Dear all,
I and my colleague tried to scrutinize the source code and found the script
which is performing the copying of the snapshot from primary storage to
secondary storage on this file:
./plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStorageProcessor.java
Specifically under
Is it not possible to just have a master/latest/head/snapshot version
of the docs on the web page with the individual release too. I do
think it it important to snapshot the documents at the individual
point releases and have those available. But just a latest, fresh
from git link would be nice.
Yes, it's required. The docs are wrong in the install section but you can get
the correct systemvm links and upgrade process from the Release Notes under the
3.x to 4.2.0 upgrade section for your hypervisor(s).
Travis
On Oct 9, 2013, at 11:52 PM, Kirk Kosinski wrote:
> Alena, are you sure ins
Alena, are you sure installing a new system VM template is required for
going from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0? I was just looking into doing this exact
upgrade and the 4.2.0 release notes have no mention of this in the
"Upgrade from 4.1.x to 4.2.0" section.
Best regards,
Kirk
On 10/09/2013 08:08 PM, Alena P
On 10/9/13 7:42 PM, "Punit Dambiwal" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Can anyone help me in this ??
>
>
>On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Punit Dambiwal wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently i have upgraded CS 4.1.1 to CS 4.2,everything working fine
>>except
>> VM instance provisioningevery time it failed and throw t
Hi,
Can anyone help me in this ??
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Punit Dambiwal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently i have upgraded CS 4.1.1 to CS 4.2,everything working fine except
> VM instance provisioningevery time it failed and throw the following
> error :-
>
> ---
> Unabl
When the software was released with a number of reported bugs in the
docs, it was done with the understanding that the 4.2 docs would be
prepared after the release of the software.
Ron
On 09/10/2013 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Great rant Carlos,
You should get it to the dev list. Actually
Could you check if your browser allows cookie? You seemed to hit an issue
that your browser is not able to maintain the web session
Kelven
On 10/9/13 8:32 AM, "Marty Sweet" wrote:
>Can you send us a portion of the management-server log, this should have
>any errors related to the console proxy
The docs have recently been moved into their main repo.
This potentially means that we are heading towards documentation releases on a
different cycle than the code release.
We are not there yet but it's in the works, anyone interested and willing to
contribute patches and ideas should registe
I see at least 1 topic for the cloudstack collab.
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On 9 okt. 2013, at 23:01, "Christopher M. Ryan" wrote:
> +1 on this.
> I find management hard to please when I persuade changing to a new technology
> only to have issues related to documentation. This prolongs deployme
Hi, yes, the OS Type also determines the network controller configured
for VMs. The quote from the docs is a general recommendation. For
Ubuntu VMs on KVM hypervisors it should usually be fine to use an OS
Type for a previous version.
Best regards,
Kirk
On 10/09/2013 02:03 AM, Indra Pramana wr
+1 on this.
I find management hard to please when I persuade changing to a new technology
only to have issues related to documentation. This prolongs deployment and
doesn't help with the already difficult management decision. It took us a month
to switch to CloudStack and almost a week to begin
Great rant Carlos,
You should get it to the dev list. Actually I'll add the dev list in
now. It makes sense to update the docs also after a release, when bug
in the docs are found these can easily be changed without a full
release cycle of the code itself.
regards,
Daan
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10
It seems like the only way that docs (
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/index.html) are updated is when a
release is done. Is it not possible to have these updated otherwise?
Waiting for the next patch release of the software so that the docs get
updated is causing problems with folks not
Curtis,
Can you submit a change to the docs by editting the source at
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-docs.git
sure such an update will be picked up.
regards,
Daan
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Old, Curtis wrote:
>
> Has anyone thought of updating the section 4.4.2 on the
The doc highlight the Ubuntu command after giving each full command per
hyperisor using the /usr/lib64 path to things.
As Adrian pointed out, the /usr/lib64 is wrong as well. I'm sure it's doc
rot from something that has since been updated in the new cloudstack packages.
As for the corr
After upgrading from CS 2.2.14 to 4.1.1 cloudstack-usage fails to start.
This is the trace from attempting to execute cloudstack-usage start
http://fpaste.org/45521/38134595/
It looks like jsvc is failing to run as the cloud user.
Nitin,
Management Server log is available at:
http://mail.manske.org/management-server.log.gz
I spent some time updating the System VM Templates but symptomatically
I'm still dealing with the same malfunction; Creating an instance with
an ISO fails every time, creating an instance with the templa
Hi Travis,
I'm running centos 6.4, the documentation doesn't mention anything
regarding a difference between Centos and ubuntu.
And honestly there shouldn't be a difference..
What is the correct path of a KVM system VM template ?
Doub't that it is acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2 again which
>From what I recall it was that, and at the time most of the shared primary
>storage options out there (LVMoSCSI, OCFS2, etc) had a limit of 16 hosts.
>XenServer has a hard limit of 16 hosts per resource pool, but VMware and KVM
>don't.
-Original Message-
From: Kirk Kosinski [mailto:ki
The Cloudstack repo link is also incorrect in Cloudstack 4.2 installation
guide at
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/configure-package-repository.html
:
The link given under ubuntu :
deb http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu precise 4.1
and Cen
Ah ya, unfortunately my company wants me to build our own RPMs from
source. I did see while searching for a solution that this issue had
popped up in earlier builds but it looked like a fix had been merged in.
# java -version
java version "1.6.0_24"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.11.1
I'm using interface eth1 for public/guest traffic; I have two VLANs
eth1.1(public traffic) and eth1.99(guest traffic) do I need to create two
bridges? one for each VLAN?
[root@kvm1 network-scripts]# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
cloudbr0
Hi,
I am trying to install cloudstack 4.2 on centos 6.4. I have three separate
servers for management server and database and storage. I completed all
configurations in all servers with no issues and the command
"cloudstack-setup-management" finished with no errors. But when i tried to
access usin
Can you send us a portion of the management-server log, this should have
any errors related to the console proxy in it.
Thanks,
Marty
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:22 PM, CK wrote:
> I have both rebooted and destroyed/recreated the Console Proxy VM, but
> still have the same error/problem.
>
>
> On
Hi all
I tried to test snapshot on a fresh install of CS 4.2 with kvm hypervisor.
I changed the value of kvm.snapshot.enabled for true, restart the server,
but when I try a snapshot I have the message 'VM snapshot is not enabled for
hypervisor type: KVM'.
I don't undestand.
My serv
I have both rebooted and destroyed/recreated the Console Proxy VM, but
still have the same error/problem.
On 9 October 2013 10:44, Marty Sweet wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Have you tried to reboot the Console Proxy? If that doesn't work try
> destroying it and remaking it.
>
> Marty
>
> On Wednesday, Octob
Hi Geoff,
You are correct. Before i have given 1024MB(*1 GB*) of RAM and it didn't
work.
Now i have given 2100MB( More than *2 GB*) of RAM, and i reconstructed the
databases and now its working fine :)
I can able to LOGIN without any issues.
I will update the JIRA as well.
https://issues.apache.
Centos is wrong - I've used Centos 6.4 and the path needs to be:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-t
mplt
instead of:
/usr/lib64/cloud/common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt
as documented
Not sure if the download URL is correct either. I've
Hi Chirg
It seems that old System VM template cause this error.
System VM template is updated at version 4.2.0, so old System VM
template is useless.
You have to download new System VM template.
However, wrong urls are written in installation guide of 4.2.0
and there's no notice in release notes o
Thanks, I googled it, but did not find anything.
2013/10/9 Go Chiba
> I found similar discussion by dev team.[1]
>
> It seems sometimes requested to add permission to add
> sub-domain/account/user for domains.
> And it already reported on JIRA.[2]
>
> [1]h ttp://markmail.org/message/ucxsapyanna
I found similar discussion by dev team.[1]
It seems sometimes requested to add permission to add
sub-domain/account/user for domains.
And it already reported on JIRA.[2]
[1]h ttp://markmail.org/message/ucxsapyannat2z6b
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4830
On Wed, Oct 9, 201
I am using CS 4.1.1 and still domain admin cannot create user accounts.
Thanks for the hint, I will do that, but I am curious.
Have you seen a discussion or something like that about this?I mean it
would be simple to create a parameter to determine if domain admins can or
cannot add new user to t
Hi,
I create a new zone, pod, cluster and added a KVM(RHEL 6.4) host , But
the two System VMs are not coming up, throwing the error :
1. com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:3] is
unreachable: Host 3: Unable to start instance due to Unable to start
VM[Secondar
Hi ,
While registering template we can specify whether xenserver/vmware tools
installed in the template using this flag(dynamically scalable). This is
required while deploying vm to set some parameters for dynamic scaling of cpu
and ram feature to work. The same flag is reflected in the vm insta
Dear all,
What does "dynamically scalable" means on a VM instance or a template?
Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
Cheers.
Dear all,
Anyone can advise on this?
Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
Cheers.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> After upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0, I am not able to reboot a VM
> instance. Error message: "Unable to find service offering:
> [SOME-
Hi!
Have you tried to reboot the Console Proxy? If that doesn't work try
destroying it and remaking it.
Marty
On Wednesday, October 9, 2013, Cloudwizz wrote:
> Yes, but it is expiring the session immediately after I login and view
> console, so all in under a minute of logging in.
>
>
> > On 9
Yes, but it is expiring the session immediately after I login and view console,
so all in under a minute of logging in.
> On 9 Oct 2013, at 09:36, Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
>
> As the display message says: Session expired, so you need to login again and
> then try to view console.
>
> --Sanjay
Hi Kirk,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail reply.
Can I confirm that the OS type determines the network controller as well?
I read from CloudStack documentation that it's not advisable to use a lower
version of the OS if the actual version is not available?
http://cloudstack.apache
As the display message says: Session expired, so you need to login again and
then try to view console.
--Sanjay
> -Original Message-
> From: CK [mailto:cloudw...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 1:58 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Console not working - erro
The OS Type determines the disk controller, so use the "Ubuntu 12.04
(64-bit)" OS Type instead.
Best regards,
Kirk
On 10/09/2013 01:19 AM, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I setup Ubuntu VMs using virtio driver for network and disk for faster
> performance, and saved them as templates.
>
>
I think the issues I've seen with large KVM clusters have been solved by
now, and even in older versions there were workarounds. People have
been using larger KVM clusters going back to the 2.2.x releases.
I don't know the current reasoning behind this requirement. It may be
that only up to a 16
Nitin,
I've filed it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4838
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Valery - Can you please file a bug for a better message.
> You are calling as a system user (port 8096) but for the account vdc3880
> and so the system checks whethe
Hi,
I am running CloudStack 4.2, when I 'view console' for an instance, the
popup window displays:
-401unable
to verify user credentials
If I then click on another menu option in CloudStack, it immediately popups
the message: Session Expired!
Can anyone help?
Thanks,
CK
Dear all,
I setup Ubuntu VMs using virtio driver for network and disk for faster
performance, and saved them as templates.
For Ubuntu 12.04, I saved the template using "Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit)" OS
type and any new VMs being created based on that template will retain the
virtio driver settings, no i
Hi,
Recently i have upgraded CS 4.1.1 to CS 4.2,everything working fine except
VM instance provisioningevery time it failed and throw the following
error :-
---
Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|test2]
---
In the log file this is what i found a
47 matches
Mail list logo
