http://www.aesolves.com
On 5/21/12 8:29 AM, Nick Rosser wrote:
There is also something similar in our BigFish implementatio
#x27;t
require data model changes but rather a completely new UI. (An OFBiz
webapp etc. with webpages, events...)
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
On 5/21/12 8:04 AM, Info Olagos wrote:
Hi Ruth,
Yes, i think it is smoother to push one button, than to have to think to
set every date available in the
Hi Heidi:
IMHO, these responses are missing the point and show a total lack of
understanding surrounding the many and varied business rules behind
publishing a product catalog.
I think this is a really cool idea and would certainly set OFBiz apart
from any competition.
Best Regards,
Ruth
suggesting they look
at this site.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Paul:
Congratulations! Really nice site. Very clean lines and the one page
checkout works! I do like your anonymous checkout. Easy to follow, concise
and does the job.
[FYI - I'm trying to come t
Hi Paul:
Thanks for your detailed response. Please see below:
On 4/19/12 1:45 PM, madppiper wrote:
Hi Ruth,
thanks for the great feedback :)
To answer your questions, I think you got a mixup in the paypal integration
there. Without going over the details, I would recommend to implement paypal
OFBiz. I'm just going to
add - Thanks for doing this.
I'm curious about Solr. I have not heard that thousands of products are
a performance issue if you use OFBiz caching wisely. Have you found that
was the case or did you implement Solr for other reasons?
Finally, where are you g
page would not hurt ;o)
Anyway, if you got ASF consent I have nothing more to say
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman"
Hi Jacques & List:
I've had this discussion with the Apache Foundation in the past as I
too am concerned about copyright infringement and misrepresenting my
p
Hi Jacques & List:
I've had this discussion with the Apache Foundation in the past as I too
am concerned about copyright infringement and misrepresenting my
purpose. The Foundation's legal advisers found my "interpretation" of
the rules satisfactory.
FYI, I do clearly state the relationship
Hi Pierre:
Maybe. Any suggestions on a best way to do that? I'd be interested in
hearing about other user experiences (what works/doesn't work) for
inserting forced registration into the existing OOTB solution.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
http://www.myofbiz.com
On 3/7/12 8:06
Hi Bernat & Hans:
With OFBiz out-of-the-box (OOTB) you can always buy anonymously. Perhaps
the confusion might be in what Bernat is calling "registration".
(Creating an account with a user login vs. creating a unique user
identifier record in the Party table. A Party record is always created
article, it's more about economics. For instance it's far more easier
with multi tenant to create a new account for a new client.
There are "endless" points to consider...
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman"
Hi Jacques:
Isn't there more to this than just SQL inje
well the same code, it's just a matter of
what database you're connected to.
So I don't see multi-tenant as a totally new or unique situation. It's a
difference of degree, not kind.
Cheers
Paul Foxworthy
Ruth Hoffman-2 wrote
Hans, Pierre and several others have been kind e
most relevant article I found is
http://iaas.ulitzer.com/node/1624391/mobile (look for "SQL Injection
In Multi Tenant Database Design")
Also IBM seems to have deposed an intellectual property
http://ip.com/IPCOM/000184999
HTH
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman"
Hi Adri
different than a single instance.
-Adrian
On 1/28/2012 5:17 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hans, Pierre and several others have been kind enough to outline the
OFBiz multi-tenant value proposition.
I appreciate this primarily because I can't even count the number of
times prospective OFBiz user
s shopping cart objects or
usernames and passwords of the other tenants?
Really, I'd like to endorse multi-tenant implementations. But I am still
left with this one - very significant - security question.
Anyone care to respond? Am I missing something here?
Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
Jacopo:
Thanks for the clarification.
Would it also be fair to say that there is no Apache OFBiz project
"official" upgrade path or document?
Each OFBiz user is on their own when it comes to upgrade policies and
procedures?
Best Regards,
Ruth
On 1/27/12 2:49 PM, Info Olagos wrote:
Jacopo,
Hi Mike:
I did a section on how to do something like this for the OFBiz Cookbook,
but I don't think it ever made it into the final version.
Contact me directly and I'll send you a copy of what I wrote.
rhoff...@aesolves.com
Best Regards and Happy New Year.
Ruth Hoffman
On 1/1/
Hi Jacques:
Sorry I didn't see your original post. THANKS! This is great.
Ruth
On 12/14/11 6:45 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Ruth,
You may use http://www.tuckey.org/ (I already posted about that some
years ago) simple and effective; just a new thing to learn ;o)
Jacques
From:
Hello All:
Are there any other suggestions?
In the past I have used an Apache web server to map URLs and effectively
remove "control" from the path.
I have also, in one case implemented something similar to Han's
suggestion. This however required changes to the ControlServlet. I'm
wondering
On 12/11/11 2:56 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Carsten:
I hope you are not implying that my writing about OFBiz is "fuzzy". I
take great pains to ensure that it is as clear and concise as possible.
Where I am stating an opinion or interpretation I try to make sure
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:31:29
To:
Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: vendors and suppliers
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi David:
Nice to hear from you again. Thanks for your input. I have some
responses. Please see below:
On 12/9/11 4:44 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
2) If
what is in it.
Regards,
Ruth
On 12/10/11 8:40 AM, Info Olagos wrote:
Hi Ruth,
Just one more question.
I have the Data Model book. But is the Data Model part 2 book also
interesting for Ofbiz?
thanks,
Heidi
2011/12/10, Ruth Hoffman:
Hi Mike:
I too looked at the Data Model book and would
nyone care for more of my opinions on this or any matter
concerning OFBiz (or the coming elections :-), please feel free to
contact me via the myofbiz.com website. That is what it is there
for...to spread OFBiz information - real or imaginary.
Best Regards
Ruth Hoffman
ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com
s,
Ruth
http://www.myofbiz.com
BTW, I didn't ask
On 12/9/11 9:31 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi David:
Nice to hear from you again. Thanks for your input. I have some
responses. Please see below:
On 12/9/11 4:44 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
2) If you
one time a part 2 or an extension or
something !!
Heidi
2011/12/10 Ruth Hoffman:
Hi Heidi:
Oh, I see now. Out-of-the-box I believe that the VendorProduct information
is not displayed on the ecommerce site. In 9.x and 10.x I don't remember
seeing this anywhere.
Should not be hard to do if yo
On 12/9/11 3:23 PM, Info Olagos wrote:
Hi Ruth,
Yes ok, but now i am a little bit again confused. In fact there is not
so much difference between a vendor and a supplier then.
I didn't saw neither any interactive functionalities around a vendor
on the commerce website. Perhaps there is a
Ruth
On 12/9/11 3:23 PM, Info Olagos wrote:
Hi Ruth,
Yes ok, but now i am a little bit again confused. In fact there is not
so much difference between a vendor and a supplier then.
I didn't saw neither any interactive functionalities around a vendor
on the commerce website. Perhaps there is
Hi David:
Nice to hear from you again. Thanks for your input. I have some
responses. Please see below:
On 12/9/11 4:44 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
2) If you look at how vendor/supplier is used in some of the OFBiz
applications, you might observe that:
A vendor "sup
Hi Heidi:
Another way to look at this:
1) The OFBiz data model has a table/entity named "VENDOR" but *NO
*table/entity for a "SUPPLIER". (9.4 and 10.4)
2) If you look at how vendor/supplier is used in some of the OFBiz
applications, you might observe that:
A vendor "supplies" goods or servi
now recall
why I said "lists". HTML lists (ul/ol) are created automatically by Menu
and Tree widgets.
Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
On 12/3/11 3:51 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Jacques:
Sorry, by "list" I really mean Screen widgets with entity-condition
lists. Never meant to imply
Hi Gavin:
Not sure if this is your problem or not, but I had a similar issue with
email message content. The solution was to change the attribute(s) on
the Service(s) used from something like:
allow-html="safe"/>
to:
allow-html="any"/>
There was something in the pasted text (a hidden charac
Hi BJ:
Just to give a little more info:
At one time the US Defense Department did not allow Javascript on its
computers (as you describe below). Not sure if this is still a mandate.
They also have a very strict accessibility requirement called Section
508 which details how web pages should be
Hi Deepti:
First thing to try is the DWR testing interface. Can you call your OFBiz
event through that interface? If so, then there is something wrong with
your FTL code. If not, then there is something wrong with your back end
event or the integration/configuration of the same.
Best Regards,
Hi Chatree:
I have not had a chance to look at this. If it had been available when I
needed AJAX support I probably would have used it.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
Best Regards,
Ruth
On 8/28/11 10:13 AM, Chatree Srichart wrote:
Hi Ruth Hoffman. Have you seen OFBiz-GWT project
ahead and did it
myself.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
http://www.myofbiz.com
http://www.aesolves.com
On 8/26/11 2:14 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
First of all make sure it is really required to integrate DWR.
Integration of a tool because you know it is normally not a good reason.
It is normally
(http://www.myofbiz.com).
Best to follow the instructions on the DWR site and just use any OFBiz
Component as the starting point.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
On 8/26/11 1:49 AM, deepti.mittal wrote:
I want to integrate DWR with Ofbiz. Can anyone help me with that. I tried to
find some tutori
Thanks Tim!
Ruth
On 8/25/11 7:10 PM, Tim Stoel wrote:
I can vouch for the very high quality of Ruth's documentation, we've
purchased all of her PDFs except the manufacturing one and they are well
worth the price. Thanks Ruth!
Tim Stoel
From: Ruth Hoffman
Reply-To: "user@o
Hi Piyush:
I've got some of this information on my site: http://www.myofbiz.com.
Some info is free and some, like the Catalog Manager book must be
purchased. Some content is a bit dated, however, you will find that all
the resources are still relevant as almost all changes since these books
w
ng out the appropriate lines in the ofbiz-component.xml
file in the Component(s) of interest.
Of course, if you do this, then you need to be aware that if someone
navigates to one of the disabled URLs, they will get a nasty error message.
Good Luck.
Ruth Hoffman
http://www.myofbiz.com
http://www.ae
Hi Mike:
Not sure if there is a way to turn this off, but on my 9.04 production
system I changed the default code so that the admin user had to be
logged in as admin before the password is reset. I also changed the way
the forgot password works...basically my implementation ignores requests
to
ences in the configuration between the trunk
and the trunk-demo, but didn't expect the code to be different.
I am downloading ofbiz 10.04 and will see if this weird issue exist.
On Sat Jul 09,2011 01:09 pm, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hello Mansour:
Not sure if this will be of any help but some
Services -
from the Content Component if I remember correctly - are used regardless
of the source of the uploaded file.
Anyhow, you may need to look at the code for more help in figuring this
out. In my case, I think I had to add support (code) for mime types like
PDF.
Best Regards,
Ruth
Hi BJ:
I did the same as Adrian for my blog
(http://www.myofbiz.com/control/blog/RuthHoffman).
Regards,
Ruth
On 6/2/11 6:15 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I reused the existing eCommerce forum artifacts to create a
stand-alone corporate forum application. It was fairly simple, I just
improved some of
p://www.les7arts.com/assist/OFBiz/Principales%20Caracteristiques%20Fonctionnelles.htm
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman"
Hi Hans:
IMHO, you would just be adding to the confusion. How does
someone know if they are a beginner? And, what are the basic
features in each component? Who decides bas
Hi Hans:
IMHO, you would just be adding to the confusion. How does someone know
if they are a beginner? And, what are the basic features in each
component? Who decides basic vs. full featured?
On the other hand, now that I'm thinking about it, maybe this is a good
idea. In the process of dec
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi All:
Sharan Foga just finished up a new OFBiz accounting book. It is valid for
9.04 and 10.x releases. If interested, please come take a look:
http://www.myofbiz.com/ecommerce/products/PROMOTIONS/p_PUB-0796
Thanks
Ruth Hoffman
ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com
Hi All:
Sharan Foga just finished up a new OFBiz accounting book. It is valid
for 9.04 and 10.x releases. If interested, please come take a look:
http://www.myofbiz.com/ecommerce/products/PROMOTIONS/p_PUB-0796
Thanks
Ruth Hoffman
ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com
use a more convenient entity (or create
one) to stuff your text into.
-David
On Mar 25, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Carsten:
Here's a snippet (BeanShell, I'm afraid - but it shouldn't be to hard to convert) I
use to display a single blog entry/article on my webs
nd how the lookup would work?
Regards
Carsten
Gesendet mit BlackBerry® Webmail von Telekom Deutschland
-Original Message-
From: Ruth Hoffman
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:54:35
To:
Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using CMS Elements in FTL
Hi Carsten:
Are you referring to Ele
Hi Carsten:
Are you referring to ElectronicText.textData?
Usually content - like email body values - is either in an
ElectronicText.textData record pointed to by a
DataResource.dataResourceId and/or Content.dataResourceId or in a disk
file somewhere and the DataResource.dataResourceId points
tting edge 10 years ago, but is now the butt of developer jokes... I'm
looking at you IE6.
Ryan L. Foster
801.671.0769
cont...@ryanlfoster.com
ryanlfoster.com
On Jan 20, 2011, at 8:38 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Yeah you do...live in a vacuum. IMHO and experience the PMC does live in a vacuum. A
Yeah you do...live in a vacuum. IMHO and experience the PMC does live in
a vacuum. As the saying goes...you guys "don't have a clue".
Just my 2 cents.
Ruth
On 1/20/11 9:56 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
That's not true. Every change is discussed and debated.
The OFBiz developers and the PMC don't live
Hi Scott:
You might want to check out my website:
http://www.myofbiz.com
I've got some free content that may help with your search.
Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
On 11/29/10 3:32 AM, scott.ven...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Just requested the faq's from the list manager, and it says there ar
I've done it many times.
You can see an example implementation on http://www.myofbiz.com. The
rotating testimonials are being extracted from the OFBiz database and
served by DWR (with the fade-in fade-out handled by Prototype).
Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
On 10/6/10 9:43 AM, S K Pradeep
Hi Mike:
Thanks. I didn't know that it is now available on Amazon,
Regards,
Ruth
On 9/29/10 10:10 AM, Mike Z wrote:
Hey Ruth. I also bought your book through Amazon.com for $38.86.
http://www.amazon.com/Apache-OFBiz-Cookbook-Ruth-Hoffman/dp/1847199186/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie
1 - 100 of 600 matches
Mail list logo
