Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-12 Thread Mark H. Wood
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:28:39AM +0100, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > Hi all, > for anyone interested more in contributing for make things change rather > than ranting about autopsy and post-mortem status, I'd strongly suggest > to take a look at [1], if need subscribe to dev@ ML, and join the

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-12 Thread Bart Remmerie
We should really focus on > getting c3 1.0 out which will give users a more confident feeling API's > won't break that easily. > > Robby > > -Original Message- > From: Bart Remmerie [mailto:remme...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 9:21 PM > To:

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-12 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi all, for anyone interested more in contributing for make things change rather than ranting about autopsy and post-mortem status, I'd strongly suggest to take a look at [1], if need subscribe to dev@ ML, and join the discussion there. Regards. [1] http://markmail.org/message/n3xt6yio6vikanuh -

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-11 Thread Michael Müller
...Activities for Cocoon 3 are much to little... Missing 3 in my contribution. Just for clarification. Herzliche Grüße - Best Regards, Michael Müller Am 11.11.2012 21:42, schrieb Michael Müller: Bart, If you guess, Maven is a problem, I second you. Maven might be great from the developer's v

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-11 Thread Michael Müller
Bart, If you guess, Maven is a problem, I second you. Maven might be great from the developer's view. But a poor (cocoon) user perfers just a simple setup. Thus Maven might scare users - and it did, when I tried the new version apx. 5 or 6 years ago. But from my point of view, tinker on a ne

RE: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-11 Thread Robby Pelssers
n.apache.org Cc: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Is cocoon dead ? Just being critical & analytical: where die we observe the big drop in community activity ? Switch to Maven & move from 2.1.11 to next version ? (just a guess) => What can we learn from this ? Bart Remmerie

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-11 Thread Bart Remmerie
Just being critical & analytical: where die we observe the big drop in community activity ? Switch to Maven & move from 2.1.11 to next version ? (just a guess) => What can we learn from this ? Bart Remmerie Op 11-nov.-2012 om 18:13 heeft Michael Müller het volgende geschreven: > Francesco,

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-11 Thread Michael Müller
Francesco, I observe this list for years now (since I started using Cocon 2.1). And I recongnized some activities, especially from you. But since a couple of years I'm using a) a different technology (JSF) for my web pages and b) I'm waiting for Cocoon 3.0 to become ready. Even there are some

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-10 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi all, I think e-mails like the one below are not helpful at all. First of all, even though most of critical aspects of our current situation are reported, some things are barely wrong: > down the same page you find the next most recent news is a year and a > half old Open your favorite browser

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-08 Thread Mark H. Wood
I'm not surprised at all. Looking 3cm. down the same page you find the next most recent news is a year and a half old. When people ask about C2.x (and the latest released version is 2.2) nobody wants to talk about it (except others desperate for information about some aspect of C2); one is told t

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-08 Thread Gintare Ragaisiene
I'm still getting Cocoon user list letter, please sign me out. On 8 November 2012 15:10, Thorsten Scherler wrote: > Sorry for top posting but I am writing from ApacheCon from my tablet. > > I am suprised actually about the question since 6 weeks is not really a > long time and more in the contex

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-08 Thread Thorsten Scherler
Sorry for top posting but I am writing from ApacheCon from my tablet. I am suprised actually about the question since 6 weeks is not really a long time and more in the context that close to all active committers are ATM here in Sinsheim and had to prepare presentation, travelling, ... Any way we

AW: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-08 Thread Kunisch, Arne
Nachricht- Von: Daniel Smith [mailto:opened...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. November 2012 12:55 An: users@cocoon.apache.org Betreff: Re: Is cocoon dead ? Franceso, is there any documentation anywhere detailing the differences in Cocoon 3, or advances etc? Thanks so much. An old list

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-08 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 08/11/2012 13:10, Daniel Smith wrote: > Hmm. > What needs to be done to complete it? > Just wondering. Just search for "TBW" in http://cocoon.apache.org//3.0/reference/html-single/index.html ;-) Regards. > On 11/8/12, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: >> On 08/11/2012 12:55, Daniel Smith wrote:

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-08 Thread Daniel Smith
Hmm. What needs to be done to complete it? Just wondering. Dan >:) On 11/8/12, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > On 08/11/2012 12:55, Daniel Smith wrote: >> Franceso, is there any documentation anywhere detailing the >> differences in Cocoon 3, or advances etc? > > You can find a short summary at [

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-08 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 08/11/2012 12:55, Daniel Smith wrote: > Franceso, is there any documentation anywhere detailing the > differences in Cocoon 3, or advances etc? You can find a short summary at [1] and the complete documentation - still to be completed, any volunteer? - at [2] > An old list member from all the

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-08 Thread Daniel Smith
Franceso, is there any documentation anywhere detailing the differences in Cocoon 3, or advances etc? Thanks so much. An old list member from all the way back to the first Cocoon book, etc. Dan Smith On 11/8/12, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > On 08/11/2012 05:14, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: >> As of

Re: Is cocoon dead ?

2012-11-08 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 08/11/2012 05:14, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: > As of today the page > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cocoon/cocoon3/trunk/ shows that the most > recent changes were 6 weeks ago. > Is there any activity or plans to continue developing cocoon ? Hi Mansour, unfortunately this question keeps popping up: