Hi,
This may seems very simple, but I am not sure why we are
getting this error lines frequently in my error logs.
[Tue Nov 17 01:34:49 2009] [error] [client 64.136.3.254] Critical dirty
memory for pid 30717 [3612/79384] exceeds maximum 74997760 bytes after
42 good requests (freeing 77
Hi,
Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
Apache web server side or even needs change in application point of view
also.
Sorry to spam you guys .
Thanks,
Jai
---
Oliver Schoett wrote:
Some more info: the backend server sends a "TLSv1 Encrypted Alert"
spontaneously when a connection is idle for approx. 17s. The error in
the log file (with a 502 error code sent to the client) occurs when
this alert happens in response to another request being sent over
Kamaraj, Jayakumar wrote:
Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
Apache web server side or even needs change in application point of view
also.
Sorry to spam you guys .
Both the s
hi,
I have a problem.
I'm using mod_rewrite and mod_status.
mod_status is configured this way.
SetHandler server-status
Order deny,allow
Deny from all
Allow from .your_domain.com
When I acess http://localhost/server-status I don't see the page because
mod_rewrite don't allow.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:43 AM, ricardo13 wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I have a problem.
> I'm using mod_rewrite and mod_status.
>
> mod_status is configured this way.
>
> SetHandler server-status
> Order deny,allow
> Deny from all
> Allow from .your_domain.com
>
>
> When I acess http://local
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Mike Cardwell
wrote:
> Kamaraj, Jayakumar wrote:
>
>> Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
>> http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
>> Apache web server side or even needs change in application poin
Thank you
Ricardo
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:43 AM, ricardo13
> wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > I have a problem.
> > I'm using mod_rewrite and mod_status.
> >
> > mod_status is configured this way.
> >
> >SetHandler server-status
> >O
Brian Mearns wrote:
Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
Apache web server side or even needs change in application point of view
also. Sorry to spam you guys .
Both the server and
Guys,
We are switching out mod_ajp for mod_jk and have ran into a wall with
ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse.
With mod_ajp we have this setting
BalancerMember ajp://tomcat05:8009 smax=20 min=0 max=10 loadfactor=1
flushpackets=on route=node1
BalancerMember ajp://tomcat06:8009 smax=20 min
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 10:21 -0500, chuck.pa...@travelchannel.com wrote:
> Guys,
>
> We are switching out mod_ajp for mod_jk and have ran into a wall with
> ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse.
Most people ditch mod_jk for mod_proxy_ajp.
Care to elaborate as to why mod_proxy_ajp isn't working for you
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:21 PM, wrote:
> Guys,
>
> We are switching out mod_ajp for mod_jk and have ran into a wall with
> ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse.
>
> With mod_ajp we have this setting
>
>
>
> BalancerMember ajp://tomcat05:8009 smax=20 min=0 max=10 loadfactor=1
> flushpackets=on rout
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Mike Cardwell
wrote:
> Brian Mearns wrote:
>
Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
Apache web server side or even needs change in application point
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Crypto Sal wrote:
> In the future, please bottom post to the mailing list. It makes it much
> easier to read.
>
> Here's a great article on how to see if the modulus on the private key and
> the modulus on the certificate match.
>
> http://kb.wisc.edu/middleware/
Because we are running productions, as stated on the Apache site in BOLD
letters, mod_ajp is not for production use. We see our jboss down with it.
CHUCK PAYNE | Unix System Administrator
TRAVEL CHANNEL MEDIA
3700 Mansell Rd, Suite 500
Alpharetta, GA 30022
Office: 404-269-5533
Blackberry: 770-9
I agree with Chuck here - would definitely NOT use mod_proxy_ajp in
production and would ALWAYS use mod_jk
Back to the original question - have a look at
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/printer/apache.html - in
particular the "JkOptions +ForwardURICompat " part.
I think thi
Mike Cardwell wrote:
I agree with the above. I started this thread to make people aware of
it's existance and to provoke discussion on the matter.
Yep, someone posted it a week or so back.
However, if
someone were to take up the reigns and begin developing an Apache module
for it using th
Hi,
I am trying to build Apache HTTP Server for 32 bit and 64 bit linux OS. How do
I specify the option for x86-64 bit OS.
Please let me know.
Thanks & Regards,
Aruna.
Nick Kew wrote:
>> I agree with the above. I started this thread to make people aware of
>> it's existance and to provoke discussion on the matter.
>
> Yep, someone posted it a week or so back.
Yeah, me.
>> However, if someone were to take up the reigns and begin
>> developing an Apache mo
chuck,
* chuck.pa...@travelchannel.com [2009-11-17
17:42]:
> Because we are running productions, as stated on the Apache site in
> BOLD letters, mod_ajp is not for production use. We see our jboss
> down with it.
I see a few references to mod_ajp from 2004 (e.g. in this thread[1])
but I guess y
On 11/17/2009 11:37 AM, sieger...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a lot folks. I am getting some sort of handle here .
The problem is If I use the original key and the certificate that
they give me, the web server does not start I assume because the CN,
OU, etc. does not match.I just want a SSL cert t
Hi,
Try this in your configure script to build on 64 bit OS.
--enable-lib64 --libdir=/usr/lib64
Regards
Nasir
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Aruna Gummalla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build Apache HTTP Server for 32 bit and 64 bit linux OS. How
> do I specify the option for x86-64 bit OS
22 matches
Mail list logo
