On 12/08/11 14:38, planas wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 13:52 +1000, Simon Cropper wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have been doing some follow-up investigations that I thought you might
like to be made aware.
First, why? Well after testing the file that I recreated by copying the
text, formula and style
*** Jorge, as I respond to your email I find out a range of things of
note, as I try and support or refute my ideas. It is enlightening to
read the entire post but you can just as easily jump to >>HERE<< ***
Sorry Jorge,
I suppose it is confusing.
The problem is the corruption due to the inse
FWIW - I prefer mmmdd or ddmmm where the 'm' is alphabetic; -
unambiguous!
nvsoar
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Stan Goodman wrote:
> On Thursday 11 August 2011 22:40:04 planas wrote:
> > Johnny
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 12:36 +0200, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> > > 2011/8/11 Tom Dav
Hi
Thank you, I understand now. I used it as you say and I could modify
all the headers (The first Column included), but the data headers (Where
the sum, average or other calcs are), change to its original formats
when the pilot data is refreshed (The first column header and Data Title
kee
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 13:52 +1000, Simon Cropper wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have been doing some follow-up investigations that I thought you might
> like to be made aware.
>
> First, why? Well after testing the file that I recreated by copying the
> text, formula and styles I could not cause
Hi
I'm some confused. Was the comment or the image the problem ? or Both ?
Regards,
Jorge Rodríguez
_
El vie, 12-08-2011 a las 13:52 +1000, Simon Cropper escribió:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have been doing some follow-up investigations that I thought you might
> like to be mad
At 10:11 11/08/2011 +0100, R J Weir wrote:
To avoid confusion between the mm.dd. and the dd.mm. date
formats can we have the less ambiguous "International" .mm.dd
format included as an option (default?) in the fields for Writer?
Isn't it already there?
When entering a new field:
o
Hi Everyone,
I have been doing some follow-up investigations that I thought you might
like to be made aware.
First, why? Well after testing the file that I recreated by copying the
text, formula and styles I could not cause the error to occur again.
This is what I reported yesterday. I then
Installing LO 3.4.2 and a long list of add-ons (+90) had few problems than
several prior OO installs. The Extension Manager GUI stability is greatly
improved. No crashes! Yea!
Problems encountered were largely due to the EM installing (or attempting to
install) defective packages, primarily ".zips
On Thursday, August 11, 2011 03:07:54 PM Stan Goodman wrote:
> On Friday 12 August 2011 00:22:12 planas wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:59 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> > > On 11/08/2011 20:43, planas wrote:
> > > > Gordon
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:24 +0100, Gordon Burge
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 01:07 +0300, Stan Goodman wrote:
> On Friday 12 August 2011 00:22:12 planas wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:59 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> > > On 11/08/2011 20:43, planas wrote:
> > > > Gordon
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:24 +0100, Gordon Burgess-P
On Friday 12 August 2011 00:22:12 planas wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:59 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> > On 11/08/2011 20:43, planas wrote:
> > > Gordon
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:24 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> > >> Yes it's true!
> > >> I see this more and more -
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:59 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> On 11/08/2011 20:43, planas wrote:
> > Gordon
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:24 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> >
> >> Yes it's true!
> >> I see this more and more - LO being recommended to people who've bought
> >> a compu
On Thursday 11 August 2011 22:40:04 planas wrote:
> Johnny
>
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 12:36 +0200, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> > 2011/8/11 Tom Davies :
> > > Hi :)
> > > Ahhah, great. I prefer dashes - because after reading too much
> > > for too long my eyes get a bit muddled when people use / and
Le 10/08/11 01:46, Simon Cropper a écrit :
Hi Simon,
> If I work back through the historical copies of the file, I can only
> reproduce the error in this years version. It is as if the file has
> become partially corrupted. The question is how and can it be easily fixed.
>
Use xmlpp and xmldiff
On 2011-08-11, planas wrote:
> Partha,
>
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 18:07 +0530, Partha Chowdhury wrote:
>
>> I have successfully build libreoffice-3.3.3.1 form source.However, I
>> need office only to open and edit word documents and nothing else. So I
>> want only to build the writer part and no
Hi
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 19:24 +0200, DE VITO Dominique wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just a 10 Mo .ppt including around 30 jpeg images.
> I want to convert it towards PDF using LibreOffice, while using a Java
> program.
>
> To do so, I use the LibreOffice SDK from Java, with socket connection (due
Am 11.08.2011 01:38, Simon Cropper wrote:
On 11/08/11 02:53, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hmm, well maybe not the absolute worst. A sieve or broken
> floppy disc or an ancient format that no program can read
> might be worse but yes, databases with an audit-trail are
> much more secure and plain text
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:17 +0200, Andreas Säger wrote:
> Am 10.08.2011 09:23, toto wrote:
> > I'm using macro's function and it doesn't start when the document start.
> > It would start if I change the value of the variabel at the function.
> > The code is to change numeric value to string. If I
On 11/08/2011 20:43, planas wrote:
Gordon
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:24 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
Yes it's true!
I see this more and more - LO being recommended to people who've bought
a computer with a Trial version of Office 2010 that's expired...
+1
Where is this happening?
her
Partha,
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 18:07 +0530, Partha Chowdhury wrote:
> Hallo all.This is my first post to the list.
>
> I have successfully build libreoffice-3.3.3.1 form source.However, I
> need office only to open and edit word documents and nothing else. So I
> want only to build the writer
Lars
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 10:23 +0200, Lars Callenbach wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> I have modified the QuantLib addin code so that it runs under Linux and
> Windows XP (using Openoffice 3.2.1). Under Libreoffice the code compiles and
> the oxt file will be created but loading of the addin (using th
Gordon
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:24 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> Yes it's true!
> I see this more and more - LO being recommended to people who've bought
> a computer with a Trial version of Office 2010 that's expired...
>
+1
Where is this happening?
--
Jay Lozier
jsloz...@gmail.c
Johnny
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 12:36 +0200, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> 2011/8/11 Tom Davies :
> > Hi :)
> > Ahhah, great. I prefer dashes - because after reading too much for too
> > long my
> > eyes get a bit muddled when people use / and dots still seem to confuse
> > obscure
> > Windows syste
Hi
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 06:11 -0700, msaum@smi wrote:
> We have main frame reports that are generated using "xhtml" and saved as
> extension "xls". When the user gets the report they would typically just
> open them with excel, no problem... Calc does not open them properly. When
> I ope CALC
Yes it's true!
I see this more and more - LO being recommended to people who've bought
a computer with a Trial version of Office 2010 that's expired...
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to
Hi
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 18:01 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 11/08/11 15:46, Wayne a écrit :
>
> > Would you include Python in that list?
> > Wayne
>
> Sure, any programming language that allows you to build a graphically
> driven frontend. AFAIK, Python can do that with tcl, wx, gtk,
Hi :)
Which version of Java are you using? The more recent _26 and _24 versions
create problems in LibreOffice. The ideal version is their _21 but the _22 and
_20 are also quite good.
Also which version of LibreOffice are you using? The 3.3.3 is the latest
stable
but the more adventurous
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/2011 05:23 PM, Simon Cropper wrote:
> It is obvious that you do not like OO or LO Calc, and that you don't
> like the fact that your data is continually corrupted.
LO is a tool. I neither like or dislike it. As a tool, it has a major
defect in
Hi,
I have just a 10 Mo .ppt including around 30 jpeg images.
I want to convert it towards PDF using LibreOffice, while using a Java program.
To do so, I use the LibreOffice SDK from Java, with socket connection (due to
streaming) between Java/LibreOffice.
While the original document size sounds
Le 11/08/11 15:46, Wayne a écrit :
> Would you include Python in that list?
> Wayne
Sure, any programming language that allows you to build a graphically
driven frontend. AFAIK, Python can do that with tcl, wx, gtk, and no
doubt other graphical toolkits so why not ? ;-)
I actually went scouring
Le 11/08/11 15:44, Dave Sergeant a écrit :
Hi Dave,
> In LO 3.4.2:
> cad7593009.wps - opens blank, if I look at the properties pane it
> claims it has 1 page with 0 characters.
> fot4813409.wps and mot6312910.wps open correctly as plain text but all
> the bolding, italics, paragraph indents, an
On 08/11/2011 06:44 AM, Dave Sergeant wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2011 at 12:35, Charlie wrote:
>
>> > How much experience of people had of Works import and does it actually
>> > work, or is it as I seem to be finding rather buggy?
>>
>> No problem here using V 3.3.3 running on Ubuntu (that's the latest
>
We have main frame reports that are generated using "xhtml" and saved as
extension "xls". When the user gets the report they would typically just
open them with excel, no problem... Calc does not open them properly. When
I ope CALC and manually open the spreadsheet, it eventually opens in
Writer/W
Am 11.08.2011 11:11, rjw...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
To avoid confusion between the mm.dd. and the dd.mm. date formats can we have the
less ambiguous "International" .mm.dd format included as an option
(default?) in the fields for Writer?
menu:Tools>Options>LanguageSettings>Languges
Am 11.08.2011 01:28, jorge wrote:
Hi
I'm sorry but I made an example with Style and the first column header
(Title) wasn't changed. Besides, I refreshed the pilot table and lost
the headers format.
What did I wrong ?
The pilot uses one distinct set of automatically generated
Am 10.08.2011 09:23, toto wrote:
I'm using macro's function and it doesn't start when the document start.
It would start if I change the value of the variabel at the function.
The code is to change numeric value to string. If I execute the code:
ubah(123) the result is "seratus dua puluh tiga". A
yeah,thought so
On 10 August 2011 19:09, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Not really. It is nice to see different languages in here but native
> English-speakers are often unable to understand more than 1 language and
> many
> have trouble even with that one. There are many other lists for many oth
Hi,
I saved the instructions for adding the Java for my future reference if
needed. These are slightly modified over what had been in the post:
*Older Java Version for LibreOffice and Open Office for Linux Install:*
Overview:
1. Download the JRE archive (approx. 20 mb)
2. Extract in /tmp
3.
On 08/10/2011 04:50 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 07/08/11 03:55, Wayne a écrit :
Hi Wayne,
A couple of three days ago someone, on this list, mention not to use
BASE, as there wasn't much development going on. Their suggestion
was to look for a different front end to use. Can someone make a
On 11 Aug 2011 at 12:35, Charlie wrote:
> > How much experience of people had of Works import and does it actually
> > work, or is it as I seem to be finding rather buggy?
>
> No problem here using V 3.3.3 running on Ubuntu (that's the latest
> version for Ubuntu). See samples at
> www.writersedg
Thanks for all who answered, creating the .fonts directory under
/home// and rerunning fc-cache was the solution that worked.
Thanks for all of you!
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/add-ttf-fonts-to-LibreOffice-tp3241306p3245749.html
Sent from the Users maili
On 11/08/11 12:16, Dave Sergeant wrote:
> How much experience of people had of Works import and does it actually
> work, or is it as I seem to be finding rather buggy?
Be sure you installed the 'Legacy File Format Filters' when you
installed it.
You have to choose the 'Custom' install option to g
Hi :)
Yes, i have heard that of AbiWord before. Writer does have a lot more
features.
With LinuxFromScratch you might find Slackware forums helpful as i think they
are the most similar to what you are doing. There will be slight differences
of
course but they are probably very used to the
On 11/08/11 12:16, Dave Sergeant wrote:
How much experience of people had of Works import and does it actually
work, or is it as I seem to be finding rather buggy?
Dave
http://www.davesergeant.com
No problem here using V 3.3.3 running on Ubuntu (that's the latest
version for Ubuntu). Se
LibreOffice 3.4 is advertised as supporting import of MS Works files,
but a search of the archives of this list shows very little about it. I
have a colleague who has a rather large (66Mb) .wps file with loads of
pictures that he wants to open on his Mac, and I suggested LO as an
easy way.
A q
2011/8/11 Tom Davies :
> Hi :)
> Ahhah, great. I prefer dashes - because after reading too much for too long
> my
> eyes get a bit muddled when people use / and dots still seem to confuse
> obscure
> Windows systems sometimes. I was told that the / was the European Standard
> but
> if - are us
2011/8/11 Johnny Rosenberg :
> 2011/8/11 Tom Davies :
>> Hi :)
>> Lol, yup. I think we both found the same thing at the same time! I am not
>> sure
>> about missing the / now. All the guides i have seen do include it. So maybe
>> the issue is about which folder you are in when you run the comm
2011/8/11 Tom Davies :
> Hi :)
> Lol, yup. I think we both found the same thing at the same time! I am not
> sure
> about missing the / now. All the guides i have seen do include it. So maybe
> the issue is about which folder you are in when you run the command. I might
> test it out from wor
Hi :)
Ahhah, great. I prefer dashes - because after reading too much for too long my
eyes get a bit muddled when people use / and dots still seem to confuse obscure
Windows systems sometimes. I was told that the / was the European Standard but
if - are used in one other country then that helps
2011/8/11 :
> To avoid confusion between the mm.dd. and the dd.mm. date formats can
> we have the less ambiguous
> "International"
It IS international, it's ISO 8601 (and also Swedish standard, lucky
me… ;P)! Except that there should be dashes, not dots: -mm-dd.
Kind regards
Johnn
Hi :)
Lol, yup. I think we both found the same thing at the same time! I am not
sure
about missing the / now. All the guides i have seen do include it. So maybe
the issue is about which folder you are in when you run the command. I might
test it out from work later. If i can get onto a su
2011/8/11 Tom Davies :
> Hi :)
> Ahah, i have just found these links
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/system-requirements/
> I'm guessing that's the guide you used? It's definitely official and
> definitely
> for LibreOffice but it doesn't give a lot of detail.
>
> Jonny, it is to register a
2011/8/11 Tom Davies :
> Hi :)
> I think you don't need the / at the start of a command like that. Try
> msoreg=1
>
> However, i have no idea what that command does or what it is supposed to do so
> please double check what the command is supposed to do and don't just blindly
> accept some random
Hi :)
Ahah, i have just found these links
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/system-requirements/
I'm guessing that's the guide you used? It's definitely official and
definitely
for LibreOffice but it doesn't give a lot of detail.
Jonny, it is to register all the various office formats that wo
2011/8/11 Johnny Rosenberg :
> 2011/8/11 Andreas Säger :
>> Am 11.08.2011 10:30, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
>>>
>>> The macro is used as a cell function right?
>>> In that case, where did you put the macro? It should be placed in My
>>> Macros, I think, so you need to move it there if it's not there
>
2011/8/11 Andreas Säger :
> Am 11.08.2011 10:30, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
>>
>> The macro is used as a cell function right?
>> In that case, where did you put the macro? It should be placed in My
>> Macros, I think, so you need to move it there if it's not there
>> already.
>>
>>
>
> Wrong. It has t
Le 11/08/11 10:23, Lars Callenbach a écrit :
Hi Lars,
> I have modified the QuantLib addin code so that it runs under Linux and
> Windows XP (using Openoffice 3.2.1). Under Libreoffice the code compiles and
> the oxt file will be created but loading of the addin (using the oxt file)
> fails wi
Hi :)
I think you don't need the / at the start of a command like that. Try
msoreg=1
However, i have no idea what that command does or what it is supposed to do so
please double check what the command is supposed to do and don't just blindly
accept some random unofficial guide, blog or forum po
Hi :)
Good plan. It sounds like an "Easy Hack" and posting bug-reports like that can
help people learn how to write code for LibreOffice. So, please post a
bug-report
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport
Good luck and regards from
Tom :)
From: "rjw..
Hi :)
Is the QuantLib addin/add-on/plug-in/extension released under a copy-left
License such as GPL, LGPL, MPL or something like that? Are you happy to
release
your updated one under a copy-left so that anyone can modify and redistribute
the code in an OpenSource way?
If so then it might be a
To avoid confusion between the mm.dd. and the dd.mm. date formats can
we have the less ambiguous "International" .mm.dd format included as an
option (default?) in the fields for Writer?
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www
From: john d. herron
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thu, 11 August, 2011 4:12:48
Subject: [libreoffice-users] New Custom Style in Writer - odd behavior
Aug 07, 2011; 8:42pm - john herron wrote:
I created a style (Default_2, next style also Default_2
Am 11.08.2011 10:30, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
The macro is used as a cell function right?
In that case, where did you put the macro? It should be placed in My
Macros, I think, so you need to move it there if it's not there
already.
Wrong. It has to be stored in library "Standard", either the d
Hi Jay,
I have modified the QuantLib addin code so that it runs under Linux and Windows
XP (using Openoffice 3.2.1). Under Libreoffice the code compiles and the oxt
file will be created but loading of the addin (using the oxt file) fails with
an error message under Linux.
Was there any change
2011/8/10 toto :
> I'm using macro's function and it doesn't start when the document start. It
> would start if I change the value of the variabel at the function. The code
> is to change numeric value to string. If I execute the code: ubah(123) the
> result is "seratus dua puluh tiga". Any idea ho
2011/8/10 Cor Nouws :
>
> toto wrote (10-08-11 09:23)
>>
>> I'm using macro's function and it doesn't start when the document start.
>
> You can change that via Tools > Customize > Events.
> Find the OnOpen event and link it to the macro for the document.
I think the function is supposed to be use
2011/8/11 sobriquet :
> My computer does not have Microsoft office installed; rather the minute
> Starter office is in place.
> I followed the instructions in the System Requirements and
> downloaded--mmsvc90.dll. My computer is running Win7, so I went to
> Programs-->Accessories--> Command Prompt,
Le 10/08/11 09:22, Lars Callenbach a écrit :
Hello Lars,
>
> I have compiled an addin which works find under openoffice 3.2. Using either
> libreoffice 3.3 or 3.4 the following error message appears:
>
> ERROR: Fehler beim Hinzuf�gen von:
> vnd.sun.star.expand:$UNO_USER_PACKAGES_CACHE/un
69 matches
Mail list logo
