Thanks for all the further suggestions. I'll use Coccon 2.1. (I dont
know anything about Spring/Maven/Hibernate)
Derek Hohls wrote:
Personally, I would think that Cocoon 2.1 is the most well-developed
and stable of the series. 2.0 is really out-of-date. 2.2 might be worth
tackling if you're p
Personally, I would think that Cocoon 2.1 is the most well-developed
and stable of the series. 2.0 is really out-of-date. 2.2 might be worth
tackling if you're prepared to learn the associated frameworks such as
Spring and Hibernate, plus be prepared to do Java coding; but, as many
others have po
Hello
I wrote two applications using CForms, Spring and Hibernate in Cocoon
2.1. It found it relatively easy to upgrade them to Cocoon 2.2. I
think that CForms, Spring and Hibernate work very well together.
But the same client also has a couple of old applications which still
run in Cocoo
...which in turn would result in Hippo 7 to get a Cocoon front-end,
right? :-)
Well yes that could indeed happen, but we're not there yet. :-)
Jeroen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@cocoon.apache.org
For additi
Hi,
Recognizing the feeling of disconcertation when after having worked with
Cocoon 2.1 one comes back and finds out about Cocoon 2.2.
- many things have changed, (striving towards MVC paradigm)
which is OK, if things are improving
- Cocoon still depends on Avalon (which caused me troubles in
Version 2.1 is still king for me!
On 11/09/2009, at 2:44 AM, David Beasley wrote:
Thanks for everyone's responses.
I'm beginning to think that I should use Cocoon 2.0, because at
least I know this is well documented. Which is a shame after people
have put a lot of effort into developing ve
David Beasley wrote:
Thanks for everyone's responses.
I'm beginning to think that I should use Cocoon 2.0, because at least
I know this is well documented. Which is a shame after people have put
a lot of effort into developing versions 2.1 and 2.2 ...
I would recommend Cocoon 2.1. The documen
David Beasley wrote:
I'm looking for help with starting to use Cocoon 2.2. I've looked at
the website (cocoon.apache.org), but havent found very much in terms
of introductory guides, tutorials, etc.
Tutorials are something that is really lacking. I don't know if it is
me, but I think that docu
al Message-
From: David Beasley [mailto:david.beas...@publishingtechnology.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 6:44 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Starting out with Cocoon 2.2
Thanks for everyone's responses.
I'm beginning to think that I should use Cocoon 2.0, because a
Thanks for everyone's responses.
I'm beginning to think that I should use Cocoon 2.0, because at least I
know this is well documented. Which is a shame after people have put a
lot of effort into developing versions 2.1 and 2.2 ...
David Legg wrote:
> Most of the useful documentation can be fo
IMHO, developers tend to mirror the general population in that the majority
follow the herd. The habits of imperative Java programming and the
not-invented-here syndrome meant that Cocoon was only ever going to appeal
to a minority of enlightened developers.
Maven is a head f&*ck for the average J
On 10/sep/09, at 16:55, Jeroen Reijn wrote
Well I think that some people have put Cocoon on a low profile.
There were a lot of great frameworks added to the ASF code base
lately, which made people broaden their perspective.
I don't really think that people quit working with/on Cocoon,
bec
Well I think that some people have put Cocoon on a low profile. There
were a lot of great frameworks added to the ASF code base lately, which
made people broaden their perspective.
I don't really think that people quit working with/on Cocoon, because
Cocoon 2.1 is stable and a lot of people ar
Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 10/sep/09, at 15:05, Ellis Pritchard wrote:
Lamentable indeed.
Having taken a break from Cocoon 2.1 at work, and returned to 2.2,
after much pain and frustration at recreating what was in cocoon
using 'pure' java and spring mvc + freemarker (urgh) + 1000's of
On 10/sep/09, at 15:05, Ellis Pritchard wrote:
Lamentable indeed.
Having taken a break from Cocoon 2.1 at work, and returned to 2.2,
after much pain and frustration at recreating what was in cocoon
using 'pure' java and spring mvc + freemarker (urgh) + 1000's of
lines of horrible java to
Lamentable indeed.
Having taken a break from Cocoon 2.1 at work, and returned to 2.2,
after much pain and frustration at recreating what was in cocoon using
'pure' java and spring mvc + freemarker (urgh) + 1000's of lines of
horrible java to do stuff cocoon did for free, I realize how much
Hi David,
I'm just about to embark on a new project... I'd like to use Cocoon
2.2 for this, but I'm concerned about the apparent lack of support for it.
It is true that Cocoon has hit a low point at the moment and I'm sure
many of us wonder if it will ever recover. Many of the original
cont
17 matches
Mail list logo
