Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-02-05 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
10:57:17 AM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] Hi All, The vote for CloudStack 4.11.0.0 *passes* with 4 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-02-05 Thread Khosrow Moossavi
Monday, February 5, 2018 10:57:17 AM > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] > > Hi All, > > The vote for CloudStack 4.11.0.0 *passes* with 4 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-02-05 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
ck.apache.org> From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 10:57:17 AM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] Hi All, The vote for CloudStack 4.11.0.0 *passes* with 4 PMC +

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-02-05 Thread Rohit Yadav
he.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] Hi All, The vote for CloudStack 4.11.0.0 *passes* with 4 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 2 person (Mike, Daan, Wido, Rohit) +1 (non binding) 2 person (Lucian, Boris) 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I wi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-02-05 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi All, The vote for CloudStack 4.11.0.0 *passes* with 4 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 2 person (Mike, Daan, Wido, Rohit) +1 (non binding) 2 person (Lucian, Boris) 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 48 hour

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-01-31 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
k.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] > > did package verification with all three sig files and including my own > monkeying and Boris testing; > +1 (binding) > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Co

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-01-31 Thread Rohit Yadav
Mike - is that a binding +1 vote? Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 2:52:41 PM To: dev Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] did package verification with all three sig files and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-01-31 Thread Daan Hoogland
did package verification with all three sig files and including my own monkeying and Boris testing; +1 (binding) On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.11.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for > testing and a vote: > > Git Branch and C

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-01-29 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
Hi, I am +1 on RC2. Here is the list of tests I ran for RC1: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2416#issuecomment-359220967 In that RC, I found one blocker, which has been fixed and included in RC2. I went through the list of new commits for RC2 and I didn’t see anything in them to con

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-01-29 Thread Nux!
; Cc: "users" > Sent: Friday, 26 January, 2018 17:48:24 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] > Hi all, > > I’ve done upgrade testing on the following platform matrix: > > > OS and Hypervisor \ ACS Version 4.5 → 4.11 4.6 → 4.11 4.9

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-01-26 Thread Nux!
I won't be able to test sooner than Monday guys. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Boris Stoyanov" > To: "dev" > Cc: "users" > Sent: Friday, 26 January, 2018 17:48:24 &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-01-26 Thread Boris Stoyanov
Hi all, I’ve done upgrade testing on the following platform matrix: OS and Hypervisor \ ACS Version 4.5 → 4.11 4.6 → 4.11 4.9 → 4.11 M: CentOS6 H: CentOS 6 ✔ M: CentOS6 H: XS65sp1 ✔ M: CentOS6 H: VMware 5.5u3 ✔ M: CentOS7 H: CentOS 7 ✔ M: CentOS7 H: XS7

[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

2018-01-26 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi All, I've created a 4.11.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.0.0-RC20180126T1313 Commit: 5dada1f7ed5fb6a8ee261c763f744583e586f8bf Source release (

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-26 Thread Rohit Yadav
January 24, 2018 2:08:40 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) I found and fixed an issue in cloudstack-agent logrotate. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10255 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2429 IMHO it's f

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-24 Thread Rohit Yadav
egards, Rohit Yadav From: Nux! Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 9:29:21 AM To: users Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Paul, Ok, let me play some more with those tunings params, see if I can find a satisfactory combination and I'll withhold

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-24 Thread Nux!
- Original Message - > From: "Paul Angus" > To: "users" > Cc: "dev" > Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2018 19:55:01 > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > Hey Nux, > > There is quite a bit of tuning you can do, to speed or

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-23 Thread Paul Angus
- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 23 January 2018 19:08 To: users Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Hi Paul, To be honest I do not remember when I last saw this, as I have not been testing ACS in 2017. You'd kill a HV, the VMs would pop up on anot

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-23 Thread Nux!
ssage - > From: "Paul Angus" > To: "users" , "dev" > Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2018 16:02:54 > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > Hi Nux, > > When have you seen the VMs on KVM behaving in the manner which you are > expecting? I

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-23 Thread Paul Angus
[mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 23 January 2018 15:06 To: dev Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Rohit, I'll also have to insist with the VM HA issue. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10246 Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-23 Thread Nux!
;users" > Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2018 14:28:34 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > All, > > > Given we've outstanding blockers and PRs in review/testing, I'll cut RC2 only > after we manage to get them reviewed, tested and merged. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-23 Thread Rohit Yadav
VP Technology paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> -Original Message- From: Boris Stoyanov [mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 22 January 2018 07:31 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Rohit Yadav ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Daan Hoogland Subject: Re: [VOT

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-22 Thread Rohit Yadav
ary 22, 2018 9:24:25 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Rohit Yadav; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Daan Hoogland Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) If I've understood the issue correctly, "not being able to log in if upgrading from 4.5" is a blocker in my book.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-22 Thread Boris Stoyanov
> www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Boris Stoyanov [mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: 22 January 2018 07:31 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Rohit Yadav ; d...@cloud

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-22 Thread Paul Angus
ent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Boris Stoyanov [mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 22 January 2018 07:31 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Rohit Yadav ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Daan Hoogland Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (L

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-21 Thread Boris Stoyanov
taIsEnabled=15 parameter? > > > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > From: Rohit Yadav > Sent: 19 January 2018 09:27 > To: users ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Paul > Ang

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-19 Thread Paul Angus
...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue From: Rohit Yadav Sent: 19 January 2018 09:27 To: users ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Paul Angus Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Hi Bobby, Agree, it's not user-fri

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-19 Thread Rohit Yadav
nuary 19, 2018 3:08:05 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users; Paul Angus Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Thanks Rohit, That said I must agree it’s not a blocker but still it definitely should be part of upgrade guide. Bobby. boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com www.shapebl

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-19 Thread Boris Stoyanov
: Friday, January 19, 2018 2:51:32 PM To: users Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Hi Rohit, That doesn’t sound much user friendly what do you think? Can we look for a way to automate this dependency

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-19 Thread Rohit Yadav
ing to the release notes /cc @Paul Angus<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>. - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> From: Boris Stoyanov Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 2:51:32 PM To: users Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudst

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-19 Thread Boris Stoyanov
gt; From: Boris Stoyanov > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 6:54:28 PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > > I think I’ve hit a blocker when upgrading to 4.11 > > Here’s the jira id: https://

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-19 Thread Rohit Yadav
Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) I think I’ve hit a blocker when upgrading to 4.11 Here’s the jira id: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10236 I’ve upgraded from 4.5 to 4.11, then I’ve logged in with admin and got session expired immediately. Regards, Boris Stoyanov boris

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-17 Thread Boris Stoyanov
I think I’ve hit a blocker when upgrading to 4.11 Here’s the jira id: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10236 I’ve upgraded from 4.5 to 4.11, then I’ve logged in with admin and got session expired immediately. Regards, Boris Stoyanov boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-16 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
Hi everyone, For the past couple days, I have been running the KVM managed-storage regression-test suite against RC1. With the exception of one issue (more on this below), all of these tests have passed. Tomorrow I plan to start in on the VMware-related managed-storage tests. Once I’ve comple

[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2018-01-15 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi All, I've created a 4.11.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.0.0-RC20180115T1603 Commit: 1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4 Source release (checks