with WAS 6.1. Then
I have a stronger case to press issue for WAS 7.0.
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, pblatner pblat...@gmail.com wrote:
From: pblatner pblat...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Struts 2 Container Security problem
To: user@struts.apache.org
Received: Monday, March 16, 2009, 9:05 PM
I have tried
. If this is determined to be a Websphere problem with WAS 6.1.
Then I have a stronger case to press issue for WAS 7.0.
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, pblatner pblat...@gmail.com wrote:
From: pblatner pblat...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Struts 2 Container Security problem
To: user@struts.apache.org
Received: Monday
a stronger case to press issue for WAS 7.0.
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, pblatner pblat...@gmail.com wrote:
From: pblatner pblat...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Struts 2 Container Security problem
To: user@struts.apache.org
Received: Monday, March 16, 2009, 9:05 PM
I have tried to do the exact thing
pblat...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Struts 2 Container Security problem
To: user@struts.apache.org
Received: Tuesday, March 17, 2009, 9:20 PM
I installed the latest fix pack for WebSphere, bringing my
version up to
6.1.0.21 and it did the trick. The Web container
authentication now works
as I
in the root of the
application's context path.
I usually split my struts2 application into at least two packages:
package name=public namespace=/ ...
package name=secure namespace=/protected
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Struts-2-Container-Security-problem
=/ ...
package name=secure namespace=/protected
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Struts-2-Container-Security-problem-tp15571409p22547426.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at
Nabble.com
Hi Everyone,
I'm attempting to secure my first Struts 2 web app using container
security with a DataSourceRealm. I'm using Tomcat 6 as my container.
Here is how my project is setup:
LicensingAdministration/
META-INF/
context.xml
WEB-INF/
web.xml
classes/
start here
http://www.acegisecurity.org/guide/springsecurity.html
M-
- Original Message -
From: Kelly Graus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: user@struts.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:12 PM
Subject: Struts 2 Container Security problem
Hi Everyone,
I'm attempting to secure my
Martin Gainty mgainty at hotmail.com writes:
start here
http://www.acegisecurity.org/guide/springsecurity.html
M-
Thank you for the response. I looked at Acegi, but it seemed overly
complex for my requirements. This application is just a simple in
house administration tool (and learning
Hi Kelly,
In struts.xml, the namespace given to your package needs be in
/protected as well.
eg. package name=myPackage namespace=/protected
Otherwise, as you've seen, it's available in the root of the
application's context path.
I usually split my struts2 application into at least two
Jeromy Evans jeromy.evans at blueskyminds.com.au writes:
Hi Kelly,
In struts.xml, the namespace given to your package needs be in
/protected as well.
eg. package name=myPackage namespace=/protected
Otherwise, as you've seen, it's available in the root of the
application's context
--- Kelly Graus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would add a login action to the public namespace which prepares a
login page. Unfortunately I don't think the container will allow you to
specify /login.action as the login page though, but you can make
login.jsp redirect to it.
According
I would add a login action to the public namespace which prepares a
login page. Unfortunately I don't think the container will allow you to
specify /login.action as the login page though, but you can make
login.jsp redirect to it.
According to Practical Apache Struts 2, this should be
Jeromy Evans jeromy.evans at blueskyminds.com.au writes:
I would add a login action to the public namespace which prepares a
login page. Unfortunately I don't think the container will allow you to
specify /login.action as the login page though, but you can make
login.jsp redirect
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
I'm jumping in late, so if I refer to something that came up in a
previous post, I apologize ahead of time. I'm guessing that you're using
tomcat. Tomcat is picky about certain things being actual filesystem
resources. There are two possible solutions (if I'm right about
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 00:43 +, Kelly Graus wrote:
Jeromy Evans jeromy.evans at blueskyminds.com.au writes:
[snip]
I would add a login action to the public namespace which prepares a
login page. Unfortunately I don't think the container will allow you to
specify /login.action as
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 00:43 +, Kelly Graus wrote:
Jeromy Evans jeromy.evans at blueskyminds.com.au writes:
[snip]
I would add a login action to the public namespace which prepares a
login page. Unfortunately I don't think the container will allow you to
specify
--- Jeromy Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
In this case a 0-byte file called login.action may do the trick. It's a
bit
of a hack, and I think when this comes up with the Tomcat peeps, they
point to the spec.
Excellent! I loathe using a redirect. This probably
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 17:56 -0800, Dave Newton wrote:
--- Jeromy Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
In this case a 0-byte file called login.action may do the trick. It's a
bit
of a hack, and I think when this comes up with the Tomcat peeps, they
point to the spec.
Wes Wannemacher wesw at wantii.com writes:
I'm jumping in late, so if I refer to something that came up in a
previous post, I apologize ahead of time. I'm guessing that you're using
tomcat. Tomcat is picky about certain things being actual filesystem
resources. There are two possible
20 matches
Mail list logo
