Hoping somebody can help me here.
I have an old Linux box running apache that's at least 7 years old. It has
several virtualhosts setup on it that are working seamlessly.
I have built a new Linux box and I have the latest version of Apache up and
running with its main server configuration
If you are using all zones to serve the same content, enter 3 of them in the
configuration under the 'ServerAlias' directive.
Use the 'ServerName' directive for the your main identity zone.
-p
- Original Message -
From: Mark Feather [m...@akwe-xavante.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 01/15/2010
Thank you Peter,
Do you mean
Virtualhost *
ServerName www.example.co.uk:80
ServerAlias example.co.uk
ServerAlias www.example.com
ServerAlias example.com
DocumentRoot /path/to/blah/blah
etc...
etc...
/Virtualhost
Mark
- Original Message -
From: Peter J Milanese
Yes, something of that sort.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Feather [m...@akwe-xavante.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 01/15/2010 01:22 PM GMT
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Virtualhosts - Starting from afresh
Thank you Peter,
Do you mean
Virtualhost *
Jarrod Slick wrote:
All tests will be performed on localhost.
I did not want to comment since I am not an Apache nor LiteSpeed performance
expert,
but I rather suspect that will invalidate any results you get. At least it will
make it
much harder to get any kind of consistent results.
--
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Tommy M. McGuire wrote:
Jarrod Slick wrote:
All tests will be performed on localhost.
I did not want to comment since I am not an Apache nor LiteSpeed
performance expert,
but I rather suspect that will invalidate any results you get. At
least it will make
Would:
Virtualhost *:80
ServerName www.example.co.uk:80
ServerAlias *.example.* example.*
DocumentRoot /path/to/blah/blah
etc...
etc...
/Virtualhost
Work better?
- Original Message -
From: Peter J Milanese pmilan...@nypl.org
To: users users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January
On 15-Jan-2010, at 09:29, Jarrod Slick wrote:
I'm curious -- why do you think that the results will be inconsistent? If
anything I would be inclined to think that using localhost would improve
consistency as extraneous variables like network congestion at the time of
testing would not be
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Jarrod Slick jar...@e-sensibility.com wrote:
I'm curious -- why do you think that the results will be inconsistent? If
anything I would be inclined to think that using localhost would improve
consistency as extraneous variables like network congestion at the
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Jarrod Slick jar...@e-sensibility.com
wrote:
I'm curious -- why do you think that the results will be
inconsistent? If
anything I would be inclined to think that using localhost would
improve
consistency as
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jarrod Slick jar...@e-sensibility.com wrote:
What about having a private VLAN between a testing machine and the apache
machine. I suppose that would solve the resource separation problem between
the benchmarking tool and the web server. Can you think of any
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:44 AM, LuKreme wrote:
Run thousands of test across multiple connections from multiple
sources for each server if you want to see what the performance is
ACTUALLY like.
Unfortunately multiple sources is impractical for me unless you want
to donate some hardware.
On Jan 15, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jarrod Slick jar...@e-sensibility.com
wrote:
What about having a private VLAN between a testing machine and the
apache
machine. I suppose that would solve the resource separation
problem between
the
From the doc :
This flag is just a hack to enable post-processing of the output of
RewriteRule directives, using Alias, ScriptAlias, Redirect, and other
directives from various URI-to-filename translators
If I understand well (correct me if I'm wrong), after RewriteRule has
applied,
On 15-Jan-2010, at 10:08, Jarrod Slick wrote:
On Jan 15, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jarrod Slick jar...@e-sensibility.com
wrote:
What about having a private VLAN between a testing machine and the apache
machine. I suppose that would solve the
From: LuKreme [mailto:krem...@kreme.com]
Sent: January 15, 2010 11:45 AM
On 15-Jan-2010, at 09:29, Jarrod Slick wrote:
I'm curious -- why do you think that the results will be
inconsistent? If anything I would be inclined to think that using
localhost would improve consistency as
So, I should be more specific with my question: to the end of
determining strictly which webserver is more efficient do you see
any problems with this type of setup?
More 'efficient' I think you mean.
Is that not exactly what I said?
And another question: how would you do it
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Mark Feather
m...@akwe-xavante.demon.co.uk wrote:
Would:
Virtualhost *:80
ServerName www.example.co.uk:80
ServerAlias *.example.* example.*
DocumentRoot /path/to/blah/blah
etc...
etc...
/Virtualhost
Work better?
I believe that wildcards can only be
Our apache version is 2.2.3 and we are having a problem in getting a file open.
We use Location directive to connect to the backend weblogic. Proxypass is
not enabled.
When the user access a url they get 404 because %2f is not converting to /
I tried adding AllowEncodedSlashes On after
I have a doubt about mod_disk_cache.
Once configured for the main host, does it apply for all vhosts too ?
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site Server Adminstrator
www.itech7.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Jarrod Slick jar...@e-sensibility.comwrote:
[ ... ]
And another question: how would you do it differently? Sure, in an ideal
world I could assemble my own botnet and then blast my corporate network
with a gigabit of distributed traffic multiple times for each
Jarrod Slick wrote:
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Tommy M. McGuire wrote:
Jarrod Slick wrote:
All tests will be performed on localhost.
I did not want to comment since I am not an Apache nor LiteSpeed
performance expert,
but I rather suspect that will invalidate any results you get. At
Hi
these are my config files
in httpd.conf add
LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so
LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so
LoadModule proxy_ajp_module modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so
LoadModule proxy_balancer_module modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so
and include
On 15-Jan-2010, at 10:34, Jarrod Slick wrote:
So, I should be more specific with my question: to the end of determining
strictly which webserver is more efficient do you see any problems with
this type of setup?
More 'efficient' I think you mean.
Is that not exactly what I said?
My
On 15-Jan-2010, at 12:38, Scott Gifford wrote:
I think using a LAN/VLAN connection would be a fair measure. You could also
consider running the tests as instances on Amazon EC2, which will let you
lease a small pool of servers for a few hours for $20 or so.
That's a good idea. I'd forgotten
On 15-Jan-2010, at 11:19, Kpadvel wrote:
In-Reply-To: 2e027be01001150934m482eb453p1d6bee636977a...@mail.gmail.com
Please do not hijack someone else's thread to start your own thread. Changing
the subject is not enough. Start a new message addressed to the list.
--
Vampires are [...] by nature
26 matches
Mail list logo
