I did not try the patch as it seemed like it would make matters worse. I had
to move on and ended up implementing something else for now. I will keep an
eye on 5.3 which will hopefully resolve this issue.
-Farshad
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> Eric,
> just in case you have not seen it, you may find
Our broker is running on Linux (RHEL4 box) and after 1 or 2 days I see below
error in logs.
Note that, below values are set in bin/activemq in out test lab:
if [ -z "$ACTIVEMQ_OPTS" ] ; then
ACTIVEMQ_OPTS="-Xmx512M -Dorg.apache.activemq.UseDedicatedTaskRunner=true"
fi
I tried to stress test bro
I tried this as well, but didn't see any improvement. According to the wiki
page about preFetch the default is Short.MAX_VALUE-1 for non-persistent
topics.
rajdavies wrote:
>
> You should try increasing the prefetchSize for the network connection
> - by default its 1000 - setting it to a hig
FWIW, I have gotten throughput rates of ~3000 msg/s under the following
conditions.
Used persistent messages, default msg store, message size = 1k, queues, and
producer had jms.useAsyncSend=true
Broker ran on an openSUSE 11.0 laptop (2GB memory, Intel Core 2 Duo T5550,
1.83 GHz, JDK 1.6) and
Hi, I'm trying to find a message broker that has the performance for
persistent messages that we need.
We have defined the following scenario:
- 6 producers (standalone java applications) that send persistent messages.
Each producer send 20 msg/s. The messages have xml payload, 3 kB. No
transact
I run this sample in AMQ-5.2 and its ok, no exceptions.
but whe I run this in AMQ-5.3 (RC4) I get a exception each minute.
I upload my test-program, link is below...
Thanks.
Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:49 -0700, lujan99 wrote:
>> using "Assembly Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ, Ve
Hi List,
I'm using standard ruby stomp client to communicate with activeMQ 5.2.0,
using non-persistent messages. Very rarely (maybe once every 10,000
messages) the stomp client receives a message from the server with no
message-id header. It does have other headers, but is missing the
message-id.
You may want to consider using Camel to implement the request/reply messaging
pattern in combination with a content based router to route messages to
their respective systems.
http://camel.apache.org/request-reply.html
http://camel.apache.org/content-based-router.html
Camel makes it a lot easie
Hello Joe,
Thank you for the quick reply, I tried what you are suggesting before
however, it didn't work for me. My setup will work perfectly via ssl and no
discovery, and if I try discovery with tcp it works fine however when I try
to combine the two my clients just spin trying to connect to the
I gave up and went back to using old bean style definitions.
angrywooper wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have a problem with configuring amq:connectionFactory in my srping
> config file.
> Ive searched google, and found some people who had the same problem, but
> their solution dont work for me for some rea
Here are some snippets taken from the
http://www.ttmsolutions.com/Apache_Software/ActiveMQ_Reference_Guide.php
ActiveMQ Reference Guide . You'd use a 'ssl' connector instead of 'tcp'.
Hope this helps
To configure a broker and client to discover each other using the rendezvous
connector, specif
Hello All,
I am trying to get my system working, I need to use rendezvous, to discover
brokers in my system but I want to encrypt the channel with SSL, does anyone
know how I can configure this to work? HELP PLEASE!!!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Please-help-me-get-ren
I've got a very simple Java/Spring program that works with an out-of-the-box
ActiveMQ 5.2.0 configuration when the broker is local. When I send a
message to the broker, I can see with the admin interface that the queue was
created and the message was received.
However, this same client program a
We see the same exception against a 5.1 broker, although we have not been able
to pin down exactly when it happens, and it certainly isn't as frequently as
every 60 seconds.
Gabe
-Original Message-
From: "Timothy Bish"
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 10:47am
To: users@activemq.apache.or
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:49 -0700, lujan99 wrote:
> using "Assembly Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ, Version 1.1.0.1642"
>
> when I use:
> connection = CreateConnection();
> connection.ExceptionListener += new ExceptionListener(OnException);
> session = connection.CreateSession(this.SessionAckn
possibly add the following to your log4j configuration:
## Be sure that ActiveMQ messages are not logged to 'jms' appender
log4j.logger.org.apache.activemq=INFO, stdout
see:
http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-use-log4j-jms-appender-with-activemq.html
2009/10/10 Mike Nooney
>
> Hi,
>
> I am u
Hi,
activemq-jmdns is not intended to be a full replacement for
http://jmdns.sourceforge.net/ and it just include a subset of its classes
need to implement zeroconf functionality (
http://activemq.apache.org/zeroconf.html)
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integrati
Just do
brokerService.setPlugins(new BrokerPlugin[]{sap});
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:18 AM, vivekarora wrote
18 matches
Mail list logo
