use a stricter policy and they then block and submit the IP for
blacklisting.
This is how many spam and maliciousware servers are discovered and shut
down, from their sending content.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 17/08/2013 11:49 PM, Dave Liesse wrote:
That would be correct. It's the inc
erif one, which is the
default one for Thunderbird, under Windows 7 that is.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 17/08/2013 09:22 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
On 08/17/2013 12:56 PM, Brian Barker wrote:
At 10:47 17/08/2013 +0200, Andrew Brown wrote:
In the read word punctuation taught us when to ta
unctuation and spacing
leads the eye to faster reading as opposed to sans serif. Man tests have
been done with this. So the article written in the provided link, is
found to be hard to read as it is a sans serif font used.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 16/08/2013 11:08 PM, James Knott wrote:
Michael
o the issues we are
discussing here.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 16/08/2013 02:23 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
On 08/16/2013 03:06 AM, Brian Barker wrote:
o I would suggest that two spaces are probably useful with
fixed-pitch text as on a typewriter, especially when the
sentence-ending full stop wi
ces.
What one does and what is a standard is two different things.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 15/08/2013 08:04 PM, Dave Liesse wrote:
Well, that's what someone decided, and it is the standard for HTML,
but it still is not universally accepted. A double space, whatever
minimal width the spa
introduce
conditions in code to strip or add spaces, which is a piece of code by
the way, computers do not know what is a white space or blank, it's
treated as a character.
So we need to get around what we are referring to when it comes to
digital text or the written / printed word.
Andrew
deems private (only he can access and work with)
content, issues such as spam, and blocking it.
Really, so easy to resolve even if one does not have time for a
supposedly public web space.
Andrew Brown
On 15/08/2013 02:00 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
+1
I've not been a long term use
ws.
This when there are superior and up to date Internet browsers out there.
Andrew Brown
On 15/08/2013 06:08 AM, Brian Barker wrote:
At 21:02 14/08/2013 -0400, Virgil Arrington wrote:
The strange thing was I didn't extract the oxt from the zip. I simply
renamed the zip to an oxt. There wa
to be the problem.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 13/08/2013 08:32 AM, Dave Barton wrote:
Tom,
Undoubtedly you post with the best of intentions, but please stop
jumping in with confusing misinformation.
There are two entirely separate forums:
1. http://www.oooforum.org The independent "unoff
ou, all good, I
uploaded from Linux to my mobile device, edited the files, saved then
added to online space, and downloaded them to Windows and to Linux,
re-edited them, saved and uploaded back to online storage and to device.
Device reads them fine.
Hope this help you some more to find your fault
will obey the O/S setting.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 10/08/2013 07:32 AM, Sina Momken wrote:
Hello,
This is not a bug. I guess the document was written in a bi-directional
enabled Writer using Hindi Numerals.
To fix it do:
1-
Tools->Options->Language_Settings->Languages->Enhanced_lang
, and
GNOME popular with Apple O/S type users for function and layout. There
are of course many other desktops as well.
Very useful, hope you find it's of use to you. As Tom iterated in
another post, nice to offer you back something for all your help with LO
to us.
Regards
Andrew Brown
interestingly of Gnumeric's use. I never realised the
dot points of the screen width, mine 1920, having an effect, I was
playing with 2000 data points.
Nice, one learns more every day.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 08/08/2013 06:14 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Sebastián,
Sebastián Dietrich sc
ot; or the like in
other products, you will see in brackets it indicating that it is in a
(read only) state.
This is the same for any doc on your drive, flash disk etc also locked
in a read only state.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 08/08/2013 01:06 PM, Gilles wrote:
Thanks for the tip. I don'
ocument. And I
tested this in both Linux and Windows on my system with LO.
So again Brian has covered what one can do, and I was able to save it to
my drive as a .docx and open it fine in a now non-read only state and
fill it in, and then save it as a .docx IN LO.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 07/
, and other users of
non-MS products, working perfectly fine with it and could not really
give a hoot of it's millisecond or second performance.
Andrew Brown
On 07/08/2013 04:29 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Yes, there are a lot of people who can give others "proof" of
year,and I have to correct mine this way as
well.
Try this, I am sure you will resolve your mentioned problem.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 07/08/2013 10:56 AM, Harshad Italiya wrote:
Hi,
I am using LibreOffice Calc 3.6.2.2. When I enter Date as 30/05/2013 in
column it displays it according to the
Sorry typo, meant to read 100GB not MB. Allowing for anything FAT coming
along.
Andrew Brown
On 07/08/2013 10:18 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I tend to make / around 10-15Gb now for Ubuntu. 100Mb is about enough
for a separate /boot partiiton but not enough for the / of most
distros
data separate.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 07/08/2013 07:53 AM, Doug wrote:
On 08/07/2013 01:05 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
If you have your /home on a separate partition then it might be possible to
install the 64bit version of Ubuntu without disturbing your 32 it version. I
tend to use a 10
y tests on my desktop, likewise not a solid scientific benchmark, but
supplied as a performance indicator that LO is nut a slug as is perceived.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 06/08/2013 11:41 PM, Sina Momken wrote:
I also think that start up time for LO Writer and MS Office and many
other program
Well said
Andrew Brown
On 06/08/2013 09:10 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I've not had any problems with AVG so far. Afaik!
But i definitely think anti-malware stuff is definitely one of those
things that people have to make up their own minds about which is best
for them. After-all
e, is like being
an ant sliding down a 20 foot razor blade using your (part of the male
anatomy, rhymes with many golf balls) as brakes"
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 06/08/2013 09:05 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
On 08/06/2013 02:07 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
I still abide by a statement attribut
pe, as I say
bull baffles brains.
Thanks for this link. I like going over stuff like this.
Andrew Brown
On 06/08/2013 08:54 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Andrew,
Just interested in your comments/thoughts on this site:
http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/rap-index.xml
On 8/6/13 12:05 PM, Andrew Brown wr
are
1. MSSE
2. Avast
3. ClamAV for Windows
For payware there is only two, by continuous test, both personal,
business and enterprize, and without starting a flame war
Kaspersky
ESET Nod32
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 06/08/2013 04:30 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Good point. I only had the anti-ma
Hi Bruce
Yep, nice feedback of what can be done, thanks for that. This should get
you going then, if Mark Shuttleworth pulls it off with his upcoming
device Ubuntu Edge and Ubuntu Touch. Both Ubuntu and Android running
side by side, with no routing/jailbreaking (a risky thing to do if you
don
Ha! Ha! there you go, LO just runs on whatever platform and O/S of your
choice. And for the most part, what is a minute or less really from
switch on to productive use of something. I can't make a cup of tea in
that time, and I mean a real brewed cup of tea. Now at least the movies
can show an
different Win7 installs on each]. Now my old
AMD64 laptops running XP/pro takes about 15 to 20 seconds. I do not use
Calc, Impress, or Draw much so I never really noticed their opening speeds.
On 08/05/2013 09:17 AM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Gents
Kracked, a good reply. If I may add my two cents wo
Gents
Kracked, a good reply. If I may add my two cents worth to performance of
start-ups here.
This is my system hardware top of the range in December 2007, and still
hops today. The only things updated since 2008 was the video card and
the SATA III hard drives, and the O/S's.
Windows 7 Ul
re hardware involved.
So the only place on today's modern hardware, where you plug the ROM in,
is in the emulators folder. Just do a Google search for "Emulator game
ROM's, and you'll understand what I am on about.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 04/08/2013 01:14 AM, Doug wrote:
On
Hi Tom
No, it's an actual game from Atari, Mark was playing with the words, if
I am correct, with "Eastern Front - Font" and Doug picked up on this
asking about a genuine early 1980's game. Check out my email posted a
short while ago.
Sorry Kracked, you cracked this one wrongly :-D
Ah! Stea
l but to acquire the ROM is
not, as they still retain copyright.
But if you can figure it out from here, you are on your way.
<http://www.atariage.com/2600/emulation/>
Andrew Brown
On 03/08/2013 07:29 AM, Doug wrote:
On 08/02/2013 09:03 AM, Mark Stanton wrote:
All quiet on the eastern
Apologies, late night Saturday here 11H40PM, the version is 4.0.4.2 that
I use in Windows and Linux and the stable one, not 4.1.?.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 03/08/2013 11:29 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Err, just 1 correction.
It's the 4.0.4 that is the most recent stable version.
nough space to carry personal or work related
docs too. You can even surf the web with nothing left on the host PC.
Hope this helps
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 03/08/2013 09:49 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
It's often best to keep documents in ODF formats, in this case Odp, and just
edit th
onth Year etc.
That should sort you out and give a better experience with LO. If you
need furhter help and assistance, please reply. I can send you
screenshots of what I am referring to as well, as I live in South
Africa, and have set mine to work perfectly with my country locale and
langu
Hi Kracked_P_P
No, not necessary. I was just asked to post the screens as per our
discussion, of both the Windows and Linux version of LO, for future
reference and use by others.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 01/08/2013 03:54 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
On 07/31/2013 06:11 PM
Heh! Heh! yes force of habit clicking "Reply All" when I see multiple
names, instead of "Reply to list" as I have done now, and I do use
Thunderbird :-P
Andrew Brown
On 01/08/2013 02:36 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
And you did it again.
Best is to use an email client that actual
Apologies Tanstaafl, I replied to all. I must have replied directly to
you as well as the list
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 01/08/2013 01:51 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Please don't send to me directly, I'm on the list.
Thanks
On 2013-08-01 7:44 AM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Hi Tanstaafl
Y
Hi Tanstaafl
Yes, a good choice, I forgot about UltraDefrag.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 01/08/2013 01:26 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Someone had asked about a free/FOSS defragger...
There is UltraDefrag:
http://ultradefrag.sourceforge.net/en/index.html
I don't use it much, but thats only be
org/wiki/TOP500> systems, 459
(91.8%) run a Linux distribution. Linux was also selected as the
operating system for the world's most powerful supercomputer, IBM's
Sequoia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Sequoia> which became
operational in 2011.^
Unquote
Andrew Brown
O
ndows still has it's place, and I have to be
familiar with it due to my business and support of my clients. I even
have an old PowerMac to keep up to date with my few clients using Macs.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 01/08/2013 12:25 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Is Disktrix UltimateDefrag free? F
a. But this has to be done with a reboot and MS pre-install mode (UD
does it all automatically) to complete this task. And I've benched my
drives on all of my systems, it certainly makes for very fast boot and
shutdown times, and better stability.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 31/07/2013 10:52
d see if
it affects my printer.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 31/07/2013 09:33 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
When I had the issue with the duplexing on one printer, it seemed that
everyone who was "helping" must have been on Windows, since they did
not know what I was talking
laptop
computer level to take a slice of the pie away from MS.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 31/07/2013 05:02 PM, jomali wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Andrew Brown wrote:
And some more info and statics with charts, to refudiate your claims of
Windows XP and Vista (the latter also a
settings seem the same except for the extra tick box to do
"PDF as Standard Print Job Format"
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 31/07/2013 09:56 AM, Andrew Brown wrote:
HI Kracked_P_P
As to my statement, here is a screenshot of the Windows version of LO
4.0.4.3. indicating the option to
0,000 option but whew!! that's a bit steep for my pocket.
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/ubuntu-edge--35
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 31/07/2013 11:46 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I think Windows will continue to dominate the desktops and full
laptops, maybe even down to notebooks.
Net
ect".
Hope this helps you to get further. If not then I would follow Tom's
proposal in his reply.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 31/07/2013 11:25 AM, Sergio Martino wrote:
Dear Andrew,
maybe I am missing something.
In "Tools - Options - Language settings - Languages" I can s
Hi Sergio
Have you tried to add it under "Tools - Options - Language settings" and
then the sub-options of "Languages" and "Writing aids". This might guide
you to get the language into your workspace.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 31/07/2013 10:07 AM, Sergio Martino
world, and the no.1 O/S for mobile - Android, followed shortly by
Firefox O/S and Ubuntu Touch.
You like many, incorrectly and simply refer to the desktop/laptop use of
an O/S, yes where MS currently dominates, but not for long.
Good Day
Andrew Brown
On 31/07/2013 10:20 AM, Andrew Brown wrote
Again, you troll with no supply of facts. My response was out by 2%
WOW!!! but this article includes tablets and Windows RT
http://www.winbeta.org/news/windows-8-and-windows-rt-account-45-global-tablet-market-share-q2-2013
Andrew Brown
On 31/07/2013 04:45 AM, Urmas wrote:
Just know that
lease validate your knowledge pool before labelling others as quote
"pushing your vendor-locked ODF crap here please." unquote.
Have a good day
Andrew Brown
On 31/07/2013 04:29 AM, Urmas wrote:
"Andrew Brown":
So the open document standards were
born and ratified and acc
duplex correctly. The HP Laserjet 2300dn
duplexing worked either way. Now that I have a Cannon MG6220 to
replace the Epson, I have not unchecked that box to see if the
duplexing still worked.
On 07/30/2013 03:05 AM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Hi Kracked_P_P
One correction, your last statemen
r
productive action.
Virgil
-Original Message-
From: Amit Choudhary
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 10:47 AM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Amit Choudhary
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Andrew Brown wrote:
ext of the sender. Only if you leave the option
to reveal the headers on, will the sent emails show all of the code and
make the email look like garbage.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 30/07/2013 12:48 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-07-30 5:16 AM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Remember to return your headers to &
equent
email will be sent out with all headers exposed in the email, generally
loking like garbage.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 30/07/2013 10:39 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I have just had an email that looks like spam. It's allegedly a survey being
done by IT World. So, if it is not
Hi Kracked_P_P
One correction, your last statement, the option to check "Use
LiberOffice dialogues" is available for Windows users under the same
"Tools / Options / LibreOffice / General". In this part of the "General"
settings it's under the heading "
share.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 29/07/2013 08:48 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi Amit,
Revenues and profits (and shares for that matter), are not the same as
market share. Just because revenue is increasing, doesn't mean they
aren't losing market share. If they are losing market share, it
just means thei
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Brown <mailto:andre...@icon.co.za>> wrote:
Amit
Your knowledge of the document standards is limited by your reply
here. This issue of the document standards and naming convention
was covered by a world body of multinationa
, cloned the AMD64 microcode and released
their 64bit versions in 2004. The first Intel Itanium's failed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit_computing
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 28/07/2013 07:38 PM, Les Howell wrote:
On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 08:23 -0400, James Knott wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Act
ident whatsoever, so it might either point to a XP
/ LO problem under 32bit, or something you have installed in XP causing
the crash.
Hope this helps to iron out some of your issue.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 28/07/2013 07:52 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-07-26 4:57 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
FW
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 28/07/2013 02:41 PM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Hi James
Correct in the mainframe / large server arena of the two systems you
mentioned, but between AMD and Intel (desktop / local server) of which
the majority of users know, AMD was the first, and the Itanium was
factually o
factualness, from AMD/Intel archives, techblogs, Wikipedia etc.
Intel had the concept for 64bit, IA64, as far back as 1999, but did not
get to market with it before AMD.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 28/07/2013 02:23 PM, James Knott wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Actually, I believe both the PowerPC
cient
and useful alternatives in the digital world.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 27/07/2013 12:46 PM, Amit Choudhary wrote:
If we have to beat Microsoft then we need to focus only on what Microsoft
provides and not on .odt format, etc. We cannot beat Microsoft by
introducing a new format and
the PC based Pentium 4F and Pentum D, and in 2006 with the server
Itanium with IA-64 code.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 28/07/2013 12:14 PM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Yes under a laymans's terminology, and Linux devs seem to still use
i586 and i686 in labelling pices of software, to explain the chi
The latter I mentioned above is more applicable today to explain the
difference between 32bit and 64bit now, due to the fact that we have
both hardware and software running 64bit.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 27/07/2013 04:06 AM, James Knott wrote:
Paul wrote:
Technically, the x86 indicates t
Fine, but that only explains the executable as a 64bit under Linux
Standard Base (LSB part in the given reference for those wishing to
understand, meaning a standard function through all 'nixes). It's still
not the entire LO code base that is 64bit.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 26/07/
//www.y2038.com/
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 26/07/2013 03:39 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-07-26 8:18 AM, Jay Lozier wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:03:43 -0400, Tanstaafl
wrote:
On 2013-07-26 7:54 AM, James Knott wrote:
Tom Davies wrote:
My guess is that the default is 64bit or else other apps might
create a new store.
The human race (those that have access to IT technology) has become
hoarders of digital garbage in the most part of instances.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 26/07/2013 03:39 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-07-26 8:18 AM, Jay Lozier wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:03:43 -0400
to be functional on 64bit O/S's, unlike a naitve 32bit app for a
32bit O/S.
Hope this explains it better.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 26/07/2013 06:56 PM, James Knott wrote:
Andrew Brown wrote:
Umm!!! factually no, LO is still 32bit on Linux
Then why is there an x86_64 version, when the 32 b
a monumental uphill learning curve.
In the simplest terms imagine managing 32 horses of a high spirit, and
you just get it right, now add another like 32, and you can see just the
tip of the iceberg what is involved in offering apps in 64bit mode.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 26/07/2013 01:54 PM
Heh! Heh! Thanks Tanstaafl. You are correct, it works, a good work
around indeed. As I thought with my posting here, a fresh set of eyes on
something and with a different view, and one is given good advice.
But as you said it should ;-)
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 26/07/2013 12:36 PM
x are seamlessly working with 32bit
and 64bit apps, and the general populous of Linux users are not aware of
what bitness an app is, as long as it works. The world does not even
remember our transition from 8bit to 16bit in our hardware and software,
and it's happening the same now.
Regar
Hi Tanstaafl
Agreed for the current case of LO, but I have also found other issues
with now emerging 64 bit apps that rely on 64bit Java, hence my
suggestion. It was just to alleviate other issues going forward, even to
the release we see of a 64bit LO one day.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 26
improve on the knowledge they have gained to date. So I have to question
are there really true inventors out there.
Sorry for the philosophy. Going off topic.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 26/07/2013 12:16 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
I want to jump in here and ask - have you changed the
rt and might help to
find out which version changed the behaviour?
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Andrew Brown
To: Tim Lloyd
Cc: "users@global.libreoffice.org"
Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 8:30
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Help with two issue I
is to "right
click - copy", which only copies the text, and paste. So this is a
straight forward process, only two actions involved.
Hope this helps explain what I am about with this problem now, in LO Calc.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 25/07/2013 08:43 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
It is n
iter the 2nd
image was pasted on top of the first. Is that what you see? I expected
to see the images separated in some way.
Cheers
On 07/25/2013 06:13 PM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Hi Tim
Ok, at least I have a comrade with the same observation and non
function. Yes I am aware of the cell right c
Hi Rogman
I think I can help you with this. LO is currently a 32bit app set, that
you, like me, are running on a 64bit O/S. No issue with this as Windows
7 64bit know hows to work with both 32bit and 64bit apps, hence the two
"Program Files" (64bit default app store) and "Program files (x86)"
fixed.
Thanks for the feedback.
Andrew Brown
On 25/07/2013 09:50 AM, Tim Lloyd wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I agree regarding the calc issue. I tried this on 4.0.4.2 under Fedora
and 4.0.0.3 portable under Windows. Neither allow you to right click
on the input line. As you noted, CTRL-C works. So, I
Agreed, I did not find it in the other components of LO, only in Draw.
And agreed on the printer. You could post this as a feature add/bug
report, to be included in the next release.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 25/07/2013 12:44 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Why is this option not part of
Ah! you are correct, I've just found it in LO Draw, under Ubuntu Raring
too. So I am learning more personally from these emails.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 24/07/2013 10:17 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi,
Kracked_P_P---webmaster schrieb:
On 07/24/2013 08:47 AM, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi
software does have a choice somewhere in it's software
settings, to do multipage printing.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 24/07/2013 09:40 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
On 07/24/2013 08:47 AM, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi John,
John R. Sowden schrieb:
We have created a floor plan, using LO
Hi Virgil
You have observed correctly. I have just done a test of installing two
version of AOO under Windows 7, and quite correctly, it installs it's
own local cache/store of settings, per version, thus allowing two copies
to work side by side, as long as you create two distinct install folde
n cut and stitch together.
To be honest I have never tried this in LO Draw, but I am sure it can be
done as long as LO Draw knows how to tile an image. I am metric in my
part of the world so you will need to adapt for imperial settings
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 24/07/2013 01:23 PM, Kracked_P_P-
correct and
memory serves, the first versions of LO. And all version of MSO can do it.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 24/07/2013 12:58 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I have had a few issues copy&pating lately. Not sure i can pin it
down to a single app or single OS.
Seems that nowadays if i
am linking). In Draw
you can now edit the PDF and import the parts you want, or all into
Writer. This is similiar in Linux as well.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 24/07/2013 10:58 AM, Sajan Parikh wrote:
I'm in a situation where I have a few single page PDF documents, that
I want to import into an
Options - Load/Save - General
- Document type - Always save as". This is even true for saving in the
format of MSO document types temporarily, or permanently using the
latter settings.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 24/07/2013 10:11 AM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
I just installed AOO4 today and find
eeds to be addressed and fixed.
Regards
--
Andrew Brown
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List arc
Folks
This is a normal function of Windows 7/8 and LO. When installing one
version higher or lower, it is coded to use a central store in this
hidden by default location "C:\Users\name>\AppData\Roaming\LibreOffice\4\user\config". So installing two
versions will use the same default store and c
am
using Ubuntu Raring.
I am on the road at the moment, with a client (windows only I'm afraid,
so cannot test here), but can check later in Ubuntu on how to change
your system default settings.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 24/07/2013 12:39 AM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
On 2013-07-24 10:12
I have not experienced this with any clients
using LO, and I am migrating my Apache OOo clients over to LO, due to
this issue.
So my opinion, off the bat, LO is the better choice.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 23/07/2013 09:38 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
Are there any known conflicts with having LO 4.0.4 a
fix all of your
issues and return your USB ports back to full functionality, along with
a stable old PC.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 22/07/2013 01:48 AM, Demétrio Soares wrote:
Hi and thanks for the prompt responses,
reboot is "hard" (instant black screen) using 2 usb 2.0, yeah Andrew
just signed up.
I will post all five screenshots (.jpg, not .png, allowing all five of
them to be only 1.45MB in total size) on Nabble and then email the link.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 21/07/2013 11:06 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Ok, we have the 4.1.0 screenshots but now would like a comparison
ing Windows
7 64bit with 6GB of RAM, and I am consuming 35% (2GB) of this RAM right
now as I type this email, Thunderbird open, Firefox open, and not much
else except some system resources running.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 21/07/2013 06:25 PM, Gabriel Risterucci wrote:
While it's totally
, and see if this also
causes the crash with LO and the PC, if not, then you know where your
source of your problem is.
Cheers
Andrew Brown
On 21/07/2013 05:20 PM, Gabriel Risterucci wrote:
There is not much stuff (if any) in LO that could cause a reboot of a
computer. Although it's not pos
Tom
I can help, just currently downloading 4.1.0, then will install and send
some screenshots. I am currently using LO 4.0.4, and I am on Windows 7
Ultimate 64bit.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 21/07/2013 05:31 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Is anyone on Win7 and able to run 4.1.0 alongside
come up with a "Not responding" prompt
for about minute (could be slow internet for me at the moment) but
otherwise all good.
In fact you have pointed me to a nice feature I have not used before. To
help, I'm running Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit an LO version 4.0.4.2
Regards
Andrew
rd i.e. what MS systems have set as a precedence, whether we like
it or not, for a good user experience, to get them to change over to a
better system. As the old analogy goes, equal to or better.
Cheers
Andrew Brown
On 18/07/2013 07:44 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I think all of us here are
Hi There
I've used LibreOffice succesfully now for the last two years (I think),
ever since I found out OpenOffice was being managed and taken over by
Oracle. I also migrated to it under Windows due to it becoming the
standard in Ubuntu Linux, may main O/S of choice.
No problems to date unti
98 matches
Mail list logo
